bipartite edge prediction via transductive learning over
play

Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs Hanxiao Liu, Yiming Yang School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University July 8, 2015 ICML


  1. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs Hanxiao Liu, Yiming Yang School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University July 8, 2015 ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 1

  2. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs Problem Description Outline 1 Problem Description 2 The Proposed Framework 3 Formulation Product Graph Construction Graph-based Transductive Learning 4 Optimization 5 Experiment 6 Conclusion ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 2

  3. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs Problem Description Problem Description Many applications involve predicting the edges of a bipartite graph. A 1 Recommender System -2 I ? 2 Host-Pathogen Interaction ? B 3 Question-Answering Mapping +5 ? II 4 Citation Network . . . ? C

  4. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs Problem Description Problem Description Many applications involve predicting the edges of a bipartite graph. A 1 Recommender System -2 I ? 2 Host-Pathogen Interaction ? Graph G B Graph H 3 Question-Answering Mapping +5 ? II 4 Citation Network . . . ? C Sometimes, vertex sets on both sides are intrinsically structured. ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 4

  5. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs Problem Description Problem Description Many applications involve predicting the edges of a bipartite graph. A 1 Recommender System -2 I ? 2 Host-Pathogen Interaction ? Graph G B Graph H 3 Question-Answering Mapping +5 ? II 4 Citation Network . . . ? C Sometimes, vertex sets on both sides are intrinsically structured. Heterogeneous info: G + H + partial observations ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 5

  6. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs Problem Description Problem Description Many applications involve predicting the edges of a bipartite graph. A 1 Recommender System -2 I ? 2 Host-Pathogen Interaction ? Graph G B Graph H 3 Question-Answering Mapping +5 ? II 4 Citation Network . . . ? C Sometimes, vertex sets on both sides are intrinsically structured. Heterogeneous info: G + H + partial observations Combine them to make better edge predictions? ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 6

  7. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs The Proposed Framework The Proposed Framework A -2 I ? ? B Graph G Graph H +5 ? II ? C Transductive learning should be effective 1 Labeled edges (red) are highly sparse 2 Unlabeled edges (gray) are massively available ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 7

  8. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs The Proposed Framework The Proposed Framework A -2 I ? ? B Graph G Graph H +5 ? II ? C Transductive learning should be effective 1 Labeled edges (red) are highly sparse 2 Unlabeled edges (gray) are massively available Assumption: similar edges should have similar labels ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 8

  9. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs The Proposed Framework The Proposed Framework A -2 I ? ? B Graph G Graph H +5 ? II ? C Transductive learning should be effective 1 Labeled edges (red) are highly sparse 2 Unlabeled edges (gray) are massively available Assumption: similar edges should have similar labels Prerequisite: a similarity measure among the edges, i.e. a “Graph of Edges” (not directly provided) ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 9

  10. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs The Proposed Framework The Proposed Framework A -2 I ? ? B Graph G Graph H +5 ? II ? C Transductive learning should be effective 1 Labeled edges (red) are highly sparse 2 Unlabeled edges (gray) are massively available Assumption: similar edges should have similar labels Prerequisite: a similarity measure among the edges, i.e. a “Graph of Edges” (not directly provided) Can be induced from G and H via Graph Product! ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 10

  11. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs The Proposed Framework The Proposed Framework The “Graph of Edges” can be induced by taking the product of G and H In the product graph G ◦ H Each Vertex ∼ edge (in the original bipartite graph) Each Edge ∼ edge-edge similarity ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 11

  12. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs The Proposed Framework The Proposed Framework The “Graph of Edges” can be induced by taking the product of G and H In the product graph G ◦ H Each Vertex ∼ edge (in the original bipartite graph) Each Edge ∼ edge-edge similarity The adjacency matrix of the product graph is defined by “ ◦ ” (to be discussed later). ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 12

  13. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs The Proposed Framework The Proposed Framework Problem Mapping Edge Prediction Vertex Prediction (Original Problem) (Equivalent Problem) Given G , H and labeled edges, Given G ◦ H and labeled vertices, predict the unlabeled edges predict the unlabeled vertices ? -2 ? A (I , C ) (I , A ) (I , B ) -2 I ? ? B ? ? +5 +5 ? II (II , C ) (II , A ) (II , B ) ? C ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 13

  14. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs Formulation Outline 1 Problem Description 2 The Proposed Framework 3 Formulation Product Graph Construction Graph-based Transductive Learning 4 Optimization 5 Experiment 6 Conclusion ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 14

  15. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs Formulation Product Graph Construction Outline 1 Problem Description 2 The Proposed Framework 3 Formulation Product Graph Construction Graph-based Transductive Learning 4 Optimization 5 Experiment 6 Conclusion ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 15

  16. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs Formulation Product Graph Construction Product Graph Construction Q: When should vertex ( i, j ) ∼ ( i ′ , j ′ ) in the product graph? Tensor GP i ∼ i ′ in G AND j ∼ j ′ in H � i ∼ i ′ in G AND j = j ′ � � i = i ′ AND j ∼ j ′ in H � Cartesian GP OR ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 16

  17. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs Formulation Product Graph Construction Product Graph Construction Q: When should vertex ( i, j ) ∼ ( i ′ , j ′ ) in the product graph? Tensor GP i ∼ i ′ in G AND j ∼ j ′ in H � i ∼ i ′ in G AND j = j ′ � � i = i ′ AND j ∼ j ′ in H � Cartesian GP OR Can be trivially generalized to weighted graphs. ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 17

  18. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs Formulation Product Graph Construction Product Graph Construction Q: When should vertex ( i, j ) ∼ ( i ′ , j ′ ) in the product graph? Tensor GP i ∼ i ′ in G AND j ∼ j ′ in H � i ∼ i ′ in G AND j = j ′ � � i = i ′ AND j ∼ j ′ in H � Cartesian GP OR Can be trivially generalized to weighted graphs. To compute the adjacency matrices of PG G ◦ T ensor H = G ⊗ H � �� � Kronecker (a.k.a. Tensor) Product G ◦ Cartesian H = G ⊗ I + I ⊗ H = G ⊕ H � �� � Kronecker Sum ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 18

  19. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs Formulation Product Graph Construction Product Graph Construction Both GPs can be written in the form of spectral decomposition � ( λ i × µ j )( u i ⊗ v j )( u i ⊗ v j ) ⊤ G ◦ T ensor H = (1) i,j � ( λ i + µ j )( u i ⊗ v j )( u i ⊗ v j ) ⊤ G ◦ Cartesian H = (2) i,j ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 19

  20. Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs Formulation Product Graph Construction Product Graph Construction Both GPs can be written in the form of spectral decomposition � ( u i ⊗ v j )( u i ⊗ v j ) ⊤ G ◦ T ensor H = ( λ i × µ j ) (1) � �� � i,j soft AND � ( u i ⊗ v j )( u i ⊗ v j ) ⊤ G ◦ Cartesian H = ( λ i + µ j ) (2) � �� � i,j soft OR The interplay of graphs is captured by the interplay of their spectrum! ICML 2015 Bipartite Edge Prediction via Transductive Learning over Product Graphs 20

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend