On bipartite Q -polynomial distance-regular graphs with c 2 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

on bipartite q polynomial distance regular graphs with c
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

On bipartite Q -polynomial distance-regular graphs with c 2 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q -polynomial DRG with D 6 and c 2 2 Equitable partitions when c 2 2 Case D = 4 On bipartite Q -polynomial distance-regular graphs with c 2 2 Stefko Miklavi


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4

On bipartite Q-polynomial distance-regular graphs with c2 ≤ 2

ˇ Stefko Miklaviˇ c, Safet Penji´ c

Andrej Maruˇ siˇ c Institute University of Primorska

2015 International conference on Graph Theory Koper, May 26-28, 2015

1 / 34

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4

Outline

1 Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory

(a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

2 Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2

Case D ≥ 6 - Theorem 7. Case D ≥ 6 - Proof of Theorem 7.

3 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2

The partition - part I The partition - part II

4 Case D = 4

Theorem 35

2 / 34

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Some notation before definition of DRG

3 / 34

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Distance-regular graphs

A connected graph Γ is called distance-regular (DRG) if there are numbers ai, bi, ci (0 ≤ i ≤ D) s.t. if ∂(x, y) = h then

|Γ1(y) ∩ Γh−1(x)| = ch |Γ1(y) ∩ Γh(x)| = ah |Γ1(y) ∩ Γh+1(x)| = bh

Numbers ai, bi and ci (0 ≤ i ≤ D) are called intersection numbers, and {b0, b1, ..., bD−1; c1, c2, ..., cD} is intersection array.

4 / 34

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Distance-regular graphs

A connected graph Γ is called distance-regular (DRG) if there are numbers ai, bi, ci (0 ≤ i ≤ D) s.t. if ∂(x, y) = h then

|Γ1(y) ∩ Γh−1(x)| = ch |Γ1(y) ∩ Γh(x)| = ah |Γ1(y) ∩ Γh+1(x)| = bh

Numbers ai, bi and ci (0 ≤ i ≤ D) are called intersection numbers, and {b0, b1, ..., bD−1; c1, c2, ..., cD} is intersection array.

4 / 34

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Distance-regular graphs

A connected graph Γ is called distance-regular (DRG) if there are numbers ai, bi, ci (0 ≤ i ≤ D) s.t. if ∂(x, y) = h then

|Γ1(y) ∩ Γh−1(x)| = ch |Γ1(y) ∩ Γh(x)| = ah |Γ1(y) ∩ Γh+1(x)| = bh

Numbers ai, bi and ci (0 ≤ i ≤ D) are called intersection numbers, and {b0, b1, ..., bD−1; c1, c2, ..., cD} is intersection array.

4 / 34

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Distance-regular graphs

A connected graph Γ is called distance-regular (DRG) if there are numbers ai, bi, ci (0 ≤ i ≤ D) s.t. if ∂(x, y) = h then

|Γ1(y) ∩ Γh−1(x)| = ch |Γ1(y) ∩ Γh(x)| = ah |Γ1(y) ∩ Γh+1(x)| = bh

Numbers ai, bi and ci (0 ≤ i ≤ D) are called intersection numbers, and {b0, b1, ..., bD−1; c1, c2, ..., cD} is intersection array.

4 / 34

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Distance-regular graphs

A connected graph Γ is called distance-regular (DRG) if there are numbers ai, bi, ci (0 ≤ i ≤ D) s.t. if ∂(x, y) = h then

|Γ1(y) ∩ Γh−1(x)| = ch |Γ1(y) ∩ Γh(x)| = ah |Γ1(y) ∩ Γh+1(x)| = bh

Numbers ai, bi and ci (0 ≤ i ≤ D) are called intersection numbers, and {b0, b1, ..., bD−1; c1, c2, ..., cD} is intersection array.

4 / 34

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Distance-regular graphs - examples

Line graph of Petersen’s graph.

5 / 34

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Distance-regular graphs - examples

Line graph of Petersen’s graph (diameter is three and intersection array is {4, 2, 1; 1, 1, 4})

6 / 34

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Hamming graphs

The Hamming graph H(n, q) is the graph whose vertices are words (sequences or n-tuples) of length n from an alphabet of size q ≥ 2. Two vertices are considered adjacent if the words (or n-tuples) differ in exactly one term. We observe that |V (H(n, q))| = qn. The Hamming graph H(n, q) is distance-regular (with ai = i(q − 2) (0 ≤ i ≤ n), bi = (n − i)(q − 1) (0 ≤ i ≤ n − 1) and ci = i (1 ≤ i ≤ n)).

7 / 34

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Hamming graphs

The Hamming graph H(n, q) is the graph whose vertices are words (sequences or n-tuples) of length n from an alphabet of size q ≥ 2. Two vertices are considered adjacent if the words (or n-tuples) differ in exactly one term. We observe that |V (H(n, q))| = qn. The Hamming graph H(n, q) is distance-regular (with ai = i(q − 2) (0 ≤ i ≤ n), bi = (n − i)(q − 1) (0 ≤ i ≤ n − 1) and ci = i (1 ≤ i ≤ n)).

7 / 34

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Hamming graphs H(3, 2)

Hamming graph H(3, 2).

8 / 34

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Hamming graphs H(2, 3)

Hamming graph H(2, 3).

9 / 34

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

n-dimensional hypercubes (shortly n-cubes)

Hamming graph H(n, q) in which words of length n are from an alphabet of size q = 2 are called n-dimensional hypercubes

  • r shortly n-cubes.

10 / 34

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

4-dimensional hypercube (4-cubes)

4-dimensional hypercube

11 / 34

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

More examples

That comes from classical objects:

Hamming graphs, Johnson graphs, Grassmann graphs, bilinear forms graphs, sesquilinear forms graphs, dual polar graphs (the vertices are the maximal totally isotropic subspaces on a vector space over a finite field with a fixed (non-degenerate) bilinear form)

Some non-classical examples:

Doob graphs, twisted Grassman graphs,

Distance-regular graphs give a way to study these classical

  • bjects from a combinatorial view point.

12 / 34

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

More examples

That comes from classical objects:

Hamming graphs, Johnson graphs, Grassmann graphs, bilinear forms graphs, sesquilinear forms graphs, dual polar graphs (the vertices are the maximal totally isotropic subspaces on a vector space over a finite field with a fixed (non-degenerate) bilinear form)

Some non-classical examples:

Doob graphs, twisted Grassman graphs,

Distance-regular graphs give a way to study these classical

  • bjects from a combinatorial view point.

12 / 34

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

More examples

That comes from classical objects:

Hamming graphs, Johnson graphs, Grassmann graphs, bilinear forms graphs, sesquilinear forms graphs, dual polar graphs (the vertices are the maximal totally isotropic subspaces on a vector space over a finite field with a fixed (non-degenerate) bilinear form)

Some non-classical examples:

Doob graphs, twisted Grassman graphs,

Distance-regular graphs give a way to study these classical

  • bjects from a combinatorial view point.

12 / 34

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Distance-i matrix

Let MatV (R) denote the algebra of matrices over R with rows and columns indexed by V . For 0 ≤ i ≤ D, let A A Ai denote the matrix in MatV (R) with (y, z)-entry (A A Ai)yz = 1 if ∂(y, z) = i, if ∂(y, z) = i (y, z ∈ X). We call A A Ai the ith distance-i matrix of Γ.

13 / 34

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Distance-i matrix

Let MatV (R) denote the algebra of matrices over R with rows and columns indexed by V . For 0 ≤ i ≤ D, let A A Ai denote the matrix in MatV (R) with (y, z)-entry (A A Ai)yz = 1 if ∂(y, z) = i, if ∂(y, z) = i (y, z ∈ X). We call A A Ai the ith distance-i matrix of Γ.

13 / 34

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Primitive idempotents

We refer to E E E 0, ..., E E E D as the primitive idempotents of Γ. Primitive idempotents of Γ represents the orthogonal projectors onto Ei = ker(A A A − θiI) (along im(A A A − θiI))

14 / 34

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Primitive idempotents

We refer to E E E 0, ..., E E E D as the primitive idempotents of Γ. Primitive idempotents of Γ represents the orthogonal projectors onto Ei = ker(A A A − θiI) (along im(A A A − θiI))

14 / 34

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Distance algebra

If Γ is regular (and Γ is not distance-regular) we have: Adjacency algebra (ordinary ” ·” product), A = span{A A A0,A A A1, ...,A A Ad} = span{E E E 0,E E E 1, ...,E E E d} Distance algebra (entry-wise ”

multiplication), D = span{A A A0,A A A1, ...,A A AD}

15 / 34

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Case wehen Γ is is distance-regular

The following statements are equivalent: (i) Γ is distance-regular, (ii) D is an algebra with the ordinary product, (iii) A is an algebra with the Hadamard product, (iv) A = D.

16 / 34

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Q-polynomial property

Let Γ denote any distance regular graph with diameter D ≥ 3, and let A A A denote the adjacency algebra for Γ. Let E E E denote a primitive idempotent of Γ. Since A has a basis A A A0, A A A1, ..., A A AD of 0 − 1 matrices, A is closed under entry-wise matrix multiplication. Γ is said to be Q-polynomial with respect to E E E = E E E 1 whenever there exist an ordering E E E 0, E E E 1, ..., E E E D of the primitive idempotents such that for each i (0 ≤ i ≤ D), the primitive idempotent E E E i is a polynomial of degree exactly i in E E E 1, in the R-algebra (A, ◦), where ◦ denote entry-wise multiplication. We say Γ is Q-polynomial whenever Γ is Q-polynomial with respect to at least one primitive idempotent.

17 / 34

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Q-polynomial property

Let Γ denote any distance regular graph with diameter D ≥ 3, and let A A A denote the adjacency algebra for Γ. Let E E E denote a primitive idempotent of Γ. Since A has a basis A A A0, A A A1, ..., A A AD of 0 − 1 matrices, A is closed under entry-wise matrix multiplication. Γ is said to be Q-polynomial with respect to E E E = E E E 1 whenever there exist an ordering E E E 0, E E E 1, ..., E E E D of the primitive idempotents such that for each i (0 ≤ i ≤ D), the primitive idempotent E E E i is a polynomial of degree exactly i in E E E 1, in the R-algebra (A, ◦), where ◦ denote entry-wise multiplication. We say Γ is Q-polynomial whenever Γ is Q-polynomial with respect to at least one primitive idempotent.

17 / 34

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Q-polynomial property

Let Γ denote any distance regular graph with diameter D ≥ 3, and let A A A denote the adjacency algebra for Γ. Let E E E denote a primitive idempotent of Γ. Since A has a basis A A A0, A A A1, ..., A A AD of 0 − 1 matrices, A is closed under entry-wise matrix multiplication. Γ is said to be Q-polynomial with respect to E E E = E E E 1 whenever there exist an ordering E E E 0, E E E 1, ..., E E E D of the primitive idempotents such that for each i (0 ≤ i ≤ D), the primitive idempotent E E E i is a polynomial of degree exactly i in E E E 1, in the R-algebra (A, ◦), where ◦ denote entry-wise multiplication. We say Γ is Q-polynomial whenever Γ is Q-polynomial with respect to at least one primitive idempotent.

17 / 34

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Q-polynomial property

Let Γ denote any distance regular graph with diameter D ≥ 3, and let A A A denote the adjacency algebra for Γ. Let E E E denote a primitive idempotent of Γ. Since A has a basis A A A0, A A A1, ..., A A AD of 0 − 1 matrices, A is closed under entry-wise matrix multiplication. Γ is said to be Q-polynomial with respect to E E E = E E E 1 whenever there exist an ordering E E E 0, E E E 1, ..., E E E D of the primitive idempotents such that for each i (0 ≤ i ≤ D), the primitive idempotent E E E i is a polynomial of degree exactly i in E E E 1, in the R-algebra (A, ◦), where ◦ denote entry-wise multiplication. We say Γ is Q-polynomial whenever Γ is Q-polynomial with respect to at least one primitive idempotent.

17 / 34

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Result of Coughman, motivation

Theorem (Caughman, 2004) Let Γ denote a bipartite distance-regular graph with diameter D ≥ 12. If Γ is Q-polynomial then Γ is either the ordinary 2D-cycle,

  • r the D-dimensional hypercube, or the antipodal quotient of the

2D-dimensional hypercube, or the intersection numbers of Γ satisfy ci = (qi −1)/(q −1), bi = (qD −qi)/(q −1) (0 ≤ i ≤ D) for some integer q at least 2. Note that if c2 ≤ 2, then the last of the above possibilities cannot occur. It is the aim of this presentation to further investigate graphs with D ≤ 11 and c2 ≤ 2.

18 / 34

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Result of Coughman, motivation

Theorem (Caughman, 2004) Let Γ denote a bipartite distance-regular graph with diameter D ≥ 12. If Γ is Q-polynomial then Γ is either the ordinary 2D-cycle,

  • r the D-dimensional hypercube, or the antipodal quotient of the

2D-dimensional hypercube, or the intersection numbers of Γ satisfy ci = (qi −1)/(q −1), bi = (qD −qi)/(q −1) (0 ≤ i ≤ D) for some integer q at least 2. Note that if c2 ≤ 2, then the last of the above possibilities cannot occur. It is the aim of this presentation to further investigate graphs with D ≤ 11 and c2 ≤ 2.

18 / 34

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Result of Coughman, motivation

Theorem (Caughman, 2004) Let Γ denote a bipartite distance-regular graph with diameter D ≥ 12. If Γ is Q-polynomial then Γ is either the ordinary 2D-cycle,

  • r the D-dimensional hypercube, or the antipodal quotient of the

2D-dimensional hypercube, or the intersection numbers of Γ satisfy ci = (qi −1)/(q −1), bi = (qD −qi)/(q −1) (0 ≤ i ≤ D) for some integer q at least 2. Note that if c2 ≤ 2, then the last of the above possibilities cannot occur. It is the aim of this presentation to further investigate graphs with D ≤ 11 and c2 ≤ 2.

18 / 34

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 (a.1) Distance-regular graphs, examples, hypercubes (a.2) Q-polynomial property of DRG (a.3) Result of Coughman, motivation

Result of Coughman, motivation (cont.)

Our main result is the following theorem. Theorem 1. Let Γ denote a bipartite Q-polynomial distance-regular graph with diameter D ≥ 4, valency k ≥ 3, and intersection number c2 ≤ 2. Then one of the following holds: (i) Γ is the D-dimensional hypercube; (ii) Γ is the antipodal quotient of the 2D-dimensional hypercube; (iii) Γ is a graph with D = 5 not listed above.

19 / 34

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Case D ≥ 6 - Theorem 7. Case D ≥ 6 - Proof of Theorem 7.

Theorem 7.

Let Γ denote a Q-polynomial bipartite distance-regular graph with diameter D ≥ 6, valency k ≥ 3, and intersection numbers bi, ci. In this section we show that if c2 ≤ 2, then Γ is either the D-dimensional hypercube, or the antipodal quotient of the 2D-dimensional hypercube.

20 / 34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Case D ≥ 6 - Theorem 7. Case D ≥ 6 - Proof of Theorem 7.

Theorem 7.

Let Γ denote a Q-polynomial bipartite distance-regular graph with diameter D ≥ 6, valency k ≥ 3, and intersection numbers bi, ci. In this section we show that if c2 ≤ 2, then Γ is either the D-dimensional hypercube, or the antipodal quotient of the 2D-dimensional hypercube.

20 / 34

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Case D ≥ 6 - Theorem 7. Case D ≥ 6 - Proof of Theorem 7.

Idea for proof of Theorem 7.

Assume that Γ is not the D-dimensional hypercube or the antipodal quotient of the 2D-dimensional hypercube. Then there exist scalars s∗, q ∈ R such that ci = h(qi − 1)(1 − s∗qD+i+1) 1 − s∗q2i+1 , bi = h(qD − qi)(1 − s∗qi+1) 1 − s∗q2i+1 h = 1 − s∗q3 (q − 1)(1 − s∗qD+2)

21 / 34

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Case D ≥ 6 - Theorem 7. Case D ≥ 6 - Proof of Theorem 7.

Idea for proof of Theorem 7.

Assume that Γ is not the D-dimensional hypercube or the antipodal quotient of the 2D-dimensional hypercube. Then there exist scalars s∗, q ∈ R such that ci = h(qi − 1)(1 − s∗qD+i+1) 1 − s∗q2i+1 , bi = h(qD − qi)(1 − s∗qi+1) 1 − s∗q2i+1 h = 1 − s∗q3 (q − 1)(1 − s∗qD+2)

21 / 34

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Case D ≥ 6 - Theorem 7. Case D ≥ 6 - Proof of Theorem 7.

Idea for proof of Theorem 7. (cont.)

By [3, Lemma 4.1 and Lemma 5.1], scalars s∗ and q satisfy q > 1, and − q−D−1 ≤ s∗ < q−2D−1. (1) Assume first c2 = 1. Abbreviate α = 1 + q − q2 − qD−1 + qD + qD+1 and observe α > 2. By Lemma 6(iii) we find s∗ = α ±

  • α2 − 4qD+1

2qD+3 . Note that α2 − 4qD+1 ≥ 0, and so we have s∗ ≥ α −

  • α2 − 4qD+1

2qD+3 .

22 / 34

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Case D ≥ 6 - Theorem 7. Case D ≥ 6 - Proof of Theorem 7.

Idea for proof of Theorem 7. (cont.)

By [3, Lemma 4.1 and Lemma 5.1], scalars s∗ and q satisfy q > 1, and − q−D−1 ≤ s∗ < q−2D−1. (1) Assume first c2 = 1. Abbreviate α = 1 + q − q2 − qD−1 + qD + qD+1 and observe α > 2. By Lemma 6(iii) we find s∗ = α ±

  • α2 − 4qD+1

2qD+3 . Note that α2 − 4qD+1 ≥ 0, and so we have s∗ ≥ α −

  • α2 − 4qD+1

2qD+3 .

22 / 34

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Case D ≥ 6 - Theorem 7. Case D ≥ 6 - Proof of Theorem 7.

Idea for proof of Theorem 7. (cont.)

By [3, Lemma 4.1 and Lemma 5.1], scalars s∗ and q satisfy q > 1, and − q−D−1 ≤ s∗ < q−2D−1. (1) Assume first c2 = 1. Abbreviate α = 1 + q − q2 − qD−1 + qD + qD+1 and observe α > 2. By Lemma 6(iii) we find s∗ = α ±

  • α2 − 4qD+1

2qD+3 . Note that α2 − 4qD+1 ≥ 0, and so we have s∗ ≥ α −

  • α2 − 4qD+1

2qD+3 .

22 / 34

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Case D ≥ 6 - Theorem 7. Case D ≥ 6 - Proof of Theorem 7.

Idea for proof of Theorem 7. (cont.)

