No One Left Behind W eb co eb co nferen ference ce # # 2 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

no one left behind
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

No One Left Behind W eb co eb co nferen ference ce # # 2 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

No One Left Behind W eb co eb co nferen ference ce # # 2 2 U IA -U U R R B B A A C TJo int nt K no o w w led ledge ge A ctivity ct ty -C ities es en engaging ging in the e right t to ho us s ing ing


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Moderated by Laura Colini, UIA and URBACT expert

@ U IA _initiative@ U R B A C T # R ight2H 2H

  • us

in us ing

No One Left Behind

W eb eb co co nferen ference ce # 2 # 2 U IA

  • U

R B A U R B A C TJo int nt K no w

  • w

led ledge ge A ct ctivity ty -C ities es en engaging ging in the e right t to ho us ing s ing

slide-2
SLIDE 2

10.00-10.05 Welcome and introduction by Laura Colini 10.05-10:15 Key findings from FEANTSA & Fondation Abbé Pierre’s report on housing exclusion and homelessness 10:15-10:25 From managing homelessness to eradicating homelessness: lessons from Ghent (BE) 10:25-10:55 Discussion on tackling homelessness with Glasgow (UK), Odense (DK), and Lyon (Fr) - followed by Q&A session

A G A G E N D A N D A

10.55-11:05 Key findings from FEANTSA & Fondation Abbé Pierre’s report on housing exclusion of migrants 11:05-11:15 Empowering refugees and migrants to ignite housing affordability: lessons from Athens (EL) 11:15-11:50 Discussion on how to address housing exclusion of migrants with Thessaloniki (EL), Antwerp (BE), and Thomas Lacroix, CNRS - followed by Q&A session 11:50-12:00 Concluding remarks

@ U IA _initiative@ U R B A C T # R ight2H 2H

  • us

in us ing

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2020 HOUSING EXCLUSION REPORT

  • K

E Y Y F IN D IN G S D IN G S O N H O H O M E M E L E L E S S N E S S S S N E S S

Chloé Serme-Morin and Sarah Coupechoux, FEANTSA and Fondation Abbé Pierre @

U IA _initiative@ U R B A C T # R ight2H 2H

  • us

in us ing

slide-4
SLIDE 4

5th Overview of Housing Exclusion in Europe 2020

sneak preview

No one

  • one le

left ft be behi hind nd

URBA BACT/UIA IA web confer ferenc ence 26.06 06.20 .2020

Chloé

  • é SERME

ME- MO MORIN – FEANTSA Sarah ah COUPECHOUX ECHOUX – Fondation Abbé Pierre

slide-5
SLIDE 5

WHO AR ARE E WE? E?

Europe pean an Federatio ration of Na National al Orga ganisat nisations ions Working king wi with the Ho Homele less ss Over 130 member organisations from 30 countries Work towards ending homelessness in Europe Fondati ation

  • n Abbé Pierre

re French foundation fighting against housing exclusion and homelessness

slide-6
SLIDE 6

WHAT AT IS TH S THE AN E ANNUAL AL OVE VERVI VIEW EW OF HO F HOUSI SING EX EXCLUSI SION IN EU EU?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

1st DIALOGUE ON THE KEY FINDINGS OF THE REPORT RELATED TO HOMELESSNESS

Photo: Chloé Thôme – L’Ilot

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ES ESTI TIMAT ATES ES OF F TH THE NU E NUMBE BER O OF F HOMEL ELES ESS PE S PEOPL PLE I E IN EU EU

No No commo mon definiti ition

  • n of homelessne

lessness ss/method methodolog

  • logies

es & & la lack of stand ndardised rdised EU EU statistics atistics on

  • n homele

lessness ssness

FRANCE.

+50%

from 2001 to 2012 143,000 homeless people (1 night in 2012)

+211%

from 2014 to 2019 IRELAND. 10,148 homeless people in emergency accommodation (1 week in 2020)

+121%

from 2009 to 2018 THE NETHERLANDS. 39,300 homeless people (annual estimate)

+67%

from 2013 to 2018 4,029 homeless people registered by social services (annual estimate) SLOVENIA.

+29%

from 2009 to 2019 DENMARK.

6,431 homeless people (1 week in 2019)

  • 32%

from 2015 to 2019 FINLAND. 4,600 homeless people (1 night in 2019)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

ES ESTI TIMAT ATES ES OF F TH THE NU E NUMBE BER O OF F HOMEL ELES ESS PE S PEOPL PLE I E IN EU EU

+ 70% + 70%

in 10 in 10 yea ears

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

TH THE M E MAN ANY Y FA FACES ES O OF F HOMEL ELES ESSN SNES ESS I S IN EU EUROPE PE

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

TH THE I E IMPA PACT T OF TH F THE EU E EU H HEA EALTH THCAR ARE E CRISI SIS S ON HOMEL ELES ESSN SNES ESS

Housin ing is is a key determi erminant nant of healt lth and must st be be recogni

  • gnised

sed as such The impact of emergency measures on homelessness services The impact on reception systems for asylum seekers & refugees The The current rent & f futur ture e impact ct of the health crisis on people experi riencing ncing housing exclusi sion

  • n & dire poverty

rty

slide-14
SLIDE 14

P atricia.V anderbauw hede@ s tad.gent -@ U R B A C TR O O F

From MANAGING homelessness to ERADICATING homelessness

  • L

E S S O S O N S S F R O M G H E N T(B E ) Patricia Vanderbauwhede, Lead Partner URBACT ROOF Network

 P leas e us e the Q &A A fo r ques tio ns tio ns

@ U IA _initiative@ U R B A C T # R ight2H 2H

  • us

in us ing

slide-15
SLIDE 15

26 June 2020

From managing to eradicating homelessness

No One Left Behind URBACT-UIA webconference Patricia Vanderbauwhede - City of Ghent Project Leader URBACT APN ROOF

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • A. Europe and its cities joining forces against rising

homelessness

=> The Shift (UN) => The Pledge (European Pillar of Social Right Principle 19 – Eurocities)

  • => EU UA Partnerships

Poverty and Affordable Housing => Policy Lab 2018 together with FEANTSA on combatting homelessness

26 June 2020

URBACT and Ghent joining forces

No One Left Behind - ROOF and how Ghent tackles homelessness 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

KEY POINTS of ROOF – URBACT APN

Right to housing Eradicate homelessness through innovative housing solutions at city level. → Exchange knowledge on how to: 1) gather accurate data 2) make the shift from management to the actual ending of homelessness, with Housing First and Housing Led as guidance model

Braga Ghent (LP) Glasgow Liège Odense Poznan Timisoara Thessaloniki Toulouse Metropole

OUTPUT: Produce integrated local action plans linked to the long term strategic goal of Functional Zero (no structural homelessness)

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • B. Tackling homelessness locally through housing

solutions

CHALLENGES FOR GHENT

> Inaccessible and unaffordable housing stock > Growing diversity among homeless people > ‘Societalisation’ of residential social services

(e.g. psychiatry)

> Migration (different legal status and rights)

26 June 2020 No One Left Behind - ROOF and how Ghent tackles homelessness 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

From managing homelessness (past policy)…

.

PREVENTION

SHELTER TEMPORARY HOUSING

SUSTAINABLE PERMANENT HOUSING

PREVENTION

SHELTER TEMPORARY HOUSING

SUSTAINABLE PERMANENT HOUSING

... to ending homelessness (new policy) …

No One Left Behind- ROOF and how Ghent tackles homelessness 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

... through structural housing solutions

22 No One Left Behind- ROOF and how Ghent tackles homelessness

k

SOCIAL SUPPORT

AND

WELLBEING

HOUSING

slide-23
SLIDE 23

No One Left Behind - ROOF and how Ghent tackles homelessness 23

  • HOUSING FOR

THE HOMELESS

  • 1. Provide prevention

> Make an integrated Poverty Reduction

Plan

> Provide rental arrears mediation > Support people at key life moments that

are predictive to homelessness

26 June 2020

slide-24
SLIDE 24

No One Left Behind - ROOF and how Ghent tackles homelessness 24

  • HOUSING FOR

THE HOMELESS

  • 2. Provide more affordable housing

stock

> Make an integrated master plan for social

and affordable housing

> Gather funds: 92 million euro for 6 years

(use advocacy, covid, HF…)

> Focus on structural solutions

– expanding rental housing stock for

lowest income and families with children – improving quality e.g. renovating of bad-quality housing from poor owners with recurring funds (UIA)

26 June 2020

slide-25
SLIDE 25

No One Left Behind - ROOF and how Ghent tackles homelessness 25

  • HOUSING FOR

THE HOMELESS

  • 3. Provide more housing (first/led) for

vulnerable groups

> Focus on sufficient stock for different

groups

– Providing 59 Housing First units/year for homeless people Social housing companies – Doubling 266 to 532 social rental units for vulnerable groups – Building 11 Robust units for the most complexe group (Skaeve Huse) > Gather accurate data using ETHOS Light

(ROOF)

26 June 2020

slide-26
SLIDE 26

No One Left Behind - ROOF and how Ghent tackles homelessness 26

  • HOUSING FOR

THE HOMELESS

  • 4. Provide sufficient accompanying

social support

> Expand Housing First/Led support

along with housing stock

> Maintain outreaching services

26 June 2020

slide-27
SLIDE 27

No One Left Behind - ROOF and how Ghent tackles homelessness 27

  • HOUSING FOR

THE HOMELESS

  • 5. Optimise shelter system

and temporary housing, also for migrants

> Optimise your shelter system > Provide solutions for migrants – Shelter and orientation system for people without legal documents or with a precarious status – Post mobile housing

26 June 2020

slide-28
SLIDE 28

No One Left Behind - ROOF and how Ghent tackles homelessness 28

  • HOUSING FOR

THE HOMELESS

  • 6. Work on local, national and

European level

> Engage all your local

stakeholders

– Taskforce Housing and Sheltering – Action plan housing solutions for homeless people (ROOF) > Advocate on national and

European Level to align homelessness and housing policy

– Advocacy trajectory ROOF × National strategy is crucial × Use story telling × Use COVID 19 momentum!

26 June 2020

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Thank you for listening! Any questions?

Patricia Vanderbauwhede Project Leader URBACT APN ROOF Policy advisor - Housing service City of Ghent – Belgium patricia.vanderbauwhede@stad.gent

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Discussion on TACKLING HOMELESSNESS

W ITH : TH : Glasgow (UK), URBACT ROOF Network, Marie McLelland - @ M arie rieM cl clel elland and@ U R B A C A C TR O O F O F Odense (DK), URBACT ROOF Network, Tom Pedersen Rønning Lyon (FR), UIA Home Silk Road, Martine Chanal - @ A u A utreS reS

  • ie
  • ie#H
  • m

e m eS ilkR

  • ad

S ilkR

  • ad

 P leas e us e the Q &A fo r ques t s tio n io ns

@ U IA _initiative@ U R B A C T # R ight2H 2H

  • us

in us ing

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Access to social housing (2019): Active requests 70,575 Requests filled 9,883

Indicators Individuals Households

Declared as homeless or «Winter plan»/emergency shelters

2,522 1,539

Declared as «no fixed residence»

15,887 7,080

L yo n, U IA H O M E S IL K R O A D pro ject

slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Q&A

session

Ruth Owens, FEANTSA deputy director & UIA expert

@ U IA _initiative@ U R B A C T # R ight2H 2H

  • us

in us ing

slide-34
SLIDE 34

2020 HOUSING EXCLUSION REPORT

  • K

E Y Y F IN D IN G S D IN G S O N H O H O U S U S IN G N G E X C X C L U S IO N U S IO N O F M I M IG R A N TS A N TS

Chloé Serme-Morin and Sarah Coupechoux, FEANTSA and Fondation Abbé Pierre

 P leas e us e the Q &A fo r ques ti s tio ns

  • ns

@ U IA _initiative@ U R B A C T # R ight2H 2H

  • us

in us ing

slide-35
SLIDE 35

2nd DIALOGUE ON THE KEY FINDINGS RELATED TO ASYLUM SEEKERS & REFUGEES

Photo: David Boureau – Emmaüs Solidarité Paris Ivry

slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37

EX EXILED ED & & HOMEL ELES ESS

Definitio itions ns & & outline nes

asylum seekers, beneficiaries of international protection, ‘dublinised’ people, migrants in transit, rejected asylum seekers

9 c countr ntries es selecte cted for comparat arative ve analysi sis (highest nb of asylum

applications in 2019) : DE, FR, GR, IT, ES, NL, SE, BE, UK

slide-38
SLIDE 38

EX EXILED ED & & HOMEL ELES ESS

Seeking ng refu fuge: ge: inadequate ate recept ption & ac accomm

  • mmodati

dation

  • n conditi

ition

  • ns

s for r asylum um seekers ers

Eurostat, 2020

77% < 35 years old 29% childre ren < 18 years old

slide-39
SLIDE 39

EX EXILED ED & & HOMEL ELES ESS

Seeking ng refu fuge: ge: inadequate ate recept ption & ac accomm

  • mmodati

dation

  • n conditi

ition

  • ns

s for r asylum um seekers ers

  • Outdated & unsuitable specialised accommodation systems: the

institutionalisation of emergency accommodation for asylum seekers

  • Access to dignified housing conditions hindered by the abuses of the

Dublin Regulation & by a tightening up of national legislation

  • Varied measures when it comes to provision for people in vulnerable

situations

  • The absence of accommodation options for migrants in transit
slide-40
SLIDE 40

EX EXILED ED & & HOMEL ELES ESS

« Un Under r protection tection » bu but homeless ess: : the diffi ficulties culties benefici ficiari aries of internatio rnationa nal protectio tection n face e in accessi ssing ng housing

  • The problem of housing transitioning despite the change in

administrative status

  • The escalation of barriers to accessing common law housing for people

under international protection

  • Feedback from the field & best practice
  • Housing exclusion in EU: housing inequalities increased in EU between

2008 & 2018 > non-EU nationals 2x more e likely to be overbu burden rdened ed by housing g costs ts & 2,5 more e likely y to live in overcrow crowding ding

slide-41
SLIDE 41

EX EXILED ED & & HOMEL ELES ESS CO CONC NCLUS USIO ION

Migration crisis Re Recept ption crisis Reception conditions and accommodation for exiles must be an integral part of social policies to combat housing exclusion & poverty in the EU Another consequence of the Europe-wid wide e housing g crisis Everyo ryone ne has the right ht to shelter ter & di dignifi fied ed support rt regardless rdless of their ir admin inistrat istrative ive status atus

slide-42
SLIDE 42

TH THAN ANK Y K YOU OU!

http: tp://ww //www.fea w.feants ntsa.o a.org rg http:/ tp://ww www.fond w.fondati ation

  • n-abbe

abbe-pie pierr rre.fr e.fr Launc nch webinar ar: : 23rd July ly, , 9:30 - 11:00 00

chloe.serme-morin@feantsa.org SCOUPECHOUX@fondation-abbe-pierre.fr

slide-43
SLIDE 43

a.ko tanidi@ athens .gr -@ s ynathina# curingthelim bo

EMPOWERING refugees and migrants to IGNITE housing affordability

  • L

E S S O S O N S S F R O M A T A TH E N S N S (E L ) Antigone Kotanidi, UIA Curing the Limbo project manager

 P leas e us e the Q &A A fo r ques tio ns tio ns

@ U IA _initiative@ U R B A C T # R ight2H 2H

  • us

in us ing

slide-44
SLIDE 44

www.curingthelimbo.gr

slide-45
SLIDE 45

City of Athens University of Athens Catholic Relief Services International Rescue Committee Athens Development Agency

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Age: 18+ Asylees living in Athens Arabic, Farsi, French speakers Pilot for 350 people

slide-47
SLIDE 47

The challenge

  • Create a dynamic and holistic integration model
  • Help refugees transit from humanitarian aid programs to

a life they chose

  • Connect refugees with local active citizens
  • Support collaborative actions that respond to city needs
slide-48
SLIDE 48
  • Training
  • Affordable housing
  • Job counselling
  • Connection to city activities

The main action pillars

slide-49
SLIDE 49

The context

  • Following the 2015 crisis, thousands of arrivals in the city  need for

quick accommodation solutions.

  • Bulk of available housing stock privately owned (apartments, city center).
  • Humanitarian programs initially addressed the problem with temporary

accommodation approach for people in transit.

  • No long-term housing solutions for the people who are granted asylum.
  • No long-term social housing policy at national level.
slide-50
SLIDE 50

A twofold goal

  • How to help refugees transition from

emergency to longer term housing solutions? How to best support them to build their life in the new city?

  • How to create a sustainable housing

model that fits the characteristics of the Athenian housing market? How to give incentives to landlords to participate in this pilot?

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Housing Facilitation Unit

Social Rental Agency

Access to a pool of apartments Rental technical support Conditional cash subsidy Support through bureaucracy Household finance planning Neighborhood integration Legal support to renters and

  • wners
slide-52
SLIDE 52

Lessons learned so far

  • Better understanding of target

population tailoring support to their needs.

  • Importance of mediation and support

during the transition build trust.

  • Importance of providing rental technical

support: participants taking ownership

  • f the solution.
  • Program’s holistic approach and key

linkages with other pillars help monitor participants’ engagement and assess their needs for further support.

  • Need for more radical incentives to
  • wners.
  • Initial learning from Curing the Limbo

contributed to the development of the National Integration Program “Helios”

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Challenges

  • Dependence on private market

availability and costs, subject to changes in the housing market

  • Failure to collaborate with publicly-
  • wned apartments
  • Lack of employment opportunities

which contribute to precarious tenancies

  • Impact of housing model: will

refugees be able to keep their apartment?

  • Financial sustainability: still unclear

who could incorporate this housing model it into their mandate

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Key figures

Based on the ongoing survey for the total population with signed leases 62% of respondents stated that they feel ready to maintain their apartment beyond project support 79% of respondents stated that rental subsidy enabled them to meet their accommodation needs according to their personal choice criteria. 88% of respondents stated that the rental subsidies combined with the accommodation support received allowed them to focus on their priorities. The program has supported 115 households which corresponds to 287 individuals.

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Antigone Kotanidis Project Manager a.kotanidi@athens.gr

slide-56
SLIDE 56

DISCUSSION ON HOUSING EXCLUSION OF MIGRANTS

W ITH : TH : Thessaloniki (EL), URBACT ROOF and Arrival Cities Networks, Meric Ozgunes - @ U R B A C TR O O A C TR O O F Antwerp (BE), UIA CURANT project, Jolien De Crom Thomas Lacroix, CNRS Research Fellow

 P leas e us e the Q &A fo r ques t s tio n io ns

@ U IA _initiative@ U R B A C T # R ight2H 2H

  • us

in us ing

slide-57
SLIDE 57

From temporary accommodation to housing solutions for asylum seekers and refugees in Thessaloniki Challenges/housing exclusion factors:

  • No social housing stock, policies: primarily subsidy based

interventions

  • Increasing pressure on affordable housing availability

due to increasing rents, red loans, auctions of primary residence, housing costs

  • Temporary accommodation for asylum seekers
  • Refugees once recognised lose benefits (temporary

accommodation + cash assistance)

  • Limited durable accommodation options for refugees

Opportunities:

  • Action planning through Arrival Cities and ROOF

networks

  • Establishing social rental agency/house provider
  • Baseline study for evidence-based policy making
  • Building, managing and providing affordable housing

stock at city level

https ://urbact.eu/arrival-cities https ://urbact.eu/ro

  • f @

U R B A C TR O O F

  • zgunes

@ m dat.gr(R O O F U L G C

  • rdinato

r)

slide-58
SLIDE 58

81 refugees and 77 buddies cohoused in 3 years

Unaccompanied young adult refugee (17-22 years) Together:

  • living room
  • kitchen
  • bathroom

Young (Flemish) volunteer (20-30 years)

One-2-one integration

A ntw erp, U IA C U R A N T pro ject

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Housing by City of Antwerp: 63 duo units

6

bought units = 1 big studenthouse

16

modular units

  • n 1 location

through the city

CURANT

4

renovated units

37

rental units from private landlords (2 and 4 bedroom units) A ntw erp, U IA C U R A N T pro ject

slide-60
SLIDE 60
slide-61
SLIDE 61

Q&A

session

Ruth Owens, FEANTSA deputy director & UIA expert

@ U IA _initiative@ U R B A C T # R ight2H 2H

  • us

in us ing

slide-62
SLIDE 62

CONCLUDING REMARKS

Ruth Owen, FEANTSA Deputy Director & UIA expert Laura Colini, UIA and URBACT expert

@ U IA _initiative@ U R B A C T # R ight2H 2H

  • us

in us ing

slide-63
SLIDE 63

THANK YOU FOR JOINING US!

What’s NEXT?

6 November 2020

W eb b co nf nfer erence# 3 ence# 3 Fair Finance

M un unici cipal pal s tra rategies tegies pr pro te

  • tecti

cting ng ho ho us us ing ing fro m

  • m

s pe pecu cu la lati tio n

  • n

U IA

  • U

R B A C T J

  • int K

no w ledge A ctivity -C ities engaging in the right to ho us ing

@ U IA _initiative@ U R B A C T # R ight2H 2H

  • us

in us ing