Meeting #2 NOVEMBER 15, 2017 Overv rview Tim imelin ine - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Integrated Strategic Planning Taskforce Meeting #2

NOVEMBER 15, 2017

• Tim

imelin ine

• Da

Data In Informed Str trategic Plan lannin ing

• Stu

Student Da Data

• Hig

ighlig lights fr from RCCD Dr Draft Envir ironmental Sc Scan

• Oth

ther Da Data Ne Needed Di Discussion

• Themes an

and Go Goal l Se Settin ing Di Discussion

• Review of
• f MVC Mis

ission, Vis ision, an and Valu alues

• Su

Summary of

• f Cali

alifornia Community Coll

• llege Chan

ancell llors Office Vis ision for Success

• Su

Summary of

• f MVC 20

2015 15-2018 Str Strategic Plan lan Themes

• Di

Discussion of

• f Potential

l Themes/Areas of

• f Focus/Core

Commitments an and Hom

• mework

Overv rview

MVC Integrated Strategic Plan Timeline

2017 2018

Today Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018 Feb Mar Apr May Jun

SPC Council Retreat

9/8/2017

ISP Taskforce Meeting #1

11/3/2017

ISP Taskforce Meeting #2

11/15/2017

ISP Taskforce Meeting #3

11/29/2017

ISP Taskforce Meeting #4

12/13/2017

ISP Taskforce Meeting #5 - Half Day Retreat (January)

1/12/2018

ISP Taskforce Meeting #6 - Half Day Retreat (January)

2/1/2018

ISP Plan Draft Themes-Goals-Activities - SPC Retreat (No Date Set)

2/8/2018

ISP Draft and Actives Feedback Due

2/16/2018

ISP First Draft for Circulation and Feedback

3/2/2018

MVC Governance Review of ISP Completed

5/4/2018

MVC ISP Board of Trustees Approval

6/18/2018

11/3/2017 - 3/2/2018 ISP Draft Production

3/5/2018 - 5/4/2018 ISP Draft to Governance Review and Feedback

ISP Taskforce Tentative Meeting Schedule and Tasks

• 11/2/17 Meeting #1 – Introduction and Timeline
• 11/15/17 Meeting #2 – Data, Themes/Focus Areas/Core Commitments, & Goals
• 11/29/17Meeting #3 – Themes/Focus Areas/Core Commitments & Goal Setting
• 12/8/17 ISP Campus Forum – Timeline, Taskforce, and Work to Date
• 12/13/17 Meeting #4 – Goal Setting Draft Completion
• 1/12/18 Meeting #5 – Activities to Achieve Goals Brainstorming and Workgroups
• 1/26/18 Meeting #6 – Activities to Achieve Goals Draft
• 2/8/18 ISP Draft Themes-Goals-Activities SPC Retreat (No Date Set)
• 2/16/18 Draft Themes-Goals-Activities Workgroup Feedback from Campus Community
• 3/2/18 First Draft of ISP for Review to Governance Completed
• 5/4/18 MVC Governance Review Completed and ISP Sent to District Strategic Planning Council
• 6/18/18 MVC Board of Trustees Approval

Moreno Valley College

CRITICAL LOCAL CONTEXT & STUDENT PROFILE

MVC’S INTEGRATED STRATEGIC PLAN 2018-2021 OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS

NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL CONTEXT

Figure 1: The US Education Pipeline, by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, 2012

Data Source: American Community Survey (ACS) data for 2012, compiled by the US Bureau of the Census. Note: The first number represents females, the second, males.

Figure 1: Educational Pipeline for Latina/o students in the United States

Source: U.S. Census, 2000; Solorzano, 2006; Rivas, Perez, Alvarez & Solorzano, 2007; Rivas, 2012)

10 3 6 10 11 19 24

5 10 15 20 25 30 Doctoral Production Rates (1990-2000)

Doctoral Production Rates by Community College Scholars (1990-2000)

Overall Asian American Puerto Rican African American White Native American Mexican American (Chicana/os)

Data Source: Survey of Earned Doctorates (SED), 1990-2000; Rivas, Perez, Alvarez & Solorzano, 2007; Rivas, 2012

MORENO VALLEY : Local Context

UNDERSTANDING OUR COMMUNITY

Local Changes

Population Growth

City of Moreno Valley

31 22 19 10 15 2 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Below H.S. H.S. Diploma Some College, No Degree A.A. BA Graduate

Educational Attainment Levels (%)

Data Source: U.S. Census, American Community Survey, 2013-2016

Residents Below Poverty Levels

35% 42% 29% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Moreno Valley Perris Riverside

Data Source: U.S. Census, American Community Survey, 2013-2016

Language Diversity

48% 63% 43% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Language Other than English Spoken at Home

Moreno Valley Perris Riverside

Data Source: U.S. Census, American Community Survey, 2013-2016

MORENO VALLEY COLLEGE: Who Are Our Students?

Race/Ethnicity Enrollment by Percentage Race/Ethnicity CCC State Total RCCD MVC Norco RCC African American

5.87 8.09

15.89

5.42 7.64 American Indian 0.40 0.32 0.28 0.25 0.37 Asian 11.00 4.90 3.14 6.32 5.03 Filipino 2.92 2.11 2.05 2.42 2.00 Latinx

45.08 60.93

61.88

58.61 60.75 Multi-Ethnicity 3.76 2.31 2.89 2.32 2.09 Pacific Islander 0.41 0.36 0.35 0.35 0.37 Unknown 4.42 0.85 0.58 0.36 1.21 White Non-Hispanic

26.14 20.13 19.04

24.07 20.55

MVC serves Students of Color proportionally at higher rates than State and District levels

Data Source: California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO), March, 2017

Region 9: Latina/o Student Success Rates (Spring, 2016)

70.1

69.9

69.7 69

68.5

67.2 66.2 65.1 65 64.3 64.2

Crafton Hills (#1) MVC (#2) Palo Verde (#3) Chaffey (#4) Cooper Mt (#5) Norco (#6) San Bernardino (#7) COD (#8)

• Mt. San

Jacinto(#9) Victor Valley (#10) RCC (#11) Top Quarter of CA CCC Bottom Quarter of CA CCC

CA: #24 #27 #29 #39 #43 #58 #72 #85 #87 #93 #94

MVC Enrollment Mirrors Local Demographics

18 1 6 54 19 6

Moreno Valley

African American Native American Asian Latinos White 2 or more races 12 1 4 72 11 5

Perris

African American Native American Asian Latinos White 2 or more races

Data Source: U.S. Census, 2010

MVC Students: City of Residence (%)

(2016-2017)

Data Source: Datatel Note: Only includes students who are identified in the system as MVC being their home college.

50 20 17 5 3 2 2 1

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%

Moreno Valley Perris Other Riverside Nuevo Hemet Menifee San Jacinto

Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity (%) (2016-2017)

58 19 16 4 3

10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Latinx White African American/Black Other Asian

Data Source: MIS referential files, 2016-2017

Local Student Enrollment

1800 800 800 400 300 200 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Moreno Valley USD ValVerde USD Graduates Enroll into PostSecondary Attend MVC

40%

Data Source: California Department of Education, CDE 2015; California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office, CCCCO 2017

50%

MVC is the “home college” for majority of our students

• “Home College” - Percent of students who

complete at least 60% of their attempted coursework at only one college

• Moreno Valley College is clearly a unique case

in RCCD

• Vast majority of MVC students complete

majority of attempted coursework at MVC = 3 of every 4 students

• Norco and RCC students complete or attempt

coursework at more than one college

• Continue to strength our culture to ensure

MVC continues to be the College of Choice!

MVC Gender Representation

57%

42%

Data Source: MIS referential files, 2016-2017

Unknown: 1%

Age Distribution & Representation

Data Source: MIS referential files, Fall 2016

28.6 % 38.0 % 15.0 % 7.1 % 4.1 % 4.4 % 2.8 %

0.0 % 5.0 % 10.0 % 15.0 % 20.0 % 25.0 % 30.0 % 35.0 % 40.0 % 19 or Less 20 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 34 35 to 39 40 to 49 50 +

Student Unit Load (% by Category) Fall Terms, 2010-2016

18 19 15 5 3 4 5 29 29 29 31 31 30 31 20 21 20 23 22 24 24 14 13 15 17 18 18 18 14 14 15 18 19 19 17 4 4 5 6 6 5 4

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

<2.9 units 3-5.9 units 6-8.9 units 9-11.9 units 12-14.9 units 15+ units

10532 9829 8936 8220 8592 8697 9022 Data Source: California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO), March, 2017

MVC Student Outcomes: How are we, collectively, supporting students?

Successful Course Completion

OUTCOMES 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017

Overall

71.9% 70.5% 71.1% 72.2%

Transfer courses

72.6% 71.6% 71.8% 72.1%

Credit - Degree applicable courses

73.0% 71.7% 72.1% 73.3%

Career/Technical Education courses

78.3% 78.5% 80.0% 83.1%

Remedial Education courses

64.1%

61.5% 63.2% 61.2%

ESL

74.8% 70.8% 76.9% 74.6%

Source: MIS referential files

MVC Successful Course Completion (2013-2017)

85.31 % 86.65 % 85.41 % 86.16 % 85.25 % 84.74 % 0.00 % 10.00 % 20.00 % 30.00 % 40.00 % 50.00 % 60.00 % 70.00 % 80.00 % 90.00 % 100.00 % Retention Rate Retention Rate Retention Rate Retention Rate Retention Rate Retention Rate Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Fall 2014 Spring 2015 Fall 2015 Spring 2016 Fall 2016 Spring 2017

MVC Credit Course Retention Rates Fall 2014 - Spring 2017

Data Source: California Community College Chancellors Office DataMart

68.43 % 67.82 % 67.55 % 69.05 % 70.66 % 68.10 % 0.00 % 10.00 % 20.00 % 30.00 % 40.00 % 50.00 % 60.00 % 70.00 % 80.00 % 90.00 % 100.00 % Success Rate Success Rate Success Rate Success Rate Success Rate Success Rate Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Fall 2016 Spring 2015 Spring 2016 Spring 2017

MVC Credit Course Success Rates Fall 2014 - Spring 2016

Data Source: California Community College Chancellors Office DataMart

MVC Successful Course Completion (2013-2017)

71.90% 70.50% 71.10% 72.20% 72.10% 73.30% 83.10% 74.60% 65.00% 66.00% 67.00% 68.00% 69.00% 70.00% 71.00% 72.00% 73.00% 74.00% 75.00% 76.00% 77.00% 78.00% 79.00% 80.00% 81.00% 82.00% 83.00% 84.00% 85.00% 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017

Overall Transfer Credit-Degree CTE ESL

MVC Persistence Rates (2013-2017)

Fall to Spring Persistence Rates Beginning Term N Ending Term N Persistence Rate Fall 2013 and Spring 2014 Fall 2013 6,968 Spring 2014 4,472

64.2%

Fall 2014 and Spring 2015 Fall 2014 7,445 Spring 2015 4,733

63.6%

Fall 2015 to Spring 2016 Fall 2015 7,521 Spring 2016 4,683

62.3%

Fall 2016 to Spring 2017 Fall 2016 7,222 Spring 2017 4,596

63.6%

Fall to Spring Persistence Rates Beginning Term N Ending Term N Persistence Rate

MMAP Fall 2016 to Spring 2017 Fall 2016 885 Spring 2017 717 81% FYE(Y1) Fall 2016 to Spring 2017 Fall 2016 81 Spring 2017 75 92.1%

527 702 915 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 Annual 2014-2015 Annual 2015-2016 Annual 2016-2017

Moreno Valley College Total Associates Degrees

297 271 605 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Annual 2014-2015 Annual 2015-2016 Annual 2016-2017

Moreno Valley College Total Certificates

MVC First-Year Student Performance

DATA INFORMING GUIDED PATHWAY: FIRST-YEAR, FULL-TIME COLLEGE STUDENTS

Moreno Valley College GP-KPI PARTICIPATIO N (2013-2017)

1585 1611 1684 1669 1549

368 387 414 248 858

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Fall 2017

First-time Students Full-time Students

23%

25% 24% 15% 55%

Moreno Valley College GP-KPI PERSISTENCE & SUCCESSFUL COURSE COMPLETION (2013-2017)

1585 1611 1684 1669

1236 1192 1280 1085 914 904 934 863

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 First-time Students Successful Course Completion Persisted Term 1 to Term 2

78% 74% 76% 65% 58% 56% 55% 52%

Moreno Valley College GP-KPI CREDITS ATTEMPTED (2013-2017)

Degree-Applicable Credits Credits Attempted 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Fall 2017

14 13 13 12 10 17 16 17 15 11

Degree-Applicable Credits Credits Attempted

GP-KPI Transfer Level Math & English Year 1 Completion (2013-2017)

16% 15% 21% 24% 5% 4% 5% 4%

3% 2% 3% 3%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Transfer-Level English Transfer-Level Math Both Transfer-Level English & Math (Y1)

Moreno Valley College GP-KPI First TERM Momentum Credits EARNED (2013-2017)

565 508 541 460

168 155 137 143 46 28 32 31

100 200 300 400 500 600 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017

Earned 6+ College Credits Earned 12+ College Credits Earned 15+ Credits

Moreno Valley College GP-KPI First YEAR Momentum Credits EARNED (2013-2017)

386 326 367 276 180 94 123 99 70 29 56 23

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017

Earner 15+ College Credits Earned 24+ College Credits Earned 30+ College Credits

MVC Enrollment Data

1585 1611 1684 1669 1549 368 387 414 248 858 23% 24% 25% 15% 55%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800

2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Fall 2017

FTES

MVC First Time Students and Full-Time Status

Number of First Time Students Number of First Time Full Time Students % FT Students Data Source: MVC Guided Pathways Key Performance Indicators, October 2017 *Average units attempted per Student is 11 for Fall 2017 alone. 2016-2017 annual attempted units was 15.

6062 6043 6363 6607 6833 3032 6174 5727 6262 6473 6573 6347 3016

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Fall 2017 FTES

MVC FTES Targets and Actuals

Target Actual

Fall 2017 Unduplicated Headcount is up 9.9% and Enrolled Seats is up 12.2%

Data Source: Targets established via District Allocation Model; Annual Credit FTES Reported CCFS-320 Report Note: In order to make district targets, FTES earned in summer sessions were reported for previous year every year but 2013-2014

1700 1475 1370 1428 1520 1521 1596 705 91% 88% 93% 81% 78% 77% 74% 80%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800

2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Fall 2017

Fill Rates Course Sections

Number of Course Sections and Average Fill Rates

Course Sections Average Fill Rates Data Source: RCCD Enrollment Management Dashboard, November 2017

SUM17 FALL17 WIN18 SPR18 TOTAL Original Credit FTES Target 639.74 3032.04 578.66 2857.81 7108.25 Earned, Projected, or Needed 600.98 3016.15 604.31 2936.81 7158.25 639.74 3032.04 578.66 2857.81 7108.25 600.98 3016.15 604.31 2936.81 7158.25

0.00 1000.00 2000.00 3000.00 4000.00 5000.00 6000.00 7000.00 8000.00

FTES

2016-2017 MVC FTES Generation and Projections

Fall 17 FTES is projected to be up 10.2% compared to Fall 2016

MVC Innovative Efforts

ASSESSMENT AND KEY COLLABORATIONS

MMAP at MVC (2016-2017)

Multiple Measures for Assessment and Placement (MMAP) National, State, California Community College Chancellor’s Office – evidence-based and research-driven process Innovative, holistic process to assess and place students AccuPlacer test + MMAP information = placement levels

• English and Math

MMAP information – previous experience

• 6 key elements (English, Math, overall GPA while in high school)

English Placement Levels % (2016-2017)

13.5 33.1 8.7 44.7 74.1 36.1 8.7 3.1

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Transfer Level 1 Level Below 2 Levels Below 3+ Levels Below Accuplacer MMAP

Math Placement Levels % (2016-2017)

2.2 35 26.4 36.4 52.6 14.7 20.1 12.6

10 20 30 40 50 60 Transfer Level 1 Level Below 2 Levels Below 3+ Levels Below Accuplacer MMAP

Reading Placement Levels % (2016-2017)

40.5 18.6 10.7 30.2 73.2 16.1 9 1.7

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Transfer Level 1 Level Below 2 Levels Below 3+ Levels Below Accuplacer MMAP

14% 71% 2% 46% 36% 69% 14% 72% 3% 50% 40% 71% 12% 77% 1% 59% 41% 74% 17% 77% 7% 59% 39% 80% 28% 81% 5% 64% 62% 81% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

% ACC % MMAP % ACC % MMAP % ACC % MMAP English Math Reading African American Hispanic Native Amer/Alaska Native Native Hawaiian/Pac Islander White

RCCD 2016-2017* Transfer Placement Levels By Race/Ethnicity

* Includes Fall, 2017 placement data

MMAP Students Successful Course Completion

2016-2017 ACADEMIC RESULTS MMAP STUDENTS, COMPARED TO NON-MMAP STUDENTS IN SAME COURSES

Student Unit Load (Historical Trends – MMAP Cohort)

18 19 15 5 3 4 5 29 29 29 31 31 30 31 20 21 20 23 22 24 24 14 13 15 17 18 18 18 14 14 15 18 19 19 17 4 4 5 6 6 5 4

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

<2.9 units 3-5.9 units 6-8.9 units 9-11.9 units 12-14.9 units 15+ units 10532 9829 8936 8220 8592 8697 9022

Data Source: California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO), March, 2017 2 7 13 18 53 8 MMAP 2016

MVC English Course Results, 2016- 2017

69% 69% 68% 70% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Transfer Level 1 Level Below

Comparison of MMAP Placement Against Other Students in Class

MMAP All other students in same class

MVC Math Course Results, 2016-2017

45% 51% 46% 44% 49% 54% 37% 54% 0% 25% 50% 75%

Transfer 1 Level Below 2 Levels Below 3 Levels Below

Comparison of MMAP Placement Against Other Students in Class

MMAP All other students in same class

MVC Reading Course Results, 2016- 2017

67% 90% 67% 61% 82% 74% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

1 Level Below 2 Levels Below 3 Levels Below

Comparison of MMAP Placement Against Other Students in Class

MMAP All other students in same class

SO WHY SHOULD MVC FOCUS ON EDUCATIONAL EQUITY?

What is equity? What is it not?

Equality

• Assumes everyone is equal
• Assumes there is nothing wrong with access and
• pportunities
• Meritocracy – everyone has a fair chance
• Assumes, “WE ALL HAVE A FAIR CHANCE TO BE IN THE

ROOM”

Diversity

• Celebration of diversity
• Representation of all people
• All students
• Asks, “WHO IS IN THE ROOM?”

Equity

• Identifies historical and infrastructural barriers
• Acknowledges systemic biases
• Working poor, first-generation, Students of Color
• Asks, “WHO IS TRYING and FIGHTING TO GET

INTO THE ROOM?”

Draft RCCD Environmental Scan Data Highlights

Themes and Goal Setting Discussion

MVC Mission, Vision, and Values

MVC Values

• RECOGNITION OF OUR HERITAGE OF EXCELLENCE
• PASSION FOR LEARNING
• APPRECIATION OF DIVERSITY
• DEDICATION TO INTEGRITY
• COMMITMENT TO COMMUNITY BUILDING
• COMMITMENT TO ACCOUNTABILITY

California Community College Chancellor’s Vision for Success Core Commitments

• 1. Focus Relentlessly on Students’ End Goals
• 2. Always Design with the Student in Mind
• 3. Pair High Expectations with High Support
• 4. Foster the use of Data, Inquiry, and Evidence
• 5. Take Ownership of Goals and Performance
• 6. Enable Action and Thoughtful Innovation
• 7. Lead the Work of Partnering Across Systems

MVC 2015-2018 Integrated Strategic Plan Goals

1.Teaching and Learning 2.Sustainability 3.Community Building 4.Organizational Quality

Themes/Focus Areas/Core Commitments Discussion

What should we call these high level areas (Themes, Focus Areas, Core Commitments, …)? How do we want to organize our highest level themes/focus areas/core commitments as part of our new ISP? How many should we have? (Suggestion is no more than 4 or 5)

Next Steps – Homework for 11/29/17 Meeting