MIDDLE SCHOOL BOUNDARY REVIEW UPDATE 5-14-2018 PROJECT SEQUENCING - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MIDDLE SCHOOL BOUNDARY REVIEW UPDATE

5-14-2018

S e p t e m b e r

• 1a. Project Kick Off

A p r i l M a y - J u n e S u m m e r

• 1b. Qualitative Assessment
• 1c. Quantitative Assessment

Enrollment Assessment Land Use Assessment Projected Enrollment Draft Surveys Market Study Interviews Report

• 1d. Develop and Approve

Values and Core Principles

• 2a. Develop Committee Process

Application Process Committee Selected

• 2b. Develop Citizen Engagement Plan

Public Announcement

• 3a. Boundary Review Committee

Facilitation

Task 1: Initial Assessment Task 2: Framework Recommendations Task 3: Boundary Review Process Task 4: Final Boundary and Transition Recommendations

Final Recommendation

Ongoing Process Updates / Feedback

• 3b. Technical Support
• 3c. Community Engagement
• 2d. Springboard

Proposal

O c t o b e r

PROJECT SEQUENCING AND MILESTONES

• 3a. Boundary Review

Committee Facilitation

• 3b. Technical Support

The Process

Initial Assessment Final Recommendations Boundary Review Process

THE PROCESS

PARENT SURVEYS  455 One-on-One

telephone interviews

 265 Middle School

parents

 190 Elementary

School parents

 100% of respondents confirmed they

have children attending CVSD

73.6% AWARENESS

65.3% of elementary

school parents

79.6 % of middle school

parents

SIX KEY ATTRIBUTES (VALUES) Those ranked highest as most important were:

• Small class size
• Attending same school as

neighbors

Assuming that their child is safe, parents were asked to identify the next most important factor regarding where their child attended school.

The overwhelming response – by nearly four times over the next named factor - is the:

• Quality of that school and

their teachers.

MOST IMPORTANT FACTORS

• Both elementary and middle

school parents agreed that in the event that their child needed to be bussed, a ride of up to 20 minutes would be acceptable.

• 57.5% responded that if their

child was to be bussed 20 minutes or less it did not matter which school they attended.

• For those saying that 30 minutes
• r less was acceptable a majority

still had no strong preference of the school their child attended.

BUSSING

MIGRATION

• 78.4% of elementary

school parents, and 82.6%

• f middle school parents

in this study have no plans to move from their current home within 3 to 4 years.

• Of the 15% that project

moving, 77.5% still plan to remain within the District.

• Number one area

mentioned is Liberty Lake

BOUNDARY REVIEW PROCESS

What the most important thing for CVSD to consider when embarking upon and implementing this process.

• Proximity to our

home/walkability 20.4%

• Ability to attend same

school as neighbors 13.0%

• Class size 12.7%

Summary of Boundary Criteria

Based upon the input received from this study, revisions should be considered and implemented using as a foundation:

• Proximity to home/walkability
• The creation and maintenance of neighborhood schools
• Class size/capacity
• Future growth
• Minimize time spent on bus

Additional Feedback

“One of the special things about living in this district is that if people want a voice all they need to do is to

• participate. The Central Valley School District has been

doing a very good job of keeping things well publicized,

• ut in the open, asking residents for their input, and

making sure that everyone has a voice.”

When considering boundary revisions the committee will consider, to the extent possible, the following core values:

• Maintain a district-wide perspective by considering growth trends and enrollment

projections

• Develop new boundaries that work to balance school capacities across schools
• Consider impact to the smallest number of families
• Make efforts to maintain neighborhood schools and the feeder system to the extent

possible

• Minimize disruptions and impacts to special programs or special populations (e.g.,

homeless youth, free-and-reduced lunch programs, special education, Title programs)

• Maximize to the greatest extent possible, proximity to home/walkability (e.g., not

having to cross busy streets and consider natural boundaries)

• Consider transportation impacts, and work towards limiting the amount of time

required on a bus

4.25.2018

LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW

LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW

LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW

ENROLLMENT AND CAPACITY ASSESSMENT

2021 2026 District Wide Middle School Projected Enrollment Current District Wide Middle School Facility Capacity

Committee Maximum Target Capacity Facility Capacity

FACILITY AND TARGET CAPACITY

Students Residing in Existing Attendance Areas Max Target Capacity Students Residing in Springboard Attendance Areas

EXISTING BOUNDARIES AND SPRINGBOARD COMPARISON

SPRINGBOARD PROPOSAL COMPONENTS

Springboard Proposal

A starting point of revised boundaries which meet target capacities and consider guiding principles for the committee to begin their revisions from

Enrollment and Capacity Assessment Community Surveys Land Use and Development Review

Springboard Proposal

Guiding Principles and Target Capacities

SUMMARY STATISTICS

SUMMARY STATISTICS

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT  Community Announcements

• Mailers
• School Newsletters
• Emails
• Social Media

 Webpage content and update schedule

• Process description and Q&A
• Committee agendas, meeting minutes, documents,

and proposals

• Feedback mechanism (questions/comments)

 Open houses

• Announcements
• Submitting comments
• Feedback for the working committee

COMMITTEE SCHEDULE

• Kick off meeting – 4/17
• * Board Representatives Update – 4/18

1) Committee Meeting – 4/25: Introduction to the boundary review process committee

* Meeting 4/30: Review springboard with District staff * Meeting 5/9: Community survey overview with Critical Data

2) Committee Meeting – 5/9 : Committee workshop

* Board Update – 5/14

3) Committee Meeting – 5/23: Committee workshop 4) Open House #1 – 5/30

* Board Meeting Update – 6/11

5) Meeting 5 – 6/13: Committee workshop

– Summer Break –

6) Committee Meeting – 9/12: Committee workshop 7) Committee Meeting – 9/19: Committee workshop 8) Open House #2 – 9/26

* Board Meeting Update – 10/8

9) Committee Meeting – 10/10: Committee workshop

* Board Meeting Recommendation – 10/22