Network approach for bringing together brain structure and function - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

network approach for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Network approach for bringing together brain structure and function - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Network approach for bringing together brain structure and function Sebastiano Stramaglia Physics Dept. University of Bari & INFN BCAM- Basque Center Applied Math Bilbao Capri 31 agosto 2015 Complex Collective Dynamics: Brains and beyond


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Network approach for bringing together brain structure and function

Sebastiano Stramaglia Physics Dept. University of Bari & INFN BCAM- Basque Center Applied Math Bilbao

Capri 31 agosto 2015 Complex Collective Dynamics: Brains and beyond

slide-2
SLIDE 2

http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/1410.7959

  • Sci. Rep. 2015

Work done with:

Paolo Bonifazi (Tel Aviv) Ibai Diez (Bilbao) Iñaki Escudero(Bilbao) Beatriz Mateos (Bilbao) Miguel A. Muñoz (Granada) Jesus M Cortes (Bilbao)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Neuron ~mm

Brain networks ~cm

STRUCTURE space

Neuronal circuits ~mm

slide-4
SLIDE 4

DYNAMICS time

Brain rhythms

Neuron ~mm

Brain networks ~cm

STRUCTURE space

Neuronal circuits ~mm

slide-5
SLIDE 5

STRUCTURE FUNCTION OPERATIONAL PLASTICITY Dynamics reinforces structure OPERATIONAL TOPOLOGY Topology supports dynamics The operational brain: the structural-functional cycle BRAIN FUNCTIONS Circuitries’ dynamics Circuitries’ structure

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Science 2013

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Chialvo D.R. and Bak P. (1999) Bak P and Chialvo D.R. (2001) Eguíluz V.M., Chialvo D.R., Cecchi G., Baliki M, and Apkarian AV. (2004) Chialvo, D. R. (2004)

  • D. Fraiman, P. Balenzuela, J. Foss and D. R. Chialvo (2004)
  • D. R. Chialvo (2010)

The conjecture of the brain at criticality

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • It measures the magnitude and orientation of water

molecules diffusion within brain tissues

Macroscale structural networks: Connectome from Diffusion Tensor Imaging

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Functional Connectivity

  • Statistical dependency between neuronal

units (also distant ones)

  • Correlation between BOLD time series
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Dynamical systems on the connectome: Chialvo, Sporns, Deco, Jirsa, Marinazzo, SS …

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Link-wise comparison Ising model

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Pairwise link-to-link comparison

From Honey,…Sporns, PNAS 2009

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Multilayer networks

S Boccaletti, et al. Physics Reports 544 (1), 1-122, 2014

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Decomposing the brain in modules

  • Important to reduce the variability of anatomical and

functional patterns in the class of healthy subjects

  • Paradigm signal vs noise -> patient vs healthy
  • Parcellations based on anatomy or function, separately, are

well known (AAL, RBN, …)

  • The question we pose here: is there a decomposition

accounting for both structure and function?

  • Ans: YES
  • What is the most suitable resolution of the modular

decomposition to describe the common structure-function modular skeleton?

  • Ans: Cross-modularity
slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • N. Tzourio-Mazoyer, B.

Landeau,D. Papathanassiou, F. Crivello, O. Etard, N. Delcroix, Bernard Mazoyer and M. Joliot, NeuroImage 2002

Automated Anatomical Labeling parcellation

  • f the brain: 90

anatomical areas

slide-16
SLIDE 16

RESTING BRAIN NETWORKS

  • Distributed sets of brain regions whose spontaneous

activity exhibits a large degree of temporal coherence (Biswal et al., 1995)

  • Identified by Independent Component Analysis (ICA)
  • a high degree of reproducibility of RSNs both across

healthy subjects and across datasets acquired on the same subject.

  • RSNs correspond to regions that are known to share and

support cognitive functions

  • Alterations in resting state networks have been reported in

several brain pathologies and diseases

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Medial Visual Lateral Visual Auditory Sensory Motor Default Mode Network Executive control Dorsal Visual Stream Left Dorsal Visual Stream Right

COGNITIVE CORRELATES OF THE RSNs

slide-18
SLIDE 18

no aware no awake Vegetative State Minimally Conscious State Locked-In Syndrome partial aware (arousal) no awake aware no awake aware awake (can’t move)

Traumatic Brain Injury patients

(Noirhomme et al 2010)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Relation between structural and functional networks

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Our data set

Structural Connectivity and Functional Connectivity (resting conditions) from the same subject (Bilbao Cruces Hospital) 12 Healthy human subjects, age 33.5 ± 8.7 Resolution: 2514 ROIs

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Our approach: comparison at the moduli level

Contrast functional and structural networks by exploiting thier hierarchical modular organization (Skudalski et al 2008, Betzel et al 2013, Kolchinsky et al 2014)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Cosine distance between ROIs

  • For each ROI, the feature vector is the

connectivity to all the 2514 ROIs.

  • For each pair of ROIs, the cosine distance is

defined as one minus the cosine between the two feature vectors

slide-23
SLIDE 23

5 2 4 1 3

Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering

3 1 4 2 5

Distance between joined clusters Need to define the distance between the new cluster and the other clusters. Single Linkage: distance between closest pair. Complete Linkage: distance between farthest pair. Average Linkage: average distance between all pairs

  • r distance between cluster centers

Dendrogram

The dendrogram induces a linear ordering

  • f the data points
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Comparison at the moduli level

Clustering of rsFC -> ordering for both rsFC and SC

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Hierarchical Clustering provides a tree

  • f modules

How to choose the

  • ptimal resolution
  • f clustering?
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Similarity Sorensen index L Modularity Q

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Cross Modularity X

A, B two networks with the same nodes Π a partition of nodes

 3

1

] [

B AB A

Q L Q X  

slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Optimal partition 20 modules

slide-32
SLIDE 32

All the modules are characterized anatomically (and have cognitive correlates)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Some modules are compact

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Some are made of anatomically distinct components

slide-35
SLIDE 35

The wiring among these components is evident after plotting fibers

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Overlap with AAL and RBN modules

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Robustness

slide-38
SLIDE 38

structure fMRI DTI function structural – functional brain networks Brain insults Aging SUBJECT TEMPLATE ASSESSMENT Brain recovery Development Pathology

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Usefulness of cross-modularity: Real data

  • 14 healthy subjects in wakefulness and

propofol anesthesia

  • 116 ROIs resolution
slide-40
SLIDE 40

CM empirical-model functional correlations

slide-41
SLIDE 41

CM structural-empirical fc

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Conclusions

Our results show that when trying to correlate brain structure with function, a clear structure-function matching emerges when applying a hierarchical modular approach. This new large-scale brain division will have an impact to study brain disorders , as anomalies in this partition might reflect pathologies with both a functional and anatomical character.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

www.nitr.org/projects/biocruc_hcatlas

To download the hierarchical partition, the brain networks and the code for cross-modularity