marcos l pez for the magic collaboration
play

Marcos Lpez for the MAGIC Collaboration Univ. Complutense Madrid, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Marcos Lpez for the MAGIC Collaboration Univ. Complutense Madrid, Spain, marcos@gae.ucm.es ICRC 2017 Busan The MAGIC telescopes La Palma island Characteristics 2 Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes 17 m diameter with active


  1. Marcos López for the MAGIC Collaboration Univ. Complutense Madrid, Spain, marcos@gae.ucm.es ICRC 2017 – Busan

  2. The MAGIC telescopes La Palma island Characteristics • 2 Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes • 17 m diameter with active mirror control • Fast readout ∼ 2 GS/s • ∼ 2TB per night Performance • Energy range: 50 GeV to 50 TeV MAGIC site • Sensitivity: 10% Crab in 1 h above 100 GeV • Energy resolution: 15 – 23% • Angular resolution: ∼ 0.1º MAGIC continuous improvement • 4x improvement sensitivity over last decade • 10x at the lowest energies ! 2

  3. MAGIC Galactic Physics Program MAGIC has made significant contributions to the study of galactic sources Pulsars PWN Discovery of the first VHE pulsar Crab nebula over 4 decades Fundamental Physics SNRs Mapping de Galactic Center Study of LIV Bianry systems Search for Pevatrons Search for Microqusars Periodic emission from binary systems 3

  4. Pulsars at TeVs Pulsars Where do 𝜹 -rays come from? Before MAGIC MAGIC • Different 𝜹 -ray emission sites • 2008: Crab pulsar above 25 GeV • Rule out low altitude models proposed for Crab: • 2012: Spectrum measured up to 400 GeV • Spectra follow power-laws ➔ No cutoff seen New models proposed • Within or beyond the magnetosphere • If beyond, expected cutoff at ~0.5 TeV • Emission via curvature radiation • Expected sharp exp. cut-offs at few GeV 4

  5. Pulsars at TeVs Pulsars Up to which energy does the Crab pulsate? MAGIC E > 400 GeV MAGIC latest Crab results 150 • MAGIC detected TeV emission from Crab E > 400 GeV 100 • Used 8 years of data, 320 hours 50 • Spectra of both peaks extending as power- 0 -50 laws far beyond the expected cutoffs: 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 Phase • ] P1 detected up to 0.6 TeV ( 𝛥 =3.5 ± 0.1 ) -1 s -2 -10 10 [TeV cm • P2 detected up to 1.5 TeV ( 𝛥 =3.0 ± 0.1) -11 10 dEdAdt dN Implications of TeV emission -12 10 2 E • Synchrotron-curvature ruled out -13 10 Fermi-LAT P1 Fermi-LAT P2 ➔ Most likely, emission from outer -14 10 MAGIC P1 MAGIC P2 magnetosphere via IC -15 10 -1 2 3 10 1 10 10 10 Energy [GeV] • But no model can fully explain TeV Ansoldi et al., A&A 582 A133 (2016) pulsations 5

  6. Cas A is not a Pevatron ! SNRs Context • SNRs considered the most promising source of CRs up to the “Knee”. • But no evidence (yet) of particle acceleration up to 10 15 eV Cassiopeia A (Cas A) • Bright and point-like in GeV/TeV ( HEGRA, VERITAS, MAGIC and Fermi) • Considered a classical Pevatron candidate arXiv: 1707.01583 / D. Guberman ICRC2017 MAGIC latest results • 160 h of data (2014 and 2016) • SED measured up to 8 TeV • Exponential cut-off (EPWL) fit preferred over pure power-law (PWL) at 4.6 𝝉 • Cut-off at ~ 3.5 TeV • Even if TeV due solely to hadrons, Cas A cannot be a PeVatron at present time 6

  7. Binaries Super - orbital Variability of LSI +61 303 Context A&A 591, A76 (2016) / D. Hadash, ICRC 2017 • Binary system: Be star + unknown compact object (orbital period 26.5 days) • Discovered at VHE by MAGIC in 2006 • Orbital variability: TeV emission only when compact object is far from the stellar disc • Modulation at longer time scales? Latest results • Extended campaign by MAGIC & VERITAS in 2010-14, added to archive data since 2006 • Superorbital 4.5 yr variability found at TeV ! • Period consistent with optical, radio and HE Possible superorbital explanation Flip-flop magnetar scenario (Torres et al. 2012): Expected antcorrelation between Size of the disk and VHE emission 7

  8. Binaries Galactic jets at TeV ? • Acceleration in microqusars jets may produce TeV, but not (yet) detected • MAGIC has deeply studied 2 high-mass microquasars: Cygnus X-1 and X-3 Cygnus X-3 Cygnus X-1 • Detected in 2009 by Fermi during a flare • A recent analysis of ~8 yrs of Fermi-LAT • In 2016, flaring in radio and GeV shows detection up to 20 GeV • MAGIC follow-up observations for 70 hr • MAGIC observed 100 h during 2007-2014 ➔ No detection at TeV ➔ No detection above 200 GeV MAGIC Coll., submitted to MNRAS (2017) VHE flux is suppressed ➔ no efficient acceleration on the jets See also A. Fernández-Barral @ ICRC 2017 8

  9. Galactic Center • In 2012 found a gas cloud (~3 Earth masses) orbiting towards the SMBH Sgr A* • MAGIC observed 70 h (2012-15) the GC Light curve ESO simulation Gas Cloud • No TeV variability found during the passage of the gas cloud Sgr A* 2013 2014 2015 Flux > 1 TeV 10x Flux > 10 TeV Ahnen et al., A&A, 601 (2017) A33 9

  10. Galactic Center • In 2012 found a gas cloud (~3 Earth masses) orbiting towards the SMBH Sgr A* • MAGIC observed 70 h (2012-15) the GC Light curve ] -1 Ahnen et al., A&A, 601 (2017) A33 s -2 [TeV cm • No TeV variability found during the − 10 10 passage of the gas cloud dE dA dt dN − 11 10 2 E Syst. err. MAGIC − 12 10 Spectrum of Sgr A*: 0.3 - 50 TeV Fermi, Malyshev et al. 2015 MAGIC, this work 0.1 deg (Schmelling) MAGIC, this work 0.1 deg (Forward) • Power-law with an exp. cutoff at 7.6 TeV Had. model, Chernyakova et al. 2011 Had. model, Ballantyne et al. 2011 − 13 10 Had. model, Linden et al. 2012 Had. model, Fatuzzo et al. 2012 Hybrid model, Guo et al. 2012 • Matches nicely Fermi spectrum Lept. model, Kusunose et al. 2012 − 14 10 − − 2 1 2 3 4 5 10 10 1 10 10 10 10 10 • Compatible with leptonic or hadronic models E [GeV] SgrA* & G0.9 removed G0.9 G0.9 Morphology • Detected Sgr A* and G0.9+ 0.1 Arc Arc • Removing foreground ➔ Discovered new Sgr A* Sgr A* VHE source in the radio Arc region: MAGIC J1746.4-2853 10

  11. Follow - up of HAWC sources Unidentified HAWC sources • The 2 nd HAWC catalogue (2017) contains 39 detected TeV sources. • 19 of them have no association with any known VHE source MAGIC archive data • Some of these 19 Unid. sources were in the FoV (<1.5º) of former MAGIC observations: HAWC source Tobs [h] 2HWC J2006+341 61 2HWC J1907+084 4 2HWC J1852+013 120 Preliminary • Re-analysis of these MAGIC observations looking for point-like emission (0.10º) or slightly extended (0.16º) ➔ No signal found 11

  12. MAGIC opening to external scientists https://magic.mpp.mpg.de/outsiders/magicop/ • Starting from this year, external scientists can apply for MAGIC observation time • Deadline for the call: 03-Nov-2017 MAGIC welcomes observational proposals by external scientists: Looking forward to do great science together ! 12

  13. Summary Outstanding recent MAGIC galactic results: • Crab pulsation up to TeV • Cas A is not a Pevatron • Superorbital TeV modulation in LS I+61 • Deep observations of microquasars ➔ No detections so far • 4 year observations of Galactic Center ➔ Detection of a source in the Arc region • Follow-up studies of Unid. HAWC sources ➔ No counterpart found For more details, see the 7 dedicated MAGIC galactic contributions @ ICRC 2017: • A. Fernández-Barral: Pulsar Wind Nebulae • D. Guberman: Cassiopeia A • D. Hadash: Binary Systems • A. Fernández-Barral: Cygnus X-1 & Cygnus X-3 • M. Strzys: Gamma-Cygni • M. López: Black Widow B1957+20 binary system • M. Gaug: Lorentz invariance violations using the Crab pulsar 13

  14. BACKUP 14

  15. Pulsar searches Pulsars Geminga Black widow B1957+20 ms pulsar • After Crab, it is the brighter Fermi • MS pulsars orbiting low massive stars pulsar in the Northern Sky could produce VHE emission • VHE emission tail? • But not (yet) detected • MAGIC observed the system for 66 h • Observed by MAGIC for 60 h • • 4 possible regions in which 𝜹 -rays could be No signal detected above 50 GeV. produced • Upper limits don’t allow to rule out the existence of a VHE power-law tail. Region Expected emission I. Bow shock Extended / steady MAGIC Geminga II. Inner nebula Point-like / steady III. Binary system Point-like / modulated IV. Pulsar Point-like / pulsed • P2 No emission detected in any case PSR B1957+20:P2 PSR B1957+20:P2 460 ] Events -1 MAGIC UL MAGIC UL MAGIC UL s -10 10 -2 MAGIC > 50 GeV dN/dE [TeV cm FERMI FERMI FERMI P2 440 PLExpCutoff: PLExpCutoff: PLExpCutoff: Γ Γ Γ =1.45 Ec=1.8 b=1.0 =1.45 Ec=1.8 b=1.0 =1.45 Ec=1.8 b=1.0 PL: PL: PL: Γ Γ Γ =2.23 =2.23 =2.23 -11 10 420 2 E -12 10 400 -13 380 10 360 -14 10 Ahnen et al., A&A 591 A138 (2016) 340 -15 10 -1 2 3 10 1 10 10 10 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Pulsar phase Energy [GeV] Ahnen et al., arXiv:1706.01378 15

  16. Pulsar Wind Nebulae searches PWN • PWNe are the most numerous population of TeV sources in our galaxy: • Powered by young and energetic pulsars ➔ Particles accelerated to VHE in the pulsar surroundings, or at the shocks • MAGIC detected the less luminous (3C 58) and the most luminous ones (Crab) A. Fernández-Barral , ICRC 2017 Latest MAGIC observations • MAGIC has observed 3 promising PWN candidates around high spin-down power Fermi pulsars Pulsar Campaign Tobs [h] 37 PSR J0631+1036 2015/16, 2016/17 PSR J1954+2838 2015 16 4 PSR J1958+2845 2015 • No signal found from any candidate. • MAGIC results are in agreement with the expected luminosity in the 1-10 TeV band. The band shows the fit obtained from detected PWNe and ULs in HESS galactic survey 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend