mitigating composite pain
play

Mitigating Composite Pain 1. What are my reporting requirements 2. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mitigating Composite Pain 1. What are my reporting requirements 2. Why are we here MCP OVERVIEW 3. Make Safe Short term 4. Remediation Cost Mitigation 5. Project Delivery WHY ARE WE HERE? A Brief History of Combustible Cladding Fires


  1. Mitigating Composite Pain

  2. 1. What are my reporting requirements 2. Why are we here MCP OVERVIEW 3. Make Safe – Short term 4. Remediation – Cost Mitigation 5. Project Delivery

  3. WHY ARE WE HERE? A Brief History of Combustible Cladding Fires ▪ ACP Flame Spread: Vertical – Up and Down Grenfell Tower ▪ Impacts to Surrounding Structures and Elements London ▪ Chimney Effect ▪ Petrochemical cladding • 24 storey building that burned for 60 hours Lacrosse • Fire fighters onsite in 6 minutes Building • Fire spread quickly up and around external facade of building • Combination of factors resulting in over 80 deaths Melbourne The product eventually identified was a non-compliant • Renovations undertaken in 2016 included installing cladding to the building product ‘ Alucobest ’ which by visual inspection is • An alternate cladding panel was rejected due to cost indistinguishable from other compliant products such as ‘Alucobond Plus’

  4. CYBER TOWERS BANGKOK

  5. OTHER CASES MLB (2014)

  6. ACP REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 1. Self assessment-notification to QBCC: 29/3/19 2. Determination of type and risk assessment: 29/5/19 3. Fire safety risk assessment: FE 27/8/19 – 3/5/21 1. Sate wide audit 1734 Buildings 2. Risk assessments on 298 Buildings 3. Building Permit Authority requires remedial action on 31 Buildings 1. >30% Polyethylene ACP Banned 10/2018 2. Building registration CTF 22/2/19 3. Withdrawal of CodeMark Certificates 02/19 4. ACP Inspection and determination 5. Building may be subject to fire order 1. Ban on ‘high risk cladding’ 2. State-wide Audit of 1269 Buildings with ACP 3. Show Cause notices issued to 150 Buildings 4. >High risk buildings 275

  7. PROJECT DELIVERY • Short Term Make Safe • Intrusive Investigation • Planning • Design • Material selection • Remediation • Certification

  8. REMEDIATION: Assessment Engage a professional to asses cladding zones: confirm high risk areas and remediation works • Short Term Make Safe Actions / Risk Mitigation • These works are undertaken to mitigate risk associated with potential ignition sources for combustible cladding • Cost Mitigation Activities • Undertake Intrusive investigations of your cladding • What is behind it • What is the substrate condition like Am I able to reuse the subframe system • Are there other non-compliant materials • Assess the condition and performance of: • Thermal insulation • Window performance and condition • • The more background detail you are able to ascertain will facilitate your ability to corral the remedial cost exposure

  9. REMEDIATION: Works Delivery • Where to does my cost exposure lie • Replacement Material Selection: 20-35% Design: 5-10% • Access and Installation: 45-60% • Certification: 5-15% • Delivery Cost Mitigation Activities • Preplanning: • Use the knowledge gained from your earlier investigations • Have a developed scope and specification in place for tender • • Are there other remediation works that could be combined into the programme: ie. Is commercial benefit in improving the underlying Thermal and Acoustic performance of the façade The longer the duration on the site, the more prolonged your risk exposure •

  10. ACCESS SYSTEMS TYPICAL OPTIONS: Mast Climber • Scaffolding • Elevated Work Platforms (EWP) • • Boom lifts • Scissor Lifts Rope Access • • Swing Stage Building Maintenance Units (BMU) •

  11. MATERIAL OPTIONS: DtS Replacement • Solid 3mm or 4mm Solid Aluminium Plate Cladding: AS 1530.1 • High Performance Composites (Honeycomb Core) • Patinated Zinc • Patinated Copper Glassfibre Reinforced Concrete (GRC) •

  12. DESIGN CONTRACTOR ENGAGEMENT CERTIFICATION Design Considerations • Is there Benefit/Requirement in Architectural engagement • Cladding Replacement: visual like for like or alter the architectural aspect • DA considerations: Does a fire order impact on a potential DA application • Does the project quantum warrant 3D modelling Contractor Engagement • Who will manage the process: Tender(s), Project Management, Sub-Contractor Selection • Project Monitoring / Reporting Cycles / Community & Stakeholder Liaison • Works Verification Procedures: Clear and concise, understand the procedure to deal with ‘issues’ Certification and Statutory Submittals • How to minimise your certification processes: Early engagement is key • Clear and defined design verification processes • Material selection: DtS is Recommended / Advised / Counseled / Beseeched

  13. THANK YOU Core was founded with an adventurous spirit, with the vision to lead our industry to higher standards of engineering. EVERY PROJECT, EVERY BUILDING, EVERY DAY.

  14. CONSULTING ENGINEERS

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend