NEXT NATIVE EDUCATION CENTRE 1PM 4PM C O MM- Y UNIT ANS PL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

next
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

NEXT NATIVE EDUCATION CENTRE 1PM 4PM C O MM- Y UNIT ANS PL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

COMMUNITY WORKS HOP S ELECTION CRITERIA OCTOBER 3, 2010 NEXT NATIVE EDUCATION CENTRE 1PM 4PM C O MM- Y UNIT ANS PL City of Vancouver Planning Department WORKSHOP: Key Obj ectives Background on Community Planning


slide-1
SLIDE 1

NEXT

C O MM- UNIT Y

PL ANS

COMMUNITY WORKS HOP S ELECTION CRITERIA OCTOBER 3, 2010 NATIVE EDUCATION CENTRE 1PM – 4PM

City of Vancouver Planning Department

slide-2
SLIDE 2

WORKSHOP: Key Obj ectives

  • Background on Community Planning
  • Overview of S

election Criteria and Indicators

  • Assess indicators for relevance, completeness

and feasibility

  • General discussion
  • Next steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 LOCAL AREA PLANNING: a timeline

Community Visions

1997 – 2008

City Plan

1992 – 1995

Vision

Implementation

Neighbourhood Centres

Community Planning

2008 – present

Area Plans

1970s to early 1990s

slide-4
SLIDE 4

LOCAL AREA PLANNING: Community Planning Areas

Community Visions Areas Community Plans Areas

slide-5
SLIDE 5

What’s in a Community Plan? Policy directions and actions

  • Urban Design
  • Land use
  • Traffic and safety improvements
  • Transportation
  • Public amenities
  • S

ustainability

  • Heritage
  • Consideration for community aspirations in

conj unction with City-wide policies and goals

  • Terms of Reference unique to each community
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Next Community Plans: S election Process

  • Residents’ S

urvey (2004)

  • random sample
  • Draft S

election Criteria Workshop (2005)

  • S

taff Review of input and data

  • 2005 S

election: Mount Pleasant

slide-7
SLIDE 7

CRITERIA

1. Development Pressures and Rate of Change 2. An Opportunity to Build a Cohesive Community 3. Recreational and S

  • cial S

ervices 4. Quality of Life 5. Appropriate and Affordable Housing 6. An Opportunity to Create / Enhance a Unique Community within the City as a Whole 7. Existence and Relevance of a Plan 8. Impact and Availability of Effective Transportation and Mobility

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Review of 2005 work
  • Checked for:
  • Available data
  • Additional indicators
  • Duplication

Next Community Plans: 2010 process

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Community Planning Areas

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • 8 criteria
  • 43 indicators
  • 6 excluded, 1 subsitution, 3 new indicators
  • 11 S

urvey questions

  • No updates to survey (conducted 2004)
  • Tested results with and without

Next Community Plans: changes to indicators

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Next Community Plans: Changes to indicators

1.3 Number of Rezonings

  • Substituted. Area of Residential

Rezoning (1.5)

2.5 Voter turnout 2008 Municipal Election

  • Excluded. Available data does

not match with City boundaries

2.6 Prostitution Offences, 2009

  • Excluded. Included with crime

rates (4.1)

5.6 Housing Diversity

  • Excluded. No simple calculation

for diversity

7.2 Number of Rezoning Inquiries

  • Substituted. Area of Residential

Rezoning (1.5)

8.5 Pedestrian inj ury / accident/ fatality

  • Excluded. Data from ICBC does

not cover all areas. Related to traffic accidents (8.3)

8.6 Truck traffic

  • Excluded. Data does not cover all
  • areas. Included with traffic

volume (8.1)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Next Community Plans: New indicators

3.4 Community Gardens

  • New. Responds to increasing

interest by community and City Council.

3.5 Public Art

  • New. Responds to increasing

interest by community and City Council.

3.6 %

  • f population living

more than 400m from green space

***New Indicator. Provides a measure for availability of, accessibility to green spaces (not limited to parks)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

RANKINGS

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Next Community Plan: Rankings so far

Grandview-Woodland 64% West End 62% Marpole 61% Fairview 59% Kitsilano 56%

2010 (current to October 3 workshop)

Grandview- Woodland Fairview West End Marpole Kitsilano

2005

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Changes in Rankings Rankings were very close Most communities stayed in roughly the same order Biggest change: West End

  • Population growth
  • New developments and shrinking rental

vacancy rate

  • Effect on amenity provision by population
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Next Steps Complete analysis with community feedback Communicate final rankings Explore opportunities for resourcing more than one program Report to Council: November 2010 Community Plan(s) launch: 2011

slide-17
SLIDE 17

CONTACT For more information on the Next Community Plans selection process: Harv Weidner, S enior Planner harv.weidner@ vancouver.ca Yvonne Hii, Planner yvonne.hii@ vancouver.ca