NZs Dairy Sector Institutions Philip Barry Law and Economics - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

nz s dairy sector institutions philip barry
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

NZs Dairy Sector Institutions Philip Barry Law and Economics - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NZs Dairy Sector Institutions Philip Barry Law and Economics Association Wellington Sept 4, 2019 Contents 1. What did DIRA do? 2. Has DIRA worked? 3. Is DIRA still needed? www.tdb.co.nz 2 1. What Did DIRA Do? 1. Created a


slide-1
SLIDE 1

NZ’s Dairy Sector Institutions

Wellington Sept 4, 2019 Law and Economics Association

Philip Barry

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Contents

1. What did DIRA do? 2. Has DIRA worked? 3. Is DIRA still needed?

www.tdb.co.nz 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • 1. What Did DIRA Do?

1. Created a near-monopsony for Fonterra at the farm-gate 2. Removed the monopsony of the Dairy Board at the factory-gate 3. Preserved competition in the domestic dairy-products market

www.tdb.co.nz 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • 2. Has DIRA Worked?

www.tdb.co.nz 4

5 10 15 20 25 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016

Litres (billion)

Milk processed (billion litres)

Growth in the sector until reaching peak-cow in approx. 2015-16

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Fonterra’s Place in the Sector

www.tdb.co.nz 5

60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021

Market Share

Actual Forecast

Fonterra’s Farmgate Market Share

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Increasing Competition

www.tdb.co.nz 6

Market Share at Farm-gate

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Dairy Processors’ Performance

www.tdb.co.nz 7

19% 11% 9% 6% 2% 0% 8% 16% 24% Tatua* OCD Synlait Fonterra Westland

Average Return on Capital Employed, 2014-2018

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Market Capitalisation

www.tdb.co.nz 8

$0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 August 2016 April 2017 December 2017 August 2018 April 2019 Market cap, $ billions

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Fonterra’s Financial Performance

  • Downward trend in performance

www.tdb.co.nz 9

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020

ROCE (%)

Fonterra Return on Capital Employed

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Fonterra: Commodities vs “Value Add”

www.tdb.co.nz 10

  • 2%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020

Fonterra ingredients Fonterra value add

Return on Capital Employed

Source: Northington Partners and TDB Advisory analysis

slide-11
SLIDE 11

What went wrong at Fonterra?

  • Structure or Strategy?
  • Co-op structure not inherently flawed: but

– sources of capital limited – agency costs increase with size

  • Was there a clear strategy? volume/commodity and

“value-add” – both are capital intensive

  • Fonterra’s structure did not match its strategy

www.tdb.co.nz 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Adding value vs adding costs

www.tdb.co.nz 12 2010-2018

Excluding Tatua, there is no clear relationship between economic value (NPAT/KgMS) and where a company is on the “value chain” (revenue/KgMS)

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • 3. Is DIRA Still Needed?
  • Proposed changes are at the margin
  • Preserves open entry and open exit
  • Detailed changes:

– access to DIRA milk – dairy conversions – milk-price setting

  • Reviews of DIRA every four to six years

www.tdb.co.nz 13

DIRA Amendment Bill, 2019

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • 3. Is DIRA Still Needed?

www.tdb.co.nz 14

74% of milk collected has access to more than one processor

Farm-gate Market

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • 3. Is DIRA Still Needed?

www.tdb.co.nz 15

ComCom Part IV regulation typically applied where one supplier

Farm-gate Market

Dairy Region Total production (millions kgMS) Percentage of national market (kgMS)

  • No. of processors

Waikato 503 27% 3 Whanganui / Manawatu 81 4% 2 Westland / Nelson / Tasman 85 5% 2 Canterbury 385 21% 4 Otago 101 5% 2 Southland 223 12% 3 Rest of NZ (5 regions) 483 26% 1

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • 3. Is DIRA Still Needed?
  • Under DIRA, Goodman Fielder has guaranteed access to 250M litres of raw

milk p.a. at a regulated price

  • The Commerce Commission has estimated that if the DIRA Regulations were

removed, the domestic raw milk price would increase by around 25%

  • Leading to an estimated:

– transfer of wealth from New Zealand consumers to suppliers of $51M to $92M p.a.; and – an efficiency (deadweight) loss to the economy of around $6M p.a.

www.tdb.co.nz 16

Domestic Dairy Products Market

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Conclusions

  • Under DIRA:

– The dairy sector overall has fared well; but – Fonterra has struggled

  • With increased competition there are valid questions

whether DIRA is still needed at the farmgate

  • Given the domestic presence of Fonterra, regulation is

still needed for the domestic dairy products market

www.tdb.co.nz 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Over Paying for Milk?

www.tdb.co.nz 19

  • The Farm-Gate Milk Price shows a general increasing trend
  • Fonterra's constitution states that it’s goal is to maximise pay-out for milk

to farmers, this has incentivised farmer volume production, requiring investment in processing capacity and not value add business

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Over Investing in Processing?

  • Fonterra has out-spent competitors

www.tdb.co.nz 20

Invested Capital since 2001

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Debt to debt plus equity, 2018

www.tdb.co.nz 21

17% 26% 40% 52% 67% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% OCD Synlait Tatua Fonterra Westland

Debt/(debt+equity), (%)