1
Network Models in Thermoacoustics
Ph.D. Camilo Silva
- Prof. Wolfgang Polifke
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
Network Models in Thermoacoustics Ph.D. Camilo Silva Prof. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Lehrstuhl fr THERMODYNAMIK Network Models in Thermoacoustics Ph.D. Camilo Silva Prof. Wolfgang Polifke 1 Lehrstuhl fr THERMODYNAMIK Acoustics flame coupling Entropy-Acoustics coupling Acoustic BC downstream Acoustic BC upstream Fuel
1
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
Entropy-Acoustics coupling
u0 φ0 s0
¯ ˙ Q
+ +
Stable flame Acoustics flame coupling Unstable flame Unstable flame
Acoustic BC downstream Acoustic BC upstream Air supply impedance Fuel supply impedance
Q0
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
2
3
Flame dynamics from experiments or CFD Network Models 3D Acoustic Solvers For example …
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
4
For example …
Network Models
Flame dynamics from experiments or CFD
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
5
Full System
Understand the System
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
6
Full System
Understand the System
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
7
Full System
Understand the System
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
8
Thermoacoustic Network models Full Thermoacoustic System
Decompose the System Understand the System
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
9
Ducts Compact Flames Nozzles Joints
…
Gray Box Black Box White Box
Thermoacoustic Network models Full Thermoacoustic System Acoustic two-port element
White Box
Decompose the System Understand the System
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
10
WHITE BOX
˙ Q0 ρ0 u0 p0 s0
Ducts Compact Flames Nozzles Joints
…
Gray Box Black Box White Box
Thermoacoustic Network models Full Thermoacoustic System Acoustic two-port element
Quasi 1D Conservation Equations
White Box ∂ ∂t (ρA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuA) = 0 ∂ ∂t (ρuA) + ∂ ∂x
∂x ∂ ∂t (ρsA) + ∂ ∂x (ρusA) = A T ˙ q ∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Decompose the System Understand the System Model Acoustic and entropy waves
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
11
WHITE BOX
˙ Q0 ρ0 u0 p0 s0
Ducts Compact Flames Nozzles Joints
… Gather all elements in a single matrix and compute acoustic response of the ensemble.
Gray Box Black Box White Box
Thermoacoustic Network models Full Thermoacoustic System Acoustic two-port element
White Box ∂ ∂t (ρA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuA) = 0 ∂ ∂t (ρuA) + ∂ ∂x
∂x ∂ ∂t (ρsA) + ∂ ∂x (ρusA) = A T ˙ q ∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
2 6 6 4 1 −Rin −Rout 1 T11 T12 −1 T21 T22 −1 3 7 7 5 | {z }
M
2 6 6 4 f0 g0 f3 g3 3 7 7 5 = 2 6 6 4 3 7 7 5
Decompose the System Understand the System Quasi 1D Conservation Equations Model Acoustic and entropy waves Note that under a suitable treatment, tens of elements can reduce to a 4 x 4 matrix !
CONNEXIONS
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
12
WHITE BOX
˙ Q0 ρ0 u0 p0 s0
Ducts Compact Flames Nozzles Joints
… Gather all elements in a single matrix and compute acoustic response of the ensemble.
STABILITY ANALYSIS.
Gray Box Black Box White Box
Thermoacoustic Network models Full Thermoacoustic System Acoustic two-port element
White Box ∂ ∂t (ρA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuA) = 0 ∂ ∂t (ρuA) + ∂ ∂x
∂x ∂ ∂t (ρsA) + ∂ ∂x (ρusA) = A T ˙ q ∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
2 6 6 4 1 −Rin −Rout 1 T11 T12 −1 T21 T22 −1 3 7 7 5 | {z }
M
2 6 6 4 f0 g0 f3 g3 3 7 7 5 = 2 6 6 4 3 7 7 5
Study stability of the system
Growth rate Freq. Neg. Pos. Unstable Region
Decompose the System Understand the System Quasi 1D Conservation Equations Model Acoustic and entropy waves
CONNEXIONS
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
13
WHITE BOX
˙ Q0 ρ0 u0 p0 s0
∂ ∂t (ρA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuA) = 0 ∂ ∂t (ρuA) + ∂ ∂x
∂x ∂ ∂t (ρsA) + ∂ ∂x (ρusA) = A T ˙ q ∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Gather all elements in a single matrix and compute acoustic response of the ensemble.
2 6 6 4 1 −Rin −Rout 1 T11 T12 −1 T21 T22 −1 3 7 7 5 | {z }
M
2 6 6 4 f0 g0 f3 g3 3 7 7 5 = 2 6 6 4 3 7 7 5
STABILITY ANALYSIS.
