MCSPOP2010-02 Chatham Island and Pitt Island shag census 2011 Igor - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mcspop2010 02 chatham island and pitt island shag census
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MCSPOP2010-02 Chatham Island and Pitt Island shag census 2011 Igor - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MCSPOP2010-02 Chatham Island and Pitt Island shag census 2011 Igor Debski 1 , Mike Bell 2 & Dan Palmer 1 1. Science & Technical, Department of Conservation 2. Wildlife Management International Limited Objectives (a)conduct a complete


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MCSPOP2010-02 Chatham Island and Pitt Island shag census 2011

Igor Debski1, Mike Bell2 & Dan Palmer1

1. Science & Technical, Department of Conservation 2. Wildlife Management International Limited

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Objectives

(a)conduct a complete recensus of Chatham Island and Pitt Island shags in such a way as to maximise comparability with earlier counts in order to determine any trend in population size; and (b) investigate the effects of timing and methodology on colony counts, and make recommendations for future monitoring of the populations of Chatham Island and Pitt Island shags.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Chatham Island shag Pitt Island shag

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Methods

  • Followed the methods of Bell & Bell (2000) as closely as

feasible in order to maximise the comparability with 1997/98

  • Counted breeding pairs
  • Timed counts at incubation when maximum counts would

be made

  • Extensive survey of all coast line suitable for shag nesting

sites was conducted on 11 consecutive days, from 1 to 11 October 2011 (except 3 outlying islands)

  • Additional counts at sites where temporal variation known to

be important

  • On foot and by boat
  • Also report results from a series of visits to breeding sites

around main Chatham Island

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Map of Chatham Islands showing census search effort

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Example GPS plot of on foot search

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Example GPS plot of boat search

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Results

Chatham Island shag breeding colonies

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Pitt Island shag breeding areas

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Monthly counts for Chatham Island shags

Chatham Island shag

Month Number of nests

20 40 60

Cape Fournier Cape Pattisson Incidentals

20 40 60

Matarakau

20 40 60

Motuhinahina Island Ngatikitiki Rocks Okawa Point

20 40 60

Okawa Point a

20 40 60

Okawa Point b Okawa Point c Okawa Point d

20 40 60

Point Weeding

20 40 60 JanFebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSepOct NovDec

Point Weeding b

JanFebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSepOctNovDec

Wharekauri Island

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Pitt Island shag

Month Number of nests

10 20 30

Cape Fournier Cape Pattisson Incidentals

10 20 30

Little Awatotara Creek

10 20 30

Matarakau Motuhinahina Island Okawa Point

10 20 30

Okawa Point 4

10 20 30

Okawa Point b Okawa Point c Okawa Point d

10 20 30

Point Weeding

10 20 30 Jan Mar AprMay Jun Jul AugSepOct NovDec

Point Weeding b

Jan Mar AprMay Jun Jul AugSepOct NovDec

Wharekauri Island

Monthly counts for Pitt Island shags

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Chatham Island shag census results

Colony Colony Number er of nest

  • f nests

s Overa erall c l change 1 1997/9 /98 2003/0 /04 2011 Matarakau 53 35 27 Kaingaroa 1 Okawa Point 114 47 42 Cape Fournier 115 51 The Pinnacles 30 Ke Orea Point 7 4 3 Waitangi 6 5 19 Cape Pattison 11 5 Ngatikitiki 38 4 13 Cape Young 1 Motuhinahina 68 72 Chat Chatham Isl ham Island nd to total l 401 401 138 138 232 232 42% 42% declin ine e Motutapu Point 6 Kokepa Rock 15 Rabbit Island 83 20 18 North-eastern Reef 19 17 11 Star Keys 339 81 88 Pitt Isla tt Island and surround d surrounding ng isla islands tota s total l 441 133 133 23 23 72% 72% decline cline To Total 8 l 842 2 271 271 355 355 58% % declin ine e

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Pitt Island shag census results

Compar arative br breedi ding area Nu Number o

  • f n

nests Overal all c chan ange 1 1997/9 /98 2003/0 /04 2011 Matarakau 3 11 Kaingaroa to Te Wakaru Island 29 32 62 Okawa Point 7 Owenga-Ko Orea Point 31 24 22 SW Coast 47 57 27 Waitangi 33 33 33 Red Bluff 6 9 10 Port Hutt Bays 1 Port Hutt 30 10 14 Point Somes South 19 21 7 Point Somes North 38 20 36 Ngatikitiki Rocks 18 9 3 Cape Young 68 14 62 Motuhinahina 11 7 12 Ch Chatham I ham Island nd tota total l 340 340 247 289 289 15 15% % decline cline Pitt Island North 55 54 28 Pitt Island East 32 36 Pitt Island South 49 43 15 Pitt Island West 6 11 2 Pitt tt I Isla land tota total l 142 144 45 68% d 68% decline cline Rabbit Island 29 18 6 Mangere incl. Little Mangere 23 19 15 Castle 6 14 11 Rangatira 63 45 10 Star Keys 46 43 12 Pitt tt I Island and and sur surround

  • unding isla

ing islands s tot total l 309 309 283 3 99 68% d 68% decline cline 19 1997/ 97/98-201 8-2011 co compa mparative subtot ive subtotal 649 530 388 88 40 40% d % decline cline Fourty Fours 9 4 5† Sisters 71 9 41† Western Reef 4 0† Tot Total 729 l 729 547 7 43 434†

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Conclusions

  • Results represent a real declines in the populations, with

no information to suggest such substantial numbers of breeding pairs may have been missed in 2011.

  • Greatest declines in population for both species at Pitt

Island and offlying islands, including protected, predator- free sites.

  • Declines likely to be driven by at-sea factors, but lack of

information on causal mechanisms.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Recommendations

Future survey methods:

  • Counts should be timed to coincide with incubation at all

colonies/breeding areas, recognising temporal variability.

  • Boat/on foot methods should be standardised for any one

area.

  • Aerial photography is likely to be well suited for Chatham

Island shags and should be trialled alongside ground counts.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Understanding causal factors:

  • Describe the nature and extent of direct fishing impacts

(see INT2011-02).

  • Quantify demographic parameters and identify which are

leading to the decline.

  • Describe the at-sea foraging habits (see proposed

POP2012-08).

  • Quantify diet (see proposed POP2012-08).
  • Compare studies of the elements listed above between

sites where colony trends differ (e.g. Motuhinahina vs Pitt Island area)