MOCAP Uros Zizek Measuring performance of cloud-based CEO at - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mocap
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MOCAP Uros Zizek Measuring performance of cloud-based CEO at - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MOCAP Uros Zizek Measuring performance of cloud-based CEO at CASTOOLA platform for interactive TV services delivery FEC3 Paris, March 14-16, 2018 WWW.FED4FIRE.EU Castoola Platform is cloud-based platform for serving of interactive TV


slide-1
SLIDE 1

WWW.FED4FIRE.EU

MOCAP

Measuring performance of cloud-based platform for interactive TV services delivery

FEC3

Paris, March 14-16, 2018

Uros Zizek

CEO at CASTOOLA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Castoola Platform is cloud-based platform for serving of interactive TV services based on HbbTV (“Hybrid broadcast-broadband TV”) technology. WHAT IS CASTOOLA PLATFORM?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

WWW.FED4FIRE.EU

  • hard to test our platform in a real large-scale environment

with a guarantee that existing end-users would not experience any bad side-effects

  • always keen to improve our product and deliver highest

possible quality of service

  • btain useful information about the bottlenecks and plan

future upgrades

3

Background & motivation

slide-4
SLIDE 4

WWW.FED4FIRE.EU

  • to simulate high number of end-user requests from the Virtual Wall

testbed to the test instance of our platform

  • to define and prepare 15 different test scenarios,
  • to execute the experiment on each test scenario on multiple different

ranges of number of end-user requests:

  • up to 1.000 end-users
  • up to 5.000 end-users
  • up to 10.000 end-users
  • up to 100.000 end-users
  • up to 500.000 end-users
  • up to 2.000.000 end-users

4

Concept & objectives

slide-5
SLIDE 5

WWW.FED4FIRE.EU 5

Set-up of the experiment

  • Test instance of

Castoola Platform in the cloud (DigitalOcean)

  • Virtual Wall testbed

(1 master node, 50 testing nodes)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

WWW.FED4FIRE.EU 6

Results (1/3)

Example of the result on the front-end part of the platform

slide-7
SLIDE 7

WWW.FED4FIRE.EU 7

Results (2/3)

Example of the result on the back-end part of the platform (complex operation)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

WWW.FED4FIRE.EU 8

Results (3/3)

Example of the result on the back-end part of the platform (static cached file)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

WWW.FED4FIRE.EU 9

Business impact (1/4)

  • To eliminate bottlenecks
  • To higher up the boundaries of maximum number of end-users
  • Scalability of cloud-based platform
  • Provide best possible quality of service (QoS)
  • Positive impact on pricing model (cost per end-user now

possible)

  • Market reach (premium clients)
slide-10
SLIDE 10

WWW.FED4FIRE.EU 10

Business impact (2/4)

Observations:

  • Overall satisfied with the results
  • Back-end part of the platform needs improvement

Action:

  • Future development activities to be planned based on the

results of this experiment

slide-11
SLIDE 11

WWW.FED4FIRE.EU 11

Business impact (3/4)

Value perceived:

  • gained knowledge on topics of automated testing and

experimentation, cloud-based solutions scalability and

  • ptimization, private and public networking in practice
  • practical experience on preparation and execution of the

experiment based on Fed4Fire+ facilities and testbeds;

  • btaining useful information about the performance and

bottlenecks of our cloud-based platform.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

WWW.FED4FIRE.EU 12

Business impact (4/4)

Direct value:

  • Identifying of issues and bottlenecks
  • Future development activities to be planned based on results
  • f this experiment

Indirect value:

  • Obtain useful information about latest trends of testing and

experimenting

  • Knowledge extendable to other industries and fields
slide-13
SLIDE 13

WWW.FED4FIRE.EU 13

Feedback (1/4)

Testbed used:

  • Virtual Wall

We used 51 (1 controlling + 50 testing) physical nodes, connected to each other and reachable through public network Worked very well! Tools used:

  • Fed4FIRE portal (We used

the documentation part of the portal, which was very useful for us. Everything worked well, we’ve just been missing some more practical tutorials.)

  • JFed (Our experience with

jFed tool is very good, it has been working perfectly in our case)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

WWW.FED4FIRE.EU 14

Feedback (2/4)

For us, the most valuable components of the federation are:

1.

resources and testbeds available (we could not get so much resources for free anywhere else)

2.

technical support (guidance by the patron all from the start to the end)

3.

technical documentation that comes together with the testbed

slide-15
SLIDE 15

WWW.FED4FIRE.EU 15

Feedback (3/4)

Testbed performance

  • Testbed (nodes on the Virtual Wall) performed above our

expectations

  • Number of resources available was large enough – could get

even more if needed

  • Had no issues with reservation of nodes & time planning
  • Environment was trustroworthy
slide-16
SLIDE 16

WWW.FED4FIRE.EU 16

Feedback (4/4)

What we also liked:

  • Everything in Fed4FIRE+ is well organized
  • Not too much of administration, so we could focus on practical

work

  • Fed4FIRE+ enabled us what no-one else could (as far as we

recognized)

  • We meet other experimenters & interesting projects
slide-17
SLIDE 17

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, which is co-funded by the European Commission and the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation, under grant agreement No 732638.

WWW.FED4FIRE.EU