meta study of distance study of distance meta education
play

Meta- -Study of Distance Study of Distance Meta Education Com - PDF document

12/5/2003 Lea rner - -centered Instructiona l centered Instructiona l Lea rner Design a nd Dev elop m ent: Design a nd Dev elop m ent: Tw o Exa m p les of Success Tw o Exa m p les of Success A presentation prepared for the APRU 4 th DLI


  1. 12/5/2003 Lea rner - -centered Instructiona l centered Instructiona l Lea rner Design a nd Dev elop m ent: Design a nd Dev elop m ent: Tw o Exa m p les of Success Tw o Exa m p les of Success A presentation prepared for the APRU 4 th DLI Conference, Singapore: Novem ber 30 th to Decem ber 2 nd 20 0 3 Gale Parchom a Instructional Designer UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. www.usask.ca Meta- -Study of Distance Study of Distance Meta Education Com pletion Rates Education Com pletion Rates • Distance students learn as much as conventional students • Correspondence students are much more likely to drop out before completing their courses • Dropout rates range from 19 to 90 % • An overall rate of 40 % • Studies of this magnitude have yet to be conducted for technology-based distance learning • Limited research to date suggests interactivity and novelty may contribute to higher completion rates Potashnik, M. & Capper, J. (1998). Distance education: Growth and diversity. International Monetary Fund and the I nternational Bank for Reconstruction and University of Saskatchewan - University of Saskatchewan - Extension Division Extension Division Development/ The World Bank. Trends 20 0 3: Progress towards Trends 20 0 3: Progress towards the European Higher Education the European Higher Education Area Area • New focus on learners’ needs • A paradigmatic shift from teaching to learning • The needs and aspirations of the students should constitute the driving principle in the higher education European University Association – July 2003 University of Saskatchewan University of Saskatchewan - - Extension Division Extension Division 1

  2. 12/5/2003 A Com parison of Perspectives A Com parison of Perspectives Dom ain-Centered Design Learner-Centered Design for for Com puter-Mediated Com puter-Mediated Learning Learning Gifford and Enyedy ( 19 99 ) University of Saskatchewan University of Saskatchewan - - Extension Division Extension Division Dom ain Dom ain - -Centered Design Centered Design Prerequisite knowledge Focus of design work is on � content to be developed The content of the discipline University of Saskatchewan - University of Saskatchewan - Extension Division Extension Division Learner- Learner -Centered Design (LCD) Centered Design (LCD) Who are the learners? And what do they need to know? Focus of design work is on learners’ needs � How will learners benefit from learning? University of Saskatchewan University of Saskatchewan - - Extension Division Extension Division 2

  3. 12/5/2003 Basic Principles of LCD Basic Principles of LCD � Learnability � The initial difficulty in learning how to use an a com puter-m ediated learning environm ent � Usability � Ease of use over tim e � Understandability � Meeting the content needs of the learner in order to ensure that inform ation-seeking requirem ents, perform ance goals, and level of fam iliarity w ith topics encountered are accom m odated Reeves (1999) “Prom ote a shared understanding of intentions and perm it coordinated action… for the m utual benefit of learners and their teachers.” University of Saskatchewan - University of Saskatchewan - Extension Division Extension Division Goodyear (1999) LCD Principles Applied to LCD Principles Applied to Instructional Design (ID) Instructional Design (ID) � Designing computer-mediated learning environments as information fields � An information field (Reeves, 1999): • Reduces com plexity • Focuses on reducing cognitive load • Supports learners w ithin a cognitive fram ew ork “To design is … to add value and m eaning to illum inate, to sim plify, to clarify.” Paul Rand University of Saskatchewan - University of Saskatchewan - Extension Division Extension Division Inform ation Field Design (IFD) Inform ation Field Design (IFD) Distribution of Cognitive Load Human User Designed Object Tool-centered User-centered Learner-centered Reeves ( 1 999 ) University of Saskatchewan - University of Saskatchewan - Extension Division Extension Division 3

