Nonequilibrium Markov processes conditioned on large deviations - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

nonequilibrium markov processes conditioned on large
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Nonequilibrium Markov processes conditioned on large deviations - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nonequilibrium Markov processes conditioned on large deviations Chetrite Raphael Laboratoire J.A. Dieudonne Nice FRANCE New Frontiers in Non-equilibrium Physics of Glassy Materials Kyoto, JAPAN August 2015 Work with Hugo Touchette


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Nonequilibrium Markov processes conditioned on large deviations

Chetrite Raphael

Laboratoire J.A. Dieudonne Nice FRANCE

New Frontiers in Non-equilibrium Physics of Glassy Materials Kyoto, JAPAN August 2015

  • Work with Hugo Touchette (Stellenbosch, South Africa)
  • PRL 2013 and Ann. Henri Poincar´

e 2014

  • New paper: arxiv:1506.05291

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 1 / 18

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Heuristic of Large Deviation

”Improbable events permit themselves the luxury of occurring.” C.Chan 1928

  • Random variable AT which converges typically toward a

Large Deviation

How improbable for AT to converge towards a which is different from the typical value a (rare events) : LDP: P (AT ≈ a) ≍ exp(−TI(a))

  • I(a): rate function (or fluctuation functional).
  • Large deviation theory: 1 Prove the LDP and 2 calculate the rate

function.

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 2 / 18

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Heuristic of Large Deviation

”Improbable events permit themselves the luxury of occurring.” C.Chan 1928

  • Random variable AT which converges typically toward a

Large Deviation

How improbable for AT to converge towards a which is different from the typical value a (rare events) : LDP: P (AT ≈ a) ≍ exp(−TI(a))

  • I(a): rate function (or fluctuation functional).
  • Large deviation theory: 1 Prove the LDP and 2 calculate the rate

function.

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 2 / 18

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Conditioning Problem

Physical

  • Nonequilibrium process: {Xt}T

t=0

  • Observable: AT[x]
  • Consider trajectories leading to the constraint AT = a
  • Construct effective Markov process for forget the constraint

Mathematical

  • Markov process: {Xt}T

t=0

  • Conditioned process: Xt|AT = a
  • ”Deconditionning” :

Xt | AT = a

  • conditioned

T→∞

∼ = Yt

  • Equivalent Markovian process

Exemple Jump Process : the mercantile view of the scientific life

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 3 / 18

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Conditioning Problem

Physical

  • Nonequilibrium process: {Xt}T

t=0

  • Observable: AT[x]
  • Consider trajectories leading to the constraint AT = a
  • Construct effective Markov process for forget the constraint

Mathematical

  • Markov process: {Xt}T

t=0

  • Conditioned process: Xt|AT = a
  • ”Deconditionning” :

Xt | AT = a

  • conditioned

T→∞

∼ = Yt

  • Equivalent Markovian process

Exemple Jump Process : the mercantile view of the scientific life

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 3 / 18

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Historial Work on ”Deconditionning”

In Probability : Doob 1957

  • {Wt | to go outside [0, L] via L} ≡

Yt

  • EQN: dYt

dt = 1 Yt + dWt dt

  • Brownian bridge : {Wt | WT = 0} ≡

Yt

  • EQN: dYt

dt =− Yt T−t + dWt dt

  • Quasi-stationary distributions (Deroch-Seneta 1967):

Xt

  • absorbing

| not reaching absorbing state ≡ Yt

  • non-absorbing

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 4 / 18

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Historial Work on ”Deconditionning”

In Probability : Doob 1957

  • {Wt | to go outside [0, L] via L} ≡

Yt

  • EQN: dYt

dt = 1 Yt + dWt dt

  • Brownian bridge : {Wt | WT = 0} ≡

Yt

  • EQN: dYt

dt =− Yt T−t + dWt dt

  • Quasi-stationary distributions (Deroch-Seneta 1967):

Xt

  • absorbing

| not reaching absorbing state ≡ Yt

  • non-absorbing

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 4 / 18

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Historial Work on ”Deconditionning”

In Probability : Doob 1957

  • {Wt | to go outside [0, L] via L} ≡

Yt

  • EQN: dYt

dt = 1 Yt + dWt dt

  • Brownian bridge : {Wt | WT = 0} ≡

Yt

  • EQN: dYt

dt =− Yt T−t + dWt dt

  • Quasi-stationary distributions (Deroch-Seneta 1967):

Xt

  • absorbing

| not reaching absorbing state ≡ Yt

  • non-absorbing

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 4 / 18

slide-9
SLIDE 9

But First : in Physics with Schr¨

  • dinger 1931

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 5 / 18

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 6 / 18

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 7 / 18

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 8 / 18

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 9 / 18

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 10 / 18

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Diffusion Process

  • SDE: (with additive noise here for

simplicity) dXt = F(Xt)dt + σdWt

  • One or many particles
  • Equilibrium or nonequilibrium
  • Includes external forces, reservoirs

t xHtL

  • Generator:

∂tEx[f (Xt)] = Ex[Lf (Xt)], ∂tp(x, t) = L†p(x, t) L = F · ∇ + D 2 ∇2, D = σσT

  • Path distribution: P[0,T][x]

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 11 / 18

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Diffusion Process

  • SDE: (with additive noise here for

simplicity) dXt = F(Xt)dt + σdWt

  • One or many particles
  • Equilibrium or nonequilibrium
  • Includes external forces, reservoirs

t xHtL

  • Generator:

∂tEx[f (Xt)] = Ex[Lf (Xt)], ∂tp(x, t) = L†p(x, t) L = F · ∇ + D 2 ∇2, D = σσT

  • Path distribution: P[0,T][x]

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 11 / 18

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Diffusion Process

  • SDE: (with additive noise here for

simplicity) dXt = F(Xt)dt + σdWt

  • One or many particles
  • Equilibrium or nonequilibrium
  • Includes external forces, reservoirs

t xHtL

  • Generator:

∂tEx[f (Xt)] = Ex[Lf (Xt)], ∂tp(x, t) = L†p(x, t) L = F · ∇ + D 2 ∇2, D = σσT

  • Path distribution: P[0,T][x]

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 11 / 18

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Observable - random variable

  • Path xt over [0, T]
  • General observable:

AT = 1 T T f (Xt) dt + 1 T T g(Xt) ◦ dXt

  • Large deviation principle (LDP):

P(AT = a) ≈ e−TI(a), T → ∞

t xHtL s P(AT = a) µ T = 10 T = 50 T = 100 I(a)

Examples

  • Occupation time, mean speed, empirical drift
  • Work, heat, probability current, entropy production
  • Jump process: current, activity

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 12 / 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Observable - random variable

  • Path xt over [0, T]
  • General observable:

AT = 1 T T f (Xt) dt + 1 T T g(Xt) ◦ dXt

  • Large deviation principle (LDP):

P(AT = a) ≈ e−TI(a), T → ∞

t xHtL s P(AT = a) µ T = 10 T = 50 T = 100 I(a)

Examples

  • Occupation time, mean speed, empirical drift
  • Work, heat, probability current, entropy production
  • Jump process: current, activity

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 12 / 18

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Observable - random variable

  • Path xt over [0, T]
  • General observable:

AT = 1 T T f (Xt) dt + 1 T T g(Xt) ◦ dXt

  • Large deviation principle (LDP):

P(AT = a) ≈ e−TI(a), T → ∞

t xHtL s P(AT = a) µ T = 10 T = 50 T = 100 I(a)

Examples

  • Occupation time, mean speed, empirical drift
  • Work, heat, probability current, entropy production
  • Jump process: current, activity

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 12 / 18

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Conditioned process

  • Path microcanonical ensemble :

Pmicro

a,[0,T] [x] ≡ P ([x] /AT = a) = P[0,T] [x] δ (AT [x] − a)

P (AT = a)

  • Intermediate : Path Canonical Ensemble

Pcano

k,[0,T] [x] ≡ P[0,T] [x] exp (kTAT)

EP (exp (kTAT))

  • Motivation in Physics for the Thermodynamics of Trajectories :
  • Conditioned view to Sheared Fluids (M.Evans).
  • Dynamical Phase transition for Kinetically constrained models

(V.Lecomte, F.Van Wijland,...).

  • Rare trajectories of Glassy phases (D.Chandler, J.P Garrahan...)

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 13 / 18

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Conditioned process

  • Path microcanonical ensemble :

Pmicro

a,[0,T] [x] ≡ P ([x] /AT = a) = P[0,T] [x] δ (AT [x] − a)

P (AT = a)

  • Intermediate : Path Canonical Ensemble

Pcano

k,[0,T] [x] ≡ P[0,T] [x] exp (kTAT)

EP (exp (kTAT))

  • Motivation in Physics for the Thermodynamics of Trajectories :
  • Conditioned view to Sheared Fluids (M.Evans).
  • Dynamical Phase transition for Kinetically constrained models

(V.Lecomte, F.Van Wijland,...).

  • Rare trajectories of Glassy phases (D.Chandler, J.P Garrahan...)

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 13 / 18

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Conditioned process

  • Path microcanonical ensemble :

Pmicro

a,[0,T] [x] ≡ P ([x] /AT = a) = P[0,T] [x] δ (AT [x] − a)

P (AT = a)

  • Intermediate : Path Canonical Ensemble

Pcano

k,[0,T] [x] ≡ P[0,T] [x] exp (kTAT)

EP (exp (kTAT))

  • Motivation in Physics for the Thermodynamics of Trajectories :
  • Conditioned view to Sheared Fluids (M.Evans).
  • Dynamical Phase transition for Kinetically constrained models

(V.Lecomte, F.Van Wijland,...).

  • Rare trajectories of Glassy phases (D.Chandler, J.P Garrahan...)

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 13 / 18

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Driven process

  • Tilted (Feynman-Kac) generator:

Lk = F · (∇ + kg) + D 2 (∇ + kg)2 + kf , k ∈ R

  • Dominant (Perron-Frobenius) eigenvalue: Λk
  • right Eigenfunction: rk(x) and left Eigenfunction: lk(x)

Generator

Lk = rk−1Lkrk − rk−1(Lkrk)

  • Generalized Doob transform
  • Driven SDE:

d ˆ Xt = Fk( ˆ Xt)dt + σdWt

  • Modified drift:

Fk = F + D(kg + ∇ ln rk)

  • Associated Path distribution Pdriven

k

[x]

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 14 / 18

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Driven process

  • Tilted (Feynman-Kac) generator:

Lk = F · (∇ + kg) + D 2 (∇ + kg)2 + kf , k ∈ R

  • Dominant (Perron-Frobenius) eigenvalue: Λk
  • right Eigenfunction: rk(x) and left Eigenfunction: lk(x)

Generator

Lk = rk−1Lkrk − rk−1(Lkrk)

  • Generalized Doob transform
  • Driven SDE:

d ˆ Xt = Fk( ˆ Xt)dt + σdWt

  • Modified drift:

Fk = F + D(kg + ∇ ln rk)

  • Associated Path distribution Pdriven

k

[x]

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 14 / 18

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Driven process

  • Tilted (Feynman-Kac) generator:

Lk = F · (∇ + kg) + D 2 (∇ + kg)2 + kf , k ∈ R

  • Dominant (Perron-Frobenius) eigenvalue: Λk
  • right Eigenfunction: rk(x) and left Eigenfunction: lk(x)

Generator

Lk = rk−1Lkrk − rk−1(Lkrk)

  • Generalized Doob transform
  • Driven SDE:

d ˆ Xt = Fk( ˆ Xt)dt + σdWt

  • Modified drift:

Fk = F + D(kg + ∇ ln rk)

  • Associated Path distribution Pdriven

k

[x]

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 14 / 18

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Main result

Hypotheses

  • AT satisfies LDP
  • Rate function I(a) convex
  • Other properties (spectral gap, regular rk)

Result : Equivalent Markovian process

Xt|AT = a

T→∞

∼ = Yt Pmicro

a,[0,T] [x]

≈ Pdriven

k(a) [x] si k(a) = I ′(a)

BT → b∗ ⇐ ⇒ BT → b∗ Pause 1

T

T

0 dtδ(Xt − .) → rk(a)lk(a)

1 T

T

0 dtδ(Xt − .) → rk(a)lk(a)

  • Same typical states but different fluctuations in general
  • Precursor Work : Jack-Sollich 2010 understood the path canonical

ensemble associated to Pure Jump process

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 15 / 18

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Main result

Hypotheses

  • AT satisfies LDP
  • Rate function I(a) convex
  • Other properties (spectral gap, regular rk)

Result : Equivalent Markovian process

Xt|AT = a

T→∞

∼ = Yt Pmicro

a,[0,T] [x]

≈ Pdriven

k(a) [x] si k(a) = I ′(a)

BT → b∗ ⇐ ⇒ BT → b∗ Pause 1

T

T

0 dtδ(Xt − .) → rk(a)lk(a)

