of biped locomotion
play

of Biped Locomotion Yoonsang Lee 1 Kyungho Lee 2 Soon-Sun Kwon 3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Push-Recovery ry Stability of Biped Locomotion Yoonsang Lee 1 Kyungho Lee 2 Soon-Sun Kwon 3 Jiwon Jeong 1 Carol OSullivan 4 Moon Seok Park 5 Jehee Lee 2 1 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 2 Seoul National University 3 Ajou University 4 Disney


  1. Push-Recovery ry Stability of Biped Locomotion Yoonsang Lee 1 Kyungho Lee 2 Soon-Sun Kwon 3 Jiwon Jeong 1 Carol O’Sullivan 4 Moon Seok Park 5 Jehee Lee 2 1 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 2 Seoul National University 3 Ajou University 4 Disney Research 5 Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

  2. Biped Controller Design Two fundamental goals: • Human-likeness (i.e., normal gait) • Robustness against perturbation [Lee et al. 2010]

  3. Normal Gait • Gait pattern that humans normally adopt • More energy efficient than other gaits • Many questions still remain regarding stability

  4. Questions | | Gait it St Stabil ilit ity • Under what conditions is human gait more stable? • Is normal gait more stable than abnormal gait?

  5. Questions | | Bip iped Control • How much are existing biped controllers human- like? • Are they as stable as human locomotion? • Also influenced by the gait factors that affect humans?

  6. Goal Correlation between gait and stability • which aspects of gaits affect balance-recovering capabilities • how these factors affect to computer-simulated bipeds Better understanding of existing biped controllers & how to improve controller design

  7. Background | Measurin ing St Stabil ilit ity • Standing postures stability [Rogers et al. 2001] [Brauer et al. 2001] • Gait stability [Bauby and Kuo 2000] [England and Granata 2007] [Bruijn et al. 2009] • Our work: Recovery response for moderate push while walking

  8. Background | | Bip Biped Co Control • Bipedal Locomotion [Wang et al. 2010, 2012] [Geijtenbeek et al.2013] [Mordatch et al.2013] [Kwon and Hodgins 2010] [Coros et al. 2010] [de Lasa et al. 2010] [Yin et al. 2007] [da Silva et al. 2008] … [Wang et al. 2010] • Stability to external pushes [Lee et al. 2014] [Wang et al. 2010] [Lee et al. 2010] [Yin et al. 2007] • Stomping gait controllers were better - affect of gait type?

  9. Design of f Experiments Top view Side view • Stability measure : Lateral deviation from a line • Experiments with human participants & simulated biped

  10. Experiments wit ith Human Part rticipants • 30 healthy participants ( 15 males / 15 females) • Measure 31 variables: • Level of crouch (0 ˚,20˚, 30 ˚, 60˚) • Stride length • Walking speed • Timing, magnitude and direction of the push • Height, weight, BMI, and leg lengths • Angle of the feet at ground contact • …

  11. Collected Data fr from Experiments Group 1 Group 2 • The lateral displacement • The lateral displacement peaked within one step peaked within three steps • Easily recovered balance • Experienced difficulties recovering balance

  12. Collected Data fr from Experiments • Multivariate, repeated, unbalanced, and clustered • Outcome is a time series of complex articulated structures • Measured twice on the same outcome • Difficult to collect well-balanced data with so many variables • Linear Mixed Model (LMM) • General method for handling the between- and within- subject variability in the repeated, unbalanced data. • Model selection • LMM with walking speed, push magnitude and timing minimize AIC & BIC

  13. Result | | Overall ll Analy lysis is • The gait detours less if (for both human & simulation) • Level of crouch It crouches mild • Walking speed Walks faster • Magnitude of push Push is weaker • Timing of push Push happens later • Height, weight, BMI were irrelevant.

  14. Simulation Experiments | Bip iped Con ontroll ller • Data-driven biped controller [Lee et al 2010] • Imitating reference gait

  15. Simulation Experiments | Bip iped Con ontroll ller • Feedback rules to maintain balance • stance hip & ankle, swing hip & foot height • Feedback parameter vector θ Without feedback ( θ = 0) With hand-tuned parameter θ

  16. Simulation Experiments | | Par arameter Optimization • In the original work, θ was manually tuned for each motion • In this work, θ is optimized to handle gait variations penalizes early falling penalizes excessive parameters favors better tracking • Evaluated with simulation of normal gait & 60 ° crouch gait • 10s duration, with push in the middle • Enough to deal with a wide variety of gait variations reliably

  17. Simulation Experiments | | Push sh Experiments • Gait variations with random variables • Level of crouch, stride length, walking speed, the magnitude and timing of push • Multivariate normal distributions • Using motion displacement mapping and timewarping • Fed into the optimized controller as reference motion • Simulated biped is pushed while walking

  18. Result | | Le Level l of f Cr Crouch Group 1 Group 2

  19. Result | | Energy Exp xpendit iture of Sim Simula lated Walk lkin ing • Cost of Transport : required energy to move unit distance • Humans : 1.05m/s ~ 1.4 m/s • Normal gait simulation: 1 m/s • Crouch 30 simulation : 0.76 m/s

  20. Result | | St Stri ride Length & St Stri ride Frequency • Additional analysis - the gait detours less if • Stride Length Shorter stride length • Stride Frequency Higher frequency • Opposite to the results of previous studies • [Bauby and Kuo 2000; Bruijn et al. 2009] [England and Granata 2007] • Reason - Different stability estimates • Prevs ’ - Kinematic variation (Lyapunov exponents) • Ours - Resilience against impulsive perturbation

  21. Discussion | | Su Summary ry • Significant factors affecting push -recovery response • Level of crouch, walking speed, push force and push timing • Simulated biped is affect by same factors of human • Quantitatively, human participants performed better than simulation.

  22. Discussion | Im Impli licatio ion • How much are existing biped controllers human- like? • Existing biped controllers behave quite similar to humans qualitatively

  23. Discussion | Im Impli licatio ion • About evaluating robustness of biped controllers • Normalization for push-recovery test of biped controllers

  24. Acknowledgements • Thanks to • All members of SNU Movement Research Laboratory • Seung Yeol Lee and Mi Seon Yoo from Seoul National University Bundang Hospital • Funding • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) No.2011- 0018340 , No. 2007-0056094.

  25. Push-Recovery Stability of f Bip iped Lo Locomotion Yoonsang Lee 1 Kyungho Lee 2 Soon-Sun Kwon 3 Jiwon Jeong 1 Carol O’Sullivan 4 Moon Seok Park 5 Jehee Lee 2 1 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 2 Seoul National University 3 Ajou University 4 Disney Research 5 Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend