Mining High Grade Gold in Burkina Faso TSX: ROXG Investor - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mining high grade gold in burkina faso
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Mining High Grade Gold in Burkina Faso TSX: ROXG Investor - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mining High Grade Gold in Burkina Faso TSX: ROXG Investor Presentation | July 2017 TSX: ROXG 1 Cautionary Statement This presentation contains forward-looking information. Forward looking information contained in this presentation includes,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

TSX: ROXG

Investor Presentation | July 2017

Mining High Grade Gold in Burkina Faso

TSX: ROXG

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

TSX: ROXG

Cautionary Statement

This presentation contains forward-looking information. Forward looking information contained in this presentation includes, but is not limited to, statements with respect to: (i) the estimation of measured, inferred and indicated mineral resources and probable mineral reserves including, without limitation, statements with respect to the potential establishment of new mineral resources and the expansion potential of existing mineral resources/reserves; and (ii) the success of exploration and development activities; and (iii) statements that are not of historical fact that are taken from or based on the technical report entitled “Technical Report for the Yaramoko Gold Project, Burkina Faso” dated June 4, 2014 (the “Feasibility Study”) as well as the press release dated April 18, 2017. These statements are based on information currently available to the Company and the Company provides no assurance that actual results will meet management's expectations. In certain cases, forward-looking information may be identified by such terms as "anticipates", "believes", "could", "estimates", "expects", "may", "shall", "will", or "would". Forward-looking information contained in this press release is based on certain factors and assumptions regarding, among other things, the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves (and potential establishment and increases in respect thereof), the realization of resource estimates and reserve estimates, gold metal prices, the timing and amount of future exploration and development expenditures, and materials to continue to explore and develop the Yaramoko project in the short and long-term, the progress of exploration and development activities, the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, and assumptions with respect to currency fluctuations, environmental risks, title disputes or claims, and other similar matters. While the Company considers these assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently available to it, they may prove to be incorrect. Forward looking information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking information. Such factors include risks inherent in the exploration, risks relating to variations in mineral resources and mineral reserves, grade or recovery rates resulting from current exploration and development activities (including risks that new mineral resources may not be established, or the anticipated expansion potential of existing mineral resources/reserves may not be realized), risks relating to changes in gold prices and the worldwide demand for and supply of gold, risks related to increased competition in the mining industry generally, risks related to current global financial conditions, uncertainties inherent in the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves, access and supply risks, reliance on key personnel, operational risks inherent in the conduct of mining activities including the risk of accidents, labour disputes, increases in capital and operating costs and the risk of delays or regulatory risks, including risks relating to the acquisition of the necessary licenses and permits, capitalization and liquidity risks, risks related to disputes concerning property titles and interest, and environmental risks. Please refer to the 2017 first quarter’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com on April 18, 2017 for political, environmental or other risks that could materially affect the development of mineral resources and mineral reserves. This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company's forward-looking information. These and other factors should be considered carefully and readers should not place undue reliance on the Company's forward-looking information. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking information that may be made from time to time by the Company or on its behalf, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. Slide 13 contains production guidance for 2017 as previously disclosed in the press release dated January 17, 2017. The following Qualified Persons, as defined in National Instrument 43-101, have prepared or supervised the preparation of the scientific or technical information presented in this presentation: Jean François Couture, PGeo (SRK Consulting Canada Inc.), Benny Zhang, P. Eng (SRK Consulting Canada Inc.), Sebastien Bernier (SRK Consulting Canada Inc.), Paul Criddle (Roxgold), Yan Bourassa (Roxgold). All dollars are in US currency unless otherwise stated.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

TSX: ROXG

▪ Experienced Management Team and

Board

▪ Proven Track Record of Meeting or

Exceeding Expectations

▪ May 16, 2016: Poured First Gold at

Yaramoko Project in Burkina Faso

  • Low cost, high grade underground mine
  • 17.1 grams per tonne (“g/t”) measured

and indicated at 5.0 g/t cut-off

▪ Market Cap of ~C$405 Million

(as at July 17, 2017)

▪ ~US$53 Million Cash Balance after

repayment of $19 million at March 31, 2017

(unaudited)

▪ Strong Analyst Coverage and Institutional

Support

Roxgold Snapshot

Canadian Based Gold Producer

Yaramoko

Burkina Faso

Mali Ghana Togo Benin Nigeria Guinea Gambia Senegal Mauritania Côte d’Ivoire Liberia Sierra Leoné Niger Atlantic Ocean

3 AFRICA

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

TSX: ROXG

Yaramoko – Continuing to Rapidly Evolve

Development ▪ Bagassi South Feasibility Study on track for Q4 delivery ▪ Infill program was very successful in H1 ▪ Bagassi South Indicated mineral resource estimated at 352,000 tonnes at 16.6 g/t for 188,000 ounces of gold. Inferred mineral resource estimated at 130,000 tonnes at 16.6 g/t for 69,000 ounces of gold. Reported at 5.0 g/t Au cut-off. Production ▪ 105,000 – 115,000 ounces production in 2017 ▪ Well on track with YTD results ▪ 35,594 ounces produced in Q1 ▪ AISC guidance of $740 - $790 per ounce ▪ Development well ahead of budget to underpin balance of 2017 and 2018

5

Years Initial Discovery August 2012 Maiden Resource Announced Feasibility Study Filed First Gold Pour February 2011 May 16 2016 May 16, 2016 June 2014 Total ounces of gold produced: ~125,000

(From May 16, 2016 to May 16, 2017)

May 16, 2017 Exploration ▪ Two rigs turning on the 55 Zone aimed at resource expansion ▪ One rig drilling regional targets ▪ 16,000 metres of drilling for H2 on regional targets

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Yaramoko

May 2016

Completed construction $4M under budget and ahead of schedule

Achieved 1,000,000 hours LTI Free

Declared Commercial Production

Dec 2016

Passed lender’s completion test facility

Identified new Shoot at Bagassi South

Graduated to TSX

December 2015 Sep 2016 July 2016 Aug 2016 Jun 2016 Nov 2016 Oct 2016 Jan 2017 Feb 2017 Mar 2017

From 1st Pour to 125,000 ounces

5

Produced 77,155

  • unces of gold for

first 7 months

Intersected 20.1g/t of gold

  • ver 23.8m at

Zone 55 in Hole YRM-16-DD- 426

First gold pour

Received $9M from IFC early warrant exercise

Apr 2017 May 2017

Produced 125,000

  • unces of gold

since May 2016

First double level stope successfully extracted

Completed Bagassi South infill drilling program

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

2016 Q31 2016 Q4 2017 Q1 Gold Poured (ounces)

32,987 29,688 35,594

Gold Sold (ounces)

34,594 34,271 34,979

Tonnes Milled

60,876 61,265 63,955

Head Grade

17.0 15.4 17.3

Cash Operating Costs

350 414 404

AISC

707 702 720

Average realized gold price per ounce

$1,335 $1,208 $1,229

Adjusted earnings (loss)2

($3,227) $15,744 $9,689

Adjusted earnings per share2

($0.009) (C$0.012) $0.042 C$0.056 $0.026 C$0.034

Cash flow from Mining Operations2

$29,482 $22,639 $23,747

Cash flow from Mining Operations Per Share2

$0.080 C$0.104 C$0.061 $0.081 $0.064 C$0.085

Cash on Hand

$60,552 $68,902 $52,330

LTD

$69,569 $71,068 $51,905

1. Commercial production was declared on October 1, 2016, as such the third quarter Revenue and operating expenses were accounted for against Mineral properties under development on the Company’s balance sheet and were not accounted for as part of the quarterly earnings. 2. This is a non-IFRS financial performance measure with no standard definition under IFRS. See the “non-IFRS financial performance measure” section of the Company’s 2017 MD&A available on www.SEDAR.com

Key Information

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

TSX: ROXG

2017 First Quarter Operational Highlights

Q1 2017

Total Development (metres) 912 Ore Mined (tonnes) 69,237 Milled (tonnes) 63,955 Head Grade (g/t Au) 17.30 Gold Recovery (%) 99.2 Mill Operating Time (%) 94.0 Gold Poured (ounces) 35,594 Gold Sold (ounces) 34,979

