Mitigating Composite Pain 1. What are my reporting requirements 2. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mitigating composite pain
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Mitigating Composite Pain 1. What are my reporting requirements 2. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mitigating Composite Pain 1. What are my reporting requirements 2. Why are we here MCP OVERVIEW 3. Make Safe Short term 4. Remediation Cost Mitigation 5. Project Delivery WHY ARE WE HERE? A Brief History of Combustible Cladding Fires


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Mitigating Composite Pain

slide-2
SLIDE 2

MCP OVERVIEW

  • 1. What are my reporting requirements
  • 2. Why are we here
  • 3. Make Safe – Short term
  • 4. Remediation – Cost Mitigation
  • 5. Project Delivery
slide-3
SLIDE 3

WHY ARE WE HERE?

A Brief History of Combustible Cladding Fires ▪ ACP Flame Spread: Vertical – Up and Down ▪ Impacts to Surrounding Structures and Elements ▪ Chimney Effect ▪ Petrochemical cladding

  • 24 storey building that burned for 60 hours
  • Fire fighters onsite in 6 minutes
  • Fire spread quickly up and around external facade of building
  • Combination of factors resulting in over 80 deaths
  • Renovations undertaken in 2016 included installing cladding to the building
  • An alternate cladding panel was rejected due to cost

Grenfell Tower

London

Lacrosse Building

Melbourne

The product eventually identified was a non-compliant product ‘Alucobest’ which by visual inspection is indistinguishable from other compliant products such as ‘Alucobond Plus’

slide-4
SLIDE 4

CYBER TOWERS BANGKOK

slide-5
SLIDE 5

OTHER CASES

MLB (2014)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ACP REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

1. Self assessment-notification to QBCC: 29/3/19 2. Determination of type and risk assessment: 29/5/19 3. Fire safety risk assessment: FE 27/8/19 – 3/5/21 1. >30% Polyethylene ACP Banned 10/2018 2. Building registration CTF 22/2/19 3. Withdrawal of CodeMark Certificates 02/19 4. ACP Inspection and determination 5. Building may be subject to fire order 1. Ban on ‘high risk cladding’ 2. State-wide Audit of 1269 Buildings with ACP 3. Show Cause notices issued to 150 Buildings 4. >High risk buildings 275 1. Sate wide audit 1734 Buildings 2. Risk assessments on 298 Buildings 3. Building Permit Authority requires remedial action

  • n 31 Buildings
slide-7
SLIDE 7

PROJECT DELIVERY

  • Short Term Make Safe
  • Intrusive Investigation
  • Planning
  • Design
  • Material selection
  • Remediation
  • Certification
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Engage a professional to asses cladding zones: confirm high risk areas and remediation works

  • Short Term Make Safe Actions / Risk Mitigation
  • These works are undertaken to mitigate risk associated with potential ignition sources for

combustible cladding

  • Cost Mitigation Activities
  • Undertake Intrusive investigations of your cladding
  • What is behind it
  • What is the substrate condition like
  • Am I able to reuse the subframe system
  • Are there other non-compliant materials
  • Assess the condition and performance of:
  • Thermal insulation
  • Window performance and condition
  • The more background detail you are able to ascertain will facilitate your ability to corral the

remedial cost exposure

REMEDIATION: Assessment

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Where to does my cost exposure lie
  • Replacement Material Selection: 20-35%
  • Design: 5-10%
  • Access and Installation: 45-60%
  • Certification: 5-15%
  • Delivery Cost Mitigation Activities
  • Preplanning:
  • Use the knowledge gained from your earlier investigations
  • Have a developed scope and specification in place for tender
  • Are there other remediation works that could be combined into the programme: ie.

Is commercial benefit in improving the underlying Thermal and Acoustic performance of the façade

  • The longer the duration on the site, the more prolonged your risk exposure

REMEDIATION: Works Delivery

slide-10
SLIDE 10

ACCESS SYSTEMS

  • Mast Climber
  • Scaffolding
  • Elevated Work Platforms (EWP)
  • Boom lifts
  • Scissor Lifts
  • Rope Access
  • Swing Stage
  • Building Maintenance Units (BMU)

TYPICAL OPTIONS:

slide-11
SLIDE 11

DtS Replacement Cladding: AS 1530.1

  • Solid 3mm or 4mm Solid Aluminium Plate
  • High Performance Composites (Honeycomb Core)
  • Patinated Zinc
  • Patinated Copper
  • Glassfibre Reinforced Concrete (GRC)

MATERIAL OPTIONS:

slide-12
SLIDE 12

DESIGN CONTRACTOR ENGAGEMENT CERTIFICATION

Design Considerations

  • Is there Benefit/Requirement in Architectural engagement
  • Cladding Replacement: visual like for like or alter the architectural aspect
  • DA considerations: Does a fire order impact on a potential DA application
  • Does the project quantum warrant 3D modelling

Contractor Engagement

  • Who will manage the process: Tender(s), Project Management, Sub-Contractor Selection
  • Project Monitoring / Reporting Cycles / Community & Stakeholder Liaison
  • Works Verification Procedures: Clear and concise, understand the procedure to deal with ‘issues’

Certification and Statutory Submittals

  • How to minimise your certification processes: Early engagement is key
  • Clear and defined design verification processes
  • Material selection: DtS is Recommended / Advised / Counseled / Beseeched
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

THANK YOU

Core was founded with an adventurous spirit, with the vision to lead our industry to higher standards of engineering.

EVERY PROJECT, EVERY BUILDING, EVERY DAY.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

CONSULTING

ENGINEERS