Monthly Program and Performance Review October 2018 Committed to - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Monthly Program and Performance Review October 2018

“Committed to the Safe and Efficient Management, Retrieval and Treatment of Radioactive and Hazardous Risks to the Columbia River from the Hanford Tank Farms”

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00

FY03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 FY19 TRC Rate 3.14 5.77 3.78 1.57 1.21 1.49 1.09 0.82 0.85 0.18 0.39 0.61 0.28 0.33 0.12 0.08 0.95 DART Rate 1.95 3.76 2.88 0.33 0.87 0.50 0.39 0.44 0.35 0.00 0.11 0.25 0.04 0.21 0.04 0.00 0.00

DOE/EM TRC Goal 1.10

8,915,553 hours (631 days) w/out a Lost Time Workday Injury, And… 68,200 hours (5 days) since the last Recordable case.

WRPS Fiscal Year Case Rates

Prior to WRPS TOC

DOE/EM DART Goal 0.60

Two First Aid cases and Two Recordable cases for October 2

Safety Overview

October 2018

Safety Topic

4 October 2018 - FY 2019

Drive at the Speed of Life Campaign ToxiRAE Pro Selected by IH for Ammonia Monitoring MSA Full-Face Air-Purifying Respirator

Vision and Strategy

5 October 2018 - FY 2019

System Health Program

6 October 2018

Tank Farms 242-A Tank Farms Tank Farms 242-A 242-A ETF 222-S ETF 222-S

Was Now DFLAW Integrated Ops

MSA WTP

Auxiliary Systems (E.g. ILAW Transporter)

• Safety Systems
• Safety Systems
• DID
• Environmental
• Safety Systems
• DID
• Environmental
• Mission Critical Elements

Project Focus Areas

7 September 2018

Strategic Enabler FY19 Focal Point Status

SV Improvement Focus

• Schedule opportunities being monitored and tracked
• Overtime for High Priority Work
• A/AX Farm Retrieval and

Improve Tank Farm Infrastructure Critical Procurement Focus

• Improving Procurement Cycle Accountability and Integration
• Implementation & Acceleration of FY19 Award
• A/AX Farm Retrieval, DST Space

Management and Improve Tank Farm Infrastructure Resource Availability: Getting the Right People at the Right Time

• Reprioritization of Critical Resources
• Posting of Critical Field Craft
• A/AX Farm Retrieval, DST Space

Management and Improve Tank Farm Infrastructure Facility Status

• WRPS Commitment to Mission Success Post Contract Transition
• Positioning project for proper material inventory at contract

completion (SST, TFP, Production Ops)

• Procurement Focus on Critical Need Purchase Orders
• Critical Spares Focus for post transition
• All

Driving Timely Contract Action

• Timeliness of Actions
• Additional Appropriations ($95M)
• CCP Reduction
• 222S Contract Transition
• All

Sustained Feed Delivery Operational Readiness

• Path forward from ORP Level 2 finding, on need for improved WRPS

performance

• Action plan to enhance worker and facility reliability
• All

Project Performance and Forecast

9 October 2018

Front loaded forecast schedules preserve

• pportunity pipeline and reduce risk

Management Forecast of Schedule Performance Trending Analysis from FY17/18

Cost Savings & Avoidance

10 October 2018

$6M $5M

$10M FY19 Savings Target

$4M $3M $2M $1M $7M $8M $9M $10M

October $726k

Functional Org

LOE Cost Savings Electronic Rounds and Data Historian Tank Farm Workers in SCBA

Cross-Cutting Risks

12 October 2018 Risk Id Risk Title Residual Quantitative Overall Risk Level

WRPSC-0003-R Tank Vapors Controls Impact Project Execution High WRPSC-0008-R Requirements Changes/ Interpretations of Requirements High WRPSC-0009-R Aging TOC Facilities & Infrastructure High WRPSC-0015-R Funding Shortfalls Impact the Ability to Accomplish Mission Goals and Objectives High WRPSC-0018-R PFP Control Boundaries cause WRPS delays High WRPSC-0019-R Anticipated work Scope impacted by Permitting delays High WRPSC-0001-R Contract Direction Not Received When Required (NTE) Medium WRPSC-0002-R Resources Not Available When Required Medium WRPSC-0004-R DST Space Not Available Medium WRPSC-0005-R Tank Integrity in East is Compromised Medium WRPSC-0006-R Tank Integrity in West is Compromised Medium WRPSC-0007-R Lack of Adequate Critical Spares Medium

Contract Change Summary

14

Change Proposal Number Description Notification Date Date Submitted to DOE Days from Submittal to ORP Proposed Amount thru FY19 NTE Amount Change Proposals Submitted - To Be Negotiated CP-17-022 222-SL Cold Laboratory Procurement & Construction 07/09/18 07/23/18 126 $35 $50 CP-18-006 Tank Farm Upgrades II - Revision to 3/1/18 submittal 08/14/18 11/14/18 12 $36,689 $10,000 CP-18-007 LAWPS Design Proposal - Revision to 3/29/18 submittal 08/14/18 11/15/18 11 $33,040 $37,000 CP-18-014 Process 2,000 Gallons of Tank Waste in Support of the Test Bed Initiative 04/30/18 07/31/18 118 $8,596 $1,500 CP-18-015 Analysis of Alternatives for the 222-S Cold Laboratory Expansion 05/01/18 06/04/18 175 $320 $250 CP-18-017 242-A Evaporator PB-1 and PB-2 Pump Replacements 09/27/18 11/12/18 14 $4,753 $600 CP-18-019 Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Parts Acquisition Transition Support 07/09/18 09/06/18 81 $10,686 $5,000 $94,119 $54,400 Current Proposals in Development ‐ Not Yet Submitted CP-18-004 DOE O 205.1B Cyber Security (awaiting RFP request) 12/05/17 100 CP-18-009 ACES to Sentinel Upgrade (awaiting RFP request) 02/22/18 $450 CP-18-020 Planning to Manage & Disposition Glass Containers Generated during LAW Vit 08/16/18 $200 CP-19-002 Test Bed Initiative - Phase 2 10/30/18 $300 CP-19-003 Phase 1 Emergent Workscope (FY19 Additional Funding) 11/19/18 $10875 CP-19-004 Phase 2 New Workscope (FY19 Additional Funding) 11/19/18 $0 CP-19-005 222-S Lab Cold Laboratory Design and Construction 11/14/18 1000 $12,925 Negotiation Complete ‐ Mod in Process CP-18-008 Initiation of a Contact Handled Transuranic Waste Demonstration Planning Effort 12/04/17 05/01/18 209 $194 $1,000 $194 $1,000 CP-19-001 Use of APRs & PAPRs Due to Chemical Vapors Impacts (REA)

Grand Total Count: 17

$94,313 $68,325

Total Count Change Proposals Submitted ‐ To Be Negotiated: 7 Potential New Work/Deducts Total Count Potential New Work/Deducts: 1

Grand Total Amount:

Total Count Negotiation Complete ‐ Mod in Process: 1 Total Count Current Proposals in Development ‐ Not Yet Submitted: 7

October 2018 Dollars Represented in Thousands

Run Date: 11/26/18

Critical Needs

15 October 2018

Run Date: 11/26/18

0.97 0.96 1.01 0.99 0.89 0.89

LA LAWPS Performance Revie iew

(WBS 5. 5.5)

Schedule Cost

16 Dollars Represented in Thousands

FY TCPI FYTD CPI CTD SPI CTD CPI FYTD SPI CM SPI

CTD Schedule Variance Total: -$1,807 P - LAWPS-S - Design Project Support

• $607

Cesium Removal Capability - Tech. Maturation

• $436

TSCR Infrastructure

• $379

Cost Variance FYTD: $18 CTD: -$6,281 P - LAWPS - Design $1

• $6,691

P - LAWPS - Design Project Support $1

• $2,350

P - LAWPS-S South - Design $95 $2,275

EOY Forecast SV

Delta From Today

EOY Forecast CV

Delta From Today

Key Points

• Received DFLAW WFD transfer line 30% design package
• Began decommissioning of Full-Scale test equipment
• Completed field work for geotechnical exploration
• Developed plan for long-term storage of sRF resin
• Conducted PrHA for TSCR System

October 2018

$0

• $6,865

$1,807

• $584

Biggest Threats/Risks Keys to Success

W-211 transfer lines are not able to be utilized for DFLAW (outside AP Farm) 1) Early completion of engineering evaluation and communication with regulators 2) Perform testing of transfer lines Flushing capability for DFLAW transfer lines in not provided by WTP 1) Gain concurrence from WTP on the proposed flushing strategy 2) ORP contract direction to WTP for providing flush capability Internally driven design-affecting requirements change during TSCR design 1) Take a conservative approach to nuclear safety designations in the specification 2) Hold workshop to review TCCR and TSCR safety strategy TSCR fabrication subcontractor performance is LTA Testing underway. Preliminary results indicate that cross flow filtration using Mott Grade 5 media may be superior to dead end filtration.

17 October 2018

• Letter of Direction with Notice to Proceed and Not to Exceed received October 30th
• Initiated Project activities including supported the development of Functions and Requirements Document, Tank Selection and Design Initiation

Test Bed In Initi itiative

CT CTO/Closure an and In Interim Meas asures Performance Revie iew

Schedule Cost

18 Dollars Represented in Thousands

FY TCPI FYTD CPI CTD SPI CTD CPI FYTD SPI CM SPI

CTD Schedule Variance Total: -$4,316 Direct Push Characterization & Sampling

• $1,931

Waste Mgt Area C Performance Assessments

• $623

Integrated Disposal Facility Perf Assessment

• $504

Cost Variance FYTD: $435 CTD: $13,881 Technology Development $0 $3,177 Technology Maturation & Analysis $1,456 $2,980 RCRA Closure Plan Updates $170 $2,281

EOY Forecast SV

Delta From Today

EOY Forecast CV

Delta From Today

Key Points Schedule Recovery

• WRPS supported two additional public meetings in Portland and Seattle on the

WMA C WIR Evaluation.

• The NRC consultation on the WMA C WIR Evaluation and 435.1 PA are continuing.

The consultation sessions have been increased to two per week with the NRC.

• CTO collaborating with Mission Integration and ETF Process Engineering on

alternatives for disposition of ETF brine.

• Conceptual design for the NUCON pilot test infrastructure was issued in support of

the project for a field demonstration of the NUCON Vapor Abatement Unit.

• Regulatory Documentation schedule variance is due to Ecology comments

that are past due. Have started receiving and dispositioning the

• comments. Due to the significant number of comments, recovery is not

expected until the end of this FY19.

• ILAW Glass Testing is expected to recover a portion of lost schedule in the

current fiscal year, the remaining scope (Lysimeter studies) is expected to carryover to Q1 of FY 2019.

Biggest Threats / Risks Keys to Success

Path forward for Ecology review and finalization of WMA C closure documents is needed. A mutually acceptable regulatory approach must be developed among Ecology, DOE, and WRPS to move forward with incremental closure of WMA C. Working with DOE and Ecology to develop acceptable path forward. Closure of WMA C may be delayed due to Legal action by stakeholders against the WMA C WIR Evaluation Working with DOE in NRC consultation process and resolving public comments

• n WIR Evaluation

October 2018

0.57 0.57 0.98 1.06 0.61 0.95

• $1,433

$13,143

$3,374

• $148

Tan ank Far arms Projects Performance Revie iew

Schedule Cost

19 Dollars Represented in Thousands

FY TCPI FYTD CPI CTD SPI CTD CPI FYTD SPI CM SPI

CTD Schedule Variance Total: -$16,548 Tank Farm Project Upgrades

• $5,000

Vapor Implementation

• $4,087

Tank Chemistry & Integrity

• $2,761

DST Feed Delivery Projects

• $2,350

Cost Variance FYTD: -$1,030 CTD: -$9,239 Vadose Zone/Interim Measures

• $200
• $9,328

Effluent Treatment Facility LERF Basins $141

• $3,150

Vapor Implementation

• $467

$900 Tank Chemistry & Integrity

• $230

$4,733

EOY Forecast SV

Delta From Today

EOY Forecast CV

Delta From Today

Key Points

• Completed asphalt barrier punch list South section SX Farm
• Completed A-105 Pre Mock-up Training and Graded Mock-up
• Completed Ultrasonic Testing Floor Scan AP-107
• Replaced AP-02A jumper gasket
• Initiated Core Platform Maintenance

Biggest Threats / Risks Keys to Success

Construction and plant forces resource availability Weekly critical resource allocation reviews and prioritization. Impact of change in mission to include Tank Side Cesium Removal and Test Bed Initiative Integration and prioritization for allocation of key resources. Emergent scope for facilities and infrastructure repairs Availability of engineering design and field resources

October 2018

1.14 1.14 0.97 0.81 0.99 1.00

• $75
• $9,543

$16,473

• $304

$4,163

• $30,889

$6,861

• $412

0.96 1.04 0.81 0.99 0.72 0.72

SST Retrie ievals ls Performance Review

Schedule Cost

20 Dollars Represented in Thousands

FY TCPI FYTD CPI CTD SPI CTD CPI FYTD SPI CM SPI

CTD Schedule Variance Total: -$7,273 A/AX Retrievals

• $6,979

C-Farm Retrievals

• $279

AY-102 Retrieval

• $15

Cost Variance FYTD: -$1,319 CTD: -$35,052 A/AX Retrievals

• $1,244
• $36,768

C-Farm Retrievals

• $62
• $6,613

AY-102 Retrieval

• $13

$8,309

EOY Forecast SV

Delta From Today

EOY Forecast CV

Delta From Today

Key Points

• Completed E/W electrical backbone conduit installation
• Removed foam from A-101 & A-103 A Pits
• Formed A-Farm exhauster valve manifold pad and installed rebar
• Completed shipment of C-105 to POR104 HIHTL to ERDF
• Opportunities/Issues
• Addressing shortage of electricians to recover schedule
• Working to implement APR in AX, AY & AZ
• Initiated A-104 and A-105 strategy discussions with Ecology

Major Opportunities/Risk Response Actions

Additional FY19 funding is an opportunity to recover schedule  DOE to provide direction on FY19 funding levels.  WRPS and DOE reach agreement on updated IPL for FY19 work scope and initiate contract modification. Washington Department of Ecology has not responded to WRPS’s submittal to revise air permits for A and AX Farm exhausters. Permit revisions are prerequisites to meeting retrieval CD milestones.  Request to revise the A/AX Farm air permit needed to support retrieval was submitted to ECY on 23 February 2016.  Previous communications indicated ECY would not act until the Vapor SA was finalized. Initiated discussions about retrieval plans for leaking SSTs A-104 and A-105. Regulatory disposition is needed for TPA milestone M-045-15, retrieve A-103 by 30 September 2022.  Meeting regarding A-103, A-104, and A-105 held between WRPS, ORP, and ECY in late August.  Regulatory disposition of TPA M-045-15 is needed near-term. Costs of A/AX retrieval system construction have increased due to tank vapor safety impacts, as-found site conditions, labor and material inflation not predicted in project estimates, and other contributing causes.  Implement APR in AX farm  Portions of the WRS have been redesigned to simplify construction and reduce costs.  Re-compete of construction contracts in FY19 may have unanticipated impacts to performance and cost. Deployment of new retrieval technologies is needed to improve efficiency and to retrieve leaking tanks without causing further waste releases to the environment.  Coordination with CTO  Dome coring technology options  New sample auger for A-Farm application  Working to model tank vapor exposure during AX retrievals and design customized control strategy.

October 2018

$3,709

$20,696

$1,050

$0 1.02 1.01 0.96 1.00 0.99 0.99

Production Operations Performance Review

Schedule Cost

21 Dollars Represented in Thousands

FY TCPI FYTD CPI CTD SPI CTD CPI FYTD SPI CM SPI

CTD Schedule Variance Total: -$1,050 Tank Waste Volume Management - OP 2-3

• $648

222-S Analytical Equip Service Agreements-OP 2-3

• $277

UX-302A Catch Tank Pumping FY18

• $169

Cost Variance FYTD: -$485 CTD: $16,987 Production Operations Support Services

• $10
• $12,766

Production Operations Central Shift Office $52

• $1,689

Production Operations Farms AN/AP/B/BX/BY/C

• $8

$7,354

EOY Forecast SV

Delta From Today

EOY Forecast CV

Delta From Today

Key Points

• October Significant Accomplishments:

 Issued Safety Amendment for, “The Safety Basis Implementation Checklist for Tank Farms Safety Basis Amendment for Tank Farms Automation.” The purpose of this amendment is to implement changes on the Limiting Condition for Operations (LCO) 3.5, DST Annulus Flammable Gas Control and 3.6, DCRT Steady-State Flammable Gas Control while adding new LCOs: 3.10, Waste Transfer System Freeze Protection (Automation) and 3.11, DST Annulus High-Level Alarm (Automation). This Safety Basis Amendment was documented as complete by the Interoffice Memorandum (WRPS-1803548).  Completed the installation of the new Mobius-B Cooler on Gamma Energy Analyzer-190 in 222-S Laboratory room B1F.  Analysis of AIR Proficiency Test samples was completed, which is necessary to maintain Industrial Hygiene Accreditation for vapor analyses.

Biggest Threats / Risks Keys to Success

Aging Equipment: ETF Systems, 242-A Systems, Transfer Pumps Adequate Spares, PMs, and Planned Upgrades PM/CM Backlog Reduction Adequate resource availability Adequate PMs, Spare Parts Inventory Critical Resource Review Integration & prioritization for allocation of key resources Assess Skill Mix to approved Scope HAMTC MOA - Downgrade Respiratory Equip Requirement Field implementation of cartridges following 3rd Party Review PFP D&D boundary controls impact TOC execution Close coordination with CHPRC/DOE on response actions at PFP to minimize impacts 222-S and ETF Readiness to support DFLAW FY19/FY20 Proposal/ERRATA/Buy-back

October 2018