MINOS+ Results and Future Plans A.P. Schreckenberger The University - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

minos results and future plans
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MINOS+ Results and Future Plans A.P. Schreckenberger The University - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MINOS+ Results and Future Plans A.P. Schreckenberger The University of Texas at Austin (On behalf of the MINOS and MINOS+ Collaborations) Why we are excited MINOS/MINOS+ makes use of the NuMI beam Most powerful neutrino beam in


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MINOS+ Results and Future Plans

A.P. Schreckenberger – The University of Texas at Austin (On behalf of the MINOS and MINOS+ Collaborations)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Why we are excited…

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 2

 MINOS/MINOS+ makes use of the NuMI beam

 Most powerful neutrino beam in operation with upgrades in the works

 New results from both MINOS and MINOS+

 Standard three-flavor oscillations  Exotic phenomena  Sterile neutrino searches

slide-3
SLIDE 3

A Brief Reminder of MINOS

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 3

ν

 Long baseline neutrino oscillation search

slide-4
SLIDE 4

What about MINOS+

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 4

Same magnetized MINOS detectors used in MINOS+

Medium-energy NuMI beam

Higher energy spectra and decreased cycle time when compared to MINOS

New target design implemented to handle increased beam power

Expect roughly 4000 νµ CC events per 6×1020 protons-on-target (POT) year

Only wide-band beam long baseline experiment operating in this decade

New physics to be investigated in this new energy window!

slide-5
SLIDE 5

MINOS & MINOS+ Data

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 5

MINOS (2005-2012)

MINOS+

1.7 ⨉ 1020 POT in ν running 10.7 ⨉ 1020 POT in ν running 3.4 ⨉ 1020 POT in ν̄ running

slide-6
SLIDE 6

MINOS & MINOS+ Data

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 6

Updating oscillation parameter measurement with increased atmospheric neutrino statistics Additional 10.8 kton-year (+28%) over previous beam+atmospherics combined analysis [PRL 112, 191801 (2014)]

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Three-Flavor Oscillations

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 7  Combine various analyses from MINOS/MINOS+

Full MINOS νμ-CC and ν̄μ-CC disappearance sample

Full νe-CC, ν̄e-CC appearance sample, described in PRL 110 171801 (2013)

Full MINOS and new MINOS+ atmospheric samples

 Sensitivity to θ13, θ23 octant, mass

hierarchy, and δCP from νe sample

 Enhanced by atmospheric data

Matter effects give rise to larger differences in multi-GeV, upward-going events

θ23

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Three-Flavor Oscillations

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 8  Combine various analyses from MINOS/MINOS+

Full MINOS νμ-CC and ν̄μ-CC disappearance sample

Full νe-CC, ν̄e-CC appearance sample, described in PRL 110 171801 (2013)

Full MINOS and new MINOS+ atmospheric samples

 Sensitivity to θ13, θ23 octant, mass

hierarchy, and δCP from νe sample

 Enhanced by atmospheric data

Matter effects give rise to larger differences in multi-GeV, upward-going events

Effects are dependent on mass hierarchy and charge conjugation

 MINOS first to probe effect

with event-by-event charge separation θ23

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Analysis Fundamentals – Beam Data

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 9

 Use energy spectra to perform precision measurement of neutrino

  • scillations

 Make a fit to the

three-flavor oscillation framework

 Use both the beam

and atmospheric data to generate constraints

  • n certain oscillation

parameters

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Analysis Fundamentals – Atmospheric Data

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 10

 Contained νµ events as a function of angle for three energy ranges  Fits to three-flavor oscillation framework include non-fiducial events

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Combined Fit Allowed Regions

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 11

Solar parameters fixed to ∆𝑛21

2 = 7.54 × 10−5eV2 and sin2 𝜄12 = 0.307 

θ13 fit as nuisance parameter, constrained by reactor results: sin2 𝜄13 = 0.0242 ± 0.0025

θ23, ∆𝑛32

2 , and δCP unconstrained 

19 systematics included as nuisance parameters in fit

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Three Flavor Takeaway

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 12

 Three-Flavor Best Fit

 Most precise measurement of

|∆𝑛32

2 |

 Results highlight precision era

  • f field
slide-13
SLIDE 13

A Look Towards Tomorrow

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 13

 MINOS+ Far Detector Beam Data

 Data consistent with oscillation

measurements from MINOS

µ- µ+

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Adding MINOS and MINOS+ Samples

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 14

 Best resolution yet of survival probability curve

 Expect combined MINOS/MINOS+ fit in the Fall  3.5×1020 POT expected by September 2014 shutdown

slide-15
SLIDE 15

A Look Towards Tomorrow’s Sensitivity

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 15

 Showing projected MINOS &

MINOS+ combined sensitivity by 2015 compared to MINOS results

 Sensitivities assume MINOS

three-flavor best fit results from PRL 112, 191801 (2014) NOνA sensitivity for 4.2×1020 POT During NOνA ramp-up, combination with MINOS+ maximizes improvement on

  • scillation parameter

measurement

slide-16
SLIDE 16

A Look Towards Tomorrow’s Sensitivity

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 16

 Showing projected MINOS &

MINOS+ combined sensitivity by 2015 compared to MINOS results

 Sensitivities assume MINOS

three-flavor best fit results from PRL 112, 191801 (2014)

 NOνA sensitivity for 4.2×1020

POT

 During NOνA ramp-up,

combination with MINOS+ maximizes improvement on

  • scillation parameter

measurement

slide-17
SLIDE 17

How standard are you? – An Intro to NSI

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 17

 Non-Standard Interaction (NSI) picture accommodates

deviations from standard oscillation picture

 Analogous to MSW matter effect

 Fits to MINOS data performed for limits on εµτ and εeτ

 εµτ sensitivity comes from νµ CC disappearance analysis  εeτ sensitivity comes from νe CC appearance analysis

slide-18
SLIDE 18

NSI Results

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 18

εµτ study from PRD 88, 072011 (2013)

εeτ study is the first MINOS only analysis regarding this parameter

Presented at Neutrino 2014 in Boston

Follows formulation from: Friedland, Lunardini, Maltoni PRD 70, 111301(2004) Coelho, Kafka, Mann, Schneps, Altinok PRD 86, 113015 (2012) |εeτ|

slide-19
SLIDE 19

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Sterile Neutrinos – More than Three?

