Using capital to counter the threat
- f low and volatile farm income
by Alex Sinnett, Jonathon Tocker, Bill Malcolm DEPI Victoria
of low and volatile farm income by Alex Sinnett, Jonathon Tocker, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Using capital to counter the threat of low and volatile farm income by Alex Sinnett, Jonathon Tocker, Bill Malcolm DEPI Victoria Changes investigated for case study farm Base Farm ( status quo SQ) 560 ha; 16 dse/ha; 129% lambing C1. C2. C3. C4.
by Alex Sinnett, Jonathon Tocker, Bill Malcolm DEPI Victoria
Base Farm (status quo SQ) 560 ha; 16 dse/ha; 129% lambing C2. Increase stocking rate on base farm 20 dse/ha (+4 dse/ha) Low Extra Capital $344,000 C3. Increase land area and run at same stocking rate as base farm 800 ha(+240 ha) High Extra capital $1,348,400 C4. Increase land area and stocking rate on base farm and extra land 20 dse/ha; 800 ha High Extra Capital $1,800,000 C1. Increase lambing % on base farm 145% lamb marking (+16%) Low extra capital $72,000
Changes investigated for case study farm
Total Cost Total Fixed Cost Total Variable Cost Quantity of output
Total variable cost, total fixed cost and total cost
$
Quantity of output
Average variable cost, average fixed cost and average total cost
$
Average Total Cost Average Variable Cost Average Fixed Cost
profit profit profit
Costs per unit of output and the number of units of output combine to create total profit. Increasing output increases profit and wealth by reducing average fixed costs per unit of
Base Farm (status quo SQ) 560 ha; 16 dse/ha; 129% lambing C2. Increase stocking rate on base farm 20 dse/ha (+4 dse/ha) Low Extra Capital $344,000 C3. Increase land area and run at same stocking rate as base farm 800 ha(+240 ha) High Extra capital $1,348,400 C4. Increase land area and stocking rate on base farm and extra land 20 dse/ha; 800 ha High Extra Capital $1,800,000 C1. Increase lambing % on base farm 145% lamb marking (+16%) Low extra capital $72,000
Changes investigated for case study farm
SQ C1 C2 C3 C4
Costs per one dollar of income Total income over 7 year analysis period
Cost of producing a dollar of income
Business risk Financial Risk
Return relative to total risk for each
Indicator of Total Risk
Business Risk compared with Financial Risk
Each change increased productivity and increased income more than costs increased, thus increased profit, above that of the current farm system.
Borrowing and buying and intensifying more land increased financial risk and business risk and at the same time increased the probable annual net cash flows and profits and growth in wealth.
In this case, if buying more land, intensification was also required to better service the added debt that had to be taken on. Buying and increasing productivity was the highest return highest risk