Ore Development (m) Waste Development (m) Tonnes Mined Stopes Completed

  • 200

400 600 800 1,000 1,200

  • 200

400 600 800 1,000 1,200

  • 10,000

20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000

  • 2

4 6 8 10

16/Q3 16/Q4 17/Q1 16/Q3 16/Q4 17/Q1 16/Q3 16/Q4 17/Q1 16/Q3 16/Q4 17/Q1

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

TSX: ROXG

2017 First Quarter Financial Highlights

Q1 2017

Average realized gold price (per ounce) $1,229 Cash operating cost (per ounce produced)1 $404 Cash operating cost (per tonne processed)1 $225 Total cash cost (per ounce sold)1 $454 Sustaining capital cost (per ounce sold)1 $226 All-in sustaining cost (per ounce sold)1 $720 Revenue ~$43 M Cash flow from Mining Operations1 23,747 Cash flow from Mining Operations Per Share1 $0.064 / C$0.085 Adjusted Earnings Per Share1 $0.026 / C$0.034 Cash on Hand $53 M

~US$53 M Cash balance (unaudited) at March 31, 2017

  • f gold poured at

March 31, 2017 35,594 oz $404/oz produced Cash operating cost1 $720/oz sold All-In Sustaining Cost4 Cash Flow From Mining Operations Per Share4 $0.064 / C$0.085

  • 1. This is a non-IFRS financial performance measure with no standard definition under IFRS. See

the “non-IFRS financial performance measure” section of the Company’s 2017 MD&A available

  • n www.SEDAR.com
slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

TSX: ROXG

Financial information

2016 Q31 2016 Q4 2017 Q1 Gold Poured (ounces)

32,987 29,688 35,594

Gold Sold (ounces)

34,594 34,271 34,979

Average realized gold price per

  • unce

$1,335 $1,208 $1,229

Revenue

$46,181 $41,385 $42,977

Adjusted earnings (loss)2

($3,227) $15,744 $9,689

Adjusted earnings per share2

($0.009) (C$0.012) $0.042 C$0.056 $0.026 C$0.034

Cash flow from Mining Operations2

$29,482 $22,639 $23,747

Cash flow from Mining Operations Per Share2

$0.080 C$0.104 $0.061 C$0.081 $0.064 C$0.085

Cash on Hand

$60,552 $68,902 $52,330

LTD

$69,569 $71,068 $51,905

1. Commercial production was declared on October 1, 2016, as such the third quarter Revenue and operating expenses were accounted for against Mineral properties under development on the Company’s balance sheet and were not accounted for as part of the quarterly earnings. 2. This is a non-IFRS financial performance measure with no standard definition under IFRS. See the “non-IFRS financial performance measure” section of the Company’s 2017 MD&A available on www.SEDAR.com

▪ LTD repayments totalling $18,150,000 were made during the quarter; ▪ LTD scheduled repayments: ➢ Q2 – 2017 : $3,000,000 ➢ Q3 – 2017 : $3,750,000 ➢ Q4 – 2017 : $3,300,000 ➢ 2018 : $8,400,000 ➢ 2019 : $12,750,000 ➢ 2020 : $16,350,000 ➢ 2021 : $9,300,000 ▪ Hedge program: ➢ Delivered: 3,822 ounces at an average of $1,052 per oz ➢ Outstanding: 61,178 oz (ends March 2021)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

TSX: ROXG

Yaramoko in 2017

2017 Estimated Costs* Cash operating cost1 $445 - $490 All-in sustaining cost1 $740 - $790 Capital expenditure $24 million-$28 million

105,000 to 115,000 oz

Gold production expected in 2017

35,594 Oz Produced in 2017 Q1

  • 1. This is a non-IFRS financial performance measure with no standard definition under IFRS. See the “non-IFRS financial performance measure” section of the

Company’s 2017 MD&A available on www.SEDAR.com

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

TSX: ROXG

History of Mineral Resource Growth at Yaramoko*

*See Slide 35 for Mineral Resource, Mineral Reserve and Potential Plant Feed Notes

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

TSX: ROXG

2017 Mine Plan

Decline planned to 5066

Decline Currently on 5134

Levels developed at 17m

7 stope faces in production

5168 5219 Portal & East Vent Shaft West Vent Shaft & Escape Way 5117 5066

Zone 55 Longsection - 2017

5168 5219 Portal & East Vent Shaft West Vent Shaft & Escape Way 5117 5066

Portal & East Vent Shaft

West Vent Shaft & Escape Way

5168 5236 5066 5134 5270 5202 5100 Levels

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13 17-P2 17-P3

DD-242 DD-250

5,200RL 5,000RL 4,800RL 4,600RL 4,400RL 4,200RL YRM-16-DD-426 20.1 g/t over 23.8 m YRM-12-DD-242 22.7 g/t over 4.1 m YRM-12-DD-250 24.3 g/t over 4.4 m 17-P1 17-P4 17-P5 17-P6 17-P7 17-P9 17-P8

