Obtaining Knowledge and Data for Separations from Molecular - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

obtaining knowledge and data for separations from
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Obtaining Knowledge and Data for Separations from Molecular - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Obtaining Knowledge and Data for Separations from Molecular Simulation J. Ilja Siepmann Nanoporous Materials Genome Center, Chemical Theory Center, Depts. of Chemistry and of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science University of Minnesota,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Obtaining Knowledge and Data for Separations from Molecular Simulation

  • J. Ilja Siepmann

Nanoporous Materials Genome Center, Chemical Theory Center,

  • Depts. of Chemistry and of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science

University of Minnesota, Twin-Cities, MN

Vapor–Liquid Equilibria / Distillation Liquid–Liquid Equilibria / Extraction Sorption and Transport in Porous Materials / Adsorption & Membranes Analyte Distribution / Chromatography A Research Agenda for a New Era in Separations Science Keck Center, Washington, DC August 22, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Goals and Challenges: Molecular Simulation

  • provide atomic-level understanding of complex

chemical systems and processes

  • investigate how changes in molecular architecture

and composition influence macroscopic observables

  • predict accurate thermophysical properties

(Chemical Industry, Vision 2020)

  • design improved separation processes and

functional materials

  • precision of particle-based simulations depends solely on sampling the important regions

in phase space

  • develop efficient Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics algorithms to sample

events/processes occurring at multiple physical timescales and length scales, e.g., local displacements versus self-assembly in fluid mixtures, transfer in multi-phase systems, and chemical reactions

  • develop software and workflows that utilize high-performance computers with

> 105 cores, novel memory distribution, and co-processor acceleration

  • accuracy depends solely on the force field or electronic structure theory used to describe

inter- and intramolecular interactions

  • develop transferable force fields (different molecules and solid sorbents,

state points, compositions, and properties)

  • develop Kohn-Sham density functional theory for chemisorption and reactive systems
slide-3
SLIDE 3

all electron pseudopotentjal for core electrons frozen electron density

  • ff-atom sites

AA with multjples and/or higher-order dispersion AA with partjal charges and C6 dispersion UA with multjpoles and/or higher-order dispersion UA with partjal charges and C6 dispersion beads representjng 3 or 4 bonded atoms blobs representjng many atoms blobs representjng multjple molecules e x c i t e d s t a t e s g r

  • u

n d s t a t e a t

  • m

t r a n s f e r / r e a c tj v e c h a r g e t r a n s f e r p

  • l

a r i z a b l e m a n y

  • b
  • d

y t e r m s p a i r w i s e a d d i tj v e s h

  • r

t

  • r

a n g e r e p u l s i v e nuclear quantum effects classical mechanics in contjnuum space classical mechanics on lattjce

Potentials & Forces – Goarse-Graining

Strans Srot Sdihedral

particle position number of sites response

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Transferability, Accuracy & Efficiency

Ø Transferable force field (FF) implies

l parameters for a given interaction site should be transferable to different molecules

(e.g., identical parameters should be used for the methyl group in, say, n-hexane, 1- hexene, or 1-hexanol)

l a specific (set of) combining rule(s) is used consistently l parameters can be used over a wide range of temperatures and pressures;

(low-temperature physics, planetary science)

l parameters can be used to predict different types of properties (e.g., thermodynamic,

structural, or transport)

Ø Accuracy can only be assessed by comparison to reliable experimental data and

  • ne requires data beyond the fitting set to truly assess transferability (true

versus effective potentials)

Ø “Efficiency” is a quest for simplicity while maintaining “accuracy” by adjusting

l functional form of interaction potential (square root, spherically symmetric) l number and types of interaction sites (e.g., meso-bead, united atom, all atom, nuclei &

valence electron centers)

l number of adjustable parameters

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Parameterization and Transferability

Vapor-liquid coexistence curves

Bead-by-bead parameterization using experimental VLE data

Transferability of CHx united atoms Early TraPPE-UA models:

Ø Fitted to reproduce critical temperature and low-T liquid density; i.e., the

temperature-dependent Gibbs free energy of transfer

Ø Using relatively short simulations over limited temperature range

slide-6
SLIDE 6

VLE – Prediction of Critical Points

Nature 1993, 365, 330

  • J. Chem. Eng. Data 2014, 59, 3301
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Performance for VLE Prediction

200 400 600 800

Tc

exp [K]

200 400 600 800

Tc

sim [K]

Gibbs99 NERD 200 400 600 800

Tc

exp [K]

Mie 200 400 600 800

Tc

exp [K]

OPPE 200 400 600 800

Tc

exp [K]

TraPPE-EH TraPPE-UA

R

2 = 0.999

MUPE = 0.2% R

2 = 0.997

MUPE = 0.9% R

2 = 0.967

MUPE = 1.2% R

2 = 0.984

MUPE = 1.5% R

2 = 0.993

MUPE = 1.0% R

2 = 0.995

MUPE = 1.2%

200 400 600

Tb

exp [K]

200 400 600

Tb

sim [K]

Mie 200 400 600

Tb

exp [K]

OPPE 200 400 600

Tb

exp [K]

TraPPE-EH TraPPE-UA

R

2 = 0.999

MUPE = 0.5% R

2 = 0.989

MUPE = 2.1% R

2 = 0.993

MUPE = 2.0% R

2 = 0.995

MUPE = 1.0%

0.5 1 1.5

rsim [g/cm

3]

  • 4
  • 2

2 4

rsim/rexp - 1 [%]

Mie OPPE 0.5 1 1.5

rsim [g/cm

3]

OPLS 0.5 1 1.5

rsim [g/cm

3]

TraPPE-UA

MUPE = 0.8% MUPE = 1.0% MUPE = 1.5% MUPE = 1.1%

critical temperature normal boiling point ambient density

Siepmann, unpublished data

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Fitting to Binary VLE Data

Vapor-liquid coexistence curves

EPM2 TraPPE-CO2

AIChE J. 2001, 47, 1676 JPCB 2001, 105, 9840

slide-9
SLIDE 9

VLE – Azeotropes & Complex Mixtures

FPE 2004, 220, 211 JPCB 2001, 105, 3093 ACR 2007, 40, 1200

slide-10
SLIDE 10

VLE - Distillation

Difference in separation factor for ethane-rich mixtures leads to 30% differences in number of stages in stripping section of distillation column

Model with distributed partial charges is significantly more accurate than point- quadrupole model

AIChE J. 2017, 63, 5098

slide-11
SLIDE 11

VLE – First Principles Simulations

  • J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 640

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 r [g/ml] 400 500 600 700 T [K] rVV10 B97M-rV revPBE-D3 BLYP-D3 M06-L-D3 PBE0-D3 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 1000/T 2 3 4 5 6 7

  • lnrvap.

PCCP 2013, 15, 13578 Siepmann, unpublished data

slide-12
SLIDE 12

(V)LLE – Miscibility Gaps

  • J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 2911

FPE 2016, 407, 269

slide-13
SLIDE 13

LLE – Extraction

AIChE J. 2013, 59, 3065 1-decanol 4-decanol

slide-14
SLIDE 14

LLE – Polymer Phase Behavior & Aggrgation

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Weight fraction of PEP*-423 300 350 400 450 500 T [K] 222-MD-1.0 280-SZ-1.05 500-SZ-1.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Weight fraction of PEP*-423 350 400 450 500 550 T [K] 217-MD-1.01 280-SZ-1.05 500-SZ-1.10 Expt Sim

n

PP

n

hhPP

n

PEP

O O CH3 H3C n−1

PEO

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1

(δ1-δ2)SANS [MPa

1/2]

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1

(δ1-δ2)sim [MPa

1/2]

PP+PEP hhPP+PP hhPP+PEP

Chen et al., Macromolecules 49, 3975 (2016) Chen et al., Macromolecules 51, 3774 (2018)

Low-χ Mixtures: Polyolefins High-χ Mixtures: PEO/PEP

HO OH y-1 (x-3)/2 (x-3)/2

5 10 15 20 Domain period d [nm] 0.1 1 10 χMF (Tsim = 400 K or Texpt = 300 K) mono-oligomers di-oligomers Expt mean-field

mono-oligomers di-oligomers

HO OH y-1 x-2

Extreme-χ Block Oligomers

Chen et al., ACS Nano 12, 4351 (2018)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Developing the TraPPE-zeo Force Field

heptane ethanol CO2

  • J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 24375
  • Challenge: Large discrepancies of current zeolite

force fields for adsorption of polar guest molecules

  • Target: non-polar, polar, and H-bonding guest

molecules in all-silica zeolites

  • LJ sites on both Si & O to achieve better balance

between dispersive and H-bonding interactions

  • A three-step, grid-based search in 5-dimensional

parameter space requiring ≈50,000 simulations

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Adsorptive Separation: Gas Phase

W

W

  • Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 5938
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Adsorption – Alcohol/Water in Silicalite-1

IAST: Myers & Prausnitz, AIChE J., 1965, 11, 121

10

1

10

2

10

3

10

4

5 10 15 20 N [molec/uc] alcohol(+water), sim water(+alcohol), sim alcohol(+water), IAST water(+alcohol), IAST alcohol(pure), sim 10

1

10

2

10

3

10

4

palcohol [Pa] 4 8 12 N [molec/uc]

methanol ethanol

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 xalcohol, ads 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 xalcohol, sol 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 xalcohol, ads 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 xalcohol, sol 10

1

10

2

10

3

10

4

Salcohol methanol, 298 K ethanol, 298 K methanol, 323 K ethanol, 323 K

Adsorption of H2O in MFI IAST overestimates separation factors for methanol and ethanol by about 5000

Bai et al., Langmuir 2012, 28, 15566; J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 24375

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Adsorptive Separation – Adsorbent Screening

Ø Screening of 402 IZA-SC structures at w = 0.12% and for top-64 structures at 5 higher concs Ø Screening yields large number of frameworks that outperform MFI (ranked 15 – 26) Ø Processes may exploit FER’s high selectivity to extract 90% of EtOH contained in a 5 wt%

fermentation broth by adsorptive separation reaching down to raffinate conc of w ≈ 0.5 wt%

Ø Processes using ATN* may exploit its higher EtOH loading and reduce feed mixture from

initial w ≈ 15% down to 5 wt% and recycle the raffinate back to the fermentation broth Bai, Jeon, Ren, Knight, Deem, Tsapatsis & Siepmann, Nature Commun. 2015, 6, 5912

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Ø Adsorption of n-C18, n-C24, n-C30,

2-methyl-C17, 4-methyl- C17, and 2,2-dimethyl-C16

Ø Infinite-dilution limit for all 300,000 structures, followed by

equimolar liquid-phase (p = 3 MPa) for top-3000 structures

Adsorptive Separation – Adsorbent Screening

Bai, Jeon, Ren, Knight, Deem, Tsapatsis & Siepmann, Nature Commun. 2015, 6, 5912

C18 C24 C30 mC17 dC16

ATO MTW PCOD-8113534

slide-20
SLIDE 20

FPMC Studies of Adsorption in Open-Metal-Site MOFs

Dzubak, …, Smit, Gagliardi, Nature Chem. 4, 810 (2012)

Adsorption – First Principles Monte Carlo Studies

  • f Adsorption in Open-Metal-Site MOFs
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Adsorption – First Principles Monte Carlo Studies

  • Chem. Comm. 2018, DOI: 10.1039/c8cc06178e
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Transport – Hierarchical Structures and Nanosheets

ACS Nano 2016, 10, 7612 Nature 2017, 543, 690

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography

ODS = Dimethyl octadecyl-silane with coverage of 2.9 µmol/m2, no endcapping C16 = Liquid n-hexadecane M = MeOH/water mixture A = ACN/water mixture

  • Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 6551
  • J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 2203

LCGC North Am. 2002, 20, 516

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography – Slot Model

1.56 1.14 1.16 1.02 sim 1.70 1.13 1.13 1.08 expt

Shape Selectivity

relative to triphenylene ODS @ 4.2 µmol/m2 67% ACN

> > ≈ ≈

NAP BcP TriP BaA Chrys

α = k'x k'TriP

Rafferty et al., J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 9183 Wise & Sander,

  • J. High. Res. Chromatogr.

1985, 8, 248

slide-25
SLIDE 25

RPLC – 2D Column Selection

Virtual screening of 2-D chromatograms for 100 sets of 1,000 analytes computed for each of 319,225 column pairs using the Hydrophobic Subtraction Model

Lindsey, Eggimann, Stoll, Carr, Schure & Siepmann,

  • J. Chromatogr. A 2018, submitted
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Size Exclusion Chromatography – Packings

Ø

Simple pore models fail to capture retention behavior (and pore size distribution)

Ø

Gel packings show linear regime for largest size range

Chen, Schure & Siepmann, J. Chromatogr. A 2018, in press

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Conclusions & Acknowledgments

Ø Molecular simulation provides molecular-level knowledge on complex

separation systems

Ø Prediction of azeotropes and liquid–liquid and solid-fluid equilibria need to be

improved

Ø Hierarchical screening workflows allow for discovery of nanoporous materials Ø FPMC allows for calculation of unary and multi-component adsorption equilibria Ø Simulated systems are often too idealized and complexity needs to be increased

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Conclusions & Acknowledgments

Ø Molecular simulation provides molecular-level knowledge on complex

separation systems

Ø Prediction of azeotropes and liquid–liquid and solid-fluid equilibria need to be

improved

Ø Hierarchical screening workflows allow for discovery of nanoporous materials Ø FPMC allows for calculation of unary and multi-component adsorption equilibria Ø Simulated systems are often too idealized and complexity needs to be increased