Mettle Fatigue: VW's Single Point of Failure Ethics Roland L. Trope - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mettle fatigue vw s single point of failure ethics
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Mettle Fatigue: VW's Single Point of Failure Ethics Roland L. Trope - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mettle Fatigue: VW's Single Point of Failure Ethics Roland L. Trope | Trope and Schramm LLP Eugene K. Ressler | US Military Academy Emeritus Faculty Purpose Our intent here is to comprehend how engineers could abandon their mettle and to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Mettle Fatigue: VW's Single Point of Failure Ethics

Roland L. Trope | Trope and Schramm LLP Eugene K. Ressler | US Military Academy Emeritus Faculty

slide-2
SLIDE 2

April 19, 2016 2

Purpose

  • Our intent here is to comprehend how

engineers could abandon their mettle and to help other engineers see the perils of doing so, even when company pressure makes dishonest practices seenmlike part of the job.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

April 19, 2016 3

Diesel Engine Functionality

  • A diesel engine does not have spark plugs.
  • Air in the cylinder is compressed to a high

pressure and temperature

– The resulting increase in temperature ignites the fuel

that is injected into the cylinder.

– The higher combustion temperature results in higher

efficiency.

– The higher temperature also causes nitrogen to

combine with oxygen, causing nitrous oxide emissions.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

April 19, 2016 4

Dysfunctional Practices

  • Senior officers insistence on the pursuit of

infeasible objectives with no tolerance for failure;

  • Suppression of open communication, enforced by

an intolerance for bad news and dissenting views;

  • Creation of software to cheat, rather than solve

engineering problems and protection of that software from disclosure as if it were a trade secret;

  • Departure from honesty in the chain of command

and reckless disregard for the consequences.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

April 19, 2016 5

Decisions Leading to the Defeat Device

slide-6
SLIDE 6

April 19, 2016 6

Insistence on Infeasible Objectives

  • VW “Strategy 2018” establishes objective to

surpass Toyota in car sales.

– Requires large expansion of diesel sales in US

market.

  • VW cancels its license of AdBlue technology

– Controls NoX emissions – VW's alternative not sufficient

  • Failure is not an option
slide-7
SLIDE 7

April 19, 2016 7

Suppression of Open Communication

  • Management style was one of intolerance for

bad news.

  • Chairman boasted publicly that he would fire

any engineering team that failed to achieve an

  • bjective.
  • “Always have good news” became the watch

word when reporting to upper management.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

April 19, 2016 8

Use of Corrupt Software

  • Software gives the engine two operating modes

– Mode changes when no steering wheel movement

is detected. This is assumed to be a marker for being under test.

– Test mode fully engaged emission controls

  • Such software needed to be tested fully to

make sure that it worked when intended but did not reduce motor performance by activating when not under test.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

April 19, 2016 9

Departure from Honesty

  • No reports of anyone in VW's senior management

recognizing or protesting these practices.

– The risk to VW's reputation and customer trust was not

recognized.

  • As the engine was installed in more and more models,

it became necessary to involve larger numbers of engineers and managers in the deception.

  • The result is a mindset that sees no problem in

deceiving those outside the organization.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

April 19, 2016 10

Aftermath and Cover up

slide-11
SLIDE 11

April 19, 2016 11

Disingenuous Denials

  • VW tries to discredit West Virginia University (WVU)

results

– Basis for discrediting WVU results changes regularly

  • VW issues recall

– CARB tests show emissions reduced but still above legal

limits

– VW disputes test environment

  • VW eventually acknowledges use of a hack to

defeat pollution tests

slide-12
SLIDE 12

April 19, 2016 12

VW's Interim Report

  • Problems due to

– Misconduct and shortcomings of individual

employees

– Weaknesses in some processes – Mindset that tolerated rule breaches

  • No assumption of responsibility by top level
  • fficers for creating the work environment in

which the failures occurred.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

April 19, 2016 13

VW's Code of Conduct

  • “Our common goal is to be number one among the world's

automobile manufacturers … based on superior quality.” (Forward)

  • “Each of our employees shall make sure that his or her demeanor

in public does not damage the reputation of the Volkswagen Group. The fulfillment of his or her duties must always be directed hereto in all respects.”

  • “Every superior has responsibility for his or her employees. Every

superior sets an example and must act in strict accordance with the Code of Conduct.”

– “By providing regular information and instruction about the relevant

responsibilities and powers for each work area, supervisors promote behavior by their employees that conforms to the Code of Conduct.”

slide-14
SLIDE 14

April 19, 2016 14

The Aftermath of Disclosure

  • VW's post disclosure behavior has reinforced

concerns about corporate culture.

– Denials of EPA and CARB findings – Reversals only when forced – Perfunctory apologies – Dearth of meaningful explanations

  • US DOJ has filed a civil complaint that may

result in billions of dollars in fines.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

April 19, 2016 15

Ethics and Mettle Fatigue

  • Ethics were VW's single point of failure

– Results at any cost – Lack of checks on dishonest behavior – Secrecy – No refusals to work on the defeat device

  • Mettle fatigue:

– Long exposure to ethically dubious activities that

prevents the recognition of reality, acceptance of facts, and responding with integrity

slide-16
SLIDE 16

April 19, 2016 16

Trust: Another Casualty

  • The environmental impact of 11 million cars

was misrepresented

  • With a million plus lines of code, consumers

need to be able to trust the developer.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

April 19, 2016 17

Codes of the Profession

slide-18
SLIDE 18

April 19, 2016 18

IEEE Code of Ethics

  • The code commits engineers “to be honest …

in making claims.”

– Does not specify to whom – VW management or government regulators?

  • No requirement to act responsibly in the

presence of other's malfeasance.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

April 19, 2016 19

ACM Code of Ethics

  • Contribute to society and human well-being.

– When designing or implementing systems, computing

professionals must attempt to ensure that the products of their efforts will be used in socially responsible ways, will meet social needs, and will avoid harmful effects to health and welfare.

  • Avoid harm to others.

– Well-intended actions, including those that accomplish

assigned duties, may lead to harm unexpectedly. In such an event the responsible person or persons are obligated to undo

  • r mitigate the negative consequences as much as possible.
slide-20
SLIDE 20

April 19, 2016 20

Tau Beta Pi Ethics Code

  • Engineers shall hold paramount the safety,

health, and welfare of the public in the performance of their professional duties.

– First fundamental canon

  • Engineers shall act in professional matters for

each employer or client as faithful agents or trustees, and shall avoid conflicts of interest.

– Assumes the engineer is independent of the

employer

slide-21
SLIDE 21

April 19, 2016 21

US Military Academy

A cadet will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those that do.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

April 19, 2016 22

Questions

slide-23
SLIDE 23

April 19, 2016 23

Culture and Ethics

  • Are the following necessary or sufficient

conditions for ethical lapses?

– Management Culture

  • “My way or the highway”
  • “Don't bring me problems; bring me solutions.”

– Unachievable requirements – Externally focused ethical standards

  • Single Point or Chain of Failures?
slide-24
SLIDE 24

April 19, 2016 24

Agile and Ethics

  • How does agile programming facilitate or

prevent ethical lapses?

– Scrums – Sprints – Technical Debt – Evolving Requirements – Misconceptions