North and South: Integration Case Studies from the Community Health - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

north and south integration case studies from the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

North and South: Integration Case Studies from the Community Health - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

North and South: Integration Case Studies from the Community Health Sector Part 3 SPEAKERS Thursday, June 25 th , 2015 Jeanie Joaquin CEO, Scarborough Centre for Healthy Communities On Scarborough's Palliative Care Community Team Annette


slide-1
SLIDE 1

North and South: Integration Case Studies from the Community Health Sector Part 3

SPEAKERS – Thursday, June 25th, 2015

Jeanie Joaquin CEO, Scarborough Centre for Healthy Communities

On Scarborough's Palliative Care Community Team

Annette Katajamki, Executive Director, CMHA Sault Ste Marie

On Learning from the Algoma Anchor Agency Experience Presented by Community Health Ontario

slide-2
SLIDE 2

About Community Health Ontario

The strategic partnership of Community Health Ontario believes that the sustainability of Ontario’s health care system depends on our ability to keep Ontarians healthy and avoid the need for more costly care models. We envision strong community-based services that are integrated, coordinated, efficient and better able to partner, focus on the social determinants of health and are coordinated with the long-term care and acute care systems.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Integration Resources Website

An online repository of resources designed to help community health organizations survive and thrive in the world of integration pressures and opportunities.

www.integrationresources.ca

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Scarborough's Palliative Care Community Team

Jeanie Joaquin

CEO, Scarborough Centre for Healthy Communities

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Building a Collaborative Model of Care

Scarborough’s Palliative Community Care Team

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Overview of Scarborough

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Overview of Scarborough

  • Scarborough is 187 km2 with a public transportation system that was last

updated in 1985

  • Population is over 600,000 residents
  • Over half of the population of Scarborough was born outside of Canada

(58%)

  • 9% of Scarborough identify as First Nations, Metis, or Aboriginal (highest in

GTA)

  • In the 1980s, Scarborough had one of the highest median household

incomes ($64,129) of all the former cities. By 2006, Scarborough is home to 6 of the 13 Neighbourhood Investment Areas in Toronto.

  • NIAs have higher than average concentrations of low income earners and

higher than average populations of individuals who are considered at-risk, such as new immigrants, visible minorities and lone parent families

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Overview of Scarborough

  • Scarborough has a slightly higher percentage of youth than other parts of

Toronto, with youth unemployment in at an all-time high of 18.1%, with marginalized youth likely having even higher unemployment rates

  • Over 14% of Scarborough’s population are seniors aged 65 years and
  • ver. By 2016, seniors will account for 16% of the population: by 2021

they will account for 18%. 82% of seniors have one or more chronic progressive health conditions, 43% have three or more.

  • 43% of low-income people live in high rise units. Most of the buildings are

more than 40 years old, energy inefficient, plagued with pests, and many are reported to be in disrepair.

  • There are 28 Toronto Community Housing Corporation communities in

Scarborough.

  • Amongst the towers, along Highway 2 (Kingston Road), many of Toronto’s

most marginalized residents live in the motels

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Where we started

  • History of fragmented HPC services in

Scarborough  many gaps in community care

  • 90% of people say they want to die at

home

  • 75% actually die in institutions  even

higher for those over 65 years of age

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Partners of Scarborough PCCT

  • Scarborough Centre for Healthy Communities –

Lead

  • Central East CCAC
  • The Scarborough Hospital
  • Rouge Valley Health System
  • Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care
  • Yee Hong Centre for Geriatric Care
  • Carefirst Seniors and Community Services
  • East GTA Family Health Team
  • Providence Healthcare
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Background

  • March 2014 the Scarborough Hospice Palliative Care (HPC)

Integration Project was launched with goals to:

– Explore integration opportunities among the existing Scarborough HPC providers – Improve accessibility to quality palliative care ensuring the right patient is in the right bed at the right time – Develop an integrated and centrally coordinated HPC model – Establish service criteria based on appropriate service level intensity across the healthcare providers (hospital and community providers) – Increase the public and care providers awareness related to HPC – Ensure the opportunity for advanced End of Life Advanced Care Planning during the early disease trajectories is incorporated in the service model.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Method

  • SWOT analysis
  • Process review
  • Current state analysis of clinical and non-clinical

services

  • Experience based co-design approach
  • Two-day Value Stream Mapping (VSM)

– Development of framework  future state – Captured patient and caregiver experiences – Engaged care providers & volunteers – Captured stories

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Goal

A model of integrated palliative care services that is inclusive of the centralized navigation system within the community that links patients and care givers to HPC services within the continuum including the introduction of a System Navigator Role and a Palliative Provider Outreach Team.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Scarborough Integrated HPC Model

  • 6 baskets of services

across the continuum of care

  • Builds on existing services
  • System navigator as

connector

  • Wrap around care

– Client and family – From diagnosis to end of life – Provides variety & choice

Right care, right time, right place

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Where are we now

  • Building the team – recruiting and hiring the Navigators and

Medical Secretary

  • Focus on transitioning patients from hospital who wish to die at

home.

  • Soft launch started May 26th with one unit at one hospital – spread

planned after 4 week trial and evaluation to other units and hospital sites within Scarborough

  • Linking/coordinating with Health Links

– Piloting the Coordinated Care Plan and Consent

  • Cultivating physician support
  • Leveraging and building on discharge options algorithm
  • Continue to work closely with the Palliative Care Network at a local

and LHIN level

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Where are we going?

  • Respecting Scarborough residents and their caregivers wishes

to die at home, with dignity, support and respect

  • 24 x 7 support to clients and caregivers
  • Serving 200 patients by 2016
  • Piloting and implementing provincial process of Coordinated

Care Plan in collaboration with Scarborough Health Links

  • Being recognized by both patients and providers as a Palliative

Hub in Scarborough community

  • Providing holistic care approach (Bereavement, Respite,

Hospice and Palliative)

  • Following up patients as early as possible in their disease

trajectory in cooperation with chronic disease management

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Keys to Success

  • Support from Senior Leadership from all partners
  • Broad engagement
  • Availability of intensified PSW and nursing support right

after discharge from hospital by staff trained in hospice palliative care

  • Timely referral of palliative patients to PCCT
  • Building relationships and trust with hospital physicians

and Most Responsible Physician (Palliative Care MD)

  • Increase awareness on available palliative community

services for primary and secondary palliative patients

slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19

On Learning from the Algoma Anchor Agency Experience

Annette Katajamaki Executive Director, Canadian Mental Health Association, Sault Ste Marie

slide-20
SLIDE 20

The Integration of Mental Health & Addictions Services in Algoma

Annette Katajamaki, Executive Director

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Context of Integration in Algoma

Population Algoma – 115,000 Population Sault Ste. Marie – 75,000 Budget 2009/10 Community Mental Health - $8.8 million Addictions - $5.6 million Total - $14.4 million 40% goes to Sault Area Hospital Range of budgets $61,548 - $5,745.952 13 different organizations with over 100 programs/services

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Agora Group delivers “Together” report

  • Seven options are laid out in the report
  • Agora Report recommends Option #7 – the

creation of an Anchor Agency for the entire District of Algoma

  • This is not an option that was put forward at

any point during the study – it appeared in the document as the recommended option

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Why one agency?

No central point for:

– Service or system monitoring and evaluation – Accountability for the system – Planning – Additional resource acquisition – Consumer engagement – Sharing system information – Entry – Human resource recruitment and support – Negotiation and bridge-building with other sectors

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Agencies involved

NE LHIN Board passes resolution to integrate the funded mental health and addictions programs/services of the following (13) agencies:

  • Lady Dunn Health Centre
  • Algoma Family Services
  • Algoma Public Health
  • Anishnabie Naadmaagi Gamig Substance Abuse Treatment Centre
  • Breton House
  • Canadian Mental Health Association
  • Counselling Centre of East Algoma
  • Ken Brown Recovery Home
  • North Shore Community Support Services
  • Phoenix Rising
  • St. Joseph’s General Hospital
  • Sault Area Hospital
  • Women in Crisis
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Proposed Integration Budget Year 1/2

  • Facilitator and supports

$150,000

  • Legal and investigative auditing 50,000
  • Buy-out for management staff

300,000

  • Team building

50,000

  • Leasing adjustment costs

60,000

  • Salary equalization

100,000

  • Staff costs (ED, supports, sr. staff)

150,000

  • Sites location/commissioning

200,000

  • Other

150,000

  • Total

$1,210,000

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Integration Timeline

  • January 2009 – proposal submitted for study
  • March 2010 – Agora Group study completed
  • October 2010 – NELHIN Board resolution for

integration

  • November 2010 – Steering Committee established
  • April 2011 – Project Manager hired by NELHIN
  • September 2011 – Proposed time line circulated with

target date set for April 2012 for fiscal integration

  • October 2011 – revised time line circulated with fiscal

integration by December 2012

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Algoma Anchor Agency Timeline

  • October 2011 – Algoma Anchor Agency Board created
  • August 2012 – CEO starts
  • October 2012 – Environmental Scan completed
  • October 2012 – Consumer Needs Assessment completed
  • October 2012 – Mission, Values, Strategic Direction created
  • November 2012 – Backend Service Agreement completed

for all Finance, HR and IT with the NE CCAC

  • June 2013 – NELHIN calls meeting of senior leaders of all

agencies

  • July 2013 – AAA Board resigns
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Lessons Learned

  • Number of agencies
  • Aggressive timelines
  • Variety of organizations
  • Large geographic area
  • Communication and transparency
  • Realistic budget
  • Competing values/vision/beliefs
  • Cohesive approach to problem-solving
slide-29
SLIDE 29

The End or the Beginning?

Dissolution of the AAA Board = Shell shocked = Negative and Positive Outcomes

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Negative Consequences

  • Distrust
  • Strained Relationships
  • Anger
  • Pulling back into Organizations/Agencies
  • Confusion
  • Mixed Messages
  • A & MH planning table not meeting
  • Labour Organization
  • Clients unsure of service delivery continuance
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Positive Outcomes

  • Commonality of the shared experience
  • Development of new system planning tables and

working groups for planning and accountability

  • Development of a shared work plan
  • Stronger relationships among CEO/ED
  • Many agencies working more closely together
  • All funding requests vetted through system table

before consideration by LHIN

  • Realization that the status quo isn’t acceptable
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Integration Today

  • Agency to agency talks continue
  • Programs/services are looking to align
  • Collaboration on new programming/services in

response to service demands

  • Sharing of information increased
  • NELHIN still engaging in some “side deals”
  • Increased formalization of partnerships and

service agreements amongst all community stakeholders

slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Case Studies from the Community Health Sector

Q & A Session

Presented by Community Health Ontario

slide-35
SLIDE 35

www.integrationresources.ca/submit-a-resource

Presented by Community Health Ontario

slide-36
SLIDE 36

www.integrationresources.ca

Presented by Community Health Ontario