On estimating divisor sums over quadratic polynomials ELAZ 2016, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

on estimating divisor sums over quadratic polynomials
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

On estimating divisor sums over quadratic polynomials ELAZ 2016, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

On estimating divisor sums over quadratic polynomials ELAZ 2016, Strobl am Wolfgangsee Kostadinka Lapkova Alfr ed R enyi Institute of Mathematics, Budapest (currently) Graz University of Technology (from next week on) 5.09.2016 K.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

On estimating divisor sums over quadratic polynomials

ELAZ 2016, Strobl am Wolfgangsee Kostadinka Lapkova

Alfr´ ed R´ enyi Institute of Mathematics, Budapest (currently) Graz University of Technology (from next week on)

5.09.2016

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 1 / 18

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

Let τ(n) denote the number of positive divisors of the integer n. We use the notation T(f ; N) :=

  • n≤N

τ(f (n))

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 2 / 18

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

Let τ(n) denote the number of positive divisors of the integer n. We use the notation T(f ; N) :=

  • n≤N

τ(f (n)) Establishing asymptotic formulae for T(f ; N) when f - linear polynomial : classical problem, Dirichlet hyperbola method;

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 2 / 18

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction

Let τ(n) denote the number of positive divisors of the integer n. We use the notation T(f ; N) :=

  • n≤N

τ(f (n)) Establishing asymptotic formulae for T(f ; N) when f - linear polynomial : classical problem, Dirichlet hyperbola method; f - quadratic polynomial : Dirichlet hyperbola method still works;

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 2 / 18

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction

Let τ(n) denote the number of positive divisors of the integer n. We use the notation T(f ; N) :=

  • n≤N

τ(f (n)) Establishing asymptotic formulae for T(f ; N) when f - linear polynomial : classical problem, Dirichlet hyperbola method; f - quadratic polynomial : Dirichlet hyperbola method still works; deg(f ) ≥ 3 : the hyperbola method does not work any more, error term larger than the main term.

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 2 / 18

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction

We consider quadratic polynomials f (n) = n2 + 2bn + c ∈ Z [n] with discriminant ∆ = 4(b2 − c) =: 4δ.

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 3 / 18

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Introduction

We consider quadratic polynomials f (n) = n2 + 2bn + c ∈ Z [n] with discriminant ∆ = 4(b2 − c) =: 4δ. We want to understand asymptotic formulae explicit upper bounds for the sum T(f , N), when f is a quadratic polynomial.

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 3 / 18

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Introduction

We consider quadratic polynomials f (n) = n2 + 2bn + c ∈ Z [n] with discriminant ∆ = 4(b2 − c) =: 4δ. We want to understand asymptotic formulae explicit upper bounds for the sum T(f , N), when f is a quadratic polynomial. These explicit upper bounds have applications in certain Diophantine sets problems.

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 3 / 18

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Irreducible f : asymptotic formulae for T(f ; N)

Scourfield, 1961 (first published): T(an2 + bn + c; N) ∼ C1(a, b, c)N log N, when N → ∞ .

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 4 / 18

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Irreducible f : asymptotic formulae for T(f ; N)

Scourfield, 1961 (first published): T(an2 + bn + c; N) ∼ C1(a, b, c)N log N, when N → ∞ . More precise work on the coefficient C1 and the error terms for polynomials of special type:

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 4 / 18

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Irreducible f : asymptotic formulae for T(f ; N)

Scourfield, 1961 (first published): T(an2 + bn + c; N) ∼ C1(a, b, c)N log N, when N → ∞ . More precise work on the coefficient C1 and the error terms for polynomials of special type: Hooley, 1963: f (n) = n2 + c ; McKee, 1995, 1999: f (n) = n2 + bn + c .

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 4 / 18

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Irreducible f : asymptotic formulae for T(f ; N)

Scourfield, 1961 (first published): T(an2 + bn + c; N) ∼ C1(a, b, c)N log N, when N → ∞ . More precise work on the coefficient C1 and the error terms for polynomials of special type: Hooley, 1963: f (n) = n2 + c ; McKee, 1995, 1999: f (n) = n2 + bn + c . Corollary: T(n2 + 1; N) = 3 πN log N + O(N) .

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 4 / 18

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Irreducible f : explicit upper bound for T(f ; N)

Elsholtz, Filipin and Fujita, 2014 : T(n2 + 1; N) ≤ N log2 N + . . .

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 5 / 18

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Irreducible f : explicit upper bound for T(f ; N)

Elsholtz, Filipin and Fujita, 2014 : T(n2 + 1; N) ≤ N log2 N + . . . Trudgian, 2015 : T(n2 + 1; N) ≤ 6/π2N log2 N + . . . , with 6/π2 < 0.61.

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 5 / 18

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Irreducible f : explicit upper bound for T(f ; N)

Elsholtz, Filipin and Fujita, 2014 : T(n2 + 1; N) ≤ N log2 N + . . . Trudgian, 2015 : T(n2 + 1; N) ≤ 6/π2N log2 N + . . . , with 6/π2 < 0.61. Remember T(n2 + 1; N) ∼ 3/πN log N .

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 5 / 18

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Irreducible f : explicit upper bound for T(f ; N)

Elsholtz, Filipin and Fujita, 2014 : T(n2 + 1; N) ≤ N log2 N + . . . Trudgian, 2015 : T(n2 + 1; N) ≤ 6/π2N log2 N + . . . , with 6/π2 < 0.61. Remember T(n2 + 1; N) ∼ 3/πN log N .

Theorem (L,2016)

For any integer N ≥ 1 we have T(n2 + 1; N) =

N

  • n=1

τ(n2 + 1) < 12 π2 N log N + 4.332 · N.

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 5 / 18

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Irreducible f : explicit upper bound for T(f ; N)

The upper theorem is a corollary of a result for slightly more general polynomials.

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 6 / 18

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Irreducible f : explicit upper bound for T(f ; N)

The upper theorem is a corollary of a result for slightly more general polynomials.

Theorem (L, 2016)

Let f (n) = n2 + 2bn + c ∈ Z[n], such that δ := b2 − c is non-zero and square-free, and δ ≡ 1 (mod 4). Assume also that for n ≥ 1 the function f (n) is positive and non-decreasing. Then for any integer N ≥ 1 there exist positive constants C1, C2 and C3, such that

N

  • n=1

τ(n2 + 2bn + c) < C1N log N + C2N + C3.

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 6 / 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Irreducible f : explicit upper bound for T(f ; N)

Theorem (L, 2016, cont.)

Let A be the least positive integer such that A ≥ max(|b|, |c|1/2), let ξ =

  • 1 + 2|b| + |c| and κ = g(4|δ|) for g(q) = 4/π2√q log q + 0.648√q.

Then we have C1 = 12 π2 (log κ + 1) , C2 = 2

  • κ + (log κ + 1)

6 π2 log ξ + 1.166

  • ,

C3 = 2κA .

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 7 / 18

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Reducible f : asymptotic formulae for T(f ; N)

Ingham, 1927: For a fixed positive integer k

N

  • n=1

τ(n)τ(n + k) ∼ 6 π2 σ−1(k)N log2 N , as N → ∞ ;

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 8 / 18

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Reducible f : asymptotic formulae for T(f ; N)

Ingham, 1927: For a fixed positive integer k

N

  • n=1

τ(n)τ(n + k) ∼ 6 π2 σ−1(k)N log2 N , as N → ∞ ; Dudek, 2016: T(n2 − 1; N) =

  • n≤N

τ(n2 − 1) ∼ 6 π2 N log2 N , as N → ∞ .

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 8 / 18

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Reducible f : asymptotic formulae for T(f ; N)

Theorem (L, 2016)

Let b < c be integers with the same parity. Then we have the asymptotic formula

  • c<n≤N

τ ((n − b)(n − c)) ∼ 6 π2 N log2 N , as N → ∞ .

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 9 / 18

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Reducible f : asymptotic formulae for T(f ; N)

Theorem (L, 2016)

Let b < c be integers with the same parity. Then we have the asymptotic formula

  • c<n≤N

τ ((n − b)(n − c)) ∼ 6 π2 N log2 N , as N → ∞ . Remark: The main coefficient does not change for different discriminants (coefficients)!

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 9 / 18

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Reducible f : asymptotic formulae for T(f ; N)

Theorem (L, 2016)

Let b < c be integers with the same parity. Then we have the asymptotic formula

  • c<n≤N

τ ((n − b)(n − c)) ∼ 6 π2 N log2 N , as N → ∞ . Remark: The main coefficient does not change for different discriminants (coefficients)! Proof: the method of Dudek with some information from [Hooley, 1958] about the number of solutions of quadratic congruences and the representation of a Dirichlet series.

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 9 / 18

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Reducible f : explicit upper bound for T(f ; N)

If we write T(n2 − 1; N) ≤ C1N log2 N + . . . , we have Elsholtz, Filipin and Fujita, 2014 : C1 ≤ 2; Trudgian, 2015 : C1 ≤ 12/π2; Cipu, 2015 : C1 ≤ 9/π2;

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 10 / 18

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Reducible f : explicit upper bound for T(f ; N)

If we write T(n2 − 1; N) ≤ C1N log2 N + . . . , we have Elsholtz, Filipin and Fujita, 2014 : C1 ≤ 2; Trudgian, 2015 : C1 ≤ 12/π2; Cipu, 2015 : C1 ≤ 9/π2; Cipu and Trudgian, 2016 : C1 ≤ 6/π2;

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 10 / 18

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Reducible f : explicit upper bound for T(f ; N)

If we write T(n2 − 1; N) ≤ C1N log2 N + . . . , we have Elsholtz, Filipin and Fujita, 2014 : C1 ≤ 2; Trudgian, 2015 : C1 ≤ 12/π2; Cipu, 2015 : C1 ≤ 9/π2; Cipu and Trudgian, 2016 : C1 ≤ 6/π2; Bliznac and Filipin, 2016 : T(n2 − 4; N) ≤ 6/π2N log2 N + . . .

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 10 / 18

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Reducible f : explicit upper bound for T(f ; N)

If we write T(n2 − 1; N) ≤ C1N log2 N + . . . , we have Elsholtz, Filipin and Fujita, 2014 : C1 ≤ 2; Trudgian, 2015 : C1 ≤ 12/π2; Cipu, 2015 : C1 ≤ 9/π2; Cipu and Trudgian, 2016 : C1 ≤ 6/π2; Bliznac and Filipin, 2016 : T(n2 − 4; N) ≤ 6/π2N log2 N + . . . Remark: C.-Tr. and Bl.-F. method is different than ours.

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 10 / 18

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Reducible f : explicit upper bound for T(f ; N)

Theorem (L, 2016)

Let b < c be integers with the same parity and δ = (b − c)2/4 factor as δ = 22t′Ω2 for integers t′ ≥ 0 and odd Ω ≥ 1. Assume that σ−1(Ω) ≤ 4/3. Let c∗ = max(1, c + 1) and X =

  • f (N). Then for any

integer N ≥ c∗ we have

  • c∗≤n≤N

τ ((n − b)(n − c)) < 2N 3 π2 log2 X + 6 π2 + C(Ω)

  • log X
  • + 2C(Ω)N + 2X

6 π2 log X + C(Ω)

  • ,

where C(Ω) = 2

  • d|Ω

1 d (2σ0(Ω/d) − 1.749 · σ−1(Ω/d) + 1.332) .

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 11 / 18

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Reducible f : explicit upper bound for T(f ; N)

In a standard way we obtain

  • n≤N

τ(f (n)) ≤ 2N

  • d≤√

f (N)

ρδ(d)/d + 2

  • d≤√

f (N)

ρδ(d) , where ρk(d) := #

  • 0 ≤ x < d :

x2 ≡ k (mod d)

  • is defined for integers k ≥ 0 and d > 0.
  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 12 / 18

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Reducible f : explicit upper bound for T(f ; N)

In a standard way we obtain

  • n≤N

τ(f (n)) ≤ 2N

  • d≤√

f (N)

ρδ(d)/d + 2

  • d≤√

f (N)

ρδ(d) , where ρk(d) := #

  • 0 ≤ x < d :

x2 ≡ k (mod d)

  • is defined for integers k ≥ 0 and d > 0.

On the other hand the condition σ−1(Ω) =

  • d|Ω

1 d ≤ 4/3 is fulfilled for example for Ω = 1, i.e. δ = 22t′ for integer t′ ≥ 0. These are the cases f (n) = n2 − 22t′ .

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 12 / 18

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Reducible f : explicit upper bound for T(f ; N)

A corollary of the previous theorem:

Theorem (L, 2016)

For any integer N ≥ 1 we have the following claims: i) For any integer t′ ≥ 0 we have

  • λ≤N

ρ22t′(λ) λ < 3 π2 log2 N + 2.774 · log N + 2.166 . ii)

N

  • n=1

τ(n2 − 1) < N 6 π2 log2 N + 5.548 · log N + 4.332

  • .
  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 13 / 18

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Reducible f : explicit upper bound for T(f ; N)

A corollary of the previous theorem:

Theorem (L, 2016)

For any integer N ≥ 1 we have the following claims: i) For any integer t′ ≥ 0 we have

  • λ≤N

ρ22t′(λ) λ < 3 π2 log2 N + 2.774 · log N + 2.166 . ii)

N

  • n=1

τ(n2 − 1) < N 6 π2 log2 N + 5.548 · log N + 4.332

  • .

Remark: This claim recreates the right main term as in the lemmas of Cipu-Trudgian for f (n) = n2 − 1 and Bliznac-Filipin for f (n) = n2 − 4.

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 13 / 18

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Proofs: the convolution method for ρδ(d)

For irreducible f (n) = n2 + 2bn + c we have

Lemma

Let δ = b2 − c be square-free, δ ≡ 1 (mod 4) and χ(n) = 4δ

n

  • for the

Jacobi symbol .

.

  • . Then

ρδ = µ2 ∗ χ .

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 14 / 18

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Proofs: the convolution method for ρδ(d)

The convolution method

Estimate the sums

  • d≤x

ρδ(d) =

  • l≤x

µ2(l)

  • m≤x/l

χ(m) ,

  • d≤x

ρδ(d)/d =

  • l≤x

µ2(l)/l

  • m≤x/l

χ(m)/m using available explicit estimates for each of the sums on RHS.

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 15 / 18

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Proofs: the convolution method for ρδ(d)

The convolution method

Estimate the sums

  • d≤x

ρδ(d) =

  • l≤x

µ2(l)

  • m≤x/l

χ(m) ,

  • d≤x

ρδ(d)/d =

  • l≤x

µ2(l)/l

  • m≤x/l

χ(m)/m using available explicit estimates for each of the sums on RHS. For example

  • m≤x/l χ(m) : effective P´
  • lya-Vinogradov inequality;
  • l≤x µ2(l)/l : effective inequality from [Ramar´

e, 2016].

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 15 / 18

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Proofs: the convolution method for ξδ(d)

For reducible f (n) = (n − b)(n − c) with δ = (b − c)2/4 = 22t′Ω2 for odd Ω ≥ 1 the function ρδ can be expressed as a more complicated sum over d | Ω of functions ξd = µ2 ∗ χd , where χd is the principal character modulo 2Ω/d.

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 16 / 18

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Proofs: the convolution method for ξδ(d)

For reducible f (n) = (n − b)(n − c) with δ = (b − c)2/4 = 22t′Ω2 for odd Ω ≥ 1 the function ρδ can be expressed as a more complicated sum over d | Ω of functions ξd = µ2 ∗ χd , where χd is the principal character modulo 2Ω/d. Hooley, 1958 : Analyses on the Dirichlet series ∞

λ=1 ρn(λ)/λs for a

general positive integer n.

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 16 / 18

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Applications for D(m)-sets

For integer m = 0 a set of n positive integers {a1, . . . , an} is called a

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 17 / 18

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Applications for D(m)-sets

For integer m = 0 a set of n positive integers {a1, . . . , an} is called a

D(m) − n-tuple:

aiaj + m is a perfect square for all i, j with 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n.

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 17 / 18

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Applications for D(m)-sets

For integer m = 0 a set of n positive integers {a1, . . . , an} is called a

D(m) − n-tuple:

aiaj + m is a perfect square for all i, j with 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n. Application of explicit upper bounds of T(f (n); N): T(n2 − 1; N) : for limiting the maximal possible number of Diophantine quintuples (D(1)−quintuples) [Cipu-Trudgian, 2016];

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 17 / 18

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Applications for D(m)-sets

For integer m = 0 a set of n positive integers {a1, . . . , an} is called a

D(m) − n-tuple:

aiaj + m is a perfect square for all i, j with 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n. Application of explicit upper bounds of T(f (n); N): T(n2 − 1; N) : for limiting the maximal possible number of Diophantine quintuples (D(1)−quintuples) [Cipu-Trudgian, 2016]; T(n2 + 1; N) : improving the maximal possible number of D(−1)−quadruples [L, 2016];

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 17 / 18

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Applications for D(m)-sets

For integer m = 0 a set of n positive integers {a1, . . . , an} is called a

D(m) − n-tuple:

aiaj + m is a perfect square for all i, j with 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n. Application of explicit upper bounds of T(f (n); N): T(n2 − 1; N) : for limiting the maximal possible number of Diophantine quintuples (D(1)−quintuples) [Cipu-Trudgian, 2016]; T(n2 + 1; N) : improving the maximal possible number of D(−1)−quadruples [L, 2016]; T(n2 − 4t′; N) : D(4t′)−sets for t′ ≥ 1 [Bliznac-Filipin, 2016 for D(4)-quintuples];

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 17 / 18

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Applications for D(m)-sets

For integer m = 0 a set of n positive integers {a1, . . . , an} is called a

D(m) − n-tuple:

aiaj + m is a perfect square for all i, j with 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n. Application of explicit upper bounds of T(f (n); N): T(n2 − 1; N) : for limiting the maximal possible number of Diophantine quintuples (D(1)−quintuples) [Cipu-Trudgian, 2016]; T(n2 + 1; N) : improving the maximal possible number of D(−1)−quadruples [L, 2016]; T(n2 − 4t′; N) : D(4t′)−sets for t′ ≥ 1 [Bliznac-Filipin, 2016 for D(4)-quintuples]; T(n2 + k; N) : D(−k)−sets for k = 0.

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 17 / 18

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Thank you for your attention!

  • K. Lapkova (R´

enyi Institute) On estimating divisor sums 5.09.2016 18 / 18