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 20  Sterile neutrino: theorized additional states that do not

interact through the weak force

Would add additional parameters to the oscillation model

 Anomalies in reactor, short-baseline, radiochemical experiments

Oscillations into light sterile neutrino possible explanation

 Evidence of sterile mixing is inconclusive due to tension between various experiment

results

MiniBooNE, PRL 110, 161801(2013)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

A Glimpse at Four-Flavor Oscillations

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 21  νµ → νs mixing yields energy-dependent

depletions in νµ CC and NC spectra relative to 3-flavor mixing

 Small ∆𝑛43 2 :

Spectra distortions above oscillation maximum at Far Detector

No Near Detector effects

 Medium ∆𝑛43 2 :

Rapid oscillations average out at Far Detector

No Near Detector effects

Counting experiment

 Large ∆𝑛43 2 :

Rapid oscillations average out at Far Detector

Near Detector distortions affect Far Detector prediction

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Far Detector CC and NC Spectra

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 22

 Comparison with 3-flavor prediction for full MINOS low-

energy beam neutrino mode sample

 Both CC and NC events important for sterile neutrino analysis  Focus on NC event rate to perform counting experiment

search

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Counting for Steriles

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 23

 Sterile neutrinos could appear in

event rate deficit

 1221 NC-like events in 10.56⨉1020

POT MINOS sample

 Construct rate metric that

accounts for CC backgrounds 𝑆 = 𝑂𝐸𝑏𝑢𝑏 − 𝐶𝑏𝑑𝑙𝑕𝑠𝑝𝑣𝑜𝑒𝑡𝑄𝑠𝑓𝑒 𝑑𝑑 𝑇𝑗𝑕𝑜𝑏𝑚𝑄𝑠𝑓𝑒 𝑂𝐷

 R < 1.0 hints sterile neutrino

driven deficit

 Results show no evidence

for sterile neutrinos at ∆𝑛43

2 = 0.5 eV2

Results from MINOS data: R = 1.049 ± 0.076 (0-200 GeV) R = 1.093 ± 0.097 (0-3 GeV)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Expanded Analysis Approach

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 24

 Assume a four-flavor 3+1

  • scillation model

 Apply oscillations to both Near and

Far Detector

 Make use of distance to meson

decay point from simulation

 Fit for ∆𝑛43 2 , ∆𝑛32 2 , θ23, θ24, and θ34

 Near Detector oscillation handling

 Constrain ND event rate  Fit data directly to oscillated F/N

ratio

 Systematics enter fit as covariance

matrix

 Re-evaluated beam flux

uncertainties

 Feldman-Cousins correction

applied to log-likelihood surfaces

CC Selection NC Selection

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Systematics

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 25

 26 systematics included in fit

 Hadron production, beam optics,

detector acceptance, energy scale, cross-section

Sensitivity to sterile mixing

slide-26
SLIDE 26

MINOS Disappearance Limit

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 26

 Feldman-Cousins corrected contour

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Comparison to Appearance Results

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 27  Combine MINOS disappearance 90% C.L. in θ24 and Bugey reactor experiment 90%

C.L. disappearance limit in θ14 (Neutrino Mode – MINOS and MiniBooNE)

 For a 3+1 model:  Bugey limit computed from GLoBES 2012 fit using new reactor fluxes, provided by

Patrick Huber

 MINOS results increases tension between null and signal results for ∆𝑛43 2 < 1 eV2

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Comparison to Appearance Results

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 28  Compare MINOS neutrino data to world antineutrino data  Assuming 3+1 model and CPT conservation (makes SBL neutrino and antineutrino

  • scillations equivalent)

 MINOS results increases tension between null and signal results for ∆𝑛43 2 < 1 eV2  Work on 3.4×1020 POT antineutrino data sterile neutrino search underway

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Sterile Neutrino in MINOS+

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 29

 Expected sensitivity from MINOS+ data by 2016,

compared to other short-baseline experiments and MINOS

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Summary

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 30

 MINOS completed a search for sterile neutrinos in a long-baseline

experiment

 No evidence of sterile neutrino oscillations found  Limits span four orders of magnitude of ∆𝑛43

2

 MINOS placed new constraints on the non-standard interaction

parameter εeτ

 MINOS three-flavor analysis improved with increased statistics from

MINOS+ atmospheric data

 MINOS+ is taking data in the medium-energy NuMI beam

 Precision test of oscillation parameters in different energy range  Results of oscillation analysis from beam data in Fall  Keep watch for any surprises

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Additional Materials

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Adding Appearance

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 32

 Sensitivity to θ13 in MINOS

from νe appearance search

 Limits on δCP obtained by

fitting data with respect to reactor experiments

 First limits on this parameter

shown by MINOS in PRL 110, 171801 (2013)

 Addition of disappearance and

atmospheric data further disfavor normal mass hierarchy and upper octant

 Published by PRL:

PRL 112, 191801 (2014)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

All MINOS FD Data – 3-flavor

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Beam and Atmospheric Event Yields

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Best Fit Results

6/12/2014 A.P. Schreckenberger - UT Austin 35