NCHRP 40-13 Recycling and Reclamation of Asphalt Pavements Using - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

nchrp 40 13
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

NCHRP 40-13 Recycling and Reclamation of Asphalt Pavements Using - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NCHRP 40-13 Recycling and Reclamation of Asphalt Pavements Using In-Place Methods 2/4/2010 Kansas 1 Key Issues Extent of annual program Project selection criteria Materials Liquids and stabilizers Design methods


slide-1
SLIDE 1

NCHRP 40-13

Recycling and Reclamation of Asphalt Pavements Using In-Place Methods

2/4/2010 1 Kansas

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Key Issues

 Extent of annual program  Project selection criteria  Materials

  • Liquids and stabilizers
  • Design methods
  • Processing methods and equipment
  • QA/QC
  • Wearing course

 Barriers  Environmental benefits

2/4/2010 2 Kansas

slide-3
SLIDE 3

In-Place Methods Considered

 Hot In-Place (HIR)  Cold In-Place (CIR)  Full Depth Reclamation (FDR)  Why one instead of the other?  Case studies  Gaps in knowledge and research  Structural coefficients?

2/4/2010 3 Kansas

slide-4
SLIDE 4

This Presentation

 Extent of Annual Program  Project Selection Criteria  Wear Courses  Specifications

2/4/2010 4 Kansas

slide-5
SLIDE 5

25 50 75 100 Responses, % Years State Agency Contractor

Years of Experience

2/4/2010 5

HIR CIR FDR

Kansas

slide-6
SLIDE 6

25 50 75 100 Responses, % Lane Miles State Agency Contractor

Annual Lane Miles

2/4/2010 6

HIR CIR FDR

Kansas

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Project Selection Criteria

Survey Results

Traffic level Roadway Geometry Climate Region

2/4/2010 7 Kansas

slide-8
SLIDE 8

25 50 75 100

<5K 5K-10K 10K-20K 20K-30K > 30K

Responses, %

AADT

State Agency Contractor

Traffic Levels for Recycling Method HIR

2/4/2010 8 Kansas

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Traffic Levels for Recycling Method CIR

25 50 75 100

<5K 5K-10K 10K-20K 20K-30K > 30K

Responses, % AADT State Agency Contractor

2/4/2010 9 Kansas

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Traffic Levels for Recycling Method FDR

25 50 75 100

<5K 5K-10K 10K-20K 20K-30K > 30K

Responses, % AADT State Agency Contractor

2/4/2010 10 Kansas

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Geometry HIR

25 50 75 100 Responses, % State Agency Contractor

2/4/2010 11 Kansas

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Geometry CIR

25 50 75 100 Responses, % State Agency Contractor

2/4/2010 12 Kansas

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Geometry FDR

25 50 75 100 Responses, % State Agency Contractor

2/4/2010 13 Kansas

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Climate HIR

25 50 75 100 Responses, % State Agency Contractor

2/4/2010 14 Kansas

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Climate CIR

38 40 40 54 14 41 27 50 25 50 75 100

Responses, % State Agency Contractor

2/4/2010 15 Kansas

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Climate FDR

25 50 75 100

Responses, %

2/4/2010 16 Kansas

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Wear Courses

2/4/2010 17 Kansas

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Surface HIR

25 50 75 100 Responses, %

State Agency Contractor

2/4/2010 18 Kansas

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Surface CIR

25 50 75 100 Responses, % State Agency Contractor

2/4/2010 19 Kansas

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Surface FDR

25 50 75 100 Responses, % State Agency Contractor

2/4/2010 20 Kansas

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Specifications

2/4/2010 21 Kansas

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Specifications HIR

25 50 75 100 Responses, % State Agency Contractor

2/4/2010 22 Kansas

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Specifications CIR

25 50 75 100 Responses, % State Agency Contractor

2/4/2010 23 Kansas

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Specifications FDR

25 50 75 100 Responses, % State Agency Contractor

2/4/2010 24 Kansas

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Preliminary Observations

 Experience

  • CIR and FDR increasingly used
  • Contractors have more experience with CIR,

FDR than agencies

 Annual lane miles

  • Agencies < 50 lane miles per year per type
  • Contractors > 50 lane miles for CIR and

FDR

2/4/2010 25 Kansas

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Preliminary Observations

Project Selection

  • Traffic

 Contractors more likely to use CIR and FDR

  • n higher AADT
  • Climate

 Cold/wet or hot/wet climates

 Needs further consideration for HIR and CIR  FDR OK

  • Geometry

 Minor lane widening, tight turns  Mountainous terrain with grades

 CIR, FDR

2/4/2010 26 Kansas

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Preliminary Observations

 Wear Courses

  • Overlays preferred by agencies/contractors

for

 HIR, CIR, FDR

  • Contractors more likely to use other options

for CIR and FDR

 Fog and chip seal for FDR

 Specifications

  • Agencies mostly method specs
  • Contractors wider range of experience

2/4/2010 27 Kansas

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Questions ??????

2/4/2010 Kansas 28