MELQUISEDEC CORTS ZAMBRANO Docente Investigador Universidad Santo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

melquisedec cort s zambrano docente investigador
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MELQUISEDEC CORTS ZAMBRANO Docente Investigador Universidad Santo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MELQUISEDEC CORTS ZAMBRANO Docente Investigador Universidad Santo Tomas SEWER SYSTEM WWTPs RIVER Separated sewer. Combined sewer. CSO . Pollutants transported during dry weather. Contaminants deposited on


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MELQUISEDEC CORTÉS ZAMBRANO Docente Investigador Universidad Santo Tomas

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • SEWER SYSTEM
  • WWTPs
  • RIVER
slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Separated sewer.
  • Combined sewer.
  • CSO .
slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Pollutants transported during dry weather.
  • Contaminants deposited on the basin surface.
  • Sedimented contaminants in the drainage system.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

1. Water flow in the sewer system (river hydraulics):

2. Accumulation of pollutants :Pollutants on the basin surface 3. Pollutant transport in the sewer system

  • Contaminants deposited on basin surface.
  • Fine particles
  • Conceptual models (Linear reservoirs in series)
  • Modelos mecanísticos (advection-dispersion equation)
  • Coarse particles (suspended solids, solids bed, solids washed)
  • Solid-hydraulic interaction sewer.

4. Chemical and biological transformation.

  • Changes in water quality.

Modelo Type of hyfraulic modelization MOUSE Complete equations of Saint Venant KOSIM Linear reservoirs method SMUSI Kalinin-Miljukov method

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Wastewater treatment plant (WWTPs)
  • Wastewater pretreatment.
  • Screening, grit removal, flotation.
  • Primary treatment of wastewater.
  • Sieving and sedimentation
  • Secondary treatment.
  • Activated sludge systems, fixed bed reactors, pond systems, etc.
  • Control and elimination of nutrients..
  • Advanced treatment.
  • Chemical coagulation, flocculation, activated carbon filters, etc.

Treatment technologies: (TPS), (UASB), (WSP), (TF), (AS). Used models: ASM (Activated Sludge Model)

  • Simulation of different types of processes (degradation of organic matter, nitrogen,

ammonium nitrification, sludge generation, among others).

CITY DRAIN (Simplifications based on the estimation of removal percentages.)

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • River
  • Impacts:
  • Hydraulic.
  • hydrological
  • Chemicals.
  • Biochemicals.
  • Physical.
  • Hygienic.
  • Aesthetic.

Modeling becomes more complex.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

DESIGN. OPERATION MODELATION.

  • Sewerage.
  • Treatment Plant Wastewater WWTP.
  • River.

WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Preservation of public health.
  • Flood prevention.
  • This traditional way of thinking about urban drainage, is reflected in

the existence of multiple models that only simulate the operation of the system. SUSTAINABLE VISIONS (environmental and economic)

  • Minimum amount of combined water.
  • Maximum storage capacity of the system.
slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • SEWER SYSTEM.

The rains and sewage from the city drains into watersheds: Torca River. Salitre River. Fucha River. Tunjuelo River. The Bogotá River is the main receiving waterbody of the drainage system of the city.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

1. Torca wetlands– Guaymaral: (73ha; 24 hay 49ha). 2. La Conejera wetlands: (59ha). 3. Córdoba wetlands: (40ha). 4. Juan Amarillo wetlands: (225ha). 5. Santa María del Lago wetlands: (11ha). 6. Jaboque wetlands: (148ha). 7. Capellanía wetlands: (21ha). 8. Techo wetlands: (12ha). 9. El Burro wetlands: (16ha).

  • 10. La Vaca wetlands: (8ha).
  • 11. Tibanica wetlands: (29ha).
  • 12. Meandro del Say wetlands: (26ha).
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Significance: Energy disipation structures Impacts:

  • Fragmentation by the construction of motorways, desiccation

and filling, and the destruction of the cover vegetation.

  • Decrease its hydraulic perimeter.
  • Water quality.
  • The wetlands are receiving wastewater discharges from hospitals,

agricultural sectors and neighborhoods of the city.

  • Wrong connections.
slide-13
SLIDE 13

PROBLEMS:

  • High percentage of wrong connections.
  • Capacity problems.
  • Inadequate treatment of wastewater.

The salitre wastewater treatment plant, has a capacity of 4 m3/s, while the city produces approximately 16 m3/s.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Planning. Management of stormwater systems. Metodology:

  • Delimitation of the study area.
  • Diagnostics.
  • Hydrologic-hydraulic modeling.
  • Rainfall data and flow.
  • Hydro-physical characteristics of the watershed.
  • Selection of return periods.
  • Model implementation.
  • Calibration y validation.
  • Evaluation of the drainage system.
  • Proposal to improve the hydraulic performance of the system.
slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Figure. Bogotá river sanitation plan (source : EAAB, 2010).
slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Figure. Traditional vision of urban drainage system (Adapted of Woods-Ballard et al.,

2007).

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The current management of drainage systems has proven to be:

  • Inefficient.
  • Unsustainable.

OPERATING COLOMBIA.

  • Measures "at the end of the pipe".

Which brings to ignore the interactions that occur between the different subsystems. IMPLICATION:

  • Difficulties in prioritizing investments in sanitation.
  • Implementation of measures that do not generate the positive impact

expected.

  • Deterioration in water quality of the waterbodies.
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Simulate different sanitation alternatives.

Considering:

  • City water receptor bodies (Bogotá river).
  • The watersheds of major tributaries (Salitre, Fucha y Tunjuelo rivers)
  • Wetlands.
  • Involving an integrated system operation. (Combined sewer)

Understanding the system in a holistic manner.

  • Relationships and complexities of the processes involved.
  • Looking ensure that the quality of water bodies is compatible with the uses
  • f water in the basin.
slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Figure. Integrated vision of urban drainage system (Adapted of Woods-

Ballard et al., 2007).

  • SUDS, BMPs, LID, LIUDD, WSUD.
  • Minimize runoff.
  • Reduce hydrologic impacts and water quality.
  • Maximize biodiversity.
slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Figure. Urban drainage subsystems and their relationships (taken from: www.acueducto.com.co).
slide-21
SLIDE 21

OBJECTIVE :

  • Optimize system performance.
  • Increase control exercised over its operation.
  • Improve the water quality of the receiving body.
  • Advances in the efficiency and sustainability of urban drainage

systems. IMPLICATION:

  • Better planning and system operation.
  • More sustainable solutions.
  • Reduce impacts on the river.
slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • 1. Improving the quality of life of the population.
  • 2. Participation of all sectors involved.
  • 3. Holistic management of water in the basin.
  • 4. Drainage of wastewater must be made on smallest areas.
slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
  • Current Status and Operation.
  • Determining the deficiency.
  • Identify the relevance and need for integrated modeling.
  • COLLECTION OF INFORMATION.
  • Dominant processes
  • INITIAL CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE MODEL.
  • IMPLEMENTATION AND MODEL ANALYSIS.
  • The model should be flexible.
  • The model must simulate all system components.
  • SCENARIO APPROACH.
  • Projected recovery plan for the city.
  • SCENARIO SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS.
  • Quantification of the resulting pollutant load in the river
slide-24
SLIDE 24

PROCESSES LIKE :

  • Calibration.
  • Validation.

Requires a lot of information of the drainage system.

  • Complex process.
  • Expensive.
  • Requires time.

You can't make a good an integrated model calibration. Scope of the methodology :

  • Implementation of the model.
  • Utilidad del modelo.

Using calibrated parameters in different studies for each of the subsystems.

slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • Reduction of runoff flows, and the consequent reduction in the risk of

floodings.

  • Reduction of the additional runoff volumes which are generated from

unpervious urban areas

  • Minimizing the impact on groundwater (and on basis flow), as a result of

increased rainwater infiltration.

  • Reduction in the peak concentration of pollutants as a result of precipitation

events from temporary storage of rain water.

  • Reduced risk of accidental discharges of pollutants to the water receptor

bodies.

  • Reducing pollution from discharges into combined sewer overflow structures.

CSOs.

  • Contribution to the aesthetics and improve the appearance of urban areas.
  • Contribution to biodiversity and creating suitable habitats for different

species of animals in urban areas.

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • Rodríguez, J. P., M. Díaz-Granados, P. Montes and J. Saavedra (2008a).

Modelación Integrada de Sistemas de Drenaje Urbano – Caso Bogotá D.C. (Colombia). XXIII Latinamerican Congress on Hydraulic (IARH), Cartagena, Colombia.

  • Rodríguez, J. P., M. A. Díaz-Granados, L. A. Camacho, I. C. Raciny, Č. Maksimović

and N. McIntyre (2008b). Bogotá's urban drainage system: context, research activities and perspectives. BHS 10th National Hydrology Symposium, Exeter.

  • Rodríguez, J. P., M. A. Díaz-Granados, L. A. Camacho, M. Rodríguez, I. C. Raciny,

C.

  • Maksimovic, N. McIntyre, S. Achleitner, M. Moderl and W. Rauch (In preparation).

Case Study III: The case of Bogotá city, Colombia. Integrated Urban Water System Interactions, UNESCO.

  • Schuetze, M. and J. Alex (2004). Suitable integrated modelling - based on

simplified models. 6th International Conference on Urban Drainage Modelling, Dresden.

slide-27
SLIDE 27