1 T

T

0 dtδ(Xt − .) → rk(a)lk(a)

  • Same typical states but different fluctuations in general
  • Precursor Work : Jack-Sollich 2010 understood the path canonical

ensemble associated to Pure Jump process

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 15 / 18

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Main result

Hypotheses

  • AT satisfies LDP
  • Rate function I(a) convex
  • Other properties (spectral gap, regular rk)

Result : Equivalent Markovian process

Xt|AT = a

T→∞

∼ = Yt Pmicro

a,[0,T] [x]

≈ Pdriven

k(a) [x] si k(a) = I ′(a)

BT → b∗ ⇐ ⇒ BT → b∗ Pause 1

T

T

0 dtδ(Xt − .) → rk(a)lk(a)

1 T

T

0 dtδ(Xt − .) → rk(a)lk(a)

  • Same typical states but different fluctuations in general
  • Precursor Work : Jack-Sollich 2010 understood the path canonical

ensemble associated to Pure Jump process

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 15 / 18

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Simple applications

  • Modified drift: Fk = F + D(kg + ∇ ln rk)

Brownian motion

Wt|WT = aT → ˆ Xt = Wt + at

Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process

dXt = −γXtdt + σdWt

  • Empirical drift/area:

AT = 1 T T Xtdt → Fk(a)(x) = −γx + a γ

  • Empirical variance:

AT = 1 T T X 2

t dt

→ Fk(a)(x) = −σ2 2ax

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 16 / 18

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Simple applications

  • Modified drift: Fk = F + D(kg + ∇ ln rk)

Brownian motion

Wt|WT = aT → ˆ Xt = Wt + at

Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process

dXt = −γXtdt + σdWt

  • Empirical drift/area:

AT = 1 T T Xtdt → Fk(a)(x) = −γx + a γ

  • Empirical variance:

AT = 1 T T X 2

t dt

→ Fk(a)(x) = −σ2 2ax

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 16 / 18

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Simple applications

  • Modified drift: Fk = F + D(kg + ∇ ln rk)

Brownian motion

Wt|WT = aT → ˆ Xt = Wt + at

Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process

dXt = −γXtdt + σdWt

  • Empirical drift/area:

AT = 1 T T Xtdt → Fk(a)(x) = −γx + a γ

  • Empirical variance:

AT = 1 T T X 2

t dt

→ Fk(a)(x) = −σ2 2ax

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 16 / 18

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Simple applications

  • Modified drift: Fk = F + D(kg + ∇ ln rk)

Brownian motion

Wt|WT = aT → ˆ Xt = Wt + at

Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process

dXt = −γXtdt + σdWt

  • Empirical drift/area:

AT = 1 T T Xtdt → Fk(a)(x) = −γx + a γ

  • Empirical variance:

AT = 1 T T X 2

t dt

→ Fk(a)(x) = −σ2 2ax

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 16 / 18

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Conclusion

Xt | AT = a

  • conditioned

microcanonical

T→∞

∼ = Yt

  • Equivalent process
  • Process (ensemble) equivalence
  • Effective Markov dynamics for fluctuations
  • Optimal (asymptotic) change of measures
  • Also works for Markov chains, jump processes, mixed processes

Other links/applications

  • Variational principles : Rayleigh-Ritz,

Donsker-Varadhan, Nemoto-Sasa

  • Stochastic optimal control : Flemming-Sheu
  • Nonequilibrium maxent
  • Conditional limit theorems

   arxiv:1506.05291

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 17 / 18

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Conclusion

Xt | AT = a

  • conditioned

microcanonical

T→∞

∼ = Yt

  • Equivalent process
  • Process (ensemble) equivalence
  • Effective Markov dynamics for fluctuations
  • Optimal (asymptotic) change of measures
  • Also works for Markov chains, jump processes, mixed processes

Other links/applications

  • Variational principles : Rayleigh-Ritz,

Donsker-Varadhan, Nemoto-Sasa

  • Stochastic optimal control : Flemming-Sheu
  • Nonequilibrium maxent
  • Conditional limit theorems

   arxiv:1506.05291

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 17 / 18

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Practical interest ? Maybe

Physics is like ♥ : sure, it may give practical results, but that is not why we do it. Richard Feynman (1918 - 1988)

Chetrite Raphael (CNRS) Conditioned processes August 2015 18 / 18