Model Users Group Meeting TMIP Peer Review NCSITE June 9,2004 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

model users group meeting tmip peer review ncsite june 9
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Model Users Group Meeting TMIP Peer Review NCSITE June 9,2004 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Model Users Group Meeting TMIP Peer Review NCSITE June 9,2004 Rhett Fussell, PE Model Research & Development Team TMIP Peer Review, How Were You? , The Mystery of TPBs Modeling Efforts! Purpose of the Review Discussion Points of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Model Users Group Meeting TMIP Peer Review NCSITE June 9,2004

Rhett Fussell, PE Model Research & Development Team

slide-2
SLIDE 2

TMIP Peer Review, How Were You?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Mystery of TPBs Modeling Efforts!

,

Purpose of the Review Discussion Points of Interest Recommendations from the Panel Where we are headed

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Purpose of the Panel: We Need Some Help From You Now!

We lost a lot of knowledge The modeling world was changing Concerned about not being state of the practice Wanted some idea of what is accepted We took a Look at the modeling world around us & realized:

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Ken Cervenka, (NCTCOG) Guy Rousseau, (ARC) Kuo-Ann Chiao, (NYMTC)

Berry Ives, (Middle Rio Grande COG)

Danny Lamb, (FDOT)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Rhett Fussell

Who Rode in our Mystery machine?

Leta Huntsinger Tim Padgett Dan Thomas Mike Bruff Lydia McIntyre Beverly Williams

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What ?s Need to be Answered to Solve the Mystery?

Guidance and recommendations on types or levels

  • f travel demand modeling

Recommendations on organizational questions, such as the role of MPOs and staffing capacities Prioritized recommendations for travel demand modeling improvements Information on travel modeling best practices at all stages of TDM development

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Discussion Points of Interest

Organizational Type Issues Data Sources Four Step Process

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Organizational Type Issues

NCDOT’s responsibilities across the state Does the Department need specialists or generalists Partnerships with Others Model Types Developed across the State

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Data Issues

Field Surveys-Does this make sense? Non-standard data collection methods Use/collection of Data Travel Surveys- performing them, transferability, commercial vehicles Data Forecasting

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Four Step Process

Gravity Model Friction Factors/gamma function Borrowing of equations, factors Destination Choice Transit modeling Assignment Techniques Validation/Calibration Issues

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Panel Recommendations Panel Recommendations

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Mystery Fact 1: Strengths of TPB Modeling Staff & Approach

Young pool of modeling talent- seem to be forward thinking

  • pen to criticism, ?’s

Good understanding of the validation/calibration criteria Good modeling training documentation (Modeling 101) Good survey base for regional areas

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Mystery Fact 2: Data/Survey Recommendations

Create Data collection strategy- 10 yrs update major surveys

  • r schedule off years to spread out cost

do more speed studies Sample broader areas in state & use to apply Creative funding-CMAQ Take advantage of other data-NPTS, census, etc look at new ways of using data Regional control totals are a must- use other tools, delphi panels, specialists Develop consistent data standards- data formats, use of data, etc

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Mystery Fact 3: 4 Step Process Recommendations

Stay Away from subjective variables(classification) Keep special generators to a minimum- stratify into another trip purpose Gravity model still the standard Invest heavily in surveys before doing destination choice Friction factors still accepted-use gamma too

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Mystery Fact 3: 4 Step Process Recommendations

Transit-identify a menu of varying techniques, nested logit, pivot pt, binomial,etc No more AON assignment-except to run logic checks Perform User equilibrium Speed studies to develop new vol/delay curves and measures for free flow speed Use aerial photos to verify centroids for loading

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Mystery Fact 4: General Opportunities & Challenges

Create a Statewide Model users group Statewide Model Make better use of consultant services-specialized tasks Create a consortium of technical partners Specialists are a necessity in your branch-pay for it Develop a toolbox for analysis Open mind in emerging processes

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Where are We headed?

Modeling Unit- specialists Control totals- have been using them in areas, looking at covering the whole state Surveys- involved in some, looking at using together perhaps a survey RFP Looking at new modeling processes-using census, modeling process development Model users group-helping to create/develop

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Where are We headed?

Use of consultants more-

  • n call contract,consortium of expertise

Toolbox for use in modeling analysis - ITRE/universities Best practices Committee

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Mystery Solved!!!!