Study stability of the system
Growth rate Freq. Neg. Pos. Unstable Region
Quasi 1D Conservation Equations Model Acoustic and entropy waves Spatial integration and the compact assumption Linearization Further Assumptions Definition of waves Boundary conditions Isentropic ducts Modeling of Flame dynamics
f = B+e−iωx/¯
c(1+M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c + ˆ u ◆ g = B−eiωx/¯
c(1−M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c − ˆ u ◆ ¯ ˙ Q = ¯ ρ1¯ u1A1cp ¯ T1 ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆ = ¯ u1A1 γ¯ p1 (γ − 1) ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆
CONNEXIONS
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
14
WHITE BOX
˙ Q0 ρ0 u0 p0 s0
∂ ∂t (ρA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuA) = 0 ∂ ∂t (ρuA) + ∂ ∂x
∂x ∂ ∂t (ρsA) + ∂ ∂x (ρusA) = A T ˙ q ∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Gather all elements in a single matrix and compute acoustic response of the ensemble.
2 6 6 4 1 −Rin −Rout 1 T11 T12 −1 T21 T22 −1 3 7 7 5 | {z }
M
2 6 6 4 f0 g0 f3 g3 3 7 7 5 = 2 6 6 4 3 7 7 5
STABILITY ANALYSIS.
Study stability of the system
Growth rate Freq. Neg. Pos. Unstable Region
Quasi 1D Conservation Equations Model Acoustic and entropy waves Spatial integration and the compact assumption Linearization Further Assumptions Definition of waves Boundary conditions Isentropic ducts Modeling of Flame dynamics
f = B+e−iωx/¯
c(1+M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c + ˆ u ◆ g = B−eiωx/¯
c(1−M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c − ˆ u ◆ ¯ ˙ Q = ¯ ρ1¯ u1A1cp ¯ T1 ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆ = ¯ u1A1 γ¯ p1 (γ − 1) ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆
CONNEXIONS
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
15
From full Navier-Stokes equations
Mass Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
16
Mass Momentum From full Navier-Stokes equations Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
17
Mass Momentum Entropy From full Navier-Stokes equations Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
18
Mass Momentum Entropy Total Enthalpy From full Navier-Stokes equations Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
19
From full Navier-Stokes equations Total Enthalpy Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
20
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Total Enthalpy
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
21
Mass Momentum Entropy
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Total Enthalpy
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
22
Mass Momentum Entropy
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Total Enthalpy
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
23
Mass Momentum Entropy
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Total Enthalpy
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
24
Momentum
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Total Enthalpy
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
25
Momentum
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Total Enthalpy
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
26
Mass Entropy
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Total Enthalpy Momentum
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
27
Mass Entropy
2nd law thermodynamics
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Total Enthalpy Momentum
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
28
Mass Entropy
2nd law thermodynamics
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Total Enthalpy Momentum
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
29
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Total Enthalpy Mass Entropy 2nd law therm.
Momentum
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
30
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Total Enthalpy Mass Entropy 2nd law therm.
Momentum
Not convenient … we have to reorganize somehow
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
31
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Total Enthalpy Mass Entropy 2nd law therm.
Momentum
A∂ ln(p1/γ) ∂t + 1 p1/γ ∂ ∂x ⇣ p1/γuA ⌘ = (γ − 1) γp ˙ qA
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
32
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Total Enthalpy Mass Entropy 2nd law therm. Momentum
Ap1/γ ∂ ln(p1/γ) ∂t + ∂ ∂x ⇣ p1/γuA ⌘ = (γ − 1) γp ˙ qAp1/γ
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
33
WHITE BOX
˙ Q0 ρ0 u0 p0 s0
∂ ∂t (ρA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuA) = 0 ∂ ∂t (ρuA) + ∂ ∂x
∂x ∂ ∂t (ρsA) + ∂ ∂x (ρusA) = A T ˙ q ∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Gather all elements in a single matrix and compute acoustic response of the ensemble.
2 6 6 4 1 −Rin −Rout 1 T11 T12 −1 T21 T22 −1 3 7 7 5 | {z }
M
2 6 6 4 f0 g0 f3 g3 3 7 7 5 = 2 6 6 4 3 7 7 5
STABILITY ANALYSIS.
Study stability of the system
Growth rate Freq. Neg. Pos. Unstable Region
Quasi 1D Conservation Equations Model Acoustic and entropy waves Spatial integration and the compact assumption Linearization Further Assumptions Definition of waves Boundary conditions Isentropic ducts Modeling of Flame dynamics
f = B+e−iωx/¯
c(1+M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c + ˆ u ◆ g = B−eiωx/¯
c(1−M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c − ˆ u ◆ ¯ ˙ Q = ¯ ρ1¯ u1A1cp ¯ T1 ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆ = ¯ u1A1 γ¯ p1 (γ − 1) ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆
CONNEXIONS
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
34
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Total Enthalpy
Z x2
x1
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) dx + Z x2
x1
∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) dx = Z x2
x1
A ˙ q dx − Z x2
x1
A∂p ∂t dx
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
35
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Total Enthalpy
Z x2
x1
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) dx + Z x2
x1
∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) dx = Z x2
x1
A ˙ q dx − Z x2
x1
A∂p ∂t dx
(x1 x2) = ∆x ⌧ λ Compact element if
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
36
Its inside quantity is bounded
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Total Enthalpy
Z x2
x1
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) dx + Z x2
x1
∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) dx = Z x2
x1
A ˙ q dx − Z x2
x1
A∂p ∂t dx
Compact assumption means to neglect those integral terms for which (x1 x2) = ∆x ⌧ λ Compact element if
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
37
Its inside quantity is bounded
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Total Enthalpy
Z x2
x1
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) dx + Z x2
x1
∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) dx = Z x2
x1
A ˙ q dx − Z x2
x1
A∂p ∂t dx
Compact assumption means to neglect those integral terms for which (x1 x2) = ∆x ⌧ λ Compact element if
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
38
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Total Enthalpy
Z x2
x1
∂ ∂t (ρhtA) dx + Z x2
x1
∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) dx = Z x2
x1
A ˙ q dx − Z x2
x1
A∂p ∂t dx
x1 = ˙
˙ Q = Z x2
x1
˙ qAdx where
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
39
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D Total Enthalpy
x1 = ˙
Compactness Mass Entropy 2nd law therm.
Ap1/γ ∂ ln(p1/γ) ∂t + ∂ ∂x ⇣ p1/γuA ⌘ = (γ − 1) γp ˙ qAp1/γ
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
40
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D Total Enthalpy
x1 = ˙
Compactness Mass Entropy 2nd law therm.
Ap1/γ ∂ ln(p1/γ) ∂t + ∂ ∂x ⇣ p1/γuA ⌘ = (γ − 1) γp ˙ qAp1/γ
Z x2
x1
Ap1/γ ∂ ln(p1/γ) ∂t dx + Z x2
x1
∂ ∂x ⇣ p1/γuA ⌘ dx = Z x2
x1
(γ − 1) γp ˙ qAp1/γ dx
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
41
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D Total Enthalpy
x1 = ˙
Compactness Mass Entropy 2nd law therm.
Ap1/γ ∂ ln(p1/γ) ∂t + ∂ ∂x ⇣ p1/γuA ⌘ = (γ − 1) γp ˙ qAp1/γ
Z x2
x1
Ap1/γ ∂ ln(p1/γ) ∂t dx + Z x2
x1
∂ ∂x ⇣ p1/γuA ⌘ dx = Z x2
x1
(γ − 1) γp ˙ qAp1/γ dx
x1 =
x1
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
42
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D Total Enthalpy
x1 = ˙
Compactness Mass Entropy 2nd law therm.
x1 =
x1
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
43
WHITE BOX
˙ Q0 ρ0 u0 p0 s0
∂ ∂t (ρA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuA) = 0 ∂ ∂t (ρuA) + ∂ ∂x
∂x ∂ ∂t (ρsA) + ∂ ∂x (ρusA) = A T ˙ q ∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
Gather all elements in a single matrix and compute acoustic response of the ensemble.
2 6 6 4 1 −Rin −Rout 1 T11 T12 −1 T21 T22 −1 3 7 7 5 | {z }
M
2 6 6 4 f0 g0 f3 g3 3 7 7 5 = 2 6 6 4 3 7 7 5
STABILITY ANALYSIS.
Study stability of the system
Growth rate Freq. Neg. Pos. Unstable Region
Quasi 1D Conservation Equations Model Acoustic and entropy waves Spatial integration and the compact assumption Linearization Further Assumptions Definition of waves Boundary conditions Isentropic ducts Modeling of Flame dynamics
f = B+e−iωx/¯
c(1+M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c + ˆ u ◆ g = B−eiωx/¯
c(1−M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c − ˆ u ◆ ¯ ˙ Q = ¯ ρ1¯ u1A1cp ¯ T1 ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆ = ¯ u1A1 γ¯ p1 (γ − 1) ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆
CONNEXIONS
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
44
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
45
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D Total Enthalpy
x1 = ˙
Compactness Linear acoustics
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
46
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
x1 = ˙
Compactness Linear acoustics Total Enthalpy
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
t|x2 x1 = ˙
1
1
t2 − T 0 t1
47
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D
x1 = ˙
Compactness Linear acoustics Total Enthalpy
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
t|x2 x1 = ˙
1
1
t2 − T 0 t1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
where
48
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D Total Enthalpy Compactness Linear acoustics Mass Entropy 2nd law therm.
x1 =
x1
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
49
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D Compactness Linear acoustics Mass Entropy 2nd law therm.
x1 =
x1
A lot of mathematical treats implemented so that after linearizing we get … A2πβ ✓ ¯ M2¯ c2p0
2
γ + ¯ p2u0
2
◆ = A1 ✓ ¯ M1¯ c1p0
1
γ + ¯ p1u0
1
◆ + β ˙ Q0 ✓ 1 + (1 − πβ) 2πβ ◆ − β2 ¯ p1 ¯ ˙ Q 1 + 1 (α + 1) ⇣ p0
2π(β+1) − p0 1
⌘
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
where Total Enthalpy
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
50
Assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D Total Enthalpy Compactness Linear acoustics Mass Entropy 2nd law therm. A2πβ ✓ ¯ M2¯ c2p0
2
γ + ¯ p2u0
2
◆ = A1 ✓ ¯ M1¯ c1p0
1
γ + ¯ p1u0
1
◆ + β ˙ Q0 ✓ 1 + (1 − πβ) 2πβ ◆ − β2 ¯ p1 ¯ ˙ Q 1 + 1 (α + 1) ⇣ p0
2π(β+1) − p0 1
⌘
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
51
WHITE BOX
˙ Q0 ρ0 u0 p0 s0
∂ ∂t (ρA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuA) = 0 ∂ ∂t (ρuA) + ∂ ∂x
∂x ∂ ∂t (ρsA) + ∂ ∂x (ρusA) = A T ˙ q ∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
CONNEXIONS
Gather all elements in a single matrix and compute acoustic response of the ensemble.
2 6 6 4 1 −Rin −Rout 1 T11 T12 −1 T21 T22 −1 3 7 7 5 | {z }
M
2 6 6 4 f0 g0 f3 g3 3 7 7 5 = 2 6 6 4 3 7 7 5
STABILITY ANALYSIS.
Study stability of the system
Growth rate Freq. Neg. Pos. Unstable Region
Quasi 1D Conservation Equations Model Acoustic and entropy waves Spatial integration and the compact assumption Linearization Further Assumptions Definition of waves Boundary conditions Isentropic ducts Modeling of Flame dynamics
f = B+e−iωx/¯
c(1+M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c + ˆ u ◆ g = B−eiωx/¯
c(1−M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c − ˆ u ◆ ¯ ˙ Q = ¯ ρ1¯ u1A1cp ¯ T1 ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆ = ¯ u1A1 γ¯ p1 (γ − 1) ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
52
Further assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D Compactness Linear acoustics Isentropic flow Total Enthalpy Mass Entropy 2nd law therm. A2πβ ✓ ¯ M2¯ c2p0
2
γ + ¯ p2u0
2
◆ = A1 ✓ ¯ M1¯ c1p0
1
γ + ¯ p1u0
1
◆ + β ˙ Q0 ✓ 1 + (1 − πβ) 2πβ ◆ − β2 ¯ p1 ¯ ˙ Q 1 + 1 (α + 1) ⇣ p0
2π(β+1) − p0 1
⌘ Total Enthalpy Mass Entropy 2nd law therm.
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
53
1 1 + γ1
2
¯ M2
1
✓ ¯ M1 u0
1
¯ c1 + p0
1
γ¯ p1 + s0
1
cp ◆ = 1 1 + γ1
2
¯ M2
2
✓ ¯ M2 u0
2
¯ c2 + p0
2
γ¯ p2 + s0
2
cp ◆
Further assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D Compactness Linear acoustics Isentropic flow Total Enthalpy Mass Entropy 2nd law therm. Total Enthalpy Mass Entropy 2nd law therm. A1 ✓ ¯ ρ1u0
1 + ¯
M1 p0
1
¯ c1 ◆ = A2 ✓ ¯ ρ2u0
2 + ¯
M2 p0
2
¯ c2 ◆
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
A2πβ ✓ ¯ M2¯ c2p0
2
γ + ¯ p2u0
2
◆ = A1 ✓ ¯ M1¯ c1p0
1
γ + ¯ p1u0
1
◆ + β ˙ Q0 ✓ 1 + (1 − πβ) 2πβ ◆ − β2 ¯ p1 ¯ ˙ Q 1 + 1 (α + 1) ⇣ p0
2π(β+1) − p0 1
⌘
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
54
1 1 + γ1
2
¯ M2
1
✓ ¯ M1 u0
1
¯ c1 + p0
1
γ¯ p1 + s0
1
cp ◆ = 1 1 + γ1
2
¯ M2
2
✓ ¯ M2 u0
2
¯ c2 + p0
2
γ¯ p2 + s0
2
cp ◆
Further assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D Compactness Linear acoustics Isentropic flow Total Enthalpy Mass Entropy 2nd law therm. Total Enthalpy Mass Entropy 2nd law therm. A1 ✓ ¯ ρ1u0
1 + ¯
M1 p0
1
¯ c1 ◆ = A2 ✓ ¯ ρ2u0
2 + ¯
M2 p0
2
¯ c2 ◆
thermoacoustic modes in combustion chambers. AIAA Journal, 52(6): 1180–1193, 2014.
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
A2πβ ✓ ¯ M2¯ c2p0
2
γ + ¯ p2u0
2
◆ = A1 ✓ ¯ M1¯ c1p0
1
γ + ¯ p1u0
1
◆ + β ˙ Q0 ✓ 1 + (1 − πβ) 2πβ ◆ − β2 ¯ p1 ¯ ˙ Q 1 + 1 (α + 1) ⇣ p0
2π(β+1) − p0 1
⌘
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
55
Further assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D Compactness Linear acoustics Total Enthalpy Mass Entropy 2nd law therm. Total Enthalpy Mass Entropy 2nd law therm. (Non-Isentropic flow) Isobaric combustion Low Mach number
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
A2πβ ✓ ¯ M2¯ c2p0
2
γ + ¯ p2u0
2
◆ = A1 ✓ ¯ M1¯ c1p0
1
γ + ¯ p1u0
1
◆ + β ˙ Q0 ✓ 1 + (1 − πβ) 2πβ ◆ − β2 ¯ p1 ¯ ˙ Q 1 + 1 (α + 1) ⇣ p0
2π(β+1) − p0 1
⌘
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
56
Further assumptions No viscous terms Quasi-1D Compactness Linear acoustics Total Enthalpy Mass Entropy 2nd law therm. Total Enthalpy Mass Entropy 2nd law therm. (Non-Isentropic flow) Isobaric combustion Low Mach number p0
2 = p0 1
A2u0
2 − A1u0 1 = (γ − 1)
γ¯ p ˙ Q0
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
A2πβ ✓ ¯ M2¯ c2p0
2
γ + ¯ p2u0
2
◆ = A1 ✓ ¯ M1¯ c1p0
1
γ + ¯ p1u0
1
◆ + β ˙ Q0 ✓ 1 + (1 − πβ) 2πβ ◆ − β2 ¯ p1 ¯ ˙ Q 1 + 1 (α + 1) ⇣ p0
2π(β+1) − p0 1
⌘
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
57
WHITE BOX
˙ Q0 ρ0 u0 p0 s0
∂ ∂t (ρA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuA) = 0 ∂ ∂t (ρuA) + ∂ ∂x
∂x ∂ ∂t (ρsA) + ∂ ∂x (ρusA) = A T ˙ q ∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
CONNEXIONS
Gather all elements in a single matrix and compute acoustic response of the ensemble.
2 6 6 4 1 −Rin −Rout 1 T11 T12 −1 T21 T22 −1 3 7 7 5 | {z }
M
2 6 6 4 f0 g0 f3 g3 3 7 7 5 = 2 6 6 4 3 7 7 5
STABILITY ANALYSIS.
Study stability of the system
Growth rate Freq. Neg. Pos. Unstable Region
Quasi 1D Conservation Equations Model Acoustic and entropy waves Spatial integration and the compact assumption Linearization Further Assumptions Definition of waves Boundary conditions Isentropic ducts Modeling of Flame dynamics
f = B+e−iωx/¯
c(1+M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c + ˆ u ◆ g = B−eiωx/¯
c(1−M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c − ˆ u ◆ ¯ ˙ Q = ¯ ρ1¯ u1A1cp ¯ T1 ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆ = ¯ u1A1 γ¯ p1 (γ − 1) ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
58
1D Convective acoustic Wave equation Solution is the sum of two functions
and
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
59
1D Convective acoustic Wave equation Solution is the sum of two functions
and are recognized as Riemann invariants
and
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
60
1D Convective acoustic Wave equation Solution is the sum of two functions
and are recognized as Riemann invariants ()0 = ˆ ()eiωt and ˆ () = Beiφ
and Knowing that harmonic oscillations are defined as
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
61
1D Convective acoustic Wave equation Solution is the sum of two functions
and are recognized as Riemann invariants ()0 = ˆ ()eiωt and ˆ () = Beiφ
and Knowing that harmonic oscillations are defined as can be defined as
and
c(1+M) = 1
c(1−M) = 1
and
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
62
1D Convective acoustic Wave equation Solution is the sum of two functions
and are recognized as Riemann invariants ()0 = ˆ ()eiωt and ˆ () = Beiφ
and Knowing that harmonic oscillations are defined as can be defined as
and
c(1+M) = 1
c(1−M) = 1
and Downstream Travelling wave Upstream Travelling wave
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
63
WHITE BOX
˙ Q0 ρ0 u0 p0 s0
∂ ∂t (ρA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuA) = 0 ∂ ∂t (ρuA) + ∂ ∂x
∂x ∂ ∂t (ρsA) + ∂ ∂x (ρusA) = A T ˙ q ∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
CONNEXIONS
Gather all elements in a single matrix and compute acoustic response of the ensemble.
2 6 6 4 1 −Rin −Rout 1 T11 T12 −1 T21 T22 −1 3 7 7 5 | {z }
M
2 6 6 4 f0 g0 f3 g3 3 7 7 5 = 2 6 6 4 3 7 7 5
STABILITY ANALYSIS.
Study stability of the system
Growth rate Freq. Neg. Pos. Unstable Region
Quasi 1D Conservation Equations Model Acoustic and entropy waves Spatial integration and the compact assumption Linearization Further Assumptions Definition of waves Boundary conditions Isentropic ducts Modeling of Flame dynamics
f = B+e−iωx/¯
c(1+M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c + ˆ u ◆ g = B−eiωx/¯
c(1−M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c − ˆ u ◆ ¯ ˙ Q = ¯ ρ1¯ u1A1cp ¯ T1 ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆ = ¯ u1A1 γ¯ p1 (γ − 1) ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
64
c(1+M)
c(1+M) = 1
c(1−M) = 1
and Downstream Travelling wave Upstream Travelling wave
Therefore
c(1−M)
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
65
WHITE BOX
˙ Q0 ρ0 u0 p0 s0
∂ ∂t (ρA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuA) = 0 ∂ ∂t (ρuA) + ∂ ∂x
∂x ∂ ∂t (ρsA) + ∂ ∂x (ρusA) = A T ˙ q ∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
CONNEXIONS
Gather all elements in a single matrix and compute acoustic response of the ensemble.
2 6 6 4 1 −Rin −Rout 1 T11 T12 −1 T21 T22 −1 3 7 7 5 | {z }
M
2 6 6 4 f0 g0 f3 g3 3 7 7 5 = 2 6 6 4 3 7 7 5
STABILITY ANALYSIS.
Study stability of the system
Growth rate Freq. Neg. Pos. Unstable Region
Quasi 1D Conservation Equations Model Acoustic and entropy waves Spatial integration and the compact assumption Linearization Further Assumptions Definition of waves Boundary conditions Isentropic ducts Modeling of Flame dynamics
f = B+e−iωx/¯
c(1+M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c + ˆ u ◆ g = B−eiωx/¯
c(1−M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c − ˆ u ◆ ¯ ˙ Q = ¯ ρ1¯ u1A1cp ¯ T1 ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆ = ¯ u1A1 γ¯ p1 (γ − 1) ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
66
Acoustic flux through a boundary is given by
˙ m0h0
t =
✓ p0 ¯ c2 ¯ u + ¯ ρu0 ◆ ✓ ¯ uu0 + p0 ¯ ρ ◆
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
67
Acoustic flux through a boundary is given by If acoustic energy it is not dissipated through the boundaries then
˙ m0h0
t =
✓ p0 ¯ c2 ¯ u + ¯ ρu0 ◆ ✓ ¯ uu0 + p0 ¯ ρ ◆
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
68
Acoustic flux through a boundary is given by If acoustic energy it is not dissipated through the boundaries then
˙ m0h0
t =
✓ p0 ¯ c2 ¯ u + ¯ ρu0 ◆ ✓ ¯ uu0 + p0 ¯ ρ ◆
f(1 + ¯ M) − g(1 − ¯ M) f(1 + ¯ M) + g(1 − ¯ M)
Open inlet Closed inlet
h0
t ≤
˙ m0 f g
Inlet
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
= 0 = 0 = 0 = 0
69
Acoustic flux through a boundary is given by If acoustic energy is not dissipated through the boundaries then
˙ m0h0
t =
✓ p0 ¯ c2 ¯ u + ¯ ρu0 ◆ ✓ ¯ uu0 + p0 ¯ ρ ◆
f g f g
Inlet Outlet
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
f(1 + ¯ M) − g(1 − ¯ M) f(1 + ¯ M) + g(1 − ¯ M)
Open inlet/outlet Closed inlet/outlet
h0
t ≤
˙ m0 = 0 = 0 = 0 = 0
70
Acoustic flux through a boundary is given by If acoustic energy it is not dissipated through the boundaries then
˙ m0h0
t =
✓ p0 ¯ c2 ¯ u + ¯ ρu0 ◆ ✓ ¯ uu0 + p0 ¯ ρ ◆
If acoustic energy it is no acoustic energy enters the system then
f g f g
Inlet Outlet
Rin = f g f g Rout = g f f g
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
Rin = (1 − ¯ M) (1 + ¯ M) Rin = −(1 − ¯ M) (1 + ¯ M) Rout = −(1 + ¯ M) (1 − ¯ M) Rout = (1 + ¯ M) (1 − ¯ M)
Close end Open end
71
WHITE BOX
˙ Q0 ρ0 u0 p0 s0
∂ ∂t (ρA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuA) = 0 ∂ ∂t (ρuA) + ∂ ∂x
∂x ∂ ∂t (ρsA) + ∂ ∂x (ρusA) = A T ˙ q ∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
CONNEXIONS
Gather all elements in a single matrix and compute acoustic response of the ensemble.