  4. 12/5/2003 IFD Applied to Interface Design IFD Applied to Interface Design • Cognitive fram ework that system atically connects a virtual learning environm ent to the learners – Fam iliarity with delivery platform – Help screens that are inform ative and appropriate for specific problem s – Intuitive navigation – Flexible – interface can cope with unexpected choices – Metaphors – Do they translate? – Sem antic density – Is it right? University of Saskatchewan - University of Saskatchewan - Extension Division Extension Division LCD LCD – – After the Interface… After the Interface… Taking a learner-centered stance “forces designers to conceptualize the developm ent process from the learners’ perspective rather than that of the content.” Sims (2001) University of Saskatchewan - University of Saskatchewan - Extension Division Extension Division LCD inside ADDIE – – I I LCD inside ADDIE Detailed Learner Profiles • Dem ographics • Com fort w ith and access to technology • Learning styles and preferences • Com fort w ith the language of instruction • Com peting responsibilities • Academ ic self-concept • Achievem ent expectancies • Perceptions of authority Laks (2003) House (2002) Schwier (2002) Barclay (2001) Wilson (1999) University of Saskatchewan University of Saskatchewan - - Extension Division Extension Division 4

  5. 12/5/2003 LCD inside ADDIE - - II II LCD inside ADDIE Learner-centered Task Analysis • Again , w hat do your learners already know ? • W hat do they need to know ? • How big is the gap? • How are you going to connect your learners’ prior know ledge to new know ledge? • How are you going to chunk the inform ation that exists inside the gap? • W hat tools are provided to learners so that they can m onitor and im prove their learning? • How w ill you dem onstrate the benefit of successful learning to them ? University of Saskatchewan University of Saskatchewan - - Extension Division Extension Division Doyle (2002) Schwier (2002) Weston & Amundsen (2001) Merrill (2000) LCD inside ADDIE LCD inside ADDIE – – III III • Focus on the skills, needs, & interest of the learners • Scaffold understanding • Plan to assist learners in their efforts to m ake schem atic connections • Plan for just-in-tim e coaching • Make self-m onitoring and evaluating activities explicit and obvious • I nclude learners in the design team Vincini (2001), Murphy (2000), Reeves (1999) “I nstructional designers m ust interact w ith the people for w hom they design.” Thomas, Mitchell, & Joseph (2002) “End users—the ‘consum ers’ of the instructional ‘product’ should contribute directly to the project’s design and developm ent.” Wilson (1995) University of Saskatchewan University of Saskatchewan - - Extension Division Extension Division LCD inside ADDIE LCD inside ADDIE – – IV IV I n an e-learning environm ent, “you have to interact w ith students on an individual level.” Barclay (2001) Learners “don’t care how m uch you know until they know how m uch you care.” Weston & Amundsen (2001) Foster an environm ent that allow s learners “to learn from course m aterials, the instructor, and each other.” Collins & Berge (1996) University of Saskatchewan - University of Saskatchewan - Extension Division Extension Division 5

  6. 12/5/2003 LCD inside ADDIE – – V V LCD inside ADDIE • Em phases: • Form ative rather than sum m ative • I terative rather than periodical • Lateral rather than hierarchical “Mem bers of a learning com m unity, including both teachers and students observe and m onitor learning and m ake needed adjustm ents to support each other in learning activities.” Wilson (1995) University of Saskatchewan - University of Saskatchewan - Extension Division Extension Division A Com parison of Two Success Stories A Com parison of Two Success Stories � COL - Writing Effectively for UNHCR – English version • Project Sponsor: Commonwealth of Learning • Instructional Designer: Dr. David Murphy • Writer: Maree Bentley – My role: One of several course tutors � U of S - Designing Materials for I ndividualized Instruction • Project Sponsor: University of Saskatchewan • Primary Instructional Designer: Dr. Richard Schwier • Student-Assistant Designers: Ruth and Thelma Cey • Writer: Dr. Richard Schwier • Instructor: Dr. Richard Schwier – My role: Instructional Designer- “Trouble-maker” University of Saskatchewan - University of Saskatchewan - Extension Division Extension Division Define Success…for the COL Define Success…for the COL UNHCR UNHCR Course Course ODLAA ( 2 0 01 ) Aw ard for Excellence in Developm ent and Delivery of Distance Education and Open Learning Program s to the Com m onw ealth of Learning " W riting Effectively for UNHCR dem onstrates a com m itm ent to excellence that is am ply reflected in the final product. The overall high quality represents the convergence of a range of attributes, the m ost notable of these being: • An in-depth understanding of the target group and its needs • Sound background research • Attention to the appropriateness of learning strategies and m edia. Op en a nd Dista nce Lea rning Associa tion of Austra lia (ODLAA) University of Saskatchewan - University of Saskatchewan - Extension Division Extension Division 6

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend