Master Plan Update
March 13, 2017
Hayfield Community Schools
Master Plan Update March 13, 2017 Today Review planning process - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Hayfield Community Schools Master Plan Update March 13, 2017 Today Review planning process and milestones Recap facility assessments Introduce ROM cost and savings Review preliminary illustrations Discuss strategy and
Master Plan Update
March 13, 2017
Hayfield Community Schools
Today…
and milestones
savings
illustrations
steps
Planning Process Described
Ideation
Assessment
Options
and Assessment feedback, develop
achieving vision
Consensus
decide whether to pursue one of the
their own)
Planning Milestones
Master Planning Initiates
analysis
Mid-Audit Plan Review
Master Plan Review
project savings and budgets
Scenarios
Options and Consensus
needed
action
Final Project Report
project costs and savings
scenarios
Plan Approval by the Board
funding
MDE
November 14, 2016 March 13, 2017 March / April, 2017 June, 2017 July, 2017 September 14, 2016
Master Planning Process
Hayfield Schools Facility Age Breakdown
Source: Minnesota Department of Education
0 to 20 Years 39% 40+ Years 61%
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Years
Average Life Expectancy Actual Age of Equipment
System Age Summary
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Years
Average Life Expectancy Actual Age of Equipment
System Age Summary
Master Planning Process
CO2 and Cognitive Performance
“Is CO2 an Indoor Pollutant? Higher Levels of CO2 May Diminish Decision Making Performance”; William J. Fisk, Usha Satish, Mark J. Mendell, Toshifumi Hotchi, Douglas Sullivan; Indoor Environment Group Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA; March 2013Space CO2 Testing
High School Indoor Environment Survey
11% 37% 26% 3% 54% 3% 6% 57% 6% 49% 17% 20% 6% 9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Temp Too Hot (Winter) Temp Too Cold (Winter) Air Too Dry (Winter) Air Too Humid (Winter) Temp Too Hot (Summer) Temp Too Cold (Summer) Air Too Dry (Summer) Air Too Humid (Summer) Too Much Air Too Little Air Too Noisy Unpleasant Odors Lights Too Bright Lights Too Dark Dis-Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied
Survey conducted from 09/20/16 to 10/20/16. T
Elementary Indoor Environment Survey
4% 22% 30% 0% 22% 11% 0% 37% 4% 15% 15% 7% 0% 7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Temp Too Hot (Winter) Temp Too Cold (Winter) Air Too Dry (Winter) Air Too Humid (Winter) Temp Too Hot (Summer) Temp Too Cold… Air Too Dry (Summer) Air Too Humid (Summer) Too Much Air Too Little Air Too Noisy Unpleasant Odors Lights Too Bright Lights Too Dark Dis-Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied
Survey conducted from 09/20/16 to 10/20/16. T
Up to 60% of classroom activities involve speech between students, indicating the importance of environments that support clear communication. Inappropriate levels of background noise can also inhibit reading and spelling ability, behavior, attention, concentration, and academic performance. ANSI-ASA design standards call for background noise levels to be below 35 dB(A) at the source (e.g. unit ventilator), as measured when the room is empty, the door is closed, and only the HVAC equipment is running.
Master Planning Process
Preliminary Prioritization
Project Architectural Work Scope User Group
1 Additional parking lots and repaving, Sidewalks 1 3 Secure entrances 1 5 Dedicated spaces for after school programs (SAC) 1 8 Elementary classroom walls 1 9 Upgrade elementary restrooms 1 11 Restroom partition replacement 1 12 Flooring Replacement: Carpet, Gym Floors, VCT 1 13 Home economics classroom remodel 1 14 Structural issues 1 15 Automatic door openers 1 16 Window & door replacement 1 17 Sealing the exterior envelope and envelope repairs 1 4 Enlarged dining area 2 21 Library Upgrades 2 2 Extended drive 3 20 New façade 3 6 Performing arts addition 4 7 Locker room addition 4 10 Choir room sound issues 4 18a Toilet rooms at outdoor concessions 4 18b Screen at ball field 4 19 Update outdoor learning center 4
Priority Importance Urgency When 1 High High 2018 2 High Medium 3 to 5 years 3 Medium Medium 6 to 10 years 4 Medium Low 10+ Years 5 Low Long-Term Never Key for District Prioritization
Hayfield School
Annual Savings Rebate / Grant Net Cost Simple Payback Funding Sources Facility Illustration FIM Code Facility Improvement Measures (FIMs) District Priority Asset ConditionHayfield School (cont.)
Annual Savings Rebate / Grant Net Cost Simple Payback Funding Sources Facility Illustration FIM Code Facility Improvement Measures (FIMs) District Priority Asset ConditionHayfield School (cont.)
Annual Savings Rebate / Grant Net Cost Simple Payback Funding Sources Facility Illustration FIM Code Facility Improvement Measures (FIMs) District Priority Financial Impact Asset ConditionPriority Importance Urgency When 1 High High 2018 2 High Medium 3 to 5 years 3 Medium Medium 6 to 10 years 4 Medium Low 10+ Years 5 Low Long-Term Never Key for District Prioritization
Retiring Debt
Revenue Timing
to MDE
Certification
Certification
down, but not up
Minnesota K-12 Funding Options
Description MN Statute Use of Funds
Does this generate new dollars to District budget Does this require Voter Approval What kind of borrowing? Will there be a new tax impact associated with levy Who pays for the levy and which tax base is utilized Max Term
Energy Efficiency Project 123B.65 Multiple Uses No No Several
No Not Applicable 15 years Referendum Revenue / Operating Levy Revenue 126C.17 Day-to-day
Yes Yes Typically, none Yes House, garage, and one acre; RMV 10 Years School Building Bonds 475 & 123B.02 Capital Expenditures Yes Yes General Obligation Yes All taxable property; NTC 30 years or useful life Capital Projects Levy 123B.63 Capital expenditures defined in 126C.10
Yes Yes Certificates
Participation Yes All taxable property; NTC 10 Years Capital Facilities Bonds 123B.62 Capital expenditures defined in 126C.62 No No General Obligation No All taxable property; NTC 15 years or useful life Capital Equipment Notes 123B.61 Capital expenditures defined in 126C.61 No No General Obligation No All taxable property; NTC 10 years or useful life Long-Term Facility Maintenance Levy 123B.595 Deferred capital expenditures & Health and Safety projects Yes No General Obligation Yes All taxable property; NTC 30 years or useful life Lease Levy / Capital Levies 126C.40 Capital expenditures defined in 126C.40 Yes No Certificates
Participation Yes All taxable property; NTC 30 years or useful life Abatement Bond
469.1812 to 469.1815
School Parking Lot Improvements Yes No General Obligation Yes All taxable property; NTC 15 years or useful life
School Building Bonds
2017 Special Election Blackout Dates
JANUARY
S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31FEBRUARY
S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28MARCH
S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31APRIL
S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30MAY
S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31JUNE
S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30JULY
S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31AUGUST
S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31SEPTEMBER
S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30OCTOBER
S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31NOVEMBER
S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30DECEMBER
S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 312015 Legislative Changes
Elimination of Alternative Facilities Bonding and Levy Program and Health & Safety Revenue
Introduction of Long-Term Facilities Maintenance Revenue
Laws 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 3, Article 6, sections 1–4 and 14 (2015 Education Act), established a Long-term Facilities Maintenance Revenue Program for school districts. The new program replaces the current Health and Safety Revenue, Deferred Maintenance Revenue and Alternative Facilities Bonding and Levy programs, beginning in FY 2017. In sum:
LTFM Revenue
Allowed uses of LTFM…
Deferred capital and maintenance projects; Increasing accessibility of facilities; or Health and Safety projects under section 123B.57
LTFM may NOT fund…
New facilities, remodeling, portable classrooms Violence protection/security
LTFM Revenue
Initial Formula
later)
Added Revenue
Service for Alt. Facility Bonds
> $100,000
Total “New” LTFM Revenue
Hayfield’s LTFM Revenue
$- $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000
FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026
Maximum LTFM Revenue
LTFM State Aid LTFM Local Levy
Potential Implementation Strategy
Phase I – Infrastructure Needs
Phase II – Functional Needs
Unesco, Inc. may provide advice that may be considered to be Municipal Advisor advice as defined in Securities and Exchange Rule 15Ba1-1. Any municipal securities or financial products information provided is for general informational and educational purposes only. Unesco, Inc. is not a Municipal Advisor and are not subject to the fiduciary duty required of Municipal Advisors when providing advice on municipal financial products or issuance of municipal securities. Any advice provided by us with respect to municipal financial products or issuance of municipal securities should be discussed with your registered Municipal Advisor before taking any action. Should there be questions or concerns about Unesco, Inc.’s role in this project, talk immediately with your Municipal Advisor and/or seek appropriate legal advice.