... After some computation we show that s∗ ≥ α −

  • α2 − 4qD+1

2qD+3 > q−2D−1, contradicting (1). Something similar we have also for c2 = 2.

23 / 34

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Case D ≥ 6 - Theorem 7. Case D ≥ 6 - Proof of Theorem 7.

Idea for proof of Theorem 7. (cont.)

... After some computation we show that s∗ ≥ α −

  • α2 − 4qD+1

2qD+3 > q−2D−1, contradicting (1). Something similar we have also for c2 = 2.

23 / 34

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Case D ≥ 6 - Theorem 7. Case D ≥ 6 - Proof of Theorem 7.

Idea for proof of Theorem 7. (cont.)

... After some computation we show that s∗ ≥ α −

  • α2 − 4qD+1

2qD+3 > q−2D−1, contradicting (1). Something similar we have also for c2 = 2.

23 / 34

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 The partition - part I The partition - part II

Definition of Di

j

Assume that Γ = (X, R) is bipartite with diameter D ≥ 4, valency k ≥ 3 and intersection number c2 = 2. In this section we describe certain partition of the vertex set X. Definition 8. Let Γ denote a bipartite distance-regular graph with diameter D ≥ 4, valency k ≥ 3 and intersection number c2 = 2. Fix vertices x, y ∈ X such that ∂(x, y) = 2. For all integers i, j we define Di

j = Di j (x, y)

by Di

j = {w ∈ X | ∂(x, w) = i and ∂(y, w) = j}.

We observe Di

j = ∅ unless 0 ≤ i, j ≤ D. Moreover |Di j | = p2 ij for

0 ≤ i, j ≤ D.

24 / 34

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 The partition - part I The partition - part II

Definition of Di

j

Assume that Γ = (X, R) is bipartite with diameter D ≥ 4, valency k ≥ 3 and intersection number c2 = 2. In this section we describe certain partition of the vertex set X. Definition 8. Let Γ denote a bipartite distance-regular graph with diameter D ≥ 4, valency k ≥ 3 and intersection number c2 = 2. Fix vertices x, y ∈ X such that ∂(x, y) = 2. For all integers i, j we define Di

j = Di j (x, y)

by Di

j = {w ∈ X | ∂(x, w) = i and ∂(y, w) = j}.

We observe Di

j = ∅ unless 0 ≤ i, j ≤ D. Moreover |Di j | = p2 ij for

0 ≤ i, j ≤ D.

24 / 34

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 The partition - part I The partition - part II

Definition of Di

j

Assume that Γ = (X, R) is bipartite with diameter D ≥ 4, valency k ≥ 3 and intersection number c2 = 2. In this section we describe certain partition of the vertex set X. Definition 8. Let Γ denote a bipartite distance-regular graph with diameter D ≥ 4, valency k ≥ 3 and intersection number c2 = 2. Fix vertices x, y ∈ X such that ∂(x, y) = 2. For all integers i, j we define Di

j = Di j (x, y)

by Di

j = {w ∈ X | ∂(x, w) = i and ∂(y, w) = j}.

We observe Di

j = ∅ unless 0 ≤ i, j ≤ D. Moreover |Di j | = p2 ij for

0 ≤ i, j ≤ D.

24 / 34

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 The partition - part I The partition - part II

Definition of Di

j - examples

4-cube with sets Di

j (b0 = 4, b1 = 3, b2 = 2, b3 = 1; c1 = 1,

c2 = 2, c3 = 3, c4 = 4).

25 / 34

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 The partition - part I The partition - part II

Case c2 = 2

What if c2 = 2? Definition 13. ... For 1 ≤ i ≤ D we define Ai = Ai(x, y), Ci = Ci(x, y), Bi(z) = Bi(z)(x, y), Bi(v) = Bi(v)(x, y) by Ai = {w ∈ Di

i | ∂(w, z) = i + 1 and ∂(w, v) = i + 1},

Ci = {w ∈ Di

i | ∂(w, z) = i − 1 and ∂(w, v) = i − 1},

Bi(z) = {w ∈ Di

i | ∂(w, z) = i − 1 and ∂(w, v) = i + 1},

Bi(v) = {w ∈ Di

i | ∂(w, z) = i + 1 and ∂(w, v) = i − 1}.

We observe Di

i is a disjoint union of Ai, Bi(z), Bi(v), Ci.

26 / 34

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 The partition - part I The partition - part II

Case c2 = 2

What if c2 = 2? Definition 13. ... For 1 ≤ i ≤ D we define Ai = Ai(x, y), Ci = Ci(x, y), Bi(z) = Bi(z)(x, y), Bi(v) = Bi(v)(x, y) by Ai = {w ∈ Di

i | ∂(w, z) = i + 1 and ∂(w, v) = i + 1},

Ci = {w ∈ Di

i | ∂(w, z) = i − 1 and ∂(w, v) = i − 1},

Bi(z) = {w ∈ Di

i | ∂(w, z) = i − 1 and ∂(w, v) = i + 1},

Bi(v) = {w ∈ Di

i | ∂(w, z) = i + 1 and ∂(w, v) = i − 1}.