DD-426 DD-428

YRM-12-DD-428 6.0 g/t over 2.1 m Drill Hole Planned Drill Hole < 1.0 g/t 1.0 to 3.0 g/t 3.0 to 5.0 g/t 5.0 to 10.0 g/t > 10.0 g/t

Zone 55 Planned Drilling Q2/Q3 201711

*See Final Slide for Notes

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

TSX: ROXG

▪ Roxgold’s first growth project ▪ 1.8km south of Zone 55 and plant ▪ Indicated resource of 188,000 oz at 16.6 g/t Au ▪ Inferred resource of 69,000 oz at 16.6 g/t Au ▪ Nominal production of 350 tpd with a 5-year mine life. Delivering approx. 30koz/yr ▪ Plant expansion sees throughput increased from 750 tpd to 1,100 tpd ▪ Utilizes synergies with the existing Yaramoko

  • peration personnel and equipment

Bagassi South Zone 55 Camp Plant

Yaramoko

TSF WSF

Bagassi South – Project Summary

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

TSX: ROXG

2017 Q2:

Infill Drilling Program Complete Hydrology & Geotechnical Studies Commence Permitting in Burkina Faso Commence Camp Expansion

2017 Q3

Resource Update Mine Planning/Optimization Plant Detailed Design

2017 Q4

Feasibility Study Approved ESIA received Development Decision Commencement of Site Works – Mine access works, plant expansion construction

2018 Q1

Mine development commences

2018 Q3 - First Ore

2017 & 2018

Pre-production Capital $ Millions Mine Development 8.1 Mine Equipment 0.5 Plant Expansion 7.4 Infrastructure 3.2 First Fills & Capital Spares 0.4 Owner’s 8.9 Contingency 3.5 Total 32.0

Bagassi South

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

TSX: ROXG

Granite Bagassi Granite Basalt Mafic Dyke

Yaramoko – QV1 Drilling 2017

West East

2013-2016 Drilling Drill Hole (Au Grade x Thickness) >100 g/t x m <5 g/t x m 5 - 25 g/t x m 25 - 50 g/t x m 50 - 100 g/t x m 2017 Drilling

0m EL

  • 200m EL

216A 122 124 199 195 135 188 138 198 134 129 192 131 133 123 125 200 201 126 128 130 191 228 233 241 227 215A 209146 167 161 143 159 239 230 208 252 231 158 160 166 163 226 144 145 149 142 139 136 172 137 206 205 162 170 140 207 148 153 217A 156 225 220 222 152 154 150 147 157 218 155 212 151 221 213 169 224 171 164 165 174A 168 173 177 175A 219 211 189 180 214 190 185 183 176 179 182 193 197 194 223 186 196 229B 203 234

YRM-17-DD-BGS-233 71.7 g/t over 3.4 m YRM-17-DD-BGS-199 156.3 g/t over 1.6 m YRM-17-DD-BGS-162 13.5 g/t over 13.3 m YRM-17-DD-BGS-164 25.0 g/t over 13.9 m YRM-17-DD-BGS-214 8.4 g/t over 13.9 m

251 255 254 245 243 246 248 249

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

TSX: ROXG

Yaramoko – QV’ Drilling 2017

Granite Bagassi Granite Basalt Mafic Dyke West East

0m EL 200m EL 181 235 184 202 187 238 240 127 132 178 232A 236 204

2013-2015 Drilling Drill Hole (Au Grade x Thickness) >100 g/t x m <5 g/t x m 5 - 25 g/t x m 25 - 50 g/t x m 50 - 100 g/t x m 2016-2017 Drilling

YRM-17-DD-BGS-178 11.5 g/t over 0.7 m YRM-17-DD-BGS-184 290.0 g/t over 0.8 m YRM-17-DD-BGS-238 11.4 g/t over 3.2 m YRM-17-DD-BGS-240 72.6 g/t over 0.7 m YRM-17-DD-BGS-181 55.8 g/t over 1.3 m 242 247A 244 250 253 118 117 116A 119A 120 121 131 141

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

TSX: ROXG

Yaramoko – QV1 Resource Estimate 2017

West East

Block Model (Au Grade) >10.0 g/t Au <1.0 g/t Au 1.0 g/t – 3.0 g/t Au 3.0 g/t – 5.0 g/t Au 5.0 g/t – 10.0 g/t Au Boreholes

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

TSX: ROXG

25 50 75 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027

Potential Production Outlook*

50 100 150 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 50 100 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027

Zone 55 Potential Plant Feed Zone 55 Reserves Bagassi South Potential Plant Feed

*See Slide 35 for Mineral Resource, Mineral Reserve and Potential Plant Feed Notes

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

TSX: ROXG

Regional Geological Overview

▪ Large regional land package of approximately 230 km2, located

  • n the Hounde Belt

▪ Majority of known anomalies and deposits are located along the Boni Shear regional break and the second order Yaramoko Shear ▪ High grade deposits of Zone 55 and Bagassi South are located in the footwall of the Yaramoko Shear along East-West extensional zones

Siou 10 Km

Hounde Project 12 Km

300 Zone 109 Zone 117 Zone 55 Zone

Basaltic Flows Tarkwaian Basin Granite Tonalite Granodiorite

Yaramoko

Niankongo Boni Shear North Boni Shear Central Yaro 300 Zone 109 Zone 117 Zone Bagassi South 55 Zone Kaho Haho

Volcaniclastic

Legend:

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

TSX: ROXG

Boni Houko Haho Bagassi Two IP surveys: ▪ Boni Shear IP grid ▪ Houko IP grid Two Pole-Dipole surveys: ▪ Bagassi PD grid ▪ Haho PD grid Ground geophysical surveyed started in Q1 and will be completed in Q3 The two Pole-Dipole surveys are conducted over portion of the concession where the 2014 IP survey highlighted areas of disruption in the regional structural fabric, namely:

  • 55 Zone Area
  • Bagassi South Area
  • Haho Area

Haho Area Zone 55 Area Bagassi South Area

Yaramoko – Ground Geophysical Surveys 2017

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

TSX: ROXG

Boni Houko Haho Bagassi

Yaramoko – Ground Geophysical Surveys 2017

2011-2017 Drill Holes

Pole-Dipole Chargeability Plan View 150RL 55 Zone

QV’ QV1 Ridge Line QV1 Extension

1 km

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

TSX: ROXG

Boni Houko Haho Bagassi

Yaramoko – Ground Geophysical Surveys 2017

Induced Polarity (IP)

Niankongo East Boni Shear Central Niankongo Boni Shear Contact Tarkwa Inlier

2 km

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

TSX: ROXG

▪ 4 ground geophysical surveys underway over the Boni Shear Zone and the Yaramoko Shear Zone consisting of 64 km of pole-dipole survey and 430 km

  • f IP survey.

▪ Bagassi South: Indicated mineral resource of 188,000

  • unces at 16.6 g/t Au and inferred mineral resource of

69,000 ounces at 16.6 g/t Au. Reported at 5.0 g/t Au cut-off ▪ Zone 55: 13,660m drilled in Q4 2016 extending Zone 55 to a depth of more than 1,000m below the surface. Follow up drilling program of 10,000 m below drill holes YRM-16-DD-426 & 428 commenced in Q2. ▪ Regional drilling program started drilling in Q3 targeting geophysical pole-dipole and IP surveys anomalies.

2017 Exploration Outlook

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

TSX: ROXG

Upcoming Catalysts

2017

Q3 2017 Q4 2017 ▪ Release of Bagassi South Resource ▪ Results of Zone 55 deep drilling program ▪ Initial drill testing of QV1 Extension ▪ Regional Targets including Ridgeline and Boni Shear Central and Contact Zones ▪ Results of Bagassi South Feasibility Study ▪ Further regional targets associated with Houko and Haho ▪ Continuation of 10,000 meter regional program

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Thank You

John Dorward

President & CEO 360 Bay Street, Suite 500 Toronto, ON M5H 2V6 jdorward@roxgold.com www.roxgold.com 416 203 6401

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

TSX: ROXG

John Dorward Paul Criddle Natacha Garoute Yan Bourassa Craig Richards

development & operating mines experience

  • perating & project

development experience Former Roles: ▪ Corporate Controller SEMAFO Inc. ▪ CN Railroad ▪ PWC Former Roles: ▪ Newmont Ghana ▪ Barrick Gold ▪ Ashanti Goldfields Former Roles: ▪ Golden Star Resources ▪ SRK Consulting

Iain Cox

Management Team

20 years 18+ years 20 years 30+ years 20+ years Former Roles: ▪ VP Business Dev. of Fronteer Gold ▪ Mineral Deposits Ltd ▪ Leviathan Resources Former Roles: ▪ COO Azimuth Resources ▪ Perseus ▪ Mineral Deposits LTD. mining finance experience development &

  • perational experience

exploration & operations level geology experience President & CEO CFO VP, Geology General Manager - Operations Principal Mining Engineer COO Former Roles: ▪ Newmont Corp ▪ AMR ▪ Centamin development &

  • perational mining

25+ years

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

TSX: ROXG

Yaramoko Debt Facility

Finance Summary

▪ Debt Facility of $60 Million ▪ Interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.75% ▪ Hedging component of 65,000 ounces of gold

  • ver the 5 year life of the loan @US$ 1,052/oz

▪ Project remains unencumbered by third party streams or royalties

27.7% 23.1% 13.3% 10.0% 8.0% 6.6% 6.3% 5.1% Retail Institutional Insiders & Mgmt

Registered holdings as per Nasdaq IR Insight, at April 17, 2016

  • N. America

Institutional Holdings by Country

35% 25% 23% 11% 2% 4%

Other

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

TSX: ROXG

Corporate Information

Covering Sell-Side Firm Analyst BMO Andrew Breichmanas Canaccord Rahul Paul Cormark Tyron Breytenbach Echelon Wealth Partners Ryan Walker GMP Oliver Turner Haywood Geordie Mark Global Mining Research David Cotterell Macquarie Michael Gray Raymond James Chris Thompson RBC Dan Rollins

Capital Structure (as at March31, 2017) Listings TSX:ROXG NASDAQ INT:ROGFF Cash US$52 million Common Shares Outstanding 371.1M Options (total vested and unvested) 12.3M

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

TSX: ROXG Mineral Resources Statement - Yaramoko Project - December 31st 2016

31-Dec-16 31-Dec-16 31-Dec-16 31-Dec-15 Measured Mineral Resources Indicated Mineral Resources Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources tonnes grade

  • unces

tonnes grade

  • unces

tonnes grade

  • unces

tonnes grade

  • unces

(000) g/t Au (000) (000) g/t Au (000) (000) g/t Au (000) (000) g/t Au (000) Zone 55 265 26.88 229 1,076 14.73 509 1,341 17.13 738 1,600 15.80 810 Bagassi South 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 265 26.88 229 1,076 14.73 509 1,341 17.13 738 1,600 15.80 810 Dec 31, 2016 Inferred Mineral Resources Dec 31, 2015 Inferred Mineral Resources tonnes grade

  • unces

tonnes grade

  • unces

(000) g/t Au (000) (000) g/t Au (000) Zone 55 669 16.14 347 840 10.26 278 Bagassi South 563 12.14 220

  • 0.00
  • Total

1,232 14.31 567 840 10.64 278

2017 Mineral Resource Yaramoko*

*See Slide 35 for Mineral Resource, Mineral Reserve and Potential Plant Feed Notes

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

TSX: ROXG

2016 Proven and Probable Reserves

As of December 31, 2016 Proven Mineral Reserves As of December 31, 2016 Probable Mineral Reserves As of December 31, 2016 Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves Estimated as of 2014 Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves tonnes grade

  • unces

tonnes grade

  • unces

tonnes grade

  • unces

tonnes grade

  • unces

(000) g/t Au (000) (000) g/t Au (000) (000) g/t Au (000) (000) g/t Au (000) Zone 55 317 18.06 184 1,453 10.01 467 1,770 11.45 651 1,996 11.83 759 Stockpiles 26 13.26 11 0.00 26 13.26 11 0.00 Total 343 17.68 195 1,453 10.01 467 1,796 11.46 662 1,996 11.83 759

Reserve grade largely maintained compared to BFS grade despite mined grade

  • ver the course of 2016 of 15.5 g/t.

*See Slide 35 for Mineral Resource, Mineral Reserve and Potential Plant Feed Notes

*

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

LOM Plan April 2017 ▪ Resource model Mar 2017 ▪ Proven & Probable reserve updated to 4556L (760m) ▪ Inferred material to 4267L (1050m) ▪

  • Prod. Rate 750 tpd

Zone 55 Life of Mine Design

Mined Out 2016 Single Decline, Exhaust Raise & Escape Ladderway 4267L (1050m Depth). 5066 DD Drive DD Drives & Vent Intakes 5168 L

Single Decline, Exhaust Raise & Escape Ladderway 4267L (1050m Depth).

DD Drives & Vent Intakes

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

TSX: ROXG

2016 Financial Performance

1. The Company considers that pre-commercial production operations at the Yaramoko Gold Project commenced in June 2016 as the construction of the processing plant and associated was completed. 2. First gold pour was on May 16, 2016, during commission of the processing plant, which resulted in production of 2,079 ounces in May 2016, which are not presented in the table above. 3. During the four month pre-commercial production period, gold sales and mine operating profit (excluding depreciation) were recognized as a reduction of Property, Plant and Equipment as commercial production had not yet been declared. 4. Cash flow from mining operations and cash flow per share are non-IFRS financial performance measures with no standard definition under IFRS. See Note 19 the “Non-IFRS financial performance measures” of the Company’s Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) dated April 18, 2017, available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. 5. Cash operating cost is a non-IFRS measure with no standard definition under IFRS and is calculated using ounces produced and tonnes processed. See the “Non-IFRS financial performance measures” note of the Company’s MD&A. 6. Total cash cost is a non-IFRS financial performance measure with no standard definition under IFRS and represents the mine operating expenses and the government royalties per ounce sold. 7. Sustaining capital cost per ounce sold is a non-IFRS financial performance measure with no standard definition under IFRS and represents the investment in underground development per ounce sold. 8. All-in sustaining cost is a non-IFRS financial performance measure with no standard definition under IFRS. See the “Non-IFRS financial performance measures” note of the Company’s MD&A. Pre-commercial production Four months ended September 30, 20161 Commercial production Three months ended December 31, 2016 TOTAL seven months ended December 31, 2016 Operating Data Ore mined (tonnes) 61,040 72,561 133,601 Ore processed (tonnes) 82,590 61,265 143,855 Head grade (g/t) 16.4 15.45 16.0 Recovery (%) 98.4 98.9 98.5 Gold ounces produced2 45,390 29,688 75,078 Gold ounces sold 42,844 34,271 77,115 Financial Data (in thousands of dollars) Revenues – Gold sales3 56,625 41,385 98,080 Mining operating expenses 14,728 14,127 28,855 Government royalties 2,730 1,685 4,415 Depreciation and depletion

  • 4,081

4,081 Net loss attributable to equity shareholder N/A N/A (4,155) Basic and diluted earnings per share N/A N/A (0.01) Cash flow from mining operations4 35,936 23,171 59,107 Per share4 0.10 0.06 0.16 Cash on hand end of period 60,552 68,902 68,902 Total assets 198,885 217,208 217,208 Statistics (in dollars) Average realized selling price (per ounce) 1,322 1,208 1,271 Cash operating cost (per ounce produced)5 350 414 375 Cash operating cost (per tonne processed)5 192 201 196 Total cash cost (per ounce sold)6 408 461 431 Sustaining capital cost (per ounce sold) 7 259 203 234 All-in sustaining cost (per ounce sold)8 707 702 705

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

TSX: ROXG

Mineral Resource Notes:

(1) Mineral Resources are reported compliance with National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) with an effective date of December 31st, 2016. (2) Underground Mineral Resources are reported at gold grade cut-off of 5.0 g/t Au, based on a gold price of US$1,250/ounce. (3) The identified Mineral Resources in the block model are classified according to the CIM definitions for the Measured, Indicated, and Inferred categories. The Mineral Resources are reported in situ without modifying factors applied. (4) The Mineral Resource Statement was prepared under the supervision of Sébastien Bernier, Principal Resource Geologist at SRK Consulting (Canada). Mr. Bernier is a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101. (5) All figures have been rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. (6) Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not necessarily demonstrate economic viability.

Mineral Reserve Notes:

(1) Mineral Reserves are reported in accordance with NI 43-101 with an effective date of December 31st, 2016. Mineral Reserve estimates reflect the Company’s reasonable expectation that all necessary permits and approvals will be obtained and maintained. Mining dilution and mining recovery vary by deposit and have been applied in estimating the Mineral Reserves. (2) Mineral Reserves are the economic portion of the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources. Mineral Reserve estimates include mining dilution at grades assumed to be 1.3 g/t. Mining dilution and recovery factors vary with specific reserve sources and are influenced by several factors including deposit type, deposit shape and mining methods. (3) The 2016 Mineral Reserves were prepared under the supervision of Benny Zhang, Principal Mining Engineer at SRK, PEng (PEO # 100115459). Mr. Benny Zhang is a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101. (4) The Mineral Reserve Statement at December 31, 2016 is reported at a cut-off grade of 4.5g/t gold assuming: metal price of US$1,250 per ounce of gold, mining cost of US$100.00 per tonne, G&A cost of US$28.30 per tonne, processing cost of US$38.90 per tonne, and process recovery of 98.5%. Reserve estimates include mining dilution and mining recovery. (5) All figures have been rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates.

Potential Plant Feed Notes:

(1) A preliminary mine schedule has been prepared for Mineral Resources at the 55 Zone and Bagassi South which could deliver potential plant feed (“PPF”) containing approximately 20,000 ounces from Indicated Mineral Resources (not included in Mineral Reserves) and 317,000 ounces from Inferred Mineral Resources over 5 years at an average grade of 9.9 g/t

  • Au. Potential plant feed is based on Mineral Resources and no feasibility study has been completed. The reader is cautioned that the PPF is based on Inferred Mineral Resources which

are considered too speculative to have economic factors applied to them. As a result, there is no certainty that the potential plant feed may be realized. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. (2)The above mine schedules, grades, capital costs and capacity additions are preliminary in nature and include Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would allow them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves. There is no certainty that the schedules, grades or costs above will be realized. The mine schedule and costs are based on current operating performance and productivity observed at the 55 Zone in 2016. The primary mining method planned is longhole open stoping with cemented rock backfill. PPF has been based upon mining recoveries of 85-95% and approximately 30% dilution.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

TSX: ROXG

Notes:

1. Cash operating cost per ounce produced, total cash cost per ounce sold and all-in sustaining cost per ounce sold are non-IFRS measures with no standard definition under IFRS. See Note 19 the “Non-IFRS financial performance measures” of the Company’s Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) dated April 18, 2017, available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. 2. Q2 was not a full quarter of operations. First gold was poured May 16, 2016. 3. Q4 was first quarter of commercial production. 4. Totals are for the full calendar year. 5. Cash flow from mining operations and cash flow per share are non-IFRS financial performance measures with no standard definition under IFRS. See Note 19 the “Non-IFRS financial performance measures” of the Company’s MD&A 6. Total cash cost is a non-IFRS financial performance measure with no standard definition under IFRS and represents the mine operating expenses and the government royalties per ounce sold. 7. Sustaining capital cost per ounce sold is a non-IFRS financial performance measure with no standard definition under IFRS and represents the investment in underground development per ounce sold. 8. All-in sustaining cost is a non-IFRS financial performance measure with no standard definition under IFRS. See the “Non-IFRS financial performance measures” note of the Company’s MD&A. 9. Cash operating per tonne milled is a non-IFRS measures with no standard definition under IFRS. See Note 19 the “Non-IFRS financial performance measures” of the Company’s MD&A 10. A preliminary mine schedule has been prepared for Mineral Resources at the 55 Zone which could deliver potential plant feed (“PPF”) containing approximately 20,000 ounces from Indicated Mineral Resources (not included in Mineral Reserves) and 322,000 ounces from Inferred Mineral Resources over 5 years at an average grade of 9.9 g/t Au. Potential plant feed is based on Mineral Resources and no feasibility study has been completed. The reader is cautioned that the PPF is based on Inferred Mineral Resources which are considered too speculative to have economic factors applied to them. As a result, there is no certainty that the potential plant feed may be realized. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. 11. All drill results that are discussed in this presentation have been previously disclosed in press releases which are all available on the Company’s corporate website (www.roxgold.com) and contain details regarding data verification undertaken, the results and interpretation of the exploration, details regarding location, types, depths and other details of the drill holes and QA/QC information.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Kelley Stamm

Investor Relations & Communications Manager 360 Bay Street, Suite 500 Toronto, ON M5H 2V6 kstamm@roxgold.com www.roxgold.com 416 203 6401