no disclosures lung in a box ex vivo lung perfusion evlp
play

No Disclosures Lung in a Box Ex vivo Lung Perfusion (EVLP) Jasleen - PDF document

5/31/2013 Critical Care Medicine & Trauma Conference 2013 No Disclosures Lung in a Box Ex vivo Lung Perfusion (EVLP) Jasleen Kukreja, M.D., M.P.H. Program & Surgical Director, Lung Transplant University of California San


  1. 5/31/2013 Critical Care Medicine & Trauma Conference 2013 No Disclosures “Lung in a Box” Ex vivo Lung Perfusion (EVLP) Jasleen Kukreja, M.D., M.P.H. Program & Surgical Director, Lung Transplant University of California San Francisco Increasing waiting list has not been Lung Transplant Facts matched with donation rate • As of Februrary 8, 2013, 1658 patients waiting for lung transplant in 70 Lung transplant • Only 15-20% offered programs in the U.S lungs accepted; 80% rejected due to: • California has the highest number on waitlist - poor quality - prolonged ischemia • >50% wait more than 6 months on the list time • 12% to 15% die waiting for suitable organs 4 1

  2. 5/31/2013 Supply : Demand Optimizing Supply : Demand Ratio • Recipient selection criteria – Age – Diagnosis – Single vs double lung transplant 5 6 LUNG TRANSPLANTS: LUNG TRANSPLANTATION Transplant Recipient Age by Year of Transplant Kaplan-Meier Survival by Age Group (Transplants: January 1990 – June 2009) Transplants: January 1, 1987 – June 30, 2010 100 HALF-LIFE 18-34: 6.4 Years; 35-49: 6.7 Years; 50-59: 5.3 Years; 60-65: 4.4 Years; >65: 3.5 100% 60 Years Median recipient age (years) 80 80% 48 Survival comparisons % of transplantsrs All p-values significant at p < 0.0001 except 18-34 vs. 35-49: p =0.1708 60% 36 Survival (%) 60 40% 24 40 20% 12 18-34 (N = 5,523) 35-49 (N = 7,980) 20 50-59 (N = 11,389) 0% 0 60-65 (N = 5,685) 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 >65 (N = 1,217) Year of Transplant 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 0-11 12-17 18-34 35-49 50-59 60-65 66+ Median Age Years ISHLT ISHLT 2011 2011 J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Oct; 30 (10): 1071-1132 J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Oct; 30 (10): 1071-1132 2

  3. 5/31/2013 LUNG TRANSPLANTATION Single vs Double Lung Transplant Kaplan-Meier Survival By Diagnosis (Transplants: January 1990 – June 2009) 100 Alpha-1 (N=2,349) CF (N=4,828) COPD (N=10,741) IPF (N=6,478) IPAH (N=1,189) Sarcoidosis (N=756) 80 HALF-LIFE Alpha-1: 6.3 Years; CF: 7.4 Years; COPD: 5.3 Years; IPF: 4.5 Years; IPAH: 4.9 Years; Sarcoidosis: 5.3 Years Survival (%) 60 40 Single Lung Single Lung Survival comparisons All comparisons with Alpha-1 and CF are 20 statistically significant at < 0.01 COPD vs. IPF: p < 0.0001 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Years ISHLT 2011 J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Oct; 30 (10): 1071-1132 ADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATION Optimizing Supply : Demand Ratio Kaplan-Meier Survival (Transplants: January 1994 - June 2009) 100 Double lung: 1/2-life = 6.8 Years; Single lung: 1/2-life = 4.7 Years All lungs: 1/2-life = 5.5 Years • Recipient selection • Donor selection criteria: 80 criteria: Survival (%) 60 – Age P < 0.0001 -Age – Diagnosis 40 -Single vs double lung – Single vs double lung transplant Bilateral/Double Lung (N=16,628) transplant 20 Single Lung (N=12,085) All Lungs (N= 28,727) 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Years ISHLT 2011 12 J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Oct; 30 (10): 1071-1132 3

  4. 5/31/2013 LUNG TRANSPLANTS: ADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTS (1/1997-6/2005) Donor Age by Year of Transplant Risk Factors for 5 Year Mortality Donor Age Transplants: January 1, 1987 – June 30, 2010 Relative Risk of 5 Year Mortality 50 100% 2 Median donor age (years) 80% 40 % of transplants 1.5 60% 30 1 40% 20 20% 10 0.5 p = 0.0646 0% 0 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Year of Transplant 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Donor Age 0-11 12-17 18-34 35-49 50-59 60+ Median Donor Age ISHLT ISHLT 2011 2011 J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Oct; 30 (10): 1071-1132 J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Oct; 30 (10): 1071-1132 Standard Lung Procurement Optimizing Supply : Demand Ratio • Recipient selection • Donor selection criteria: criteria: -Age – Age -Single vs double – Diagnosis -Rehabilitation/ – Single vs double lung reconditioning transplant 15 4

  5. 5/31/2013 “Lungs in a Box” • Bronchoscopy • Antibiotic treatment • Constant Monitoring – Dynamic compliance – Peak Inspiratory pressure – Pulmonary vascular resistance – P/F ratio Ex Vivo Reconditioning Donor Lungs Transplantation Proceedings, 42, 440 – 443 (2010) 5

  6. 5/31/2013 Normothermic Ex-vivo Perfusion in Lung Transplant N Engl J Med 364;15 April 14, 2011 High Risk Donors: • Inclusion Criteria: • PaO2/FiO2 < 300 mm Hg • Bilateral infiltrates w/o infection • Poor lung deflation or inflation intraoperatively • Blood transfusions exceeding 10 Units • Donation after cardiac death • Exclusion Criteria: • Established pneumonia • Mechanical lung injury From the Toronto Lung Transplant Program • Gross gastric aspiration N Engl J Med 2011;364:1431-40 . 6

  7. 5/31/2013 U.S. NOVEL Lung Trial Marginal Donor Lungs ADULT LUNG TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS: OCS INSPIRE Trial Relative Incidence of Leading Causes of Death International Randomized Trial (Deaths: January 1992 - June 2010) 50 Bronchiolitis Malignancy (non-Lymph/PTLD) Infection (non-CMV) Graft Failure Goals: To compare the safety and Cardiovascular 40 effectiveness of the OCS Lung Percentage of Deaths compared to cold storage for donor lung preservation 30 Design: A prospective, international, multi- 20 center, randomized controlled trial comparing preservation of donor 10 lungs using OCS-Lung perfusion device (Treatment Group) to cold 0 flush and storage (Control Group) 0-30 Days 31 Days – 1 >1 Year – 3 >3 Years – 5 >5 Years – 10 >10 Years (N=2,204) Year Years Years Years (N=675) Size: Up-to 20 participating sites with up to (N=3,781) (N=3,425) (N=1,962) (N=2,336) 264 randomized male and female subjects who are primary lung transplant recipients. ISHLT 2011 J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Oct; 30 (10): 1071-1132 7

  8. 5/31/2013 OCS™ Lung Technology INSPIRE Endpoints Primary: A composite of patient and graft survival at day 30 post transplantation, and absence of ISHLT Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Grade 3 at 72 hours post-transplantation. Secondary: • Incidence of ISHLT PGD Grade 3 at 72 hours post-transplantation • Incidence of ISHLT PGD Grade 2 or 3 at 72 hours post-transplantation • Patient survival at day 30 • Graft survival at day 30 The ONLY Portable, Integrated and Automated Perfusion & Ventilation System INSPIRE Trial Centers To-Date Early Clinical Experience • OCS Lung was released in the European market EU Sites US Sites Australia in Jan 2011 Hannover Sydney • Between February-July 2011, 13 double lung Berlin Cleveland Clinic transplant procedures on the OCS™ -Lung Madrid UCLA device Padua Canada UPMC • Non-randomized and were consecutive case Leuven The Methodist series at Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Strasbourg Edmonton UCSF Germany and Puerta de Hierro Majdahonda Bichat Harefield Hospital, Madrid, Spain Leuven 8

  9. 5/31/2013 Early outcome Post transplant outcomes OCS SOC (N=9) (N=10) ICU time (hours) Mean +/- SD 170+/-350 97+/-91 Median 50 65 Range 15 - 1033 16 - 276 The INSPIRE International Lung Trial Mechanical ventilation time (hours) With The Organ Care System Mean +/- SD 14.4+/-5.5 15.5+/-5.6 Technology (OCS™) Median 14.5 15.0 Range 5 - 22 9 - 27 G. Warnecke, A. Haverich, G. Massard, N. Santelmo, F. Rea, C. Knosalla, R. Hetzer, Survival at 30 days Patient [n(%)] 6 (100) 7 (100) G. Leseche, A. Ardehali, A. R. Simon, J. Kukreja, K. McCurrey Graft [n(%)] 6 (100) 7 (100) Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Grade 3 T 0 [n(%)] 0 (0) 2 (20) T 24 [n(%)] 0 (0) 0 (0) T 48 [n(%)] 0 (0) 1 (11) T 72 [n(%)] 0 (0) 1 (11) “Lung in a Box” might be the ANSWER! Improved Survival Increased Supply Thank You ! 35 9

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend