non alcoholic steatohepatitis nash definition natural
play

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): Definition, natural history - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): Definition, natural history and current therapeutic interventions Frank Tacke University Hospital Aachen, Germany EMA Workshop on Liver Diseases London, Dec 3rd, 2018 Disclosures Frank Tacke Research


  1. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): Definition, natural history and current therapeutic interventions Frank Tacke University Hospital Aachen, Germany EMA Workshop on Liver Diseases London, Dec 3rd, 2018

  2. Disclosures Frank Tacke • Research support (materials, funding): Tobira/Allergan, Galapagos, Inventiva, BMS • Speaker/Consulting: Tobira/Allergan, Gilead, AbbVie, BMS, Falk, Boehringer, Galapagos, Intercept, Inventiva

  3. Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: The epidemiological challenge 20-30% NAFLD 3% NASH 0.2%-0.5% HCC Total (EU: ~116 M) (EU: ~10 M) (EU 200,000 – population 500,000) HEPAMAP. A roadmap for hepatology research in Europe: An overview for policy makers. EASL 2015 BMI (kg/m²) 1974 2014 mean BMI ♂ mean BMI ♂ 105 millions BMI>30 641 millions BMI>30 NCD Risk Factor Collaboration, Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19·2 million participants. Lancet. 2016; 387(10026):1377-96

  4. Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: The epidemiological challenge 20-30% NAFLD 3% NASH 0.2%-0.5% HCC Total (EU: ~116 M) (EU: ~10 M) (EU 200,000 – population 500,000) HEPAMAP. A roadmap for hepatology research in Europe: An overview for policy makers. EASL 2015 Projection for Germany 25.0 25.0 2016 2030 Millions Millions NASH 20.9 17.0 + 42% 20.0 20.0 NASH 18.4 15.9 15.0 15.0 NASH- Zirrhose NAFLD 10.0 10.0 x 2.5 5.0 1.6 5.0 1.2 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 Total F0 F1 F2 F3 F4 Total F0 F1 F2 F3 F4 Estes C, et al. J Hepatol. 2018; 69(4):896-904

  5. Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: The epidemiological challenge 20-30% NAFLD 3% NASH 0.2%-0.5% HCC Total (EU: ~116 M) (EU: ~10 M) (EU 200,000 – population 500,000) HEPAMAP. A roadmap for hepatology research in Europe: An overview for policy makers. EASL 2015 Projection for UK 18.0 18.0 2016 16.9 2030 Millions Millions 13.8 NASH 16.0 16.0 14.1 + 43% 12.1 NASH 14.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 NASH- 10.0 10.0 Zirrhose 8.0 8.0 NAFLD x 2 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 1.2 0.9 0.8 2.0 2.0 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 Total F0 F1 F2 F3 F4 Total F0 F1 F2 F3 F4 Estes C, et al. J Hepatol. 2018; 69(4):896-904

  6. Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: The clinical challenge • Old(er) age, high(er) body-mass index • Many comorbidities (diabetes, kidney, cardiovascular…) • Substantial proportion unaware of their liver condition • High(er) rate of malignancies

  7. Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: The clinical challenge https://broadly.vice.com

  8. Extrahepatic complications of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease Type 2 Diabetes Chronic Kidney Cardiovascular Disease Disease Colorectal NAFLD OSAS (Sleep Apnea) cancer PCOS (Polycystic Hypothyroidism Ovary Syndrome) Osteoporosis Byrne CD & Targher G, J Hepatol 2015; 62: S47–S64

  9. Management of fatty liver disease: EASL multidisciplinary Clinical Practice Guideline • Chairs – EASL: Giulio Marchesini – EASD: Michael Roden – EASO: Roberto Vettor Panel members • – EASL: Christopher P Day, Jean-François Dufour, Ali Canbay, Valerio Nobili, Vlad Ratziu, Herbert Tilg – EASD: Amalia Gastaldelli, Hannele Yki-Järvinen, Fritz Schick – EASO: Gema Frühbeck, Lisbeth Mathus-Vliegen • Reviewers – Elisabetta Bugianesi, Helena Cortez-Pinto, Stephen Harrison EASL–EASD–EASO CPG NAFLD. J Hepatol 2016; 64:1388–402

  10. Natural history of fatty liver disease: Definitions of NAFLD, NAFL and NASH NAFLD • Excessive hepatic fat accumulation with IR • Steatosis in >5% of hepatocytes* • Exclusion of secondary causes and AFLD † NAFL NASH HCC • Pure steatosis • Steatosis and mild lobular inflammation Early Fibrotic Cirrhotic ≥F 2 to ≥F 3 fibrosis F0/F1 fibrosis F4 fibrosis Definitive diagnosis of NASH requires a liver biopsy *According to histological analysis or proton density fat fraction or >5.6% by proton MRS or quantitative fat/water-selective MRI; † Daily alcohol consumption of ≥30 g for men and ≥20 g for women EASL–EASD–EASO CPG NAFLD. J Hepatol 2016; 64:1388–402

  11. Diagnosis and staging of fatty liver disease: Role of liver biopsy • Liver biopsy is essential for the diagnosis of NASH – Clinical, biochemical or imaging measures cannot distinguish NASH from steatosis • NAFL encompasses – Steatosis alone plus ONE of lobular or portal inflammation OR ballooning • NASH requires – Steatosis AND – Lobular or portal inflammation AND – Ballooning • NAS scoring indicates disease severity* *Should not be used for initial diagnosis Recommendations Grade of evidence Grade of recommendation NASH has to be diagnosed by a liver biopsy showing steatosis, A 1 hepatocyte ballooning and lobular inflammation EASL–EASD–EASO CPG NAFLD. J Hepatol 2016; 64:1388–402

  12. Diagnosis and staging of fatty liver disease: Role of liver biopsy NAFLD normal fibrosis NASH Courtesy of Dr. Thomas Ritz, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Aachen

  13. Natural history of fatty liver disease: Estimated progression rates NAFLD 12 − 40% NASH ~10% NASH-fibrosis (F3) NAFLD / NASH 30-50% NASH-cirrhosis NASH-fibrosis cirrhosis 0.25-3% HCC /year 0.3-2.6% /year 0.04-0.3% /year

  14. Fibrosis determines the prognosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease • Meta-analysis of 5 studies on fibrosis-related mortality • 1,495 NAFLD patients with 17,452 patient years of follow-up Mortality rate by fibrosis stage Mortality rate ratio by fibrosis stage All Cause Liver Related All Cause Liver Related Mortality rate per 1,000 PYF 42.30 50 50 (3.51-510.34) 45 45 Mortality rate ratio 40 40 35 35 30 30 16.69 25 25 (2.92-95.36) 20 20 9.57 15 15 (1.67-54.93) 1.41 6.40 10 3.48 (0.17-11.95) (4.11-9.95) 10 (2.51-4.83) 1.58 2.52 5 5 (1.19-2.11) (1.85-3.42) 0 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 PYF, patients years of follow-up Mortality rate ratio = actual mortality versus expected mortality Dulai PS, et al. Hepatology 2017; 65: 1557–1565.

  15. Fibrosis determines the prognosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease • 458 NAFLD patients (bridging fibrosis, F3, n=159; Child A5 cirrhosis, n=222; Child A6 cirrhosis, n=77); 4 tertiary centers, mean follow-up 5.5 years • Deaths: n=37, Liver Transplant: n=37, decompensation: n=88, Liver Cancer (HCC): n=41, Cardiovascular events: n=14, non-liver cancer: n=30 Vilar-Gomez E, et al. Gastroenterology . 2018; 155(2):443-457.

  16. Fibrosis determines the prognosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease • 458 NAFLD patients (bridging fibrosis, F3, n=159; Child A5 cirrhosis, n=222; Child A6 cirrhosis, n=77); 4 tertiary centers, mean follow-up 5.5 years • Deaths: n=37, Liver Transplant: n=37, decompensation: n=88, Liver Cancer (HCC): n=41, Cardiovascular events: n=14, non-liver cancer: n=30 Vilar-Gomez E, et al. Gastroenterology . 2018; 155(2):443-457.

  17. A potential algorithm for risk assessment in non- alcoholic fatty liver disease Hepatic steatosis on imaging ± elevated serum ALT levels Evaluate alcohol Confirm NAFLD Exclude alternate causes of ↑ALT levels consumption Low-risk profile Intermediate-risk profile High-risk profile  BMI < 29.9  BMI > 29.9  ALT level > AST level  Age < 40 yrs  Age > 40 yrs  Platelets < 150,000  Noninvasive fibrosis  No T2DM or  Multiple features of the estimation: metabolic syndrome metabolic syndrome  Noninvasive fibrosis features • FIB-4 > 2.67  Noninvasive fibrosis estimation: • APRI > 1.5 estimation: • FIB-4 1.30-2.67 • NFS > 0.675  FibroScan > 11 kPa • FIB-4 < 1.30 • APRI 0.5-1.5 • APRI < 0.5 • NFS -1.455-0.675  FibroScan 6-11 kPa • NFS < -1.455  FibroScan < 5 kPa Consider liver biopsy or Follow and reassess as Consider liver biopsy confirmatory testing for risk factors evolve cirrhosis (eg, MRE) Rinella ME, Sanyal AJ. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol . 2016; 13:196-205.

  18. A potential algorithm for risk assessment in non- alcoholic fatty liver disease Hepatic steatosis on imaging ± elevated serum ALT levels Evaluate alcohol Confirm NAFLD Exclude alternate causes of ↑ALT levels consumption EASL-Guideline 2016: Low-risk profile Intermediate-risk profile High-risk profile Recommendation for liver biopsy, if  BMI < 29.9  BMI > 29.9  ALT level > AST level NASH or fibrosis is suspected  Age < 40 yrs  Age > 40 yrs  Platelets < 150,000  Noninvasive fibrosis  No T2DM or  Multiple features of the estimation: metabolic syndrome metabolic syndrome  Noninvasive fibrosis features • FIB-4 > 2.67  Noninvasive fibrosis estimation: • APRI > 1.5 estimation: • FIB-4 1.30-2.67 • NFS > 0.675  FibroScan > 11 kPa • FIB-4 < 1.30 • APRI 0.5-1.5 • APRI < 0.5 • NFS -1.455-0.675  FibroScan 6-11 kPa • NFS < -1.455  FibroScan < 5 kPa Consider liver biopsy or Follow and reassess as Consider liver biopsy confirmatory testing for risk factors evolve cirrhosis (eg, MRE) Rinella ME, Sanyal AJ. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol . 2016; 13:196-205.

  19. Natural history of fatty liver disease: Estimated progression rates NAFLD / NASH NASH-fibrosis cirrhosis 0.25-3% HCC /year 0.3-2.6% /year 0.04-0.3% /year

  20. Natural history of fatty liver disease: Progression and Regression NAFLD / NASH NASH-fibrosis cirrhosis 0.25-3% HCC /year 0.3-2.6% /year 0.04-0.3% /year

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend