MIGS: Alcon Laboratories S Maybe Its Glaucoma Surgery! Allergan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

migs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MIGS: Alcon Laboratories S Maybe Its Glaucoma Surgery! Allergan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

12/4/2015 I have the following financial interests and relationships to disclose: MIGS: Alcon Laboratories S Maybe Its Glaucoma Surgery! Allergan C,S New World Medical S NIH-NEI S Joseph Caprioli RPB S Simms-Mann Foundation S


slide-1
SLIDE 1

12/4/2015 1

MIGS: Maybe Its Glaucoma Surgery!

Joseph Caprioli

I have the following financial interests and relationships to disclose:

Alcon Laboratories S Allergan C,S New World Medical S NIH-NEI S RPB S Simms-Mann Foundation S Transcend C Other Philanthropic Support S

Ophthalmology 2015

Why MIGS?

  • Compliance with meds huge problem
  • Complications of surgery are

considerable

  • Search for bleb-less approaches

– Blebitis – Endophthalmitis

slide-2
SLIDE 2

12/4/2015 2

Opinionated Facts

  • Trabeculectomy is effective, with

acceptable risk-benefit ratio in patients at risk for visual loss

– But you have to do it correctly! – Real surgery for real glaucoma – Better than tubes for first surgery, especially for low target IOPs

See Editorial on TVT Study, AJO May 2011

  • Evolving approaches and devices
  • Current definition is fuzzy
  • A group of alternative glaucoma surgeries intended

to cause less tissue disruption and fewer complications than traditional procedures

  • It should be a bona fide glaucoma operation, not a

cataract surgery add-on (to bill for)

MIGS

  • Intended to lower IOP via outflow
  • Ab-interno or ab-externo approach
  • Limited scleral dissection

– needle or device penetration of sclera OK – procedures with significant scleral dissection excluded

  • Minimal conjunctival manipulation

– limited peritomy or small incision OK

Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery - Implantable Devices

Definition Met: Definition Not Met:

Sustained release Anterior chamber injection Dissolvable polymer

slide-3
SLIDE 3

12/4/2015 3

Locations To Which Aqueous is Directed by MIGS Device

  • Influence efficacy and safety of

new devices

–Schlemm’s canal –Suprachoroidal Space –Sub-conjunctival Space

MIGS Effectiveness: What Can We Expect?

  • IOP reduction based on anatomy and

physiology of aqueous outflow pathway

  • Schlemm’s canal is not continuous; flow

into the collector channels and veins is segmental

MIGS Effectiveness: What Can We Expect?

  • Flow in aqueous veins is pulsatile
  • There is almost no circumferential flow

within Schlemm’s canal

  • If entire TM is opened, outflow

resistance is reduced by 75% (Grant)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

12/4/2015 4

Safety and Efficacy Considerations

  • Safety and efficacy are linked, LION
  • While all procedures should have

measurable efficacy…

– Safer procedures may have modest efficacy – Procedures with greater risk should have greater efficacy

  • Ultimately the “MIGS” classification

should be earned, based on:

  • at least some efficacy
  • an enhanced safety profile as determined

by appropriately controlled clinical trials

Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery My Opinion

  • Goal of safe, minimally invasive surgery with

measurable efficacy to treat real glaucoma has not been attained

  • Efforts to reinvent the wheel have failed
  • Some promising areas

– Ab-interno suprachoroidal shunts – Injection of sustained release drugs

  • We are not not there yet, but need to keep trying