Modeling recycling in LCA Tomas Ekvall 1,2 , Anna Bjrklund 3 , - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

modeling recycling in lca
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Modeling recycling in LCA Tomas Ekvall 1,2 , Anna Bjrklund 3 , - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Modeling recycling in LCA Tomas Ekvall 1,2 , Anna Bjrklund 3 , Kristian Jelse 2 , Jenny Lagergren 1 1 Chalmers University of Technology 2 IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute 3 Royal Institute of Technology Highlights 1. Criteria for


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Modeling recycling in LCA

Tomas Ekvall1,2, Anna Björklund3, Kristian Jelse2, Jenny Lagergren1

1 Chalmers University of Technology 2 IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute 3 Royal Institute of Technology

slide-2
SLIDE 2

www.lifecyclecenter.se

Highlights

1. Criteria for good LCA methods 2. Assessment of various approaches to allocation at recycling 3. Swedish consensus process will follow

slide-3
SLIDE 3

www.lifecyclecenter.se

Source: Domenech 2019

slide-4
SLIDE 4

www.lifecyclecenter.se

Source: Ekvall et al. 2019

slide-5
SLIDE 5

www.lifecyclecenter.se

Standards Guidelines Scientific publications

ISO 14044 + TR 14049 PEF & OEF Ekvall & Tillman (1997) ISO 14067 International EPD Ekvall (2000) ISO 20915 Nordic Guidelines on LCA Schrijvers et al. (2016) EN 15804 + TR 16970 Dutch Handbook on LCA Allacker et al. (2017) EN 16485 UBA guide on packaging LCA PAS 2050 Greenhouse Gas Protocol Worldsteel Association & ISSF Ecoinvent => 12 main approaches

slide-6
SLIDE 6

www.lifecyclecenter.se

Circular Footprint Formula

E = (1-R1)×EV+R1×[AERin+(1-A)EV×QSin/QP] + + (1-A)R2×[(ERout-E*V×(QSout/QP)] + + (1-R2)×ED

slide-7
SLIDE 7

www.lifecyclecenter.se

Criteria – starting point

LCA should contribute to reducing environmental impacts

slide-8
SLIDE 8

www.lifecyclecenter.se

Previously derived criteria

Feasible Accurate Compre- hendible Inspiring

decisions

Robust

results information knowledge incentive abuse Source: Ekvall et al. 2004

slide-9
SLIDE 9

www.lifecyclecenter.se

Reduce impacts Feasible Easily applied Available data Generalizable results Accurate Close to reality Life cycle scope Explicit, justified, evaluated Comprehendible Comprehendible Inspiring Relevant Legitimate Robust Reproducable Adaptable

Our criteria

  • r indicators

Source: Ekvall et al. 2019

slide-10
SLIDE 10

www.lifecyclecenter.se

Tentative assessment results

Method Criteria

  • A. Easy to use
  • B. Readily available data
  • C. Generalizable results
  • D. Sufficiently close to reality
  • E. Life cycle scope
  • F. Explicit, justified, and evaluated
  • G. Comprehendible
  • H. Relevant
  • I. Legitimate
  • J. Reproducible
  • K. Adaptable

Simple cut-off Cut-off with economic allocation Cut-off plus credit Allocation to material losses Allocation to virgin material use 50/50 methods Quality-adjusted 50/50 methods Circular Footprint Formula Market price-based allocation Market price-based substitution Price-elasticity approaches Allocation at the point of substitution

slide-11
SLIDE 11

www.lifecyclecenter.se

The project continues…

  • Case studies in industry (ongoing)
  • Revised assessment
  • Consensus process
slide-12
SLIDE 12

www.lifecyclecenter.se

Consortium

Coordination: Swedish Life Cycle Center Funding: Swedish Energy Administration Re:Source Programme Research group: Chalmers University of Technology IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Royal Institute of Technology Case-study partners: Essity SSAB Outokumpu Volvo Tetra Pak RISE/Miljögiraff Extended working group: Vattenfall Volvo Cars Nouryon Stena Recycling Jernkontoret Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Swedish Transport Administration

slide-13
SLIDE 13

www.lifecyclecenter.se

Thanks for the attention!

Sources: Allacker K, Mathieux F, Pennington D, Pant R. 2017. The search for an appropriate end-of-life formula for the purpose of the European Commission Environmental Footprint initiative. Int. J. LCA 22:1441- 1458. Domenech T (2019) Explainer: What is a circular economy? The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-is-a-circular-economy-29666 Ekvall T (2000) A market-based approach to allocation at open-loop recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 29(1-2):93-111. Ekvall T, Tillman A-M (1997) Open-loop recycling: criteria for allocation procedures. Int. J. LCA 2:155- 162. Ekvall T, Ciroth A, Hofstetter P, Norris G (2004) Comparative assessment of attributional and consequential methods for LCA. Poster och PM från 14th Annual Meeting of SETAC-Europe, Prag, Tjeckien, april 2004. Abstracts p. 197. Ekvall T, Björklund A, Jelse K (2019) Modelling recycling in life cycle assessment ***incomplete draft***. Swedish Life Cycle Center, Gothenburg, Sweden. Schrijvers DL., Loubet P, Sonnemann G. 2016. Critical review of guidelines against a systematic framework with regard to consistency on allocation procedures for recycling in LCA. Int. J. LCA 21(7): 994-1008. Kontact: tomas.ekvall@ivl.se