2 6 6 4 1 −Rin −Rout 1 T11 T12 −1 T21 T22 −1 3 7 7 5 | {z }
M
2 6 6 4 f0 g0 f3 g3 3 7 7 5 = 2 6 6 4 3 7 7 5
STABILITY ANALYSIS.
Study stability of the system
Growth rate Freq. Neg. Pos. Unstable Region
Quasi 1D Conservation Equations Model Acoustic and entropy waves Spatial integration and the compact assumption Linearization Further Assumptions Definition of waves Boundary conditions Isentropic ducts Modeling of Flame dynamics
f = B+e−iωx/¯
c(1+M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c + ˆ u ◆ g = B−eiωx/¯
c(1−M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c − ˆ u ◆ ¯ ˙ Q = ¯ ρ1¯ u1A1cp ¯ T1 ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆ = ¯ u1A1 γ¯ p1 (γ − 1) ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
72
where
CFD or Experiments
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
73
WHITE BOX
˙ Q0 ρ0 u0 p0 s0
∂ ∂t (ρA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuA) = 0 ∂ ∂t (ρuA) + ∂ ∂x
∂x ∂ ∂t (ρsA) + ∂ ∂x (ρusA) = A T ˙ q ∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
CONNEXIONS
Gather all elements in a single matrix and compute acoustic response of the ensemble.
2 6 6 4 1 −Rin −Rout 1 T11 T12 −1 T21 T22 −1 3 7 7 5 | {z }
M
2 6 6 4 f0 g0 f3 g3 3 7 7 5 = 2 6 6 4 3 7 7 5
STABILITY ANALYSIS.
Study stability of the system
Growth rate Freq. Neg. Pos. Unstable Region
Quasi 1D Conservation Equations Model Acoustic and entropy waves Spatial integration and the compact assumption Linearization Further Assumptions Definition of waves Boundary conditions Isentropic ducts Modeling of Flame dynamics
f = B+e−iωx/¯
c(1+M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c + ˆ u ◆ g = B−eiωx/¯
c(1−M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c − ˆ u ◆ ¯ ˙ Q = ¯ ρ1¯ u1A1cp ¯ T1 ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆ = ¯ u1A1 γ¯ p1 (γ − 1) ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
74
In this case, the Mach number is considered zero.
Turbulent combustion chamber
with the flame describing function to assess combustion instability un a premixed swirled
based on the Flame Describing Function applied to turbulent premixed swirling flames.
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
75
In this case, the Mach number is considered zero.
Turbulent combustion chamber
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
76
In this case, the Mach number is considered zero.
Boundary Condition: Outlet Turbulent combustion chamber
Network Models
1 2 3 4 5
Boundary Condition: Inlet Cross section change Cross section change + Flame Duct (cold) Duct (cold) Duct (hot)
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
77
In this case, the Mach number is considered zero.
Boundary Condition: Open outlet Network Models
1 2 3 4 5
Boundary Condition: Closed Inlet Cross section change Cross section change + Flame Duct (cold) Duct (cold) Duct (hot)
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
78
In this case, the Mach number is considered zero.
Boundary Condition: Open outlet Network Models
1 2 3 4 5
Boundary Condition: Closed Inlet Cross section change Cross section change + Flame Duct (cold) Duct (cold) Duct (hot)
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
Rin = f0 g0
79
In this case, the Mach number is considered zero.
Boundary Condition: Open outlet Network Models
1 2 3 4 5
Boundary Condition: Closed Inlet Cross section change Cross section change + Flame Duct (cold) Duct (cold) Duct (hot)
f1 = f0e−iω(x1−x0)/¯
c
g1 = g0eiω(x1−x0)/¯
c
f5 = f4e−iω(x5−x4)/¯
c
g5 = g4eiω(x5−x4)/¯
c
¯ c ¯ c
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
80
In this case, the Mach number is considered zero.
Boundary Condition: Open outlet Network Models
1 2 3 4 5
Boundary Condition: Closed Inlet Cross section change Cross section change + Flame Duct (cold) Duct (cold) Duct (hot) f1 g1
e−iω(x1−x0)/¯
c
eiω(x1−x0)/¯
c
f0 g0
g5
e−iω(x5−x4)/¯
c
eiω(x5−x4)/¯
c
f4 g4
c ¯ c
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
81
In this case, the Mach number is considered zero.
Boundary Condition: Open outlet Network Models
1 2 3 4 5
Boundary Condition: Closed Inlet Cross section change Duct (cold) Duct (cold) Duct (hot)
(f4 + g4) = (f3 + g3) ξ (f4 − g4) = (f3 − g3) α [1 + θF(ω)]
Cross section change + Flame
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
82
In this case, the Mach number is considered zero.
Boundary Condition: Open outlet Network Models
1 2 3 4 5
Boundary Condition: Closed Inlet Cross section change Duct (cold) Duct (cold) Duct (hot)
f4 g4
2 ξ + α + αθF(ω) ξ − α − αθF(ω) ξ − α − αθF(ω) ξ + α + αθF(ω) f3 g3
Flame
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
83
In this case, the Mach number is considered zero.
Boundary Condition: Open outlet Network Models
1 2 3 4 5
Boundary Condition: Closed Inlet Cross section change Duct (cold) Duct (cold) Duct (hot)
f4 g4
f3 g3
g1
f0 g0
g5
f4 g4
g3
f2 g2
g2
f1 g1
Flame
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
84
In this case, the Mach number is considered zero.
Network Models
1 2 3 4 5 f5 g5
f0 g0
T = D3FD2CD1
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
85
In this case, the Mach number is considered zero.
Network Models
f5 g5
f0 g0
T = D3FD2CD1
Final matrix
M
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
86
In this case, the Mach number is considered zero.
Network Models
f5 g5
f0 g0
T = D3FD2CD1
Final matrix
det(M) = 0 ⇒ T22 − RoutT12 + RinT21 − RinRoutT11 = 0
Solution comes by solving the characteristic equation
M
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
87
WHITE BOX
˙ Q0 ρ0 u0 p0 s0
∂ ∂t (ρA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuA) = 0 ∂ ∂t (ρuA) + ∂ ∂x
∂x ∂ ∂t (ρsA) + ∂ ∂x (ρusA) = A T ˙ q ∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
CONNEXIONS
Gather all elements in a single matrix and compute acoustic response of the ensemble.
2 6 6 4 1 −Rin −Rout 1 T11 T12 −1 T21 T22 −1 3 7 7 5 | {z }
M
2 6 6 4 f0 g0 f3 g3 3 7 7 5 = 2 6 6 4 3 7 7 5
STABILITY ANALYSIS.
Study stability of the system
Growth rate Freq. Neg. Pos. Unstable Region
Quasi 1D Conservation Equations Model Acoustic and entropy waves Spatial integration and the compact assumption Linearization Further Assumptions Definition of waves Boundary conditions Isentropic ducts Modeling of Flame dynamics
f = B+e−iωx/¯
c(1+M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c + ˆ u ◆ g = B−eiωx/¯
c(1−M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c − ˆ u ◆ ¯ ˙ Q = ¯ ρ1¯ u1A1cp ¯ T1 ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆ = ¯ u1A1 γ¯ p1 (γ − 1) ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
88
T22 − RoutT12 + RinT21 − RinRoutT11 = 0
Solving the characteristic equation we obtain a value for ω (complex number) Resonance frequency Growth rate (Stable or unstable)
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
89
T22 − RoutT12 + RinT21 − RinRoutT11 = 0
Solving the characteristic equation we obtain a value for ω (complex number) Resonance frequency Growth rate (Stable or unstable)
Freq.
Neg.
Pos.
U n s t a b l e
e g i
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
90
Resonance frequency Growth rate
Freq.
Neg.
Pos.
U n s t a b l e
e g i
Harmonic Oscillations a fluctuating quantity is expressed as
Therefore
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
91
WHITE BOX
˙ Q0 ρ0 u0 p0 s0
∂ ∂t (ρA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuA) = 0 ∂ ∂t (ρuA) + ∂ ∂x
∂x ∂ ∂t (ρsA) + ∂ ∂x (ρusA) = A T ˙ q ∂ ∂t (ρhtA) + ∂ ∂x (ρuhtA) = A ˙ q − A∂p ∂t
CONNEXIONS
Gather all elements in a single matrix and compute acoustic response of the ensemble.
2 6 6 4 1 −Rin −Rout 1 T11 T12 −1 T21 T22 −1 3 7 7 5 | {z }
M
2 6 6 4 f0 g0 f3 g3 3 7 7 5 = 2 6 6 4 3 7 7 5
STABILITY ANALYSIS.
Study stability of the system
Growth rate Freq. Neg. Pos. Unstable Region
Quasi 1D Conservation Equations Model Acoustic and entropy waves Spatial integration and the compact assumption Linearization Further Assumptions Definition of waves Boundary conditions Isentropic ducts Modeling of Flame dynamics
f = B+e−iωx/¯
c(1+M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c + ˆ u ◆ g = B−eiωx/¯
c(1−M) = 1
2 ✓ ˆ p ¯ ρ¯ c − ˆ u ◆ ¯ ˙ Q = ¯ ρ1¯ u1A1cp ¯ T1 ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆ = ¯ u1A1 γ¯ p1 (γ − 1) ✓ ¯ T2 ¯ T1 − 1 ◆
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
92
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
93
THERMODYNAMIK
Lehrstuhl für
Boundary Condition: Outlet
1 2 3 4 5
Boundary Condition: Inlet Cross section change Cross section change + Flame Duct (cold) Duct (cold) Duct (hot)
Open end Closed end