MODELING AT UCLA. CURRENT STATUS By Sergey Smolentsev and UCLA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
MODELING AT UCLA. CURRENT STATUS By Sergey Smolentsev and UCLA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
MODELING AT UCLA. CURRENT STATUS By Sergey Smolentsev and UCLA Modeling Group APEX e-Meeting 22 February 4, 6 2003 CONTENT Benchmark case. Lid-driven cavity flow 3-D MHD flows in non-uniform magnetic fields with j- and B-formulations
CONTENT Benchmark case. Lid-driven cavity flow 3-D MHD flows in non-uniform magnetic fields with j- and B-formulations First steps towards stability analysis for jet flows in a magnetic field
Benchmark case. Lid-driven cavity flow
Classic test for 2-D, 3-D CFD codes Not extended to 3-D MHD flows yet UCLA code 1 (Ni), FLUENT (Morley), UCLA code 2 (Smolentsev), HIMAG (Ni, Munipalli)
Lid moves in X-direction B applied in Z-direction
Ha=45 Re=100
- 1
- 0.5
0.5 1 Z-coordinate
- 1
- 0.5
0.5 1 Y-coordinate
Benchmark case. Lid-driven cavity flow
UCLA code 1 (Ni) FLUENT (Morley) UCLA code 2 (Smolentsev) HIMAG (Ni, Munipalli)
- Collocated grid
- B-formulation
- Commercial code
- Unstructured grid
- B- or ϕ-formulation
- Fully staggered grid
- B- or ϕ-formulation
- Unstructured grid
- B-formulation
Benchmark case. Lid-driven cavity flow
UCLA code 1 (Ni) FLUENT (Morley) UCLA code 2 (Smolentsev) HIMAG (Ni, Munipalli) BC: B=0 at Γ1 BC 1: B=0 at Γ2 BC 2: Bτ=0, ∂Bn/∂n=0 at Γ1 BC: jn=0 at Γ1 BC: B=0 at Γ1 Note: UCLA code 1 and FLUENT use physically incorrect BC
Benchmark case. Lid-driven cavity flow
u y
- 0.25
0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
From Mingjiu using a projection method for B From Neil using FLUENT to solve B From Sergey by solving B formulation From HIMAG by solving electrical potential formulation NonMHD flow
UCLA code 1 FLUENT (B-formulation) UCLA code 2 (B-formulation) HIMAG Non-MHD flow
U(Y) at X=0.5, Z=0.5
Benchmark case. Lid-driven cavity flow
z u
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
- 0.2
- 0.175
- 0.15
- 0.125
- 0.1
- 0.075
- 0.05
- 0.025
From Mingjiu using a projection method for B From Sergey by solving B formulation From HIMAG by solving electrical potential formulation NonMHD flow
UCLA code 1 UCLA code 2 (B-formulation) HIMAG Non-MHD flow
U(Z) at X=0.5, Y=0.5
Benchmark case. Lid-driven cavity flow V(X) at Y=0.5, Z=0.5
x v
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
- 0.3
- 0.25
- 0.2
- 0.15
- 0.1
- 0.05
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
From Mingjiu using projection method for B From Neil using FLUENT to solve B From Sergey by solving B formulation From HIMAG by solving electrical potential formulation NonMHD Result
V
UCLA code 1 FLUENT (B-formulation) UCLA code 2 (B-formulation) HIMAG Non-MHD flow
Benchmark case. Lid-driven cavity flow
All codes demonstrated excellent agreement in non-MHD case. The velocity field is almost insensitive to the BCs on B even though they are not quite correct. Fluent with ϕ-formulation had no convergence. UCLA code 2 with ϕ-formulation converged but the result was very different from other calculations. HIMAG with ϕ-formulation converged and the result agreed well with other calculations. In MHD case all calculations demonstrated reasonable agreement. Higher discrepancy in U(Z) can be explained by a strong impact
- f the Hartmann layers on the flow, which were probably resolved
differently by different codes.
3-D MHD flows in non-uniform magnetic fields with j- and B-formulations
Z X
Y
S N
GOALS Implementation of different MHD formulations Comparisons with other codes Application to APEX Construction of divB=0, rotB=0 applied magnetic fields
3-D MHD flows in non-uniform magnetic fields with j- and B-formulations
Analytical solution for a 3-D magnetic field in the gap between the magnetized plates was used to describe the applied magnetic field B-formulation J-formulation is being tested
Computations by Sergio Cuevas. More results will be presented at the next APEX Meeting.
First steps towards stability analysis for jet flows in a magnetic field
Rayley-Weber classic theory of capillary jet disintegration
) 3 1 ( 2 2 1 La + = ω ) 3 1 ( 2 1 La k + = We La C d L ) 3 1 ( / + =
Similar approach is used to study capillary jet break up in a magnetic field (radial). Preliminary analysis showed significant increase in L/d0 as the magnetic field grows.
B-field