multimessenger study of the universe
play

Multimessenger Study of the Universe Roger Blandford KIPAC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Multimessenger Study of the Universe Roger Blandford KIPAC Stanford (A personal perspective) 6 iv 2016 APPEC 1 APPEC Messengers Gamma Rays VHE Neutrinos Cosmic Rays Gravitational Radiation Also: Radio through


  1. Multimessenger Study of the Universe Roger Blandford KIPAC Stanford (A personal perspective) 6 iv 2016 APPEC 1

  2. APPEC “Messengers” • Gamma Rays • VHE Neutrinos • Cosmic Rays • Gravitational Radiation • Also: – Radio through X-ray observations – Laboratory experiments The most interesting science is seriously entangled Optimizing the international program is a challenge 6 iv 2016 APPEC 2

  3. VERITAS/H.E.S.S. 140 o octaves t to e exp xplore re Electromagnetic Fermi LIGO LIGO Auger Cosmic Rays (protons and electrons) Gravitational Radiation Neutrinos Ice Cube Dark Matter? CDMS Energy, frequency � 1 ZeV 1zeV � Wavelength 6 iv 2016 APPEC 3 +YeV, XeV!

  4. Interfacial Questions • Is Λ sufficient? • Is (classical) GR correct? • DM? • ν physics (m ν , M/D, δ CP , ??) • Inflation-LSS • Nuclear EOS • CR sources, physics • VHE ν sources • GW sources, background • FRB and new optical transients 6 iv 2016 APPEC 4

  5. Interfacial Questions • Is Λ sufficient? R- γ • Is (classical) GR correct? R,GW, lab • DM? lab, DDM, axions, γ , , GW • ν physics (m ν , M/D, δ CP , ??) lab,VHE ν , • Inflation-LSS, CMB, O,R • Nuclear EOS, GW, X,R • CR sources, physics, CR, R,X, γ • VHE ν sources, VHE ν , , R- γ • GW sources, background, GW, R- γ • FRB and new optical transients R- γ , , GW Many problems need many coordinated approaches 6 iv 2016 APPEC 5

  6. Physics vs Astronomy • Experiment vs Observation • Experimentalist vs Observer • Facility vs Observatory • National vs Extranational • Exclusive vs Inclusive • Particles vs Sources • Measurement vs Discovery • Collectivist vs Individualist • Hedgehogs vs Foxes 6 iv 2016 APPEC 6

  7. Physics vs Astronomy • Experiment vs Observation LIGO vs GONG • Experimentalist vs Observer CTA vs Planck • Facility vs Observatory DES vs LSST • National vs Extranational CERN vs CHIME • Exclusive vs Inclusive IceCube vs ROSAT • Particles vs Sources Auger vs Fermi • Measurement vs Discovery Neutrinos vs pulsars • Collectivist vs Individualist Strings vs Comp Astro • Hedgehogs vs Foxes LHC vs dust Methodologies may be converging 6 iv 2016 APPEC 7

  8. Major discoveries were “unscripted” • CMB – antenna noise • Quasars (massive BH) – radio source identifications • Stellar BHs – X-ray source identifications • Massive and mutable ν ’s – checking solar model • Neutron stars – lunar X-rays • Pulsars – interplanetary scintillation • Gamma ray bursts – nuclear weapons monitoring • Dark matter – galactic and stellar orbits • Cosmic acceleration – supernova explosions • Gravitational lenses – quasar follow up • Gravitational radiation – pulsar timing • Exoplanets – brown dwarfs Discoveries at interfaces; stovepiping is futile 6 iv 2016 APPEC 8

  9. Central Paradox of Strategic Planning • October 2014 - April 2015 (APS): – Planck results->standard model (wnf nl Ω k m ν … ), dusty B-modes – 8 “habitable??” exoplanets->life in the universe??? – 9 new dwarf galaxies -> dark matter limits – ~10 10 M sun black hole at z=6->cosmic dawn – Gravitational lenses - SN, ALMA-> pre-SN, substructure – M82 neutron star with L~100 L edd ->accretion physics – PD456 outflows->environmental impact, galaxy formation – FRBs 40% circ pol->new transients 10-100mHz – IceCube neutrinos -> cosmological origin? – … 6 iv 2016 APPEC 9 By contrast we are making science plans for 2030s

  10. Discovery • Affirmation – Higgs, SM, GR, F Λ CDM… • Surprise – LIGO BHB, DM, Λ , m ν ,… • Mystery – FRB, PeV ν ,… What may be most remarkable is how much mystery has moved up 6 iv 2016 APPEC 10

  11. Multimessenger Research • Surveys, catalogs, data-mining – Control biases, heterogeneous sources • Source identifications – Positionally consistent, temporal associations • Rapid follow up; large field of view • Foregrounds/backgrounds – Absorption, dust, lensing • Beaming – Relativistic aberration, anisotropic sources Will large N suffice? Will there be orphans? 6 iv 2016 APPEC 11

  12. Summary • Most interesting science is now entangled • Many approaches have to be coordinated • Physics and astronomy methodologies converging • Discoveries faster than facilities • Discoveries happen at interfaces • Much progress: mystery->surprise->affirmation • Will large N suffice? Will there be orphans? • New alignments mandate new management – Collaboration, cooperation, competition – Coordination, contingency, confidence • Education, re-education 6 iv 2016 APPEC 12

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend