NKN Annual Conference 2012 Mumbai, 1 November 2012 Research - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

nkn annual conference 2012 mumbai 1 november 2012
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

NKN Annual Conference 2012 Mumbai, 1 November 2012 Research - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Co-ordination & Harmonisation of Advanced e-Infrastructures The CHAIN Project: Technical Achievements Federico Ruggieri, INFN Project Director NKN Annual Conference 2012 Mumbai, 1 November 2012 Research Infrastructures Grant


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Co-ordination & Harmonisation of Advanced e-Infrastructures Research Infrastructures – Grant Agreement n. 260011

The CHAIN Project: Technical Achievements

Federico Ruggieri, INFN – Project Director

NKN Annual Conference 2012 Mumbai, 1 November 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

 Reasons behind e-Infrastructures and benefits  Regional e-Infrastructures  The need for a project like CHAIN  General information about CHAIN  Technical Achievements  Conclusions

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Computing-intensive science

 Many research challenges require community effort

 Fundamental properties of matter  Genomics  Climate change  Medical diagnostics

 Research is increasingly digital,

with increasing amounts of data

 Computation ever more demanding  Example: experimental science uses ever more

sophisticated sensors

 Huge amounts of data  Serves user communities around the world  International collaborations

3 1st CHAIN Review – Athens, 03 Feb. 2012

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The many faces of eInfrastructures

 The High Speed Communication Network  The High Performance Computing for highly

parallel applications

 The Grid for High Throughput Computing and

resource sharing

 The Clouds for elastic resource provisioning  Data Infrastructures with several issues such as:

Large data volumes, Curation, Access, High Availability, etc.

 The Human Network: researchers working

together sharing motivations, objectives, tools and resources

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Why ?

The e-Infrastructures promote the usage of network connectivity and stimulate scientific and technical development of countries

contribute to fight the digital divide and brain drain.

e- Infrastructures support wide geographically distributed communities enhance international collaboration of scientists promote collaboration in

  • ther fields.

Grids and networks allow the access of many researchers to scientific resources (laboratories and data)

Disparity can be reduced and larger participation and contributions to high quality research.

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Regional Grid infrastructures

CNGrid

NKN & Garuda

EUAsiaGrid

SAGrid & SANREN

GISELA

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

CHAIN: global coverage

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Project information

 Grant Agreement for a total EC contribution of 1.1 M€  Total cost: about 1.9 M€  Start Date: 1st December 2010 - Duration 24 Months  Partners:

1)

INFN (Italy - Coordinator)

2)

CESNET (Czech Rep.)

3)

CIEMAT (Spain)

4)

GRNET (Greece)

5)

IHEP (China)

6)

UBUNTUNET (Africa)

7)

CLARA (Latin America)

8)

PSA (India)

9)

ASREN (Med./Middle East/Gulf) Since 1 August 2011

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Project objectives

9

Define a strategy and a model for external collaboration, in close collaboration with EGI.eu which will enable operational and organisation interfacing of EGI and external eInfrastructures Validate this model, as a proof-of-principle, by supporting the extension and consolidation of worldwide Virtual Research Communities Explore and propose concrete steps forward towards the coordination with other projects and initiatives (e.g. EGI.eu, NKN & Garuda, CNGrid etc.)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Disseminate (WP5)

Project workplan

State of the Art Assessment (WP2) Analyse the different Regional Approaches (WP2, WP4) Make Recommendations (WP2, WP3, WP4) Involve the VRCs (WP3) Propose a Road-Map and Intermediate solutions (WP4, WP3) Demonstrate the usefulness of interoperation (WP3, WP4)

10 1st CHAIN Review – Athens, 03 Feb. 2012

slide-11
SLIDE 11

State of the art analysis (WP2)

 Analysis of existing NGI literature and related questionnaires  Creation of the regional and NGI questionnaires  Questionnaires being implemented and published online  Collection of contact points from all

continents

 Questionnaire is kept open and

collection of contact points from all continents is continued

 Questionnaire data provided

through the CHAIN Knowledge Base

11 1st CHAIN Review – Athens, 03 Feb. 2012

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Knowledge base (WP2, WP5)

12

www.chain-project/knowledge-base

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Country view

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Data analysis (WP4, WP2)

Nuber of sites and number of CPU - Mediterranean

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A l g e r i a E g y p t T u n i s i a M

