Non-K ahler complex structures on R 4 Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

non k ahler complex structures on
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Non-K ahler complex structures on R 4 Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introduction Construction Further results Non-K ahler complex structures on R 4 Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Aoyama Gakuin University 2016.3.8 ahler complex structures on R 4 Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Introduction Construction Further results

Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas

Aoyama Gakuin University

2016.3.8

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction Construction Further results

1 Introduction

Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

2 Construction

The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

3 Further results

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction Construction Further results Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

Our problem

A complex mfd (M, J) is said to be K¨ ahler if there exists a symplectic form ω compatible with J, i.e.,

(1) ω(u, Ju) > 0 for any u ̸= 0 ∈ TM, (2) ω(u, v) = ω(Ju, Jv) for any u, v ∈ TM.

Problem Is there any non-K¨ ahler complex structure on R2n?

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction Construction Further results Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

Our problem

A complex mfd (M, J) is said to be K¨ ahler if there exists a symplectic form ω compatible with J, i.e.,

(1) ω(u, Ju) > 0 for any u ̸= 0 ∈ TM, (2) ω(u, v) = ω(Ju, Jv) for any u, v ∈ TM.

Problem Is there any non-K¨ ahler complex structure on R2n? If n = 1, the answer is “No”.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction Construction Further results Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

Our problem

A complex mfd (M, J) is said to be K¨ ahler if there exists a symplectic form ω compatible with J, i.e.,

(1) ω(u, Ju) > 0 for any u ̸= 0 ∈ TM, (2) ω(u, v) = ω(Ju, Jv) for any u, v ∈ TM.

Problem Is there any non-K¨ ahler complex structure on R2n? If n = 1, the answer is “No”. If n ≥ 3,“Yes” (Calabi-Eckmann).

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction Construction Further results Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

Our problem

A complex mfd (M, J) is said to be K¨ ahler if there exists a symplectic form ω compatible with J, i.e.,

(1) ω(u, Ju) > 0 for any u ̸= 0 ∈ TM, (2) ω(u, v) = ω(Ju, Jv) for any u, v ∈ TM.

Problem Is there any non-K¨ ahler complex structure on R2n? If n = 1, the answer is “No”. If n ≥ 3,“Yes” (Calabi-Eckmann). Then, what about if n = 2?

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Introduction Construction Further results Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

Calabi-Eckmann’s construction

H1 : S2p+1 → CP p, H2 : S2q+1 → CP q : the Hopf fibrations. H1 × H2 : S2p+1 × S2q+1 → CP p × CP q is a T 2-bundle. The Calabi-Eckmann manifold Mp,q(τ) is a complex mfd diffeo to S2p+1 × S2q+1 s.t. H1 × H2 is a holomorphic torus bundle (τ is the modulus of a fiber torus). Ep,q(τ): the top dim cell of the natural cell decomposition. If p > 0 and q > 0, then it contains holomorphic tori. So, it is diffeo to R2p+2q+2 and non-K¨ ahler.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Introduction Construction Further results Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

Calabi-Eckmann’s construction

H1 : S2p+1 → CP p, H2 : S2q+1 → CP q : the Hopf fibrations. H1 × H2 : S2p+1 × S2q+1 → CP p × CP q is a T 2-bundle. The Calabi-Eckmann manifold Mp,q(τ) is a complex mfd diffeo to S2p+1 × S2q+1 s.t. H1 × H2 is a holomorphic torus bundle (τ is the modulus of a fiber torus). Ep,q(τ): the top dim cell of the natural cell decomposition. If p > 0 and q > 0, then it contains holomorphic tori. So, it is diffeo to R2p+2q+2 and non-K¨ ahler.

This argument doesn’t work if p = 0 or q = 0.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Introduction Construction Further results Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

Non-K¨ ahlerness and holomorphic curves

Lemma (1) If a complex manifold (R2n, J) contains a compact holomorphic curve C, then it is non-K¨ ahler. Proof.

Suppose it is K¨

  • ahler. Then, there is a symp form ω compatible

with J. Then, ∫

C ω > 0. On the other hand, ω is exact. By

Stokes’ theorem, ∫

C ω =

C dα = 0. This is a contradiction.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Introduction Construction Further results Problem and Motivation Main Theorem

Main Theorem

Let P = { 0 < ρ1 < 1, 1 < ρ2 < ρ−1

1

} ⊂ R2. Theorem For any (ρ1, ρ2) ∈ P, there are a complex manifold E(ρ1, ρ2) diffeomorphic to R4 and a surjective holomorphic map f : E(ρ1, ρ2) → CP 1 such that the only singular fiber f −1(0) is an immersed holomorphic sphere with one node, and the other fiber is either a holomorphic torus or annulus.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration

fMF : S4 → CP 1 is a genus-1 achiral Lefschetz fibration

with only two singularities of opposite signs. F1: the fiber with the positive singularity ( (z1, z2) → z1z2 ) F2: the fiber with the negative singularity ( (z1, z2) → z1¯ z2 )

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration

fMF : S4 → CP 1 is a genus-1 achiral Lefschetz fibration

with only two singularities of opposite signs. F1: the fiber with the positive singularity ( (z1, z2) → z1z2 ) F2: the fiber with the negative singularity ( (z1, z2) → z1¯ z2 )

S4 = N1 ∪ N2, where Nj is a tubular nbd of Fj,

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration

fMF : S4 → CP 1 is a genus-1 achiral Lefschetz fibration

with only two singularities of opposite signs. F1: the fiber with the positive singularity ( (z1, z2) → z1z2 ) F2: the fiber with the negative singularity ( (z1, z2) → z1¯ z2 )

S4 = N1 ∪ N2, where Nj is a tubular nbd of Fj, N1 ∪ (N2\X) ∼ = R4 (X is a nbd of − sing),

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration

fMF : S4 → CP 1 is a genus-1 achiral Lefschetz fibration

with only two singularities of opposite signs. F1: the fiber with the positive singularity ( (z1, z2) → z1z2 ) F2: the fiber with the negative singularity ( (z1, z2) → z1¯ z2 )

S4 = N1 ∪ N2, where Nj is a tubular nbd of Fj, N1 ∪ (N2\X) ∼ = R4 (X is a nbd of − sing), In the smooth sense, f is a restriction of fMF.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration 2

Originally, it is constructed by taking the composition of the Hopf fibration H : S3 → CP 1 and its suspension ΣH : S4 → S3. fMF = H ◦ ΣH.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration 2

Originally, it is constructed by taking the composition of the Hopf fibration H : S3 → CP 1 and its suspension ΣH : S4 → S3. fMF = H ◦ ΣH. How to glue ∂N2 to ∂N1 is as the following pictures (in the next page).

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

Gluing N1 and N2

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

Kirby diagrams

Figure: The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration on S4.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

Kirby diagrams 2

Figure: The map f on S4\X ∼ = R4.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

Key Lemma

Lemma (2) Let us glue A × D2 to N1 so that for each t ∈ ∂D2 = S1, the annulus A × {t} embeds in the fiber torus f −1(t) as a thickned meridian, and that it rotates in the longitude direction once as t ∈ S1 rotates once. Then, the interior of the resultant manifold is diffeomorphic to R4.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

Key Lemma

Lemma (2) Let us glue A × D2 to N1 so that for each t ∈ ∂D2 = S1, the annulus A × {t} embeds in the fiber torus f −1(t) as a thickned meridian, and that it rotates in the longitude direction once as t ∈ S1 rotates once. Then, the interior of the resultant manifold is diffeomorphic to R4. We will realize this gluing by complex manifolds!

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

Kodaira’s holomorphic model

∆(r) = {z ∈ C | |z| < r}, ∆(r1, r2) = {z ∈ C | r1 < |z| < r2}.

Consider an elliptic fibration π : C∗ × ∆(0, ρ1)/Z → ∆(0, ρ1), where the action is n · (z, w) = (zwn, w). It naturally extends to f1 : W → ∆(ρ1). W is a tubular neighborhood of a singular elliptic fiber of type I1. It is a holomorphic model of N1.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

Gluing domains in the two pieces

The model for N2\X is ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1

0 ).

The gluing domain is V2 := ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1

1 , ρ−1 0 ) ⊂ ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1 0 ).

Y := {(zϕ(w), w) ∈ C∗ × ∆(ρ0, ρ1) | z ∈ ∆(1, ρ2)} , where ϕ(w) = exp ( 1

4πi(log w)2 − 1 2 log w

) . Define the gluing domain V1 ⊂ W by V1 = Y/Z.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

Gluing domains in the two pieces

The model for N2\X is ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1

0 ).

The gluing domain is V2 := ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1

1 , ρ−1 0 ) ⊂ ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1 0 ).

Y := {(zϕ(w), w) ∈ C∗ × ∆(ρ0, ρ1) | z ∈ ∆(1, ρ2)} , where ϕ(w) = exp ( 1

4πi(log w)2 − 1 2 log w

) . ϕ(rei(θ+2π)) = reiθϕ(reiθ) = wϕ(w). Define the gluing domain V1 ⊂ W by V1 = Y/Z.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

Gluing domains in the two pieces 2

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

Gluing the two pieces

By the biholomorphism between the gluing domains Φ : V2 → V1; (z, w−1) → [(zφ(w), w)], we obtain a complex manifold E(ρ1, ρ2) = ( ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1

0 )

) ∪Φ W.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

Gluing the two pieces

By the biholomorphism between the gluing domains Φ : V2 → V1; (z, w−1) → [(zφ(w), w)], we obtain a complex manifold E(ρ1, ρ2) = ( ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1

0 )

) ∪Φ W. ∆(ρ1) and ∆(ρ−1

0 ) are glued to become CP 1.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Introduction Construction Further results The Matsumoto-Fukaya fibration Holomorphic models

Gluing the two pieces

By the biholomorphism between the gluing domains Φ : V2 → V1; (z, w−1) → [(zφ(w), w)], we obtain a complex manifold E(ρ1, ρ2) = ( ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1

0 )

) ∪Φ W. ∆(ρ1) and ∆(ρ−1

0 ) are glued to become CP 1.

f is defined to be f1 : W → ∆(ρ1) on W, and the second projection on ∆(1, ρ2) × ∆(ρ−1

0 ).

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Introduction Construction Further results

Classification of holomorphic curves

Lemma (3) Any compact holomorphic curve in E(ρ1, ρ2) is a compact fiber of the map f : E(ρ1, ρ2) → CP 1. Proof.

Let i : C → E(ρ1, ρ2) be a compact holomorphic curve. The composition f ◦ i : C → CP 1 is a holomorphic map between compact Riemann surfaces. It is either a brached covering or a constant map. Since it is homotopic to a constant map, it is a constant map.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Introduction Construction Further results

Properties of E(ρ1, ρ2)

Thanks to the existence of the fibration f and the previous lemma, we can show the following properties.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Introduction Construction Further results

Properties of E(ρ1, ρ2)

Thanks to the existence of the fibration f and the previous lemma, we can show the following properties.

E(ρ1, ρ2) ̸∼ = E(ρ′

1, ρ′ 2) if (ρ1, ρ2) ̸= (ρ′ 1, ρ′ 2).

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Introduction Construction Further results

Properties of E(ρ1, ρ2)

Thanks to the existence of the fibration f and the previous lemma, we can show the following properties.

E(ρ1, ρ2) ̸∼ = E(ρ′

1, ρ′ 2) if (ρ1, ρ2) ̸= (ρ′ 1, ρ′ 2).

E(ρ1, ρ2) × Cn−2 give uncountably many non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R2n (n ≥ 3).

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Introduction Construction Further results

Properties of E(ρ1, ρ2)

Thanks to the existence of the fibration f and the previous lemma, we can show the following properties.

E(ρ1, ρ2) ̸∼ = E(ρ′

1, ρ′ 2) if (ρ1, ρ2) ̸= (ρ′ 1, ρ′ 2).

E(ρ1, ρ2) × Cn−2 give uncountably many non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R2n (n ≥ 3). Any holomorphic function is constant.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Introduction Construction Further results

Properties of E(ρ1, ρ2)

Thanks to the existence of the fibration f and the previous lemma, we can show the following properties.

E(ρ1, ρ2) ̸∼ = E(ρ′

1, ρ′ 2) if (ρ1, ρ2) ̸= (ρ′ 1, ρ′ 2).

E(ρ1, ρ2) × Cn−2 give uncountably many non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R2n (n ≥ 3). Any holomorphic function is constant. Any meromorphic function is the pullback of that on CP 1 by f.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Introduction Construction Further results

Properties of E(ρ1, ρ2) 2

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Introduction Construction Further results

Properties of E(ρ1, ρ2) 2

f ∗ : Pic(CP 1) → Pic(E(ρ1, ρ2)) is injective.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Introduction Construction Further results

Properties of E(ρ1, ρ2) 2

f ∗ : Pic(CP 1) → Pic(E(ρ1, ρ2)) is injective. It cannot be holomorphically embedded in any compact complex surface.

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Introduction Construction Further results

Thank you for your attention!

Naohiko Kasuya j.w.w. Antonio J. Di Scala and Daniele Zuddas Non-K¨ ahler complex structures on R4