multidimensional exploratory analysis of a structural
play

Multidimensional Exploratory Analysis of a Structural Model using a - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Multidimensional Exploratory Analysis of a Structural Model using a general costructure criterion: THEME (THematic Equation Model Explorator) X. Bry I3M, Univ. Montpellier II T. Verron ITG - SEITA, Centre de recherche P. Redont I3M, Univ.


  1. Multidimensional Exploratory Analysis of a Structural Model using a general costructure criterion: THEME (THematic Equation Model Explorator) X. Bry I3M, Univ. Montpellier II T. Verron ITG - SEITA, Centre de recherche P. Redont I3M, Univ. Montpellier II

  2. THEME - Bry, Redont, Verron ; COMPSTAT 2010 Introducing the Data and Problem: 52 Variables: 15 var. 5 var. 8 var. 3 var. 3 var. 9 var. 9 var. Data: Data: Tobacco Blend Paper Tobacco Blend Filtration Hoffmann Filter Hoffmann Chemistry Combustion Combustion / ISO behaviour smoke contents smoke contents smoking / ISO /Intense smoking /ISO smoking smoking 19 CIGARETTE SMOKE Observations: Cigarettes Problem: Regulations → Hoffmann Compounds control ⇒ HC modeling

  3. THEME - Bry, Redont, Verron ; COMPSTAT 2010 Introducing the Data and Problem: 52 Variables: 15 var. 5 var. 8 var. 3 var. 3 var. 9 var. 9 var. Data: Data: Tobacco Blend Paper Tobacco Blend Filtration Hoffmann Filter Hoffmann Chemistry Combustion Combustion / ISO behaviour smoke contents smoke contents smoking / ISO /Intense smoking /ISO smoking smoking 19 Observations: Cigarettes Problem: Regulations → Hoffmann Compounds control ⇒ HC modeling 1) The thematic partitioning of variables must be kept (to separate roles , and keep explanatory ) ⇒ Dimension reduction in groups 2) Many (redundant) variables ⇒ Look for dimensions: reflecting their group's structure & interpretable with respect to their theme

  4. THEME - Bry, Redont, Verron ; COMPSTAT 2010 Introducing the Data and Problem: Dependency network of Data: Dependency network of Data: Thematic (conceptual) model Model design motivations : Equation 1 : X 1: Tob Ch X 5: Fil Iso Hoffmann compounds are generated / transferred to X 6: Hoff Iso smoke through combustion. Filter only plays a X 2: Cb Pap retention role (pores blocked in intense mode) X 7: Hoff Int X 3: Cb Blend Equation 2 : Equation 2 Final output of Hoffmann compounds is conditioned X 4: Cb Fil by other filter properties, as ventilation/dilution. Equation 1

  5. THEME - Bry, Redont, Verron ; COMPSTAT 2010 Introducing the Data and Problem: Dependency network of Data: Dependency network of Data: Thematic (conceptual) model Model design motivations : Equation 1 : X 1: Tob Ch X 5: Fil Iso Hoffmann compounds are generated / transferred to X 6: Hoff Iso smoke through combustion. Filter only plays a X 2: Cb Pap retention role (pores blocked in intense mode) X 7: Hoff Int X 3: Cb Blend Equation 2 : Equation 2 Final output of Hoffmann compounds is conditioned X 4: Cb Fil by other filter properties, as ventilation/dilution. Equation 1 ⇒ Structural dimensions should be informative with respect to the model too 1) How many dimensions do play a proper role? 2) Which ?

  6. THEME - Bry, Redont, Verron ; COMPSTAT 2010 Path modeling methods optimizing a criterion: ● Likelihood → LISREL (Jöreskog 1975-2002) ● Residual Sum of Squares → Multiblock Multiway Components and Covariates Regression Models (Smilde, Westerhuis, Bocqué 2000) Generalized structured component analysis (Hwang, Takane, 2004). RSS(group models) RSS = < Y > + RSS(component-based model) (minimized via A lternated L east S quares) < X 1 > < X 2 > ➔ Model residuals need weighting: How? ➔ Convergence problems in case of collinearity (small samples) ➔ The Methods do not extend PLS Regression to K Predictor Groups. based on a covariance criterion...

  7. THEME - Bry, Redont, Verron ; COMPSTAT 2010 Extending covariance ● Multiple Covariance (Bry, Verron, Cazes 2009) y being linearly modeled as a function of x 1 ,..., x S , Multiple Covariance of y on x 1 ,..., x S is: S  = [  V  y  ∏ S  ] s   R 1 S 1 , ... , x 2 2  y ∣ x 1 , ... ,x MC  y ∣ x V  x s = 1 Product of Linear Model all variances Fit ● Use for single « equation » structural model estimation: SEER (Bry, Verron, Cazes 2009) ➢ One component per group: 2  Yv ∣ X 1 u 1 , ... , X R u R  max MC v , u 1 , ... , u R g | f 1 , … , f R X 1 X R ∥ v ∥ 2 = 1 2 = 1 ∀ r, ∥ u r ∥ f R f 1 ... g Y

  8. THEME - Bry, Redont, Verron ; COMPSTAT 2010 Extending covariance ● Multiple Covariance (Bry, Verron, Cazes 2009) y being linearly modeled as a function of x 1 ,..., x S , Multiple Covariance of y on x 1 ,..., x S is: S  = [  V  y  ∏ S  ] s   R 1 S 1 , ... , x 2 2  y ∣ x 1 , ... ,x MC  y ∣ x V  x s = 1 Product of Linear Model all variances Fit ● Use for single « equation » structural model estimation: SEER (Bry, Verron, Cazes 2009) ➢ One component per group: 2  Yv ∣ X 1 u 1 , ... , X R u R  max MC v , u 1 , ... , u R g | f 1 , … , f R X 1 X R ∥ v ∥ 2 = 1 2 = 1 ∀ r, ∥ u r ∥ f R f 1 ... → The weighting of Groups is naturally balanced 2 = 0 ∇ log MC ⇔ relative variations compensate → The Method extends PLS Regression to K g Y Predictor Groups

  9. THEME - Bry, Redont, Verron ; COMPSTAT 2010 Extending covariance ● Multiple Covariance (Bry, Verron, Cazes 2009) y being linearly modeled as a function of x 1 ,..., x S , Multiple Covariance of y on x 1 ,..., x S is: S  = [  V  y  ∏ S  ] s   R 1 S 1 , ... , x 2 2  y ∣ x 1 , ... ,x MC  y ∣ x V  x s = 1 Product of Linear Model all variances Fit ● Use for single « equation » structural model estimation: SEER (Bry, Verron, Cazes 2009) ➢ One component per group: 2  Yv ∣ X 1 u 1 , ... , X R u R  max MC v , u 1 , ... , u R g | f 1 , … , f R X 1 X R ∥ v ∥ 2 = 1 2 = 1 ∀ r, ∥ u r ∥ 1 ⊥ … f R K f R f 1 ... → The weighting of Groups is naturally balanced 2 = 0 ∇ log MC ⇔ relative variations compensate → The Method extends PLS Regression to K 1 ⊥ … g L g Y Predictor Groups ➢ Several components per group: → Model Local Nesting Principle: Xr 's components f r 1 , f r 2 ... are mutually ⊥ and calculated sequentially in one batch, controlling for all components in the other groups

  10. THEME - Bry, Redont, Verron ; COMPSTAT 2010 Extending covariance ● Multiple Covariance (Bry, Verron, Cazes 2009) y being linearly modeled as a function of x 1 ,..., x S , Multiple Covariance of y on x 1 ,..., x S is: S  = [  V  y  ∏ S  ] s   R 1 S 1 , ... , x 2 2  y ∣ x 1 , ... ,x MC  y ∣ x V  x s = 1 Product of Linear Model all variances Fit ● Use for single « equation » structural model estimation: SEER (Bry, Verron, Cazes 2009) ➢ One component per group: 2  Yv ∣ X 1 u 1 , ... , X R u R  max MC v , u 1 , ... , u R g | f 1 , … , f R X 1 X R ∥ v ∥ 2 = 1 2 = 1 ∀ r, ∥ u r ∥ 1 ⊥ … f R K 1 ⊥ f 1 2 f R f 1 ... → The weighting of Groups is naturally balanced 2 = 0 ∇ log MC ⇔ relative variations compensate → The Method extends PLS Regression to K 1 ⊥ … g L g Y Predictor Groups ➢ Several components per group: → Model Local Nesting Principle: Xr 's components f r 1 , f r 2 ... are mutually ⊥ and calculated sequentially in one batch, controlling for all components in the other groups

  11. THEME - Bry, Redont, Verron ; COMPSTAT 2010 Extending covariance ● Multiple Covariance (Bry, Verron, Cazes 2009) y being linearly modeled as a function of x 1 ,..., x S , Multiple Covariance of y on x 1 ,..., x S is: S  = [  V  y  ∏ S  ] s   R 1 S 1 , ... , x 2 2  y ∣ x 1 , ... ,x MC  y ∣ x V  x s = 1 Product of Linear Model all variances Fit ● Use for single « equation » structural model estimation: SEER (Bry, Verron, Cazes 2009) ➢ One component per group: 2  Yv ∣ X 1 u 1 , ... , X R u R  max MC v , u 1 , ... , u R g | f 1 , … , f R X 1 X R ∥ v ∥ 2 = 1 2 = 1 ∀ r, ∥ u r ∥ 1 ⊥ … f R K 1 ⊥ f 1 2 ⊥ ... f R f 1 ... → The weighting of Groups is naturally balanced 2 = 0 ∇ log MC ⇔ relative variations compensate → The Method extends PLS Regression to K 1 ⊥ … g L g Y Predictor Groups ➢ Several components per group: → Model Local Nesting Principle: Xr 's components f r 1 , f r 2 ... are mutually ⊥ and calculated sequentially in one batch, controlling for all components in the other groups

  12. THEME - Bry, Redont, Verron ; COMPSTAT 2010 Extending covariance Predictor space < X > ● Beyond Covariance: Costructure Bundle A ➢ Broadened approach to structural strength Bundle B

  13. THEME - Bry, Redont, Verron ; COMPSTAT 2010 Extending covariance Predictor space < X > ● Beyond Covariance: Costructure PC2 Bundle A ➢ Broadened approach to structural strength PC1 Bundle B

  14. THEME - Bry, Redont, Verron ; COMPSTAT 2010 Extending covariance Predictor space < X > ● Beyond Covariance: Costructure PC2 Bundle A ➢ Broadened approach to structural strength PC1 OLS predictor Bundle B

  15. THEME - Bry, Redont, Verron ; COMPSTAT 2010 Extending covariance Predictor space < X > ● Beyond Covariance: Costructure PC2 Bundle A ➢ Broadened approach to structural strength PC1 original THEME predictor OLS predictor Bundle B

  16. THEME - Bry, Redont, Verron ; COMPSTAT 2010 Extending covariance Predictor space < X > ● Beyond Covariance: Costructure PC2 Bundle A ➢ Broadened approach to structural strength PC1 original THEME predictor OLS predictor ➢ General Costructure Criterion Bundle B ∀ component f r = X r u r , V ( f r ) = u r 'X r' PX r u r is replaced by: S  u r = ∑ a  u r ' A h u r  h = 1, H a = bundle focus parameter

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend