NSSE Results & Connections Institutional Research & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
nsse results connections
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

NSSE Results & Connections Institutional Research & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 11, 2022 144 likes •512 views

NSSE Results & Connections Institutional Research & Academic Resources California State Polytechnic University, Pomona May 16, 2013 Presidents Cabinet Outline Introduction to National Survey of Student Engagement

slide-1
SLIDE 1

NSSE – Results & Connections

Institutional Research & Academic Resources California State Polytechnic University, Pomona May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • Introduction to National Survey of Student Engagement
  • Definition of Constructs and Benchmark Comparisons
  • CPP defined comparison group
  • CPP participation and most recent results
  • Make Connections with
  • Core Values (CV)
  • University Learning Outcomes (ULO)
  • Academic Strategic Plan (ACSP)
  • University Strategic Plan (USP)
  • Discussion – What story do you see?

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

  • Administered nationally beginning in 2000 by the

Center for Postsecondary Research in the Indiana University School of Education

  • Survey instrument based on empirically confirmed

“good practices” in undergraduate education

  • On-line survey instrument with email recruitment
  • All first-time freshmen and seniors are invited

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

NSSE Benchmark Comparisons

  • Sets of questions produce benchmark comparisons for

five constructs:

  • Level of Academic Challenge
  • Active and Collaborative Learning
  • Student-Faculty Interaction
  • Enriching Educational Experiences
  • Supportive Campus Environment
  • Benchmark Comparisons Report present our institution’s

results against

  • All NSSE participating institutions
  • Institutions within our Carnegie Classification
  • Institutions in a comparison group we defined ourselves

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

CPP Defined Comparison Group

  • Defined for prior two IPEDS reports as
  • Public institutions about our size
  • Urban or suburban but not rural
  • Similar proportion of graduate enrollment, academic

programs, students living on campus

  • NSSE participating institutions in this group
  • CSUs: Fresno, Fullerton, San Bernardino, San Francisco,

San Jose

  • Eastern Michigan, Oakland (MI), Portland State (OR),

Wichita State (KS), Kennesaw State (GA), Texas at Arlington, Texas at San Antonio, Cincinnati (OH), Toledo (OH), Wisconsin-Milwaukee (WI)

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

CPP Participation

  • Initially in 2005, repeated in 2008 and 2011
  • 2011 Overall response rate 22%
  • Responses from 671 freshmen & 1,966 seniors
  • Response rates were 22% in 2005 and 28% in 2008

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Making Connections

  • Results for 2011 show
  • Small and mostly positive differences between CPP and
  • ther other institutions of our size and type
  • Small to moderate differences, roughly equal in positive

and negative, between CPP and institutions in our Carnegie classification

  • Small to moderate differences, more negative than positive,

between CPP and all institutions participating in NSSE 2011

  • The most valuable result is the six-year perspective on
  • ur own student engagement

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Level of Academic Challenge

(Core Value: Academic Quality)

  • Example items – Coursework emphasizes:
  • Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory
  • Number of written papers or reports 20 pages or more

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Level of Academic Challenge

  • Comparison over time and with all NSSE participants
  • First-Year
  • Senior

49.1 49.7 52.3 52.6 51.6 53.7

45 50 55 60 65 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11

CPP NSSE

56.3 56.6 58.4 56.5 55.5 57.4

45 50 55 60 65 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Level of Academic Challenge

(ULO: Integrative Thinker – problem solving)

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2005 2008 First Yr 2011 2005 2008 Senior 2011

Coursework emphasizes: Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory - Quite a bit/Very much

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Level of Academic Challenge

(ULO: Integrative Thinker – critical thinking)

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2005 2008 First Yr 2011 2005 2008 Senior 2011

Coursework emphasizes: Making judgments about the value of information, arguments, or methods - Quite a bit/Very much

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Level of Academic Challenge

(ULO: Practitioners - disciplinary learning)

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2005 2008 First Yr 2011 2005 2008 Senior 2011

Coursework emphasizes: Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences - Quite a bit/Very much

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Active and Collaborative Learning

(Core Value: Learn by Doing)

  • Example items:
  • Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class
  • Participated in a community-based project (e.g., service learning) as part
  • f a regular course

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Active and Collaborative Learning

  • Comparison over time and with all NSSE participants
  • First-Year
  • Senior

40.7 42.4 44.3 42.4 41.4 43.1

35 40 45 50 55 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11

CPP NSSE

51.6 52.2 53.3 51.5 50.0 51.3

45 50 55 60 65 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Active and Collaborative Learning

(ULO: Practitioners – interpersonal skills)

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2005 2008 First Yr 2011 2005 2008 Senior 2011

Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments - Often/Very often

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Active and Collaborative Learning

(ULO: Model Leaders – global citizenship)

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2005 2008 First Yr 2011 2005 2008 Senior 2011

Often/Very often - Participated in a community-based project (e.g. service learning) as part of a regular course Sometimes

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Student-Faculty Interaction

(Core Value: Teacher Scholars)

  • Example items:
  • Work on a research project with a faculty member outside of

course or program requirements

  • Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Student-Faculty Interaction

  • Comparison over time and with all NSSE participants
  • First-Year
  • Senior

29.6 30.0 31.1 34.0 33.5 34.5

25 30 35 40 45 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11

CPP NSSE

38.8 38.2 38.4 44.1 41.0 42

25 30 35 40 45 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Student-Faculty Interaction

(ACSP: Development of student scholars)

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2005 2008 First Yr 2011 2005 2008 Senior 2011

Plan to do - Work on a research project with a faculty member outside of course or program requirements Done

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Student-Faculty Interaction

(USP: Improve advising and mentoring)

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

20

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2005 2008 First Yr 2011 2005 2008 Senior 2011

Talked about career plans with a faculty member or advisor - Often/Very often

slide-21
SLIDE 21

MythBuster! Our students work more than those in other institutions True or False?

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

MythBuster! FALSE

  • In 2011, students report working for pay (on and off

campus) slightly less or about the same as at other institutions

  • On campus, 7% of first-year and 14% of seniors report

working 1 to 20 hours / week; at all NSSE institutions, those figures are 16% of first-year and 24% of seniors

  • Off campus, 2% of freshmen and 12% of seniors report

working 30+ hours / week; all NSSE 6% and 17%

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

But the level has changed over time

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2005 2008 First Yr 2011 2005 2008 Senior 2011

Working for pay off campus 30+ hrs/wk

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Enriching Educational Experiences

(Core Value: Learn by Doing)

  • Example items:
  • Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or

clinical assignment

  • Participating in co-curricular activities

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Enriching Educational Experiences

  • Comparison over time and with all NSSE participants
  • First-Year
  • Senior

24.4 25.4 26.3 27.8 26.7 27.8

15 20 25 30 35 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11

CPP NSSE

37.0 36.3 37.1 42.1 38.9 40.5

25 30 35 40 45 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Enriching Educational Experiences

(ULO: Practitioners - disciplinary learning)

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2005 2008 First Yr 2011 2005 2008 Senior 2011

Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience,

  • r clinical assignment - Plan to do

Done

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Enriching Educational Experiences

(ACSP: Increase community-based learning)

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2005 2008 First Yr 2011 2005 2008 Senior 2011

Plan to do - Community service or volunteer work Done

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Enriching Educational Experiences

(Core Value: Celebration of Diversity)

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2005 2008 First Yr 2011 2005 2008 Senior 2011

Had serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity than your own - Often/Very often

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Enriching Educational Experiences

(Core Value: Celebration of Diversity)

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2005 2008 First Yr 2011 2005 2008 Senior 2011

Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds - Quite a bit/Very much

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Enriching Educational Experiences

(ACSP: Innovative uses of technology)

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2005 2008 First Yr 2011 2005 2008 Senior 2011

Used an electronic medium (listserv, chat group, Internet, instant messaging, etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment - Often/Very often

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Supportive Campus Environment

(Vision: Learning-Centered University)

  • Example items:
  • Provided the support you need to help you succeed academically
  • Campus environment helps you cope with your non-academic

responsibilities (work, family, etc.)

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Supportive Campus Environment

  • Comparison over time and with all NSSE participants
  • First-Year
  • Senior

54.5 57.4 60.7 60.2 59.6 62.7

45 50 55 60 65 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11

CPP NSSE

54.0 56.3 58.5 57.5 56.6 59.1

45 50 55 60 65 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Supportive Campus Environment (USP: Facilitate students’ progress toward degree)

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2005 2008 First Yr 2011 2005 2008 Senior 2011

Providing the support you need to help you succeed academically - Quite a bit/Very much

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Supportive Campus Environment

(USP: Enhance programs and services that contribute to student success)

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2005 2008 First Yr 2011 2005 2008 Senior 2011

Providing the support you need to thrive socially - Quite a bit/Very much

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Supportive Campus Environment

(USP: Enhance programs and services that contribute to student success)

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2005 2008 First Yr 2011 2005 2008 Senior 2011

Helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) - Quite a bit/Very much

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Discussion

May 16, 2013 – President’s Cabinet

36