We observe Di

i is a disjoint union of Ai, Bi(z), Bi(v), Ci.

26 / 34

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 The partition - part I The partition - part II

Case c2 = 2 (cont.)

Partition of graph Γ, which involves 4(D − 1) + 2ℓ cells

27 / 34

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 The partition - part I The partition - part II

Equitable partition

We claim that the partition of V Γ into nonempty sets Di−1

i+1, Di+1 i−1 (1 ≤ i ≤ D − 1), Ai (2 ≤ i ≤ D − 1),

Bi(z), Bi(v) (1 ≤ i ≤ D − 1) and Ci (3 ≤ i ≤ D) is equitable. Main tool is ” balanced set theorem” . Theorem (Terwilliger, 1995) (abridged version of theorem) Let Γ denote a distance-regular graph with diameter D ≥ 3. Let E denote a nontrivial primitive idempotent of Γ and let {θ∗

i }D i=0 denote

the corresponding dual eigenvalue sequence.... Then for all integers h, i, j (1 ≤ h ≤ D), (0 ≤ i, j ≤ D) and for all x, y ∈ X such that ∂(x, y) = h,

  • z∈X

∂(x,z)=i ∂(y,z)=j

Eˆ z −

  • z∈X

∂(x,z)=j ∂(y,z)=i

Eˆ z = ph

ij

θ∗

i − θ∗ j

θ∗

0 − θ∗ h

(Eˆ x − E ˆ y).

28 / 34

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 The partition - part I The partition - part II

Equitable partition

We claim that the partition of V Γ into nonempty sets Di−1

i+1, Di+1 i−1 (1 ≤ i ≤ D − 1), Ai (2 ≤ i ≤ D − 1),

Bi(z), Bi(v) (1 ≤ i ≤ D − 1) and Ci (3 ≤ i ≤ D) is equitable. Main tool is ” balanced set theorem” . Theorem (Terwilliger, 1995) (abridged version of theorem) Let Γ denote a distance-regular graph with diameter D ≥ 3. Let E denote a nontrivial primitive idempotent of Γ and let {θ∗

i }D i=0 denote

the corresponding dual eigenvalue sequence.... Then for all integers h, i, j (1 ≤ h ≤ D), (0 ≤ i, j ≤ D) and for all x, y ∈ X such that ∂(x, y) = h,

  • z∈X

∂(x,z)=i ∂(y,z)=j

Eˆ z −

  • z∈X

∂(x,z)=j ∂(y,z)=i

Eˆ z = ph

ij

θ∗

i − θ∗ j

θ∗

0 − θ∗ h

(Eˆ x − E ˆ y).

28 / 34

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 The partition - part I The partition - part II

Equitable partition

We claim that the partition of V Γ into nonempty sets Di−1

i+1, Di+1 i−1 (1 ≤ i ≤ D − 1), Ai (2 ≤ i ≤ D − 1),

Bi(z), Bi(v) (1 ≤ i ≤ D − 1) and Ci (3 ≤ i ≤ D) is equitable. Main tool is ” balanced set theorem” . Theorem (Terwilliger, 1995) (abridged version of theorem) Let Γ denote a distance-regular graph with diameter D ≥ 3. Let E denote a nontrivial primitive idempotent of Γ and let {θ∗

i }D i=0 denote

the corresponding dual eigenvalue sequence.... Then for all integers h, i, j (1 ≤ h ≤ D), (0 ≤ i, j ≤ D) and for all x, y ∈ X such that ∂(x, y) = h,

  • z∈X

∂(x,z)=i ∂(y,z)=j

Eˆ z −

  • z∈X

∂(x,z)=j ∂(y,z)=i

Eˆ z = ph

ij

θ∗

i − θ∗ j

θ∗

0 − θ∗ h

(Eˆ x − E ˆ y).

28 / 34

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

Case D = 4

In this section we consider Q-polynomial bipartite distance-regular graph Γ with intersection number c2 ≤ 2, valency k ≥ 3 and diameter D = 4. We show that Γ is either the 4-dimensional hypercube, or the antipodal quotient of the 8-dimensional hypercube.

29 / 34

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

Case D = 4

In this section we consider Q-polynomial bipartite distance-regular graph Γ with intersection number c2 ≤ 2, valency k ≥ 3 and diameter D = 4. We show that Γ is either the 4-dimensional hypercube, or the antipodal quotient of the 8-dimensional hypercube.

29 / 34

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

c2 = 1

For the case c2 = 1 we have the following result. Theorem (Miklaviˇ c, 2007) There does not exist a Q-polynomial bipartite distance-regular graph with diameter D = 4, valency k ≥ 3 and intersection number c2 = 1.