Financial Disclaimer – IRMA Disclosure
Phase I
Potential LTFM Illustrations
Illustration 1Illustration 1 Scope Inclusions
Hayfield Community School
Improvements
Fixture Replacement
HW Converter
Improvements
Unit Ventilators
Total Value of Facility Reinvestment: 3,464,150 $ Grants/Rebates:
Capital Buy-Down
Net Investment Financed 3,464,150 $ Total LTFM Debt Equalization from State of MN: 226,899 $ Annual Contribution from General Fund:
Annual Tax Impact on $105K Home: (37.72) $ Annual Tax Impact on 320 acres Ag. Homestead: (668) $
Annual Tax Impact on Ag., Non-Homestead Acre valued at $7000 ($/acre):
(3.42) $
Financial Summary
Operational Cost Savings $1,118,592 LTFM Levy $2,345,558
Sources of Funding
$- $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 $700,000 $800,000 $900,000
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 Pay As You Go LTFM Levy Bonded LTFM Levy Lease Levy Debt Service Levy New H&S Bond Levy New G.O. Bond Levy
Illustration 2 Scope Inclusions
Hayfield Community SchoolOperational Cost Savings $1,156,482 LTFM Levy $8,542,418
Sources of Funding
Total Value of Facility Reinvestment: 9,698,900 $ Grants/Rebates:
Capital Buy-Down
Net Investment Financed 9,698,900 $ Total LTFM Debt Equalization from State of MN: 388,643 $ Annual Contribution from General Fund:
Annual Tax Impact on $105K Home: (6.61) $ Annual Tax Impact on 320 acres Ag. Homestead: (117) $
Annual Tax Impact on Ag., Non-Homestead Acre valued at $7000 ($/acre):
(0.60) $
Financial Summary
Items in RED are changes from previous illustration
$- $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 $700,000 $800,000 $900,000
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 Pay As You Go LTFM Levy Bonded LTFM Levy Lease Levy Debt Service Levy New H&S Bond Levy New G.O. Bond Levy
Illustration 3 Scope Inclusions
Hayfield Community SchoolOperational Cost Savings $1,194,578 LTFM Levy $12,275,222
Sources of Funding
Items in RED are changes from previous illustration
Total Value of Facility Reinvestment: 13,469,800 $ Grants/Rebates:
Capital Buy-Down
Net Investment Financed 13,469,800 $ Total LTFM Debt Equalization from State of MN: 819,205 $ Annual Contribution from General Fund:
Annual Tax Impact on $105K Home: 6.03 $ Annual Tax Impact on 320 acres Ag. Homestead: 107 $
Annual Tax Impact on Ag., Non-Homestead Acre valued at $7000 ($/acre):
0.55 $
Financial Summary
Illustration 4 Scope Inclusions
Hayfield Community SchoolOperational Cost Savings $1,205,272 LTFM Levy $15,124,528
Sources of Funding
Items in RED are changes from previous illustration
Total Value of Facility Reinvestment: 16,329,800 $ Grants/Rebates:
Capital Buy-Down
Net Investment Financed 16,329,800 $ Total LTFM Debt Equalization from State of MN: 1,067,562 $ Annual Contribution from General Fund:
Annual Tax Impact on $105K Home: 18.06 $ Annual Tax Impact on 320 acres Ag. Homestead: 320 $
Annual Tax Impact on Ag., Non-Homestead Acre valued at $7000 ($/acre):
1.64 $
Financial Summary
Potential LTFM Illustrations
Illustration 1Potential LTFM Illustrations
Illustration 1 Illustration 2 Illustration 3 Illustration 4 Total Value of Facility Reinvestment 3,464,150 $ 9,698,900 $ 13,469,800 $ 16,329,800 $ Annual Tax Impact on $105K Home (37.72) $ (6.61) $ 6.03 $ 18.06 $ Annual Tax Impact on 320 acres Ag. Homestead (668.17) $ (117.02) $ 106.86 $ 319.90 $
Annual Tax Impact on Ag., Non-Homestead Acre valued at $7000 ($/acre)
(3.42) $ (0.60) $ 0.55 $ 1.64 $
Tax Impact of Scenarios 1 to 4 (Current Law)
Unesco is not acting as a municipal advisor or fiduciary on your behalf. Any municipal securities or financial products information provided is for general informational and educational purposes only and you should
financial advisor regarding such information. Unesco makes no representation or warranty regarding any financial projections, data or information provided, except as may be expressly set forth in a definitive agreement. The figures shown represent the preliminary estimated tax impact of a levy assessed on Net Tax Capacity. It is very preliminary as the 2015 NTC as reported on MDE's Pay 2017 tax levy certification is the basis for calculating the tax
property taxes for cities, townships, counties, or
Illustration 1 Illustration 2 Illustration 3 Illustration 4 ($460,347) ($80,623) $73,626 $220,398
0.7813% 2.3388% Estimated Market Value $50,000
$2.34 $7.02 $60,000
$2.81 $8.42 $70,000
$3.28 $9.82 $80,000
$3.90 $11.68 $90,000
$4.75 $14.23 $100,000
$5.61 $16.78 $125,000
$7.74 $23.16 $150,000
$9.86 $29.53 $175,000
$11.99 $35.90 $200,000
$14.12 $42.28 $250,000
$18.38 $55.02 $300,000
$22.64 $67.77 $105,000
$6.03 $18.06 $100,000
$11.72 $35.08 $250,000
$33.20 $99.40 $500,000
$72.27 $216.34 $750,000
$111.33 $333.27 $1,000,000
$150.40 $450.21
40 acres$385,000
$17.29 $51.76
80 acres$665,000
$28.23 $84.50
160 acres$1,225,000
$50.10 $149.98
320 acres$2,345,000
$106.86 $319.90
640 acres$4,585,000
$284.00 $850.14 $5,000
$0.39 $1.17 $7,000
$0.55 $1.64 $8,500
$0.66 $1.99 $10,000
$0.78 $2.34 $12,000
$0.94 $2.81 Commercial / Industrial
Agricultural Homestead (assume dwelling is $105,000 and acreage assessed at $7,000)
Agricultural Non-Homestead (dollars per acre) Levy Amount
Type of Property
Estimated Annual Tax Impact
Residential Homestead
Average District Home Value
Tax Impact of Scenarios 1 to 4 (w/Ag Credit)
Unesco is not acting as a municipal advisor or fiduciary on your behalf. Any municipal securities or financial products information provided is for general informational and educational purposes only and you should
financial advisor regarding such information. Unesco makes no representation or warranty regarding any financial projections, data or information provided, except as may be expressly set forth in a definitive agreement. The figures shown represent the preliminary estimated tax impact of a levy assessed on Net Tax Capacity. It is very preliminary as the 2015 NTC as reported on MDE's Pay 2017 tax levy certification is the basis for calculating the tax
property taxes for cities, townships, counties, or
Illustration 1 Illustration 2 Illustration 3 Illustration 4 ($460,347) ($80,623) $73,626 $220,398
0.7813% 2.3388% Estimated Market Value $50,000
$2.34 $7.02 $60,000
$2.81 $8.42 $70,000
$3.28 $9.82 $80,000
$3.90 $11.68 $90,000
$4.75 $14.23 $100,000
$5.61 $16.78 $125,000
$7.74 $23.16 $150,000
$9.86 $29.53 $175,000
$11.99 $35.90 $200,000
$14.12 $42.28 $250,000
$18.38 $55.02 $300,000
$22.64 $67.77 $105,000
$6.03 $18.06 $100,000
$11.72 $35.08 $250,000
$33.20 $99.40 $500,000
$72.27 $216.34 $750,000
$111.33 $333.27 $1,000,000
$150.40 $450.21 $5,000
$0.23 $0.70 $7,000
$0.33 $0.98 $8,500
$0.40 $1.19 $10,000
$0.47 $1.40 $12,000
$0.56 $1.68 Type of Property
Estimated Annual Tax Impact
Residential Homestead Levy Amount
Commercial / Industrial Agricultural Non-Homestead (dollars per acre)
Average District Home Value
Source: Minnesota Department of Education
$213 $162 $169 $192 $155 $185 $230 $130 $398 $296 $145 $154 $83 $157 $135 $180 $217 $186 $294 $35 $187 $347 $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600
