multi dimensional stochastic singular control via
play

Multi-dimensional Stochastic Singular Control Via Dynkin Game and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Multi-dimensional Stochastic Singular Control Via Dynkin Game and Dirichlet Form Yipeng Yang * Under the supervision of Dr. Michael Taksar Department of Mathematics University of Missouri-Columbia Oct 11, 2012 Y.Yang (MU) Oct 11, 2012 1


  1. Multi-dimensional Stochastic Singular Control Via Dynkin Game and Dirichlet Form ∗ Yipeng Yang * Under the supervision of Dr. Michael Taksar Department of Mathematics University of Missouri-Columbia Oct 11, 2012 Y.Yang (MU) Oct 11, 2012 1 / 35

  2. Outline Problem Formulation Related Literature Dirichlet Form and Dynkin Game Dynkin Game and Free Boundary Problem The Multi-dimensional Stochastic Singular Control Problem Concluding Remarks and Future Research References Y.Yang (MU) Oct 11, 2012 2 / 35

  3. Problem Formulation Problem Formulation Given a probability space (Ω , F , F t , X , θ t , P x ), we are concerned with a multi-dimensional diffusion on R n : d X t = µ ( X t ) dt + σ ( X t ) d B t , X 0 = x , (1) where         X 1 t µ 1 σ 11 · · · σ 1 m B 1 t . . . . .         X t = .  , µ ( X t ) = .  , σ ( X t ) = . .  , B t = .  , . . . . .             X nt µ n σ n 1 · · · σ nm B mt (2) in which µ i , σ i , j (1 � i � n , 1 � j � m ) are functions of X 1 t , ..., X ( n − 1) t satisfying the usual conditions, and B t is m -dimensional Brownian motion with m � n . Y.Yang (MU) Oct 11, 2012 3 / 35

  4. Problem Formulation There is a cost function associated with this process: �� ∞ � ∞ �� e − α t � f 1 ( X t ) dA (1) + f 2 ( X t ) dA (2) e − α t h ( X t ) dt + k S ( x ) = E x , t t 0 0 f 1 ( x ) , f 2 ( x ) > 0 , ∀ x ∈ R n . (3) And there is control on the underlying process: dX 1 t = µ 1 dt + σ 11 dB 1 t + · · · + σ 1 m dB mt , . . . . . . . . . dX nt = µ n dt + σ n 1 dB 1 t + · · · + σ nm dB mt + dA (1) − dA (2) t , t X 0 = x . Y.Yang (MU) Oct 11, 2012 4 / 35

  5. Problem Formulation ◮ A control policy is defined as a pair ( A (1) t , A (2) t ) = S of F t adapted processes which are right continuous and nondecreasing in t . ◮ A (1) − A (2) is the minimal decomposition of a bounded variation t t process into the difference of two nondecreasing processes. Problem Formulation: one looks for a control policy S that minimizes the cost function k S ( x ), W ( x ) = min S∈ S k S ( x ) , (4) where S is the set of admissible policies. Y.Yang (MU) Oct 11, 2012 5 / 35

  6. Problem Formulation Applications? ◮ A decision maker observes the expenses of a company under a multi-factor situation and wants to minimize the total expense by adjusting one factor. ◮ An investor observes the prices of several assets in a portfolio and wants to maximize the total wealth by adjusting the investment on one asset. Y.Yang (MU) Oct 11, 2012 6 / 35

  7. Related Literature Related Literature ◮ This is a free boundary multi-dimensional singular control problem. ◮ The classical approach is to use the dynamic programming principle to derive the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation and solve the PDE, if one can, e.g., [Pham (2009), Ma and Yong(1999)]. ◮ Viscosity solution techniques, e.g., [Fleming and Soner(2006), Crandall, Ishii and Lions (1992)]. ◮ Existence, uniqueness and regularity of the solution to the HJB equation are hard to analyze [Soner and Shreve(1989)]. Y.Yang (MU) Oct 11, 2012 7 / 35

  8. Related Literature ◮ The value function of the stochastic singular control problem is closely related to the value of a zero-sum game, called Dynkin game, e.g., [Fukushima and Taksar(2002), Taksar(1985), Guo and Tomecek(2008)]. ◮ The value of the Dynkin game coincides with the solution of a variational inequality problem involving Dirichlet forms, e.g., [Nagai(1978), Zabczyk (1984), Karatzas(2005)]. ◮ Using an approach via Dynkin game and Dirichlet form, [Fukushima and Taksar(2002)] proved the existence of a classical solution to a one-dimensional stochastic singular control problem. Y.Yang (MU) Oct 11, 2012 8 / 35

  9. Dirichlet Form and Dynkin Game Variational Inequality Problem Involving Dirichlet Form Let f 1 ∈ F . Nagai [Nagai(1978)] showed that there exist a quasi continuous function w ∈ F which solves the variational inequality problem w � − f 1 , E α ( w , u − w ) � 0 , ∀ u ∈ F with u � − f 1 , and a properly exceptional set N such that for all x ∈ R n / N , � � e − ασ [ − f 1 ( X σ )] e − α ˆ σ [ − f 1 ( X ˆ � � w ( x ) = sup σ E x = E x σ )] , where σ = inf { t � 0; w ( X t ) = − f 1 ( X t ) } . ˆ Moreover, w is the smallest α -potential dominating the function − f 1 m-a.e. Y.Yang (MU) Oct 11, 2012 9 / 35

  10. Dirichlet Form and Dynkin Game [Zabczyk (1984)] then extended this result to the solution of the zero-sum game ( Dynkin game) by showing that, there exist a quasi continuous function V ( x ) ∈ K which solves the variational inequality E α ( V , u − V ) � 0 , ∀ u ∈ K , (5) where K = { u ∈ F : − f 1 � u � f 2 m -a.e. } , f 1 , f 2 ∈ F , and a properly exceptional set N such that for all x ∈ R n / N , V ( x ) = sup σ inf τ J x ( τ, σ ) = inf τ sup σ J x ( τ, σ ) (6) for any stopping times τ and σ , where � e − α ( τ ∧ σ ) ( − I σ � τ f 1 ( X σ ) + I τ<σ f 2 ( X τ )) � J x ( τ, σ ) = E x . (7) Y.Yang (MU) Oct 11, 2012 10 / 35

  11. Dirichlet Form and Dynkin Game What is more, if define E 1 = { x ∈ R n / N : V ( x ) = − f 1 ( x ) } , E 2 = { x ∈ R n / N : V ( x ) = f 2 ( x ) } , then the hitting times ˆ τ = τ E 2 , ˆ σ = τ E 1 is the saddle point of the game J x (ˆ τ, σ ) � J x (ˆ τ, ˆ σ ) � J x ( τ, ˆ σ ) (8) for any x ∈ R n / N and any stopping times τ, σ , where J x is given in (7). In particular ∀ x ∈ R n / N . V ( x ) = J x (ˆ τ, ˆ σ ) , (9) Y.Yang (MU) Oct 11, 2012 11 / 35

  12. Dirichlet Form and Dynkin Game [Fukushima and Menda (2006)] further showed that if the transition probability function of the underlying process satisfies the absolute continuity condition: p t ( x , · ) ≪ m ( · ) , (10) and f 1 , f 2 are finite finely continuous functions satisfying the following separability condition: Assumption There exist finite α -excessive functions v 1 , v 2 ∈ F such that, for all x ∈ R n , − f 1 ( x ) � v 1 ( x ) − v 2 ( x ) � f 2 ( x ) , (11) then there does not exist the exceptional set N , and the solution V ( x ) is finite finely continuous. Y.Yang (MU) Oct 11, 2012 12 / 35

