Modeling Cell Migration in a Simulated Bioelectrical Signaling - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

modeling cell migration in a simulated bioelectrical
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Modeling Cell Migration in a Simulated Bioelectrical Signaling - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Modeling Cell Migration in a Simulated Bioelectrical Signaling Network for Anatomical Regeneration Giordano Ferreira 1 , Matthias Scheutz 1 , Michael Levin 2 Giordano.ferreira@tufts.edu 1 Human Robot Interaction Laboratory at Tufts University 2


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Modeling Cell Migration in a Simulated Bioelectrical Signaling Network for Anatomical Regeneration

Giordano Ferreira1, Matthias Scheutz1, Michael Levin2 Giordano.ferreira@tufts.edu

1Human Robot Interaction Laboratory at Tufts University 2Allen Discovery Center at Tufts University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

´ Imagine that one can program cells to organize themselves into new tissues with novel capabilities

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

´ Imagine that one can program cells to organize themselves into new tissues with novel capabilities ´ These tissues could fix a birth defect or induce remodeling of a damaged

  • rgan

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction

´ Imagine that one can program cells to organize themselves into new tissues with novel capabilities ´ These tissues could fix a birth defect or induce remodeling of a damaged

  • rgan

´ This is one of the goals of synthetic biology. A field that aims to design and engineer biologically parts, devices and systems

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Model Organism – Planarian Flatworm

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Model Organism - Planarian Flatworm

´ Note that the shape to which an animal regenerates upon damage can be altered without genetic changes ´ For example, it is possible to produce two headed planarian worms ´ Genes and proteins involved in regeneration are known, but the exact mechanism of storing and using morphological information for regeneration is still unknown

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Computational Model of Morphology Discovery and Repair

´ We previously developed a model that could discover the morphological information of an organism, during a discovery phase ´ Later, when the organism was lesioned the dynamic messaging mechanism in the model was able to cause regeneration of the damaged parts ´ The model has demonstrated a variety of functional properties of regeneration displayed by Planaria

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Features of the model

´ Proposed in Ferreira et al. 2016 1 ´ Morphological information is stored in a dynamic distributed fashion across cells ´ The genome is hypothesized to encode the computational machinery necessary for carrying out morphological discovery and repair ´ A key feature of the model is that it can dynamically learn and maintain new morphologies using the same computational mechanism

8

1 Ferreira, G. B. S., Smiley, M., Scheutz, M., and Levin, M. (2016). Dynamic structure discovery

and repair for 3d cell assemblages. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference

  • n the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems (ALIFEXV)
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Discovery

9

Cells send messages to other cells containing information about the path that those messages traveled.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Regeneration

10

Then those message packets ”backtrack” verifying if there exists a missing cell in the previous path, repairing it.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Regeneration

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Regeneration

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Previous Findings

´ In Ferreira et al (2016) 1 we showed that this model was capable of maintaining the structure of the worm indefinitely in the light of random damages happening to parts of it ´ However, communication was assumed to be perfect and without losses, which is not realistic in any actual organism ´ In Ferreira et al (2017) 2 we investigated our model of dynamic messaging morphology discovery and repair under various conditions of noise and proposed simple extensions to overcome the detrimental effects of noise

13

1 Ferreira, G. B. S., Smiley, M., Scheutz, M., and Levin, M. (2016). Dynamic structure discovery and repair for 3d

cell assemblages. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation

  • f Living Systems (ALIFEXV)

2 Ferreira, G. B. S., Smiley, M., Scheutz, M., and Levin, M. (2017). Investigating the Effects of Noise on a Cell-to-

Cell Communication Mechanism for Structure Regeneration. In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Artificial Life (ECAL 2017)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Adult Stem Cells – ”Neoblasts”

´ An explanation for Planaria’s regeneration capabilities is the high number

  • f adult stem cells (called ”neoblasts”) that exist in their body

´ Between 20% and 30% of cells in Planaria are neoblasts ´ Neoblasts are the only type of cells capable of dividing and differentiating into any other cell type ´ Worms with no neoblasts lose their regeneration capabilities

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Migration of Neoblasts

´ There is evidence that signals coming from the wound guide neoblasts to the injury site. ´ In a partially irradiated worm (e.g., with neoblasts existing only in the posterior part), regeneration does not start immediately following a anterior

  • injury. Instead, it takes up to 4 weeks to create a mass of cells capable of

differentiating into a head. 3 ´ This suggests that neoblasts can migrate over long distances until they reach the area of the injury.

15

3 Wolff E, Dubois F. 1948. Sur la migration des cellules de régénération chez les

  • planaires. Rev. Swisse Zool. 55:218–27
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Simulated Neoblasts

´ In this work, there exist two cell types: neoblasts and somatic cells ´ Only neoblasts are capable of dividing ´ Somatic cells create migration messages that guide neoblasts to the injury area ´ We want to test whether the worm can recover from an injury that removed half of its tissue

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Discovery With Neoblasts

s1 s3 n s2 s3 n n s3 s3 n

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Backtracking

s1 s3 n s2 s3 n n s3 s3 n

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Migration Message

s1 s3 n s2 s3 n n s3 s3 n

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Migration

s1 s3 n s2 s3 n n s3 s3 n

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Migration

s3 s3 s3 s3 n n n n

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Proliferation

s3 s3 s3 s3 n n n n

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Proliferation

s3 s3 s3 s3 n n n n

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Simulated Morphology

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Worm cut – Cycle 50

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Cycle 60

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

CYCLE 70

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

CYCLE 80

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

CYCLE 90

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

End of the Regeneration Process

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Results – Full Regeneration

´ The model completely regenerated the simulated worm in 19.56% (1565 out

  • f 8000) of the parameter space

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Epimorphosis vs Morphallaxis

32

Image taken from: Agata, K., Saito, Y., & Nakajima, E. (2007). Unifying principles of regeneration I: Epimorphosis versus morphallaxis. Development, growth & differentiation, 49 2, 73-8.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Conclusion

´ In this paper, we expanded the capabilities of our model in two ways:

´ Restricted cell division to adult stem cells (neoblasts); ´ Added stem cell migration as a possible cell behavior

´ Large parameter sweeps of the model determined that even for small ratios of neoblasts (10% for instance) the model was able to fully regenerate the original morphology ´ As next steps, we want to make the model account for morphallaxis and also to investigate the robustness of the model against mutations.

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Funding support: Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group,