Statewide Average Hayfield Kingsland Lake City Blooming Prairie Stewartville Chatfield Byron Southland Grand Meadow Kasson-Mantorville
School Portion of Property Taxes Payable in 2016 on a $100,000 Homestead Residential Property
RMV Portion of Property Tax NTC Portion of Property Tax
Source: Minnesota Department of Education
$213 $162 $169 $192 $155 $185 $230 $130 $398 $296 $145 $154 $83 $157 $135 $180 $217 $186 $294 $35 $187 $347 $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600
Statewide Average Hayfield Kingsland Lake City Blooming Prairie Stewartville Chatfield Byron Southland Grand Meadow Kasson-Mantorville
School Portion of Property Taxes Payable in 2016 on a $100,000 Homestead Residential Property
RMV Portion of Property Tax NTC Portion of Property Tax
Illustration 1 Illustration 2 Illustration 3 Illustration 4
Source: Minnesota Department of Education
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
18% 24% 35% 35% 40% 59% 69% 74% 78% 81% 82%
% Agriculture of Net Tax Capacity
Source: Minnesota Department of Education
$0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $15.01 $3.41 $8.06 $13.15 $15.32 $17.58 $18.10 $18.22 $21.11 $28.64 $33.83
School Portion of Property Taxes Payable in 2016 on a 1-acre Non- homestead Agricultural Property valued at $7,000
Illustration 1 Illustration 2 Illustration 3 Illustration 4
Phase II
Potential Referendum Illustrations
Illustration 5
Access Control Systems
Main Building Entrance
System Illustration 6
Improvements
Space
Access Control Systems
Main Building Entrance
System Illustration 7
Improvements
Elementary Classroom Spaces
Space
Center Remodel
Access Control Systems
Main Building Entrance
System Illustration 8
Equipment
Joint and EIFS Repair
Systems
Improvements
Elementary Classroom Spaces
Space
Center Remodel
Access Control Systems
Main Building Entrance
System
Potential Referendum Illustrations
Illustration 5 Illustration 6 Illustration 7 Illustration 8 Total Value of Facility Reinvestment 804,800 $ 3,487,800 $ 7,759,800 $ 10,769,800 $ Annual Tax Impact on $105K Home 4.57 $ 19.78 $ 44.02 $ 61.09 $ Annual Tax Impact on 320 acres Ag. Homestead 80.87 $ 350.48 $ 779.76 $ 1,082.22 $
Annual Tax Impact on Ag., Non-Homestead Acre valued at $7000 ($/acre)
0.41 $ 1.79 $ 3.99 $ 5.54 $
Tax Impact of Scenarios 5 to 8 (Current Law)
Unesco is not acting as a municipal advisor or fiduciary on your behalf. Any municipal securities or financial products information provided is for general informational and educational purposes only and you should
financial advisor regarding such information. Unesco makes no representation or warranty regarding any financial projections, data or information provided, except as may be expressly set forth in a definitive agreement. The figures shown represent the preliminary estimated tax impact of a levy assessed on Net Tax Capacity. It is very preliminary as the 2015 NTC as reported on MDE's Pay 2017 tax levy certification is the basis for calculating the tax
property taxes for cities, townships, counties, or
Illustration 5 Illustration 6 Illustration 7 Illustration 8 $55,718 $241,468 $537,228 $745,617 0.5913% 2.5623% 5.7008% 7.9121% Estimated Market Value $50,000 $1.77 $7.69 $17.10 $23.74 $60,000 $2.13 $9.22 $20.52 $28.48 $70,000 $2.48 $10.76 $23.94 $33.23 $80,000 $2.95 $12.80 $28.48 $39.53 $90,000 $3.60 $15.59 $34.70 $48.15 $100,000 $4.24 $18.39 $40.91 $56.78 $125,000 $5.85 $25.37 $56.44 $78.34 $150,000 $7.47 $32.35 $71.98 $99.90 $175,000 $9.08 $39.33 $87.51 $121.46 $200,000 $10.69 $46.32 $103.05 $143.02 $250,000 $13.91 $60.28 $134.12 $186.14 $300,000 $17.13 $74.25 $165.19 $229.26 $105,000 $4.57 $19.78 $44.02 $61.09 $100,000 $8.87 $38.44 $85.51 $118.68 $250,000 $25.13 $108.90 $242.28 $336.27 $500,000 $54.69 $237.02 $527.33 $731.87 $750,000 $84.25 $365.13 $812.37 $1,127.48 $1,000,000 $113.82 $493.25 $1,097.41 $1,523.09
40 acres$385,000 $13.08 $56.70 $126.16 $175.10
80 acres$665,000 $21.36 $92.58 $205.97 $285.87
160 acres$1,225,000 $37.92 $164.32 $365.59 $507.41
320 acres$2,345,000 $80.87 $350.48 $779.76 $1,082.22
640 acres$4,585,000 $214.92 $931.41 $2,072.25 $2,876.06 $5,000 $0.30 $1.28 $2.85 $3.96 $7,000 $0.41 $1.79 $3.99 $5.54 $8,500 $0.50 $2.18 $4.85 $6.73 $10,000 $0.59 $2.56 $5.70 $7.91 $12,000 $0.71 $3.07 $6.84 $9.49 Commercial / Industrial
Agricultural Homestead (assume dwelling is $105,000 and acreage assessed at $7,000)
Agricultural Non-Homestead (dollars per acre) Levy Amount
Type of Property
Estimated Annual Tax Impact
Residential Homestead
Average District Home Value
Tax Impact of Scenarios 5 to 8 (w/Ag Credit)
Unesco is not acting as a municipal advisor or fiduciary on your behalf. Any municipal securities or financial products information provided is for general informational and educational purposes only and you should
financial advisor regarding such information. Unesco makes no representation or warranty regarding any financial projections, data or information provided, except as may be expressly set forth in a definitive agreement. The figures shown represent the preliminary estimated tax impact of a levy assessed on Net Tax Capacity. It is very preliminary as the 2015 NTC as reported on MDE's Pay 2017 tax levy certification is the basis for calculating the tax
property taxes for cities, townships, counties, or
Illustration 5 Illustration 6 Illustration 7 Illustration 8 $55,718 $241,468 $537,228 $745,617 0.5913% 2.5623% 5.7008% 7.9121% Estimated Market Value $50,000 $1.77 $7.69 $17.10 $23.74 $60,000 $2.13 $9.22 $20.52 $28.48 $70,000 $2.48 $10.76 $23.94 $33.23 $80,000 $2.95 $12.80 $28.48 $39.53 $90,000 $3.60 $15.59 $34.70 $48.15 $100,000 $4.24 $18.39 $40.91 $56.78 $125,000 $5.85 $25.37 $56.44 $78.34 $150,000 $7.47 $32.35 $71.98 $99.90 $175,000 $9.08 $39.33 $87.51 $121.46 $200,000 $10.69 $46.32 $103.05 $143.02 $250,000 $13.91 $60.28 $134.12 $186.14 $300,000 $17.13 $74.25 $165.19 $229.26 $105,000 $4.57 $19.78 $44.02 $61.09 $100,000 $8.87 $38.44 $85.51 $118.68 $250,000 $25.13 $108.90 $242.28 $336.27 $500,000 $54.69 $237.02 $527.33 $731.87 $750,000 $84.25 $365.13 $812.37 $1,127.48 $1,000,000 $113.82 $493.25 $1,097.41 $1,523.09 $5,000 $0.18 $0.77 $1.71 $2.37 $7,000 $0.25 $1.08 $2.39 $3.32 $8,500 $0.30 $1.31 $2.91 $4.04 $10,000 $0.35 $1.54 $3.42 $4.75 $12,000 $0.43 $1.84 $4.10 $5.70 Type of Property
Estimated Annual Tax Impact
Residential Homestead Levy Amount
Commercial / Industrial Agricultural Non-Homestead (dollars per acre)
Average District Home Value
Planning Milestones
Master Planning Initiates
analysis
Mid-Audit Plan Review
Master Plan Review
project savings and budgets
Scenarios
Options and Consensus
needed
action
Final Project Report
project costs and savings
scenarios
Plan Approval by the Board
funding
MDE
November 14, 2016 March 13, 2017 March / April, 2017 June, 2017 July, 2017 September 14, 2016
Unesco 2125 2nd Street White Bear Lake, MN 55110 (952) 277-9142 Kevin.McGauley@UnescoCorp.co m
Get in Touch!
We’d love to hear from you.