microbiological and geochemical dynamics of the
play

Microbiological and Geochemical Dynamics of the Subsurface: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Microbiological and Geochemical Dynamics of the Subsurface: chemical oxidation and bioremediation of organic contaminants Nora Barbour Sutton Soil Contamination Sources of Contamination Types of Contamination Gas Stations Benzene,


  1. Microbiological and Geochemical Dynamics of the Subsurface: chemical oxidation and bioremediation of organic contaminants Nora Barbour Sutton

  2. Soil Contamination Sources of Contamination Types of Contamination  Gas Stations  Benzene, diesel, gas  Dry Cleaners  Solvents: PCE  Industrial Factories  Heavy Metals  Transport Infrastructure Pure Pollutant Pure Pollutant Groundwater Groundwater

  3. Soil Remediation Transfer of  PHYSICAL Remediation contaminant  Physically remove contaminant from the to second subsurface location  CHEMICAL Remediation (chemical oxidation)  Contaminants are chemically degraded Conversion of contaminant into harmless products  BIOLOGICAL Remediation (Bioremediation)  Microorganisms degrade contaminants through biological processes

  4. Conversion: In situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) In situ bioremediation (ISB) CHEMICAL Remediation Benzene + oxidant → CO 2 + H 2 O BIOLOGICAL Remediation (Bioremediation) Benzene + bacteria + O 2 → CO 2 + H 2 O + biomass

  5. Conversion: In situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) In situ bioremediation (ISB) Groundwater

  6. Conversion: Chemical oxidation followed by bioremediation In situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) In situ bioremediation (ISB) Amendments Oxidants Nutrients Fenton’s Reagent H 2 O 2 + Fe 2+ Oxygen Persulfate: S 2 O 8 2- Carbon Source Bacteria Ozone O 3 - Permanganate MnO 4 Groundwater

  7. Chemical oxidation + bioremediation  Technological Motivation Parameter Chemical Oxidation Bioremediation (ISCO) (ISB) Time Rapid Slow Cost High Low Pure Pollutant Yes No Thorough No Yes Sustainable No Yes

  8. Chemical oxidation + bioremediation  Scientific Reasoning  Scientific Challenge • Reduces toxicity • Oxidizing conditions • Improves biodegradability • pH change • Improves bioavailability • Soil organic matter degradation • Increases temperature and mixing Oxidants Optimal pH Oxidation Potential (V) H 2 O 2 + Fe 2+ 2.8 (OH - ·) Fenton’s Reagent 3-4 2- - ·) Persulfate: S 2 O 8 3-4 to >10.5 2.6 (SO 4 Ozone O 3 neutral 2.1 Permanganate MnO 4 - neutral 1.7

  9. Chemical oxidation + bioremediation  Scientifically Attractive: unique system to investigate → Fundamental Understanding of Entire System Groundwater  Soil  Contaminant  Microbial Community  Groundwater

  10. Dissertation Structure Motivation Chemical Oxidation and Bioremediation Part Three: Part One: Part Two: Review; Anaerobic ISB: Aerobic ISB: limitations to ISB TPH chlorinated ethenes Diesel PCE and TCE bioremediation bioremediation with with oxygen electron donor

  11. Dissertation Structure Motivation Chemical Oxidation and Bioremediation Part Three: Part One: Part Two: Review; Anaerobic ISB: Aerobic ISB: limitations to ISB TPH chlorinated ethenes Literature Laboratory Field

  12. Dissertation Structure Motivation Chemical Oxidation and Bioremediation Part Three: Part One: Part Two: Review; Anaerobic ISB: Aerobic ISB: limitations to ISB TPH chlorinated ethenes Chapter 2 Review of ISCO coupled Literature with ISB Chapter 5 Chapter 8 Chapter 3 Aqueous constituents Bioavailability limitations Development of OHRB impact bioremediation Laboratory to bioremediation Chapter 6 resilience to chemical Microbial community oxidation dynamics following oxidation Chapter 4 Chapter 7 Chapter 9 Field limitations to Geochemical and Changes to OHRB and Field bioavailability microbial community rdh abundance during ISCO changes during ISCO and ISB

  13. Dissertation Toolbox Chapter Aspects 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 soil type X X X System chemical oxidant type X nutrient amendment X X Microbiological microbial community X X X X X X groundwater X X X X soil characteristics X Geochemical contaminant characteristics X X X

  14. Major Conclusions  Technological:  Chemical oxidation plus bioremediation is very effective

  15. Major Conclusions  Technological:  Chemical oxidation plus bioremediation is very effective  Scientific:  Bacteria are very resilient

  16. Major Conclusions  Technological:  Chemical oxidation plus bioremediation is very effective  Scientific:  Bacteria are very resilient  Chemical oxidation impacts subsurface processes

  17. Major Conclusions  Technological:  Chemical oxidation plus bioremediation is very effective  Scientific:  Bacteria are very resilient  Chemical oxidation impacts subsurface processes  DNA-based tools are essential to understanding system

  18. Major Conclusions  Technological:  Chemical oxidation plus bioremediation is very effective  Scientific:  Bacteria are very resilient  Chemical oxidation impacts subsurface processes  DNA-based tools are essential to understanding system → Fundamental Understanding of Entire System

  19. Program  Defense:  13:30-13:45 Presentation  13:45-14:30 Examination by Committee  14:30-14:45 Committee withdraws  14:45-15:00 Announcement of decision  Reception:  15:00-15:45 in Aula  Dinner and Party:  17:30 Cafe Carre, Vijzelstraat 2

  20. Microbiological and Geochemical Dynamics of the Subsurface: chemical oxidation and bioremediation of organic contaminants Nora Barbour Sutton

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend