of Polysaccharides Fractions from American Ginseng Root Lijun Wang - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

of polysaccharides fractions from
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

of Polysaccharides Fractions from American Ginseng Root Lijun Wang - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

In vitro Immuno-modulation Effect of Polysaccharides Fractions from American Ginseng Root Lijun Wang Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences Email: lijunwang8706@hotmail.com Supervisor: Dr. Lui and Prof. Ren Acknowledgement (1) Prof. Ren


slide-1
SLIDE 1

In vitro Immuno-modulation Effect

  • f Polysaccharides Fractions from

American Ginseng Root

Lijun Wang Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences Email: lijunwang8706@hotmail.com Supervisor: Dr. Lui and Prof. Ren

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Acknowledgement

 (1) Prof. Ren who supervised the project and

provided me the opportunity to come here.

 (2) Dr. Lui who invite me to come and aided in the

Pharmacological experimental design.

 (3) Miss Pei for her guidance in conducting my

experiment.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

1.Background

  • American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) is one of the most

recognized ginseng botanicals around the world.

  • Used as food, health food and drug for the pharmacological

effects on the central nervous system, cardiovascular system, endocrine system, immune system and cancer.

Usage of Ginseng

Food (Ginseng in Korea) Health Food (COLD-FX) Clinical (Traditional Chinese Medicine)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

 Polysaccharides,

  • 5-10%,

 gain more and more interest for it’s

  • immuno-modulatory ( innate and adaptive)
  • anti-tumor, anti-adhesive,
  • antioxidant,
  • hypoglycemic effects.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

2.Objectives of my study

 (1) Extraction, purification and fractionation

polysaccharides from American ginseng root

  • Chemical structure identification:
  • molecular weight,
  • monosaccharides,
  • spatial structure feature (NMR ).

 (2) Assay the immuno-modulatory effects of

polysaccharide fractions on macrophages.

  • Immuno-stimulation
  • Anti-inflammation.
slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • 3. Experiment Design

3.1. Extraction, Purification and Fractionation

Remove Water-soluble Protein

Remove Starch (34%-42%)

Separate based on different molecule weight

(35.08%) (15.86%)

More PPQ1 was obtained

49% of the compositions were removed from PPQ with α-amylose and Sevag-reagent

slide-7
SLIDE 7

 3.2 Pharmacological Characterization

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Wavelength 215nm for the detection of polysaccharides. Wavelength 280nm for the detection of protein.

  • 4. Result and Discussion

4.1 Anion Exchange Chromatography

PPQ1 PPQ2 PPQ2 had higher total yield ratio (74.02%) than PPQ2 (64.77%). More acidic fraction (47.33% ) in PPQ1 PPQ2.3 Maybe a glycoprotein for the high absorbance at 280 nm 17.44% 47.02% 40.55% 12.60% 20.60% 35.23% of PPQ1 was lose 25.98% of PPQ2 was lose

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • 4. Result and Discussion

4.2 In vitro immuno-stimulatory effect

y = 0.1179x + 3.061 R

2 = 0.9988

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 50 100 150 Dose (μg/mL) Nitrite Production (μM) PPQ1 PPQ1.1(N) PPQ1.2(A) Linear (PPQ1)

  • PPQ1 was effective and the

Dose-Response curve was linear with R2=0.9988.

  • Acidic fraction (PPQ1.2) was

more effective than PPQ1 and neutral fraction (PPQ1.1) less effective.

  • A similar result was got from

PPQ2 and it’s sub-fractions.

4.2.1 Effect on the NO production

slide-10
SLIDE 10

(a) TNF-α (b) IL-6

  • 4. 2.2 Effects of PPQ1 and it’s sub-fractions on the cytokine production

(c) IL-10 (d) IL-1β

PPQ1 and it’s sub-fractions had similar effects on this four cytokines (TNF-α ,IL-6, IL-10

and IL-1β). Neutral fraction (PPQ1.1) was inactive. Crude fraction and acidic fraction up-

regulated the production and acted in a concentration-dependent manner. There was no

  • bvious difference between PPQ1 and acidic fraction PPQ1.2. IL-1βproduction was very

low compared with TNF-α ,IL-6, IL-10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Nitrite production

4.3 Inhibition on LPS-stimulatory inflammation effect

4.3.1 Down-regulation on the NO production

Not very obvious difference between PPQ1 and it’s acidic fraction PPQ1.2. PPQ1 not acted in the linear way.

Although no effect on the immuno-stimulatory effect PPQ1.1 showed inhibition on the LPS-stimulatory NO production.

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Dose (μg/mL) Nitrite production (μM) PPQ1 PPQ1.1 PPQ1.2

slide-12
SLIDE 12

(a) TNF-α (b) IL-6

4.3.2 Down-regulation on cytokines production (c) IL-10 (d) IL-1β Neutral fraction showed inhibition effects on the cytokine (TNF-α ,IL-6 and IL- 10 ) production but weaker than crude fractions and acidic fractions. The cytokine (TNF-α ,IL-6, IL-10) production dropped rapidly when the treatment concentration increased from 1μg/mL to 50 μg/mL.

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • 5. Conclusion

  • 1. DEAE-sepharose Fast Flow is effective in the fractionation.

  • 2. More acidic fractions than neutral fractions in the AN ginseng root (1.75:1).

  • 3. Acidic fractions were more active in immuo-modulation effects of

macrophages than neutral fractions.

4.Although neutral fractions were inactive in the immuno-stimulation they still useful for displayed the inhibition against LPS-stimulatory inflammation.

  • 5. Immuno-modulation activity of polysaccharides were affected by;

Molecule weight,

State of purity,

Charge

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Thanks for Your attendance!