  • r
  • c

c

  • I

r a n U n i t e d A r a b E m i r a t e s J

  • r

d a n Sites 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 CPU cores

Number of Grid sites / clusters: Number of CPU cores:

Number of sites and number of CPUs 14 1st CHAIN Review – Athens, 03 Feb. 2012

Nuber of sites and number of CPU - Latin America

10 20 30 40 50 60 Brazil Ecuador Colombia Argentina Panamá Paraguay Mexico Cuba Venezuela Costa Rica Guatemala Peru Sites 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 CPU cores

Number of Grid sites / clusters: Number of CPU cores:

Nuber of sites and number of CPU - Asia Pacific

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Indonesia Singapore Vietnam New Zealand Taiwan Sites 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 CPU cores

Number of Grid sites / clusters: Number of CPU cores:

slide-15
SLIDE 15

WP2 Recommendations

 74 Detailed recommendations classified by:

 Short (1 year), Medium (3 years) and Long term (5 years)  High, Medium, Low priority  National Grid Initiatives (9):

 General (5); Regional (4)

 Interoperations (14):

 General (1), ROC (3), User Support (1), Monitoring (3), Security (2),

Core Services (2); Middleware (2)

 Interoperability (2): General (1), Input/Output (1)  Virtual Research Communities’ perspective: General (2)  Regional planning (47):

 Africa (9), Asia Pacific (6), Central Asia (5), China (7), India (4), Latin

America (5), Mediterranean & Arab Countries (11)

15 1st CHAIN Review – Athens, 03 Feb. 2012

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Africa & Arabia Regional Operation Centre http://roc.africa-grid.org

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

VRCs (WP3)

 Agreements with reference communities signed

 WeNMR 21/09/2011  WRF4G 19/09/2011  jModelTest 21/02/2012  LSGC 27/03/2012  INDICATE 28/03/2012  DECIDE 13/04/2012  SuperB (on the way)  Earth Science (ICTP) (on the way)

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Worldwide Interoperability Demo

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

.......

Science Gateway

  • App. 1
  • App. 2
  • App. N

Embedded Applications Administrator Power User Basic User Users from different

  • rganisations

having different roles and privileges

Access: the Science Gateway model (WP3, WP4)

Standard-based middleware-independent Grid Engine

19

Europe, Africa, Asia Pacific, Latin America

Brasil China India

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

science-gateway.chain-project.eu

slide-21
SLIDE 21

www.chain-project.eu

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Clouds and Grids

 Grid has been conceived as a resource sharing

infrastructure

 Grids provide High Throuput Computing that fits many

applications

 Clouds have a clear business model that allowed

companies to provide services on the market

 Virtualisation and elastic computing are needed by several

scientific domains (e.g. interactive and web based applications)

 Clouds and Grids can cohexist in the Research &

Education domain provided that the strenghts of both can be merged

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

R&E Clouds

 Cloud infrastructure for R&E should be based on Open SW

& Standards

 Financial:

 Public institutions are frequently receiving projects’ driven funding.

Difficult to fund long term contracts with Cloud providers

 Technical:

 Resource sharing is an issue if institutions get services from

different providers. Building securely across several administrative domains is difficult: Federation of Clouds is still not a reality

 Long term preservation of data has still many issues to be

addressed (e.g. what happens to the data after the project end ?)

 Requirements of scientists evolve and new technical challenges

appear that will push for innovation

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Conclusions

 The CHAIN project has gathered the experience and knowledge of

regional Grid infrastructures around the world

 CHAIN has made useful recommendations on several aspects of

regional e-Infrastructures and specifically to their sustainability

 CHAIN has successfully agreed with other projects (EUMEDGRID-

Support, GISELA, INDICATE, DECIDE) on the SG approach

 The first usage of SG in these projects has been very encouraging  An Interoperability demo has been demonstrated at the EGI TF 2012 in

Prague and is still available (R. Barbera talk in the CHAIN WS of 2 November here at the NKN 2012 Conference in Mumbai)

 A Road-Map for the interaction between EGI and other regional

infrastructures is being finalised

 New activities will be performed in the CHAIN-REDS project (talk in

the CHAIN WS)

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Co-ordination & Harmonisation of Advanced e-Infrastructures Research Infrastructures – Grant Agreement n. 260011

Thank you