nash bargaining
play

Nash Bargaining Julio D avila 2009 Julio D avila Nash - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nash Bargaining Julio D avila 2009 Julio D avila Nash Bargaining a bargaining problem consider the following situation a seller asks for at least 100 euros Julio D avila Nash Bargaining a bargaining problem consider the


  1. agreements as equilibria if, for all i , 0 < u i ( a ), and for some i , u i ( a ∗ ) < u i ( a ) then for all j � = i , u j ( a ∗ ) ≤ u i ( a ∗ ) 0 < u j ( a ) u i ( a ) < 1 and hence n n � � u i ( a ∗ ) u i ( a ) ≤ i =1 i =1 Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  2. Nash bargaining problems ( U , u ) ∈ 2 R n × R n is a Nash bargaining problem iff U is nonempty, compact and convex, and there exists u ∈ U such that u < u Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  3. Nash bargaining problems ( U , u ) ∈ 2 R n × R n is a Nash bargaining problem iff U is nonempty, compact and convex, and there exists u ∈ U such that u < u let B be the set of all bargaining problems Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  4. bargaining solutions s ∈ ( R n ) B is a solution for Nash bargaining problems iff for all ( U , u ) ∈ B , s ( U , u ) ∈ U Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  5. desirable properties for bargaining solutions (INV) Invariance to coordinate-wise affine transformations a bargaining solution s ∈ ( R n ) B is invariant to coordinate-wise affine transformations iff for all ( U , u ) , ( U ′ , u ′ ) ∈ B such that Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  6. desirable properties for bargaining solutions (INV) Invariance to coordinate-wise affine transformations a bargaining solution s ∈ ( R n ) B is invariant to coordinate-wise affine transformations iff for all ( U , u ) , ( U ′ , u ′ ) ∈ B such that ++ and b ∈ R n such that 1 there exist a ∈ R n diag ( a ) u + b = u ′ Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  7. desirable properties for bargaining solutions (INV) Invariance to coordinate-wise affine transformations a bargaining solution s ∈ ( R n ) B is invariant to coordinate-wise affine transformations iff for all ( U , u ) , ( U ′ , u ′ ) ∈ B such that ++ and b ∈ R n such that 1 there exist a ∈ R n diag ( a ) u + b = u ′ 2 and u ∈ U iff diag ( a ) u + b ∈ U ′ Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  8. desirable properties for bargaining solutions (INV) Invariance to coordinate-wise affine transformations a bargaining solution s ∈ ( R n ) B is invariant to coordinate-wise affine transformations iff for all ( U , u ) , ( U ′ , u ′ ) ∈ B such that ++ and b ∈ R n such that 1 there exist a ∈ R n diag ( a ) u + b = u ′ 2 and u ∈ U iff diag ( a ) u + b ∈ U ′ it holds diag ( a ) s ( U , u ) + b = s ( U ′ , u ′ ) Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  9. desirable properties for bargaining solutions (SYM) Symmetry preservation a bargaining solution s ∈ ( R n ) B preserves symmetry iff for all ( U , u ) such that Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  10. desirable properties for bargaining solutions (SYM) Symmetry preservation a bargaining solution s ∈ ( R n ) B preserves symmetry iff for all ( U , u ) such that 1 for all i � = j , u i = u j and Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  11. desirable properties for bargaining solutions (SYM) Symmetry preservation a bargaining solution s ∈ ( R n ) B preserves symmetry iff for all ( U , u ) such that 1 for all i � = j , u i = u j and 2 for all ( u 1 , . . . , u n ) ∈ U and all bijective ρ ∈ { 1 , . . . , n } { 1 ,..., n } , ( u ρ (1) , . . . , u ρ ( n ) ) ∈ U Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  12. desirable properties for bargaining solutions (SYM) Symmetry preservation a bargaining solution s ∈ ( R n ) B preserves symmetry iff for all ( U , u ) such that 1 for all i � = j , u i = u j and 2 for all ( u 1 , . . . , u n ) ∈ U and all bijective ρ ∈ { 1 , . . . , n } { 1 ,..., n } , ( u ρ (1) , . . . , u ρ ( n ) ) ∈ U it holds, for all i � = j , s i ( U , u ) = s j ( U , u ) Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  13. desirable properties for bargaining solutions (EFF) Efficiency a bargaining solution s ∈ ( R n ) B is efficient iff for all ( U , u ) ∈ B and all u ∈ U such that Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  14. desirable properties for bargaining solutions (EFF) Efficiency a bargaining solution s ∈ ( R n ) B is efficient iff for all ( U , u ) ∈ B and all u ∈ U such that 1 u ≤ u , and Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  15. desirable properties for bargaining solutions (EFF) Efficiency a bargaining solution s ∈ ( R n ) B is efficient iff for all ( U , u ) ∈ B and all u ∈ U such that 1 u ≤ u , and 2 there exists u ′ ∈ U such that u < u ′ , Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  16. desirable properties for bargaining solutions (EFF) Efficiency a bargaining solution s ∈ ( R n ) B is efficient iff for all ( U , u ) ∈ B and all u ∈ U such that 1 u ≤ u , and 2 there exists u ′ ∈ U such that u < u ′ , it holds s ( U , u ) � = u Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  17. desirable properties for bargaining solutions (IND) Independence of irrelevant alternatives a bargaining solution s ∈ ( R n ) B is independent of irrelevant alternatives iff for all ( U , u ) , ( U ′ , u ′ ) ∈ B such that Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  18. desirable properties for bargaining solutions (IND) Independence of irrelevant alternatives a bargaining solution s ∈ ( R n ) B is independent of irrelevant alternatives iff for all ( U , u ) , ( U ′ , u ′ ) ∈ B such that 1 u = u ′ , Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  19. desirable properties for bargaining solutions (IND) Independence of irrelevant alternatives a bargaining solution s ∈ ( R n ) B is independent of irrelevant alternatives iff for all ( U , u ) , ( U ′ , u ′ ) ∈ B such that 1 u = u ′ , 2 U ⊂ U ′ , and Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  20. desirable properties for bargaining solutions (IND) Independence of irrelevant alternatives a bargaining solution s ∈ ( R n ) B is independent of irrelevant alternatives iff for all ( U , u ) , ( U ′ , u ′ ) ∈ B such that 1 u = u ′ , 2 U ⊂ U ′ , and 3 s ( U ′ , u ′ ) ∈ U , Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  21. desirable properties for bargaining solutions (IND) Independence of irrelevant alternatives a bargaining solution s ∈ ( R n ) B is independent of irrelevant alternatives iff for all ( U , u ) , ( U ′ , u ′ ) ∈ B such that 1 u = u ′ , 2 U ⊂ U ′ , and 3 s ( U ′ , u ′ ) ∈ U , it holds s ( U , u ) = s ( U ′ , u ′ ) Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  22. Nash theorem If s ∈ ( R n ) B is Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  23. Nash theorem If s ∈ ( R n ) B is 1 invariant to point-wise affine transformations Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  24. Nash theorem If s ∈ ( R n ) B is 1 invariant to point-wise affine transformations 2 symmetry-preserving Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  25. Nash theorem If s ∈ ( R n ) B is 1 invariant to point-wise affine transformations 2 symmetry-preserving 3 efficient Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  26. Nash theorem If s ∈ ( R n ) B is 1 invariant to point-wise affine transformations 2 symmetry-preserving 3 efficient 4 independent of irrelevant strategies Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  27. Nash theorem If s ∈ ( R n ) B is 1 invariant to point-wise affine transformations 2 symmetry-preserving 3 efficient 4 independent of irrelevant strategies then, for all ( U , u ) ∈ B , n � s ( U , u ) = arg max ( u i − u i ) u ≤ u ∈ U i =1 Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  28. Nash theorem s is well defined: Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  29. Nash theorem s is well defined: since U is non-empty, compact and convex, Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  30. Nash theorem s is well defined: since U is non-empty, compact and convex, then there exists a unique u ∗ satisfying n u ∗ = arg max � ( u i − u i ) u ≤ u ∈ U i =1 Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  31. Nash theorem s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: INV: Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  32. Nash theorem s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: INV: 1 let ( U , u ) , ( U ′ , u ′ ) be such that, for some a ≫ 0 and b , diag ( a ) u + b = u ′ and u ∈ U iff diag ( a ) u + b ∈ U ′ Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  33. Nash theorem s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: INV: 1 let ( U , u ) , ( U ′ , u ′ ) be such that, for some a ≫ 0 and b , diag ( a ) u + b = u ′ and u ∈ U iff diag ( a ) u + b ∈ U ′ 2 let n u ∗ = arg max � ( u i − u i ) u ≤ u ∈ U i =1 Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  34. Nash theorem s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: INV: 1 let ( U , u ) , ( U ′ , u ′ ) be such that, for some a ≫ 0 and b , diag ( a ) u + b = u ′ and u ∈ U iff diag ( a ) u + b ∈ U ′ 2 let n u ∗ = arg max � ( u i − u i ) u ≤ u ∈ U i =1 then, for all u ∈ U such that u ≤ u , n n � � ( u ∗ ( u i − u i ) ≤ i − u i ) i =1 i =1 Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  35. Nash theorem s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: INV: 1 let ( U , u ) , ( U ′ , u ′ ) be such that, for some a ≫ 0 and b , diag ( a ) u + b = u ′ and u ∈ U iff diag ( a ) u + b ∈ U ′ 2 let n u ∗ = arg max � ( u i − u i ) u ≤ u ∈ U i =1 then, for all diag ( a ) u + b ∈ U ′ such that diag ( a ) u + b ≤ diag ( a ) u + b , n n � � ( a i u ∗ ( a i u i + b i − a i u i − b i ) ≤ i + b i − a i u i − b i ) i =1 i =1 Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  36. Nash theorem s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: INV: 1 let ( U , u ) , ( U ′ , u ′ ) be such that, for some a ≫ 0 and b , diag ( a ) u + b = u ′ and u ∈ U iff diag ( a ) u + b ∈ U ′ 2 let n u ∗ = arg max � ( u i − u i ) u ≤ u ∈ U i =1 then, for all u ′ ∈ U ′ such that u ′ ≤ u ′ , n n � � ( u ′ i − u ′ ( a i u ∗ i + b i − u ′ i ) ≤ i ) . i =1 i =1 Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  37. Nash theorem s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: INV: 1 let ( U , u ) , ( U ′ , u ′ ) be such that, for some a ≫ 0 and b , diag ( a ) u + b = u ′ and u ∈ U iff diag ( a ) u + b ∈ U ′ 2 let n u ∗ = arg max � ( u i − u i ) u ≤ u ∈ U i =1 then, n diag ( a ) u ∗ + b = arg � ( u i − u ′ max i ) u ′ ≤ u ∈ U ′ i =1 Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  38. Nash theorem s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: INV: 1 let ( U , u ) , ( U ′ , u ′ ) be such that, for some a ≫ 0 and b , diag ( a ) u + b = u ′ and u ∈ U iff diag ( a ) u + b ∈ U ′ 2 let n u ∗ = arg max � ( u i − u i ) u ≤ u ∈ U i =1 then, diag ( a ) s ( U , u ) + b = s ( U ′ , u ′ ) . Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  39. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  40. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: let s ∈ ( R n ) B satisfy INV, SYM, EFF, and IND and Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  41. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: let s ∈ ( R n ) B satisfy INV, SYM, EFF, and IND and let ( U , u ) ∈ B Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  42. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: let s ∈ ( R n ) B satisfy INV, SYM, EFF, and IND and let ( U , u ) ∈ B since (i) u ≤ u ∗ , (ii) there exists u ∈ U such that u < u , and (iii) n n � � ( u ∗ 0 < ( u i − u i ) ≤ i − u i ) i =1 i =1 Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  43. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: let s ∈ ( R n ) B satisfy INV, SYM, EFF, and IND and let ( U , u ) ∈ B since (i) u ≤ u ∗ , (ii) there exists u ∈ U such that u < u , and (iii) n n � � ( u ∗ 0 < ( u i − u i ) ≤ i − u i ) i =1 i =1 it follows that 0 < u ∗ − u Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  44. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: consider instead ( U ′ , u ′ ) such that diag ( a ) u + b = u ′ and u ∈ U iff diag ( a ) u + b ∈ U ′ Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  45. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: consider instead ( U ′ , u ′ ) such that diag ( a ) u + b = u ′ and u ∈ U iff diag ( a ) u + b ∈ U ′ where diag ( u ∗ − u ) � − 1 1 � a = + diag ( u ∗ − u ) � − 1 u � b = − Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  46. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: 1 by INV diag ( a ) s ( U , u ) + b = s ( U ′ , u ′ ) Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  47. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: 1 by INV diag ( a ) s ( U , u ) + b = s ( U ′ , u ′ ) 2 also n u ∗ = arg max � ( u i − u i ) u ≤ u ∈ U i =1 Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  48. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: 1 by INV diag ( a ) s ( U , u ) + b = s ( U ′ , u ′ ) 2 also, for all u ∈ U such that u ≤ u n n � � ( u ∗ ( u i − u i ) ≤ i − u i ) i =1 i =1 Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  49. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: 1 by INV diag ( a ) s ( U , u ) + b = s ( U ′ , u ′ ) 2 also, for all u ∈ U such that u ≤ u n n � � ( a i u ∗ ( a i u i + b i − a i u i − b i ) ≤ i + b i − a i u i − b i ) i =1 i =1 Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  50. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: 1 by INV diag ( a ) s ( U , u ) + b = s ( U ′ , u ′ ) 2 also, for all u ′ ∈ U ′ such that u ′ ≤ u ′ n n � ( u ′ i − u ′ � ( a i u ∗ i + b i − u ′ i ) ≤ i ) i =1 i =1 Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  51. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: 1 by INV diag ( a ) s ( U , u ) + b = s ( U ′ , u ′ ) 2 also n diag ( a ) u ∗ + b = arg � ( u i − u ′ max i ) u ′ ≤ u ∈ U ′ i =1 Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  52. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: 1 by INV diag ( a ) s ( U , u ) + b = s ( U ′ , u ′ ) 2 also n diag ( a ) u ∗ + b = arg � ( u i − u ′ max i ) u ′ ≤ u ∈ U ′ i =1 3 thus s ( U , u ) = u ∗ if, and only if, diag ( a ) u ∗ + b = s ( U ′ , u ′ ) Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  53. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: 1 by INV diag ( a ) s ( U , u ) + b = s ( U ′ , u ′ ) 2 also n diag ( a ) u ∗ + b = arg � ( u i − u ′ max i ) u ′ ≤ u ∈ U ′ i =1 3 thus s ( U , u ) = u ∗ if, and only if, 1 = s ( U ′ , 0) Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  54. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: in effect diag ( a ) u ∗ + b Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  55. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: in effect diag ( a ) u ∗ + b diag ( u ∗ − u ) � − 1 u ∗ − diag ( u ∗ − u ) � − 1 u � � = Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  56. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: in effect diag ( a ) u ∗ + b diag ( u ∗ − u ) � − 1 u ∗ − diag ( u ∗ − u ) � − 1 u � � = diag ( u ∗ − u ) � − 1 ( u ∗ − u ) � = Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  57. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: in effect diag ( a ) u ∗ + b diag ( u ∗ − u ) � − 1 u ∗ − diag ( u ∗ − u ) � − 1 u � � = diag ( u ∗ − u ) � − 1 ( u ∗ − u ) � = = 1 Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  58. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: in effect u ′ Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  59. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: in effect u ′ = diag ( a ) u + b Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  60. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: in effect u ′ = diag ( a ) u + b diag ( u ∗ − u ) � − 1 u − diag ( u ∗ − u ) � − 1 u � � = Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

  61. Nash theorem only s satisfies INV, SYM, EFF, and IND: in effect u ′ = diag ( a ) u + b diag ( u ∗ − u ) � − 1 u − diag ( u ∗ − u ) � − 1 u � � = = 0 Julio D´ avila Nash Bargaining

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend