NON-DISCRIMINATION EXERCISE THIBAULT BOSCART HILLARY HASE AITANA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
NON-DISCRIMINATION EXERCISE THIBAULT BOSCART HILLARY HASE AITANA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
NON-DISCRIMINATION EXERCISE THIBAULT BOSCART HILLARY HASE AITANA LVAREZ SIM THE MAJORIA CASE You are legal adviser to the Majorian Ministry of Finance. - Since Majoria joined the WTO in the spring of 2015, - many Majorian factories have
THE MAJORIA CASE
You are legal adviser to the Majorian Ministry of Finance.
- Since Majoria joined the WTO in the spring of 2015,
- many Majorian factories have established production in countries with lower production costs,
- (...) factories have scaled down their production in Majoria.
- Worker unions and politicians have increasingly called for adoption of domestic measures to prevent such
developments.
MAIN TOPIC
NON DISCRIMINATION
MOST FAVOURED NATION (Article I ) NATIONAL TREATMENT (ARTICLE III) GATT, 1994
QUESTION 1
LIKENESS (narrow) Article III (2), first sentence GATT 1994 DIRECTLY COMPETITIVE OR SUBSTITUTABLE (broad) Article III (2), second sentence GATT 1994
There are a some basic criteria for determining likeness, as acknowledged in Japan - Alcoholic beverages, 1996 and the Border tax adjustments report 1970.
- Product’s end-uses
- Consumers’ tastes and habits
- Product’s properties
- Nature
- Quality: maybe if production cost is lower, the quality can
differ
- PPM (process and production method) not relevant in
determination of likeness, see US - Malt Beverages 1992; US- Tuna (Mexico) 1991.
- Substitutable (Korea- Alcoholic Beverages, 1999);
(Philippines - Distilled Spirits, 2012).
- Directly competitive
- Latent demand, potential competition
a) Would products with differences in production costs be considered “like products” or “directly competitive or substitutable product” under article III:2 of GATT?
QUESTION 2
b) According to articles II and III of GATT, to what extent can Majoria impose border taxes on imports from countries with low production costs?
- Article II = Tariff Concessions and applies to border measures Relationship ?
- Article III = National Treatment and applies to internal measures
Article II:2 (a) of the GATT 1994 :
“Nothing in this Article shall prevent any contracting party from imposing at any time on the importation of any product : (a) a charge equivalent to an internal tax imposed consistently with the provisions of paragraph 2 of Article III in respect of the like domestic product (…)”.
- Ad Note of Article III of the GATT 1994 about internal taxes
QUESTION 2
- National Treatment Test for internal taxation on “directly competitive or substitutable products”
- 1. Internal tax or other internal charge
- 2. Products directly competitive or substitutable
- 3. Dissimilarly taxed
- 4. Dissimilar taxation in order to afford protection to domestic production
QUESTION 3
c) If Majoria imposes a border tax that is subsequently challenged by other countries before the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, what could be the consequences if Majoria loses the case? ➔ Recommendation ➔ Negotiations - compensation ➔ Authorisation for retaliation