30 / 34

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

c2 = 1

For the case c2 = 1 we have the following result. Theorem (Miklaviˇ c, 2007) There does not exist a Q-polynomial bipartite distance-regular graph with diameter D = 4, valency k ≥ 3 and intersection number c2 = 1.

30 / 34

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

c2 = 2 - Equitable partition

31 / 34

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

c2 = 2 - ingredients

Let Γ denote a Q-polynomial bipartite distance-regular graph with diameter D = 4, valency k ≥ 4 and intersection number c2 = 2. Assume Γ is not the 4-dimensional hypercube or the antipodal quotient of the 8-dimensional hypercube. |A2| = (k − 2)(c3 − 3)/2; c3 ≥ 4 if and only if A2 = ∅; pick w ∈ A2 let λ denote number or neighbours of w in A3; λ = (k − 2)b3(b3 − 1) (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 ; (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides (k − 2)b3(b3 − 1)

32 / 34

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

c2 = 2 - ingredients

Let Γ denote a Q-polynomial bipartite distance-regular graph with diameter D = 4, valency k ≥ 4 and intersection number c2 = 2. Assume Γ is not the 4-dimensional hypercube or the antipodal quotient of the 8-dimensional hypercube. |A2| = (k − 2)(c3 − 3)/2; c3 ≥ 4 if and only if A2 = ∅; pick w ∈ A2 let λ denote number or neighbours of w in A3; λ = (k − 2)b3(b3 − 1) (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 ; (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides (k − 2)b3(b3 − 1)

32 / 34

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

c2 = 2 - ingredients

Let Γ denote a Q-polynomial bipartite distance-regular graph with diameter D = 4, valency k ≥ 4 and intersection number c2 = 2. Assume Γ is not the 4-dimensional hypercube or the antipodal quotient of the 8-dimensional hypercube. |A2| = (k − 2)(c3 − 3)/2; c3 ≥ 4 if and only if A2 = ∅; pick w ∈ A2 let λ denote number or neighbours of w in A3; λ = (k − 2)b3(b3 − 1) (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 ; (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides (k − 2)b3(b3 − 1)

32 / 34

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

c2 = 2 - ingredients

Let Γ denote a Q-polynomial bipartite distance-regular graph with diameter D = 4, valency k ≥ 4 and intersection number c2 = 2. Assume Γ is not the 4-dimensional hypercube or the antipodal quotient of the 8-dimensional hypercube. |A2| = (k − 2)(c3 − 3)/2; c3 ≥ 4 if and only if A2 = ∅; pick w ∈ A2 let λ denote number or neighbours of w in A3; λ = (k − 2)b3(b3 − 1) (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 ; (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides (k − 2)b3(b3 − 1)

32 / 34

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

c2 = 2 - ingredients

Let Γ denote a Q-polynomial bipartite distance-regular graph with diameter D = 4, valency k ≥ 4 and intersection number c2 = 2. Assume Γ is not the 4-dimensional hypercube or the antipodal quotient of the 8-dimensional hypercube. |A2| = (k − 2)(c3 − 3)/2; c3 ≥ 4 if and only if A2 = ∅; pick w ∈ A2 let λ denote number or neighbours of w in A3; λ = (k − 2)b3(b3 − 1) (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 ; (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides (k − 2)b3(b3 − 1)

32 / 34

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

c2 = 2 - ingredients

Let Γ denote a Q-polynomial bipartite distance-regular graph with diameter D = 4, valency k ≥ 4 and intersection number c2 = 2. Assume Γ is not the 4-dimensional hypercube or the antipodal quotient of the 8-dimensional hypercube. |A2| = (k − 2)(c3 − 3)/2; c3 ≥ 4 if and only if A2 = ∅; pick w ∈ A2 let λ denote number or neighbours of w in A3; λ = (k − 2)b3(b3 − 1) (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 ; (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides (k − 2)b3(b3 − 1)

32 / 34

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

c2 = 2 - ingredients (cont.)

Each vertex in B3(v) has exactly (c3 − 3)(b3 − λ) b3 neighbours in A2. (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides (k − 4)b3(b3 − 1) (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides 2b3(b3 − 1); (k − 2)(k − 3) = 2b2

3;

λ = (k − 2)/2; q = −( √ 5 + 3)/2; s∗ = 72 √ 5 − 161.

33 / 34

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

c2 = 2 - ingredients (cont.)

Each vertex in B3(v) has exactly (c3 − 3)(b3 − λ) b3 neighbours in A2. (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides (k − 4)b3(b3 − 1) (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides 2b3(b3 − 1); (k − 2)(k − 3) = 2b2

3;

λ = (k − 2)/2; q = −( √ 5 + 3)/2; s∗ = 72 √ 5 − 161.

33 / 34

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

c2 = 2 - ingredients (cont.)

Each vertex in B3(v) has exactly (c3 − 3)(b3 − λ) b3 neighbours in A2. (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides (k − 4)b3(b3 − 1) (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides 2b3(b3 − 1); (k − 2)(k − 3) = 2b2

3;

λ = (k − 2)/2; q = −( √ 5 + 3)/2; s∗ = 72 √ 5 − 161.

33 / 34

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

c2 = 2 - ingredients (cont.)

Each vertex in B3(v) has exactly (c3 − 3)(b3 − λ) b3 neighbours in A2. (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides (k − 4)b3(b3 − 1) (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides 2b3(b3 − 1); (k − 2)(k − 3) = 2b2

3;

λ = (k − 2)/2; q = −( √ 5 + 3)/2; s∗ = 72 √ 5 − 161.

33 / 34

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

c2 = 2 - ingredients (cont.)

Each vertex in B3(v) has exactly (c3 − 3)(b3 − λ) b3 neighbours in A2. (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides (k − 4)b3(b3 − 1) (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides 2b3(b3 − 1); (k − 2)(k − 3) = 2b2

3;

λ = (k − 2)/2; q = −( √ 5 + 3)/2; s∗ = 72 √ 5 − 161.

33 / 34

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

c2 = 2 - ingredients (cont.)

Each vertex in B3(v) has exactly (c3 − 3)(b3 − λ) b3 neighbours in A2. (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides (k − 4)b3(b3 − 1) (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides 2b3(b3 − 1); (k − 2)(k − 3) = 2b2

3;

λ = (k − 2)/2; q = −( √ 5 + 3)/2; s∗ = 72 √ 5 − 161.

33 / 34

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

c2 = 2 - ingredients (cont.)

Each vertex in B3(v) has exactly (c3 − 3)(b3 − λ) b3 neighbours in A2. (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides (k − 4)b3(b3 − 1) (k − 2)(k − 3) − 2b3 divides 2b3(b3 − 1); (k − 2)(k − 3) = 2b2

3;

λ = (k − 2)/2; q = −( √ 5 + 3)/2; s∗ = 72 √ 5 − 161.

33 / 34

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

c2 = 2

Theorem 35. Let Γ denote a Q-polynomial bipartite distance-regular graph with diameter D = 4, valency k ≥ 3 and intersection number c2 =

  • 2. Then Γ is either the 4-dimensional hypercube, or the antipodal

quotient of the 8-dimensional hypercube. Assume first that c3 ≥ 4. Then by Lemma 34 we have q = −( √ 5 + 3)/2 and s∗ = 72 √ 5 − 161. Lemma 6(iii) now implies k = −6, a contradiction. Therefore c3 = 3. But now [4, Theorem 4.6] implies that Γ is either the 4-dimensional hypercube, or the antipodal quotient of the 8-dimensional hypercube.

34 / 34

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

c2 = 2

Theorem 35. Let Γ denote a Q-polynomial bipartite distance-regular graph with diameter D = 4, valency k ≥ 3 and intersection number c2 =

  • 2. Then Γ is either the 4-dimensional hypercube, or the antipodal

quotient of the 8-dimensional hypercube. Assume first that c3 ≥ 4. Then by Lemma 34 we have q = −( √ 5 + 3)/2 and s∗ = 72 √ 5 − 161. Lemma 6(iii) now implies k = −6, a contradiction. Therefore c3 = 3. But now [4, Theorem 4.6] implies that Γ is either the 4-dimensional hypercube, or the antipodal quotient of the 8-dimensional hypercube.

34 / 34

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Basic definition and results from Algebraic graph theory Bipartite Q-polynomial DRG with D ≥ 6 and c2 ≤ 2 Equitable partitions when c2 ≤ 2 Case D = 4 Theorem 35

[1] E. Bannai, T. Ito, Algebraic Combinatorics I: Association Schemes, The Benjamin-Cummings Lecture Notes Ser. 58, Menlo Park, CA, 1984. [2] A. E. Brouwer, A. M. Cohen, and A. Neumaier, Distance-Regular Graphs, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1989. [3] J. S. Caughman, Bipartite Q-polynomial distance-regular graphs, Graphs Combin., 20 (2004), 47-57. [4] B. Curtin, Almost 2-homogeneous Bipartite Distance-regular Graphs, European J. Combin. 21 (2000), 865–876. [5] E. R. van Dam, J. H. Koolen, and H. Tanaka, Distance-regular graphs, preprint, arXiv:1410.6294. [6] ˇ

  • S. Miklaviˇ

c, On bipartite Q-polynomial distance-regular graphs with c2 = 1, Discrete Math., 307 (2007), 544-553. [7] P. Terwilliger, A new inequality for distance-regular graphs, Discrete Math., 137 (1995), 319-332.

34 / 34