Monsoon is stored in (i) Tanka (ii) Village ponds Nadi (iii) Lakes, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

monsoon is stored in
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Monsoon is stored in (i) Tanka (ii) Village ponds Nadi (iii) Lakes, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MoUD Working Group on Restoration of Lakes 1 st Meeting, New Delhi 27 June 2013 Present Condition of Lakes in Urban Areas By Harsh Vardhan Monsoon is stored in (i) Tanka (ii) Village ponds Nadi (iii) Lakes, etc Let us tour Lakes:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MoUD Working Group on Restoration of Lakes

1st Meeting, New Delhi 27 June 2013

Present Condition of Lakes in Urban Areas

By Harsh Vardhan

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Monsoon is stored in (i) “Tanka” (ii) Village ponds “Nadi” (iii) Lakes, etc

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Let us tour Lakes:

(i) Ambatur lake in Tamil Nadu (ii) Vembanad lake in Kerala (iii) Bangalore lake (iv) Hyderabad lake (v) Kolkatta lake (vi) Bhopal lake (vii) Kota lake (viii) Udaipur lake (ix) Ajmer lake (x) Pushkar lake (xi) Jodhpur lake (xii) Jaisalmer lake (xiii) Dal lake

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • How many lakes in India?
  • Dams: 5,100,
  • f which 400 under

construction

  • What data on lakes?
slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Who administers lakes?
  • MoEF.
  • It gave Rs 1,000 to 100+ lakes
  • For ‘development’ or ‘conservation’
  • How many ‘conserved’?
  • Examples of lakes:
  • Hyderabad – use of JICA funds
  • Bhopal – MoEF funds
  • Ajmer – MoEF funds
  • Pushkar – MoEF funds
  • Udaipur – MoEF funds
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Reasons for poor performance?

  • (i) Lake development treated as an engineering design
  • (ii) Lake not treated as the Natural Resource
  • (iii) Restoration/conservation not accorded priority
  • (iv) Ad hoc works initiated
  • (v) Lack of monitoring
  • (vi) Stake holders not involved
  • (vii) Sewerage-treatment not addressed
  • (viii) Eco System Based Approach not adopted
  • (ix) Recycle and reuse of sewerage water not prioritized
  • (x) MoEF reduced to a grant-agency
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Possibilities:

(i) Lakes to offer quality water for uses (ii) Potable water use be separated (iii) Cities adopt own Water Budget (iv) Cities try to be self-sufficient in water

slide-22
SLIDE 22

An Ideal model:

(i) Adopt re-cycle and re-use pattern (ii) Stop Chemical treatment at ETPs/STPs (iii) Start Bio Treatment (iv) Will reduce huge capital cost (v) Will avoid use of power (vi) Will reduce implementation time (v) No foul odour around

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Inputs needed:

(i) Aquatic vegetation (ii) Fish, frogs, micro-organisms, etc (iii) Flow of water (flushing) (iv) Sedimentation Basin mechanism

slide-24
SLIDE 24

An example: Jaipur’s Man Sagar:

(i) Drain bypassed (ii) Aquatic vegetation introduced (iii) Islands created (iv) Bio treatment of sewerage (v) Water depth increased (vi) Water did not dry up (vii) Foul odour gone (viii) Biodiversity revived (ix) Immense recreation (xi) Peoples’ life improving

slide-25
SLIDE 25

PPP approach:

(i) Land around be lure (ii) Lake be objective (iii) Conservation-cap (iv) Model for other lakes

Possible :

  • Yes. Jaipur has done it:

Citizens’ Birding Fairs (1997 continue)

  • Govt. (2002) and

PPP (2005 onwards)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Hyderabad Recovery Scenario

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Dal, richer with vegetation

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Birds make Udaipur’s Pichhola rich

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Chandalai on death bed

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Jaipur’s Man Sagar: then (prior to 2005) and now (after 2006)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Inputs need recognition for Lakes

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Inputs undermined at Lakes

slide-33
SLIDE 33

An ideal can be recreated

slide-34
SLIDE 34

One person can change the world!

Thanks