maven observations of substorm like processes in the
play

MAVEN observations of substorm-like processes in the Martian - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MAVEN observations of substorm-like processes in the Martian magnetosphere Gina A DiBraccio NASA Goddard Space Flight Center 13 th International Conference on Substorms Portsmouth, NH 29 September 2017 Mars Magnetic Environment No


  1. MAVEN observations of substorm-like processes in the Martian magnetosphere Gina A DiBraccio NASA Goddard Space Flight Center 13 th International Conference on Substorms Portsmouth, NH 29 September 2017

  2. Mars’ Magnetic Environment • No global intrinsic field Connerney et al., PNAS , 2005 • Localized crustal magnetic fields • Strongest sources at 180°E Longitude in southern hemisphere Gina.A.DiBraccio@nasa.gov 2

  3. Martian Magnetosphere • Induced magnetosphere with localized planetary fields • IMF direction influences the field structure • Similar regions to intrinsic magnetospheres with similar processes on different scales Brain et al. [2015] • No ‘Dungey Cycle’ Gina.A.DiBraccio@nasa.gov 3

  4. MAVEN’s Orbit Orbit precesses to provide complete coverage View from tail Side View Gina.A.DiBraccio@nasa.gov 4

  5. Magnetic Reconnection at Mars Halekas et al. [2009] Gina.A.DiBraccio@nasa.gov 5

  6. Tail Reconnection: Fast Flows • Particle acceleration in the tail current sheet • Downtail speeds of 100 km/s or greater DiBraccio et al. [2015] Gina.A.DiBraccio@nasa.gov 6

  7. Tail Reconnection: Flux Ropes Current sheet crossing with embedded flux rope supports magnetic reconnection DiBraccio et al. [2015] Gina.A.DiBraccio@nasa.gov 7

  8. Tail Reconnection: Flux Rope Chains MGS - Eastwood et al. [2012] MAVEN - Hara et al. [2017] Gina.A.DiBraccio@nasa.gov 8

  9. Tail Reconnection: Hall Fields N (a) 20 |B| 10 Bz B MSO [nT] 0 By -10 Bx -20 L (b) |B-Bc| 1.0 M /|B| 0.5 0.0 #3 (c) 1 b 1 . b 2 Hall B polarity => 0 Crossing sunward -1 (d) cs of the X line (e) 20 λ L / λ M = 18.73 B N λ M / λ N = 6.79 10 B LMN [nT] B M L = [ 0.99, 0.15, 0.08] 0 M = [-0.17, 0.76, 0.63] B L N = [ 0.04,-0.63, 0.77] -10 (f) 10 8 1000 1000 10 7 Energy Eflux [eV] 10 6 e - 100 100 S/C 10 5 10 10 10 4 trapped e - (g) 10 6 180 180 [deg.] Eflux P.A. 10 5 e - 90 90 10 4 0 0 (h) 10 8 B M 10 4 10 4 10 7 Energy 10 3 10 3 [eV/q] Eflux Ion 10 2 10 2 10 6 B N 10 1 10 1 10 5 10 0 10 0 Sunward flow 10 -1 10 -1 10 4 (i) enhancement 20 + B L O 2 15 [km/s] 10 O + V L 5 #3 0 H + -5 -10 (j) 4 + O 2 2 [km/s] O + S/C V N 0 H + -2 V L -4 Alt. [km] 2449.6 2291.8 2132.3 1971.6 1810.3 SZA [deg.] 156.8 159.8 162.8 165.9 169.1 hhmm 1914 1916 1918 1920 1922 2014 Nov 30 Harada et al. [2017] Gina.A.DiBraccio@nasa.gov 9

  10. Energy-time Dispersed Electrons Impulsive injections of electrons onto closed crustal fields • Falling tones from ~200 eV to ~50 eV • Electrons PADs show two-sided loss cones Harada et al. [2016] Gina.A.DiBraccio@nasa.gov 10

  11. Tail Loading and Unloading Loading • Occurs over intervals of 3-5 min • IMF drapes over planet and flux builds Unloading • Occurs over intervals of 2-4 min • Sudden |B| decrease by factor of 6 • Flux ropes support reconnection DiBraccio et al. [2015] Gina.A.DiBraccio@nasa.gov 11

  12. Aurora Image credit: M. Holstrom/ESA Schneider et al. [2015] Gina.A.DiBraccio@nasa.gov 12

  13. Discrete Aurora MEX/SPICAM aurora detection: • Confined increase in UV brightness • Emission from vertical crustal field or ‘cusp’ region • ~130 km altitude Bertaux et al . [2005] MGS observations: • Peaked electron distributions • 400 km altitude on nightside • Correlated with strong crustal fields Brain et al . [2006] Gina.A.DiBraccio@nasa.gov 13

  14. Diffuse Aurora MAVEN observations: • Rise in auroral brightness correlated with SEP arrival • 60-100 km altitude • Coverage obtained over subsequent orbits • 5 day period Schneider et al . [2015] Gina.A.DiBraccio@nasa.gov 14

  15. Effects of Solar Storms Earlier flare and SEPs Second flare and SEPs EUV irradiance SEP energy SWIA Energy Btot • Three solar events occurred on March 1st, 6th, and 8 th 2015 • Global magnetosphere disruption Jakosky et al., Science, 2015 Gina.A.DiBraccio@nasa.gov 15

  16. Summary • Mars experiences substorm-like signatures: – Magnetic reconnection (hall fields, fast flows, etc.) – Flux rope formation – Tail Loading/Unloading – Aurora – Energy-time dispersed electrons – Global response to solar events – FACs – Inverted-Vs • A global process has yet to be quantified – Does one exist? – It is possible to find a single definition of a Mars storm? Gina.A.DiBraccio@nasa.gov 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend