Multi-configurational DFT by long-range/short-range separation
- f the electron-electron interaction
Julien Toulouse, Franc ¸ois Colonna, Andreas Savin Laboratoire de Chimie Th´ eorique, Universit´ e Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris
COST 2004 – p. 1/12
Multi-configurational DFT by long-range/short-range separation of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Multi-configurational DFT by long-range/short-range separation of the electron-electron interaction Julien Toulouse, Franc ois Colonna, Andreas Savin Laboratoire de Chimie Th eorique, Universit e Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris COST 2004
Julien Toulouse, Franc ¸ois Colonna, Andreas Savin Laboratoire de Chimie Th´ eorique, Universit´ e Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris
COST 2004 – p. 1/12
COST 2004 – p. 2/12
COST 2004 – p. 2/12
COST 2004 – p. 2/12
COST 2004 – p. 2/12
COST 2004 – p. 3/12
COST 2004 – p. 3/12
ee according to
COST 2004 – p. 3/12
ee according to
ee + ˆ
COST 2004 – p. 3/12
ee according to
ee + ˆ
i vµ(ri)
COST 2004 – p. 3/12
Φ
Ψ
ee + ˆ
xc[nΨ]
Φ
Ψ
ee + ˆ
xc[nΨ]
ee + ˆ
xc[n]
COST 2004 – p. 4/12
Φ
Ψ
ee + ˆ
xc[nΨ]
ee + ˆ
xc[n]
ee + ˆ
COST 2004 – p. 4/12
Φ
Ψ
ee + ˆ
xc[nΨ]
ee + ˆ
xc[n]
ee + ˆ
xc[n] = Exc[n] − Eµ xc[n] is the complement exchange-correlation energy
COST 2004 – p. 4/12
ee =
ee(rij) : long-range part of the Coulomb interaction
COST 2004 – p. 5/12
ee =
ee(rij) : long-range part of the Coulomb interaction
ee + ˆ
xc[n]
xc[n]: short-range interaction ⇒ well approximated by (semi-)local
COST 2004 – p. 5/12
ee =
ee(rij) : long-range part of the Coulomb interaction
ee + ˆ
xc[n]
xc[n]: short-range interaction ⇒ well approximated by (semi-)local
COST 2004 – p. 5/12
ee(r) = erf(µr)
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 r 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
COST 2004 – p. 6/12
ee(r) = erf(µr)
µ ee(r) = erf(˜
3 ˜
µ2r2
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 r 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
COST 2004 – p. 6/12
xc[n] can be divided as
xc[n] = ¯
x[n] + ¯
c [n]
COST 2004 – p. 7/12
xc[n] can be divided as
xc[n] = ¯
x[n] + ¯
c [n]
xc[n]:
xc[n] =
xc
xc
COST 2004 – p. 7/12
x[n]
2 4 6 8 Μ 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 E
Μ
exact LDA erf
COST 2004 – p. 8/12
x[n]
2 4 6 8 Μ 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 E
Μ
exact LDA exact LDA erf erfgau
COST 2004 – p. 8/12
x[n]
c [n]
2 4 6 8 Μ 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 E
Μ
exact LDA exact LDA erf erfgau
2 4 6 8 Μ 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 E
Μ
exact LDA erf
COST 2004 – p. 8/12
x[n]
c [n]
2 4 6 8 Μ 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 E
Μ
exact LDA exact LDA erf erfgau
2 4 6 8 Μ 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 E
Μ
exact LDA exact LDA erf erfgau
COST 2004 – p. 8/12
x[n]
c [n]
2 4 6 8 Μ 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 E
Μ
exact LDA exact LDA erf erfgau
2 4 6 8 Μ 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 E
Μ
exact LDA exact LDA erf erfgau
x[n] ≈ − A
c [n] ≈ B
COST 2004 – p. 8/12
ee + ˆ
xc[n]
COST 2004 – p. 9/12
ee + ˆ
xc[n]
COST 2004 – p. 9/12
ee + ˆ
xc[n]
COST 2004 – p. 9/12
ee + ˆ
xc[n]
COST 2004 – p. 9/12
ee + ˆ
xc[n]
COST 2004 – p. 9/12
ee + ˆ
xc[n]
COST 2004 – p. 9/12
ee + ˆ
xc[n]
COST 2004 – p. 9/12
ee + ˆ
xc[n]
COST 2004 – p. 9/12
COST 2004 – p. 10/12
x[n] for the Be atom:
2 4 6 8 Μ 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 E
Μ
COST 2004 – p. 10/12
c [n] for the Be atom:
2 4 6 8 Μ 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 E
Μ
COST 2004 – p. 11/12
COST 2004 – p. 12/12
COST 2004 – p. 12/12