Non-K ahler complex structures on R 4 Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

non k ahler complex structures on
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Non-K ahler complex structures on R 4 Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introduction Construction Further results Non-K ahler complex structures on R 4 Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Aoyama Gakuin University 2016.10.25 ahler complex structures on R 4 Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Introduction Construction Further results

Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas

Aoyama Gakuin University

2016.10.25

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction Construction Further results

1 Introduction

Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

2 Construction

The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

3 Further results

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction Construction Further results Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

K¨ ahler and non-K¨ ahler

Definition A complex mfd (M, J) is said to be K¨ ahler if there exists a symplectic form ω compatible with J, i.e.,

1 ω(u, Ju) > 0 for any u ̸= 0 ∈ TM, 2 ω(u, v) = ω(Ju, Jv) for any u, v ∈ TM.

Projective varieties, Calabi-Yau manifolds, and Stein manifolds are all K¨ ahler. Hopf manifolds, Calabi-Eckmann manifolds, and Kodaira-Thurston manifolds are non-K¨ ahler.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction Construction Further results Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

Compact complex surfaces

Compact complex surfaces are classified into seven classes: (I) CP 2 or ruled surfaces, (II) K3 surfaces, (III) complex tori, (IV) K¨ ahler elliptic surfaces, (V) alg surfaces of general type, (VI) non-K¨ ahler elliptic surfaces, (VII) surfaces with b1 = 1.

Theorem (Miyaoka, Siu) A compact complex surface is K¨ ahler iff its first Betti number b1 is even. (I) – (V) are K¨ ahler and (VI), (VII) are non-K¨ ahler.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction Construction Further results Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

Our problem

Problem Is there any non-K¨ ahler complex structure on R2n?

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction Construction Further results Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

Our problem

Problem Is there any non-K¨ ahler complex structure on R2n? If n = 1, the answer is clearly “No”.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Introduction Construction Further results Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

Our problem

Problem Is there any non-K¨ ahler complex structure on R2n? If n = 1, the answer is clearly “No”. If n ≥ 3,“Yes” (Calabi-Eckmann 1953).

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Introduction Construction Further results Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

Our problem

Problem Is there any non-K¨ ahler complex structure on R2n? If n = 1, the answer is clearly “No”. If n ≥ 3,“Yes” (Calabi-Eckmann 1953). If n = 2,“Yes” (Di Scala-K-Zuddas 2015).

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Introduction Construction Further results Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

Calabi-Eckmann’s construction

H1 : S2p+1 → CP p, H2 : S2q+1 → CP q : the Hopf fibrations. H1 × H2 : S2p+1 × S2q+1 → CP p × CP q is a T 2-bundle. The Calabi-Eckmann manifold Mp,q(τ) is a complex mfd diffeo to S2p+1 × S2q+1 s.t. H1 × H2 is a holomorphic torus bundle (τ is the modulus of a fiber torus). Ep,q(τ) := (S2p+1\ {p0}) × (S2q+1\ {q0}) ⊂ Mp,q(τ). If p > 0 and q > 0, then it contains holomorphic tori. So, it is diffeo to R2p+2q+2 and non-K¨ ahler.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Introduction Construction Further results Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

Calabi-Eckmann’s construction

H1 : S2p+1 → CP p, H2 : S2q+1 → CP q : the Hopf fibrations. H1 × H2 : S2p+1 × S2q+1 → CP p × CP q is a T 2-bundle. The Calabi-Eckmann manifold Mp,q(τ) is a complex mfd diffeo to S2p+1 × S2q+1 s.t. H1 × H2 is a holomorphic torus bundle (τ is the modulus of a fiber torus). Ep,q(τ) := (S2p+1\ {p0}) × (S2q+1\ {q0}) ⊂ Mp,q(τ). If p > 0 and q > 0, then it contains holomorphic tori. So, it is diffeo to R2p+2q+2 and non-K¨ ahler.

This doesn’t work if p = 0 or q = 0.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Introduction Construction Further results Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

Non-K¨ ahlerness and holomorphic curves

Lemma (1) If a complex manifold (R2n, J) contains a compact holomorphic curve C, then it is non-K¨ ahler. Proof.

Suppose it is K¨

  • ahler. Then, there is a symp form ω compatible

with J. Then, ∫

C ω > 0. Hence, C represents a nontrivial 2nd

  • homology. This is a contradiction.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Introduction Construction Further results Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

Main Theorem

Let P = { 0 < ρ1 < 1, 1 < ρ2 < ρ−1

1

} ⊂ R2.

Theorem (D-K-Z, to appear in Geom.Topol.)

For any (ρ1, ρ2) ∈ P, there are a complex manifold E(ρ1, ρ2) diffeomorphic to R4 and a surjective holomorphic map f : E(ρ1, ρ2) → CP 1 such that the only singular fiber f −1(0) is an immersed holomorphic sphere with one node, and the

  • ther fibers are either holomorphic tori or annuli. Moreover,

E(ρ1, ρ2) and E(ρ′

1, ρ′ 2) are distinct if (ρ1, ρ2) ̸= (ρ′ 1, ρ′ 2).

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration

fMF : S4 → CP 1 is a genus-1 achiral Lefschetz fibration

with only two singularities of opposite signs. F1: the fiber with the positive singularity ( (z1, z2) → z1z2 ) F2: the fiber with the negative singularity ( (z1, z2) → z1¯ z2 )

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration

fMF : S4 → CP 1 is a genus-1 achiral Lefschetz fibration

with only two singularities of opposite signs. F1: the fiber with the positive singularity ( (z1, z2) → z1z2 ) F2: the fiber with the negative singularity ( (z1, z2) → z1¯ z2 )

S4 = N1 ∪ N2, where Nj is a tubular nbd of Fj,

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration

fMF : S4 → CP 1 is a genus-1 achiral Lefschetz fibration

with only two singularities of opposite signs. F1: the fiber with the positive singularity ( (z1, z2) → z1z2 ) F2: the fiber with the negative singularity ( (z1, z2) → z1¯ z2 )

S4 = N1 ∪ N2, where Nj is a tubular nbd of Fj, N1 ∪ (N2\X) ∼ = R4 (X is a nbd of − sing),

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration

fMF : S4 → CP 1 is a genus-1 achiral Lefschetz fibration

with only two singularities of opposite signs. F1: the fiber with the positive singularity ( (z1, z2) → z1z2 ) F2: the fiber with the negative singularity ( (z1, z2) → z1¯ z2 )

S4 = N1 ∪ N2, where Nj is a tubular nbd of Fj, N1 ∪ (N2\X) ∼ = R4 (X is a nbd of − sing), Topologically, E(ρ1, ρ2) is N1 ∪ (N2\X) and f is the restriction of fMF.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration 2

Originally, it is constructed by taking the composition of the Hopf fibration H : S3 → CP 1 and its suspension ΣH : S4 → S3. fMF = H ◦ ΣH.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration 2

Originally, it is constructed by taking the composition of the Hopf fibration H : S3 → CP 1 and its suspension ΣH : S4 → S3. fMF = H ◦ ΣH. The two pinched points correspond to the two singularities (in the next page).

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration 2

Originally, it is constructed by taking the composition of the Hopf fibration H : S3 → CP 1 and its suspension ΣH : S4 → S3. fMF = H ◦ ΣH. The two pinched points correspond to the two singularities (in the next page). How to glue ∂N2 to ∂N1 is as the pictures in the page after next.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration 3

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

Gluing N1 and N2

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

Kirby diagrams

Figure: The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration on S4.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

Kirby diagrams 2

Figure: The map f on S4\X ∼ = R4.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

Key Lemma

Let A denote an annulus.

Lemma (2)

Let us glue A × D2 to N1 so that for each t ∈ ∂D2 = S1, the annulus A × {t} embeds in the fiber torus f −1(t) as a thickened meridian, and that it rotates in the longitude direction once as t ∈ S1 rotates once. Then, the resultant manifold is diffeomorphic to R4.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

Key Lemma

Let A denote an annulus.

Lemma (2)

Let us glue A × D2 to N1 so that for each t ∈ ∂D2 = S1, the annulus A × {t} embeds in the fiber torus f −1(t) as a thickened meridian, and that it rotates in the longitude direction once as t ∈ S1 rotates once. Then, the resultant manifold is diffeomorphic to R4. This topological lemma gives us the“blueprint”.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

Key Lemma

Let A denote an annulus.

Lemma (2)

Let us glue A × D2 to N1 so that for each t ∈ ∂D2 = S1, the annulus A × {t} embeds in the fiber torus f −1(t) as a thickened meridian, and that it rotates in the longitude direction once as t ∈ S1 rotates once. Then, the resultant manifold is diffeomorphic to R4. This topological lemma gives us the“blueprint”. We will realize this gluing by complex manifolds!

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

Holomorphic models

∆(r) := {|z| < r} ⊂ C, ∆(r1, r2) := {r1 < |z| < r2} ⊂ C. N1 ⇝ W: Kodaira’s holomorphic model, N2\X ⇝ ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1

0 ).

The elliptic fibration π : C∗ × ∆(0, ρ1)/Z → ∆(0, ρ1), where n · (z, w) = (zwn, w), extends to a singular elliptic fibration f1 : W → ∆(ρ1), whose singular fiber is type I1.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

Gluing domains in the two pieces

The gluing domain in the product part is V2 := ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1

1 , ρ−1 0 ) ⊂ ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1 0 ).

The gluing domain V1 ⊂ W is defined as follows. Put ϕ(w) = exp ( 1

4πi(log w)2 − 1 2 log w

) . V1 := {[zϕ(w), w] | z ∈ ∆(1, ρ2), w ∈ ∆(ρ0, ρ1)} . Then, V1 ∼ = ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ0, ρ1).

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

Gluing domains in the two pieces

The gluing domain in the product part is V2 := ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1

1 , ρ−1 0 ) ⊂ ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1 0 ).

The gluing domain V1 ⊂ W is defined as follows. Put ϕ(w) = exp ( 1

4πi(log w)2 − 1 2 log w

) . ϕ(rei(θ+2π)) = reiθϕ(reiθ) = wϕ(w). V1 := {[zϕ(w), w] | z ∈ ∆(1, ρ2), w ∈ ∆(ρ0, ρ1)} . Then, V1 ∼ = ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ0, ρ1).

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

Gluing domains in the two pieces 2

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

Gluing the two pieces

By the biholomorphism between the gluing domains Φ : V2 → V1; (z, w−1) → [(zϕ(w), w)], we obtain a complex manifold E(ρ1, ρ2) := ( ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1

0 )

) ∪Φ W.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

Gluing the two pieces

By the biholomorphism between the gluing domains Φ : V2 → V1; (z, w−1) → [(zϕ(w), w)], we obtain a complex manifold E(ρ1, ρ2) := ( ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1

0 )

) ∪Φ W. ∆(ρ1) and ∆(ρ−1

0 ) are glued to become CP 1.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models and analytic gluing

Gluing the two pieces

By the biholomorphism between the gluing domains Φ : V2 → V1; (z, w−1) → [(zϕ(w), w)], we obtain a complex manifold E(ρ1, ρ2) := ( ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1

0 )

) ∪Φ W. ∆(ρ1) and ∆(ρ−1

0 ) are glued to become CP 1.

f is defined to be f1 : W → ∆(ρ1) on W, and the 2nd projection on ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1

0 ).

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Introduction Construction Further results

Classification of holomorphic curves

Lemma (3) Any compact holomorphic curve in E(ρ1, ρ2) is a compact fiber of the map f : E(ρ1, ρ2) → CP 1. Proof.

Let i : C → E(ρ1, ρ2) be a compact holomorphic curve. The composition f ◦ i : C → CP 1 is a holomorphic map between compact Riemann surfaces. It is either a brached covering or a constant map. Since E(ρ1, ρ2) is contractible, f ◦ i is homotopic to a constant map. So, it is a constant map.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Introduction Construction Further results

Properties of E(ρ1, ρ2)

If E(ρ1, ρ2) ∼ = E(ρ′

1, ρ′ 2), then (ρ1, ρ2) = (ρ′ 1, ρ′ 2).

Proof.

Let Ψ: E(ρ1, ρ2) → E(ρ′

1, ρ′ 2) be a biholomorphism.

Since Ψ sends a compact curve to a compact curve, it is a fiberwise biholomorphism on W. Looking at the moduli of elliptic fibers, the base map ∆(ρ1) → ∆(ρ′

1) must be an

  • identity. We obtain ρ1 = ρ′

1.

By analyticity, it is fiberwise also on the whole E(ρ1, ρ2). Since ∆(1, ρ2) ∼ = ∆(1, ρ′

2), we have ρ2 = ρ′ 2.

In particular, there are uncountable non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Introduction Construction Further results

Properties of E(ρ1, ρ2) 2

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Introduction Construction Further results

Properties of E(ρ1, ρ2) 2

Any meromorphic function is the pullback of that on CP 1 by f.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Introduction Construction Further results

Properties of E(ρ1, ρ2) 2

Any meromorphic function is the pullback of that on CP 1 by f. f ∗ : Pic(CP 1) → Pic(E(ρ1, ρ2)) is injective.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Introduction Construction Further results

Properties of E(ρ1, ρ2) 2

Any meromorphic function is the pullback of that on CP 1 by f. f ∗ : Pic(CP 1) → Pic(E(ρ1, ρ2)) is injective. E(ρ1, ρ2) × Cn−2 give uncountably many non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R2n (n ≥ 3).

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Introduction Construction Further results

Properties of E(ρ1, ρ2) 2

Any meromorphic function is the pullback of that on CP 1 by f. f ∗ : Pic(CP 1) → Pic(E(ρ1, ρ2)) is injective. E(ρ1, ρ2) × Cn−2 give uncountably many non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R2n (n ≥ 3). It cannot be holomorphically embedded in any compact complex surface.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Introduction Construction Further results

Noncompact non-K¨ ahler complex surfaces

Theorem Any connected open oriented 4-manifold admits uncountable non-K¨ ahler complex structures. It is the consequence of a simple application of our complex R4 and Phillips’ theorem. Theorem (Phillips) Let M be an open manifold. Then, the map d: Sub(M, V ) → Epi(TM, TV ); f → d f is a weak homotopy equivalence.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Introduction Construction Further results

Thank you for your attention!

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4