  13. Dynkin Game and Free Boundary Problem Dynkin Game and Free Boundary Problem We are concerned with a multi-dimensional Dynkin game over a region D = R n − 1 × ( A (¯ x ) , B (¯ x )), where A , B are two bounded, smooth and uniformly Lipschitiz functions. The associated cost function is �� τ ∧ σ � e − α t H ( X t ) dt J x ( τ, σ ) = E x 0 (12) � e − α ( τ ∧ σ ) ( − I σ � τ f 1 ( X σ ) + I τ<σ f 2 ( X τ )) � + E x , where H is the holding cost, and f 1 , f 2 are boundary penalty costs. Y.Yang (MU) Oct 11, 2012 13 / 35

  14. Dynkin Game and Free Boundary Problem Two players P 1 and P 2 observe the underlying process X t in (1) with accumulated income, discounted at present time, equalling � σ 0 e − α t H ( X t ) dt , for any stopping time σ . ◮ If P 1 stops the game at time σ , he pays P 2 the amount of the accumulated income plus the amount f 2 ( X σ ), which after been discounted equals e − ασ f 2 ( X σ ). ◮ If the process is stopped by P 2 at time σ , he receives from P 1 the accumulated income less the amount f 1 ( X σ ), which after been discounted equals e − ασ f 1 ( X σ ). P 1 tries to minimize his payment while P 2 tries to maximize his income. Thus the value of this Dynkin game is given by ∀ x ∈ R n . V ( x ) = inf τ sup σ J x ( τ, σ ) , (13) Y.Yang (MU) Oct 11, 2012 14 / 35

  15. Dynkin Game and Free Boundary Problem ◮ Define the following Dirichlet form on D : � E ( u , v ) = ∇ u ( x ) · A ∇ v ( x ) m ( d x ) , u , v ∈ F , (14) D where � F = { u ∈ L 2 ( D ) : u is continuous , ∇ u ( x ) T ∇ u ( x ) m ( d x ) < ∞} , D 2 σσ T is assumed to be uniformly elliptic, and A ( x ) = 1 m ( d x ) = e b · x d x , in which b = A − 1 µ . ◮ Consider the solution V ∈ F , − f 1 � V � f 2 of E α ( V , u − V ) � ( H , u − V ) , ∀ u ∈ F , − f 1 � u � f 2 , (15) where � E α ( u , v ) = E ( u , v ) + α R n u ( x ) v ( x ) m ( d x ) . Y.Yang (MU) Oct 11, 2012 15 / 35

  16. Dynkin Game and Free Boundary Problem Theorem Assume some usual conditions on H, f 1 , f 2 ∈ F and the separability condition, we put �� τ ∧ σ � e − α t H ( X t ) dt J x ( τ, σ ) = E x 0 (16) � e − α ( τ ∧ σ ) ( − I σ � τ f 1 ( X σ ) + I τ<σ f 2 ( X τ )) � + E x for finite stopping times τ, σ . Then the solution of (15) admits a finite and continuous value function of the game ∀ x ∈ R n . V ( x ) = inf τ sup σ J x ( τ, σ ) = sup σ inf τ J x ( τ, σ ) , (17) Y.Yang (MU) Oct 11, 2012 16 / 35

  17. Dynkin Game and Free Boundary Problem Theorem Furthermore if we let E 1 = { x ∈ R n : V ( x ) = − f 1 ( x ) } , E 2 = { x ∈ R n : V ( x ) = f 2 ( x ) } , (18) then the hitting times ˆ τ = τ E 2 , ˆ σ = τ E 1 is the saddle point of the game J x (ˆ τ, σ ) � J x (ˆ τ, ˆ σ ) � J x ( τ, ˆ σ ) (19) for any x ∈ R n and any stopping times τ, σ . In particular, ˆ τ, ˆ σ are finite a.s. and ∀ x ∈ R n . V ( x ) = J x (ˆ τ, ˆ σ ) , (20) Regularities? Optimal control policies? Y.Yang (MU) Oct 11, 2012 17 / 35

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend