NON-DISCRIMINATION EXERCISE THIBAULT BOSCART HILLARY HASE AITANA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

non discrimination
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

NON-DISCRIMINATION EXERCISE THIBAULT BOSCART HILLARY HASE AITANA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NON-DISCRIMINATION EXERCISE THIBAULT BOSCART HILLARY HASE AITANA LVAREZ SIM THE MAJORIA CASE You are legal adviser to the Majorian Ministry of Finance. - Since Majoria joined the WTO in the spring of 2015, - many Majorian factories have


slide-1
SLIDE 1

NON-DISCRIMINATION EXERCISE

THIBAULT BOSCART HILLARY HASE AITANA ÁLVAREZ SIMÓ

slide-2
SLIDE 2

THE MAJORIA CASE

You are legal adviser to the Majorian Ministry of Finance.

  • Since Majoria joined the WTO in the spring of 2015,
  • many Majorian factories have established production in countries with lower production costs,
  • (...) factories have scaled down their production in Majoria.
  • Worker unions and politicians have increasingly called for adoption of domestic measures to prevent such

developments.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

MAIN TOPIC

NON DISCRIMINATION

MOST FAVOURED NATION (Article I ) NATIONAL TREATMENT (ARTICLE III) GATT, 1994

slide-4
SLIDE 4

QUESTION 1

LIKENESS (narrow) Article III (2), first sentence GATT 1994 DIRECTLY COMPETITIVE OR SUBSTITUTABLE (broad) Article III (2), second sentence GATT 1994

There are a some basic criteria for determining likeness, as acknowledged in Japan - Alcoholic beverages, 1996 and the Border tax adjustments report 1970.

  • Product’s end-uses
  • Consumers’ tastes and habits
  • Product’s properties
  • Nature
  • Quality: maybe if production cost is lower, the quality can

differ

  • PPM (process and production method) not relevant in

determination of likeness, see US - Malt Beverages 1992; US- Tuna (Mexico) 1991.

  • Substitutable (Korea- Alcoholic Beverages, 1999);

(Philippines - Distilled Spirits, 2012).

  • Directly competitive
  • Latent demand, potential competition

a) Would products with differences in production costs be considered “like products” or “directly competitive or substitutable product” under article III:2 of GATT?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

QUESTION 2

b) According to articles II and III of GATT, to what extent can Majoria impose border taxes on imports from countries with low production costs?

  • Article II = Tariff Concessions and applies to border measures Relationship ?
  • Article III = National Treatment and applies to internal measures

Article II:2 (a) of the GATT 1994 :

“Nothing in this Article shall prevent any contracting party from imposing at any time on the importation of any product : (a) a charge equivalent to an internal tax imposed consistently with the provisions of paragraph 2 of Article III in respect of the like domestic product (…)”.

  • Ad Note of Article III of the GATT 1994 about internal taxes
slide-6
SLIDE 6

QUESTION 2

  • National Treatment Test for internal taxation on “directly competitive or substitutable products”
  • 1. Internal tax or other internal charge
  • 2. Products directly competitive or substitutable
  • 3. Dissimilarly taxed
  • 4. Dissimilar taxation in order to afford protection to domestic production
slide-7
SLIDE 7

QUESTION 3

c) If Majoria imposes a border tax that is subsequently challenged by other countries before the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, what could be the consequences if Majoria loses the case? ➔ Recommendation ➔ Negotiations - compensation ➔ Authorisation for retaliation