Motorcycle Lane Associate Professor Dr. Law Teik Hua Road Safety - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

motorcycle lane
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Motorcycle Lane Associate Professor Dr. Law Teik Hua Road Safety - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Road Safety Research Center, UPM Developing Speed-flow-density Relationship for the Segregated Motorcycle Lane Associate Professor Dr. Law Teik Hua Road Safety Research Center High Motorcycle Population Countries 85% 77% 60% 55% 93% 72%


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Developing Speed-flow-density Relationship for the Segregated Motorcycle Lane

Associate Professor Dr. Law Teik Hua Road Safety Research Center

Road Safety Research Center, UPM

slide-2
SLIDE 2

High Motorcycle Population Countries

85% 55% 46% 93% 77% 60% 72% 73%

slide-3
SLIDE 3

World Road Deaths Statistics

Source: WHO, 2018

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Malaysia Registered Motorcycles

8 m, 2008 12 m, 2017

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Malaysia Motorcycle Deaths 2008 : 3,898 deaths 2017 : 4,348 deaths

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Malaysia Motorcycle Deaths

  • 68% of all road crash injuries
  • 20x higher risk than cars
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Motorcycle Lanes

  • First exclusive MC lane in the

world

  • 30 km long (per direction)
  • 39% mc crashes
slide-8
SLIDE 8

MC lane in Kedah, Malaysia

slide-9
SLIDE 9

MC lane in Quezon City, Philippines

slide-10
SLIDE 10

MC lane in Taipei, Taiwan

slide-11
SLIDE 11

MC lane in Taipei, Taiwan

slide-12
SLIDE 12

MC lane in Phnom Penh, Cambodia

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Research Gap

  • Max flow
  • Jam density
  • Critical density
  • Critical speed
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Speed – Flow – Density Relationship

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Experiment Design & Data Collection

Stage 1

  • Federal Highway (Route 2)
  • 2.4, 3.0 and 3.3 m
  • Initial portion of a stable flow

(Low density, high speed)

  • Flow at capacity or near-jam

density

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Experiment Design & Data Collection

Stage 2

  • Experimental study
  • UPM
  • 1.5, 1.7 and 1.9 m
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Experiment Design & Data Collection

Stage 3

  • Experimental study
  • Federal Highway (Route 2)
  • 1.4, 1.6 and 2.0 m
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Speed – Flow – Density Relationship

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Headway and Space Riding Patterns

<1.7 m >1.7 m

Headway Space

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Mc Speed vs Mc Density (Headway Pattern)

S Jam density = 640

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Mc Flow vs Mc Density (Headway Pattern)

Max Flow = 3060 Critical density = 235

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Mc Speed vs Mc Flow (Headway Pattern)

Critical Speed = 13 Unstable flow Stable flow

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Mc Speed vs Mc Density (Space Pattern)

Jam density = 0.46

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Mc Flow vs Mc Density (Space Pattern)

Max Flow = 2207 0.166 mc/m-sq (6 m-sq/mc)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Mc Speed vs Mc Flow (Space Pattern)

Critical Speed = 13 Stable flow Unstable flow

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Conclusions

Headway Riding Pattern (1.4 m – 1.7 m) Max flow : 3,060 mc/hr/lane Critical speed : 13 km/hr Critical density : 235 mc/km/lane Headway Riding Pattern (2.8 m – 3.4 m) Max flow : 6,120 mc/hr

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Conclusions

Space Riding Pattern (> 1.7 m) Max flow : 2,207 mc/hr/m Critical speed : 13 km/hr Critical density : 0.166 mc/m-sq Space Riding Pattern (> 1.7 m) Motorcycle lane width : 2.0 m Max flow : 4,414 mc/hr

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Email: lawteik@upm.edu.my