MAR ARKET KET POTENT TENTIAL IAL FOR GE GENE NE EDI DITING - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mar arket ket potent tential ial for ge gene ne edi
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MAR ARKET KET POTENT TENTIAL IAL FOR GE GENE NE EDI DITING - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Swine Summit 2018 MAR ARKET KET POTENT TENTIAL IAL FOR GE GENE NE EDI DITING TING Dr. Roger Johnson RCJ Consulting Denison, Iowa Presen esentation tation Over ervie view The Chal allen lenges ges We Face Global Local


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MAR ARKET KET POTENT TENTIAL IAL FOR GE GENE NE EDI DITING TING

  • Dr. Roger Johnson

RCJ Consulting Denison, Iowa

Swine Summit 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presen esentation tation Over ervie view

■ The Chal allen lenges ges We Face – Global – Local ■ The Oppor

  • rtun

unities es That Lay Ahead ad – Global – Local ■ Genet etic c Impro rovemen ement Overview – Traditional Strategies – “New Generation” Strategies

▪ Genetic Engineering ▪ Cloning

▪ Gene Editing

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

THE CHALLENGES WE FACE

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Global Challenges 2014  2050

■ World Popul ulati ation n  34% 34% ■ Ur Urbani aniza zati tion n  – fro rom 54% 54% to 66% ■ Middle Class  – fro rom 50% to 70%

Source: 2014 GAP Report

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Average Calorie Consumption

Source: ccafs.cigar.org/bigfacts

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Global Agricultural Output

■ Prot rotein n Revolutio ution n by 2050 – 2x livestock, k, poultr try y & fish

70% in Develop lopin ing Count ntries ries

➢ Grain

ins s & oilsee seeds ds demand nd 

■ Prot rotein n Revolutio ution n – 2013 to 2030 – Poultr try y & Eggs  63% 63% – Milk  55 55% – Ruminant nant Meat  44 44% ■ Prot rotein n Revolutio ution n – 2013 to 2023 – Fish consum umpti tion n  9% 9%

Source: 2014 GAP Report

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Source: biotech-now.org

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Prod

  • duc

ucti tivity vity GAP

Source: 2014 GAP Report

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Grains & Oilseeds Demands & Supply by 2050

■ Curre rent nt Growth wth Targe get  60% % by 2050 – Corn  67% 67% – Rice  42% 42% – Wheat at  38% 38% – Soybean ean  55% 55%

Source: ccafs.cigar.org/bigfacts

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Focus us on Uni United ed Stat ates es of Ame merica ica

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

No Shortage tage of Ag and d Food d Iss ssues es

■ Animal Welfare

– Sow Housing, Rearing Practices

■ Antibiotic usage/resistance ■ Traceability ■ Export Barriers (Russia, China, EU) ■ Food Safety, Product Recalls, Imported Items ■ Local, Organic, Slow Food Movement ■ Immigration ■ Environment/Carbon Footprint ■ Food for Fuel-Ethanol ■ Sustainability ■ Nutritional Components of Food-Fat, Sodium, Gluten

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Meat t Ind ndust ustry y Buz uzz z Wor

  • rds

ds

15

■ Local al ■ Factor

  • ry Farms

■ Group p Housed ed ■ Free ee Range ■ Made e in Rural al Amer eric ica ■ GMO vs vs non-GM GMO ■ Natu tural ral ■ Organic nic ■ ABF ■ Never er Ever ■ Never er Ever3 ■ Susta tain inab ability ility ■ Global al Mark rket t or Consumer ers ■ Meat t of Choic ice ■ HSUS S & PETA ■ Food

  • d Fusion

ion ■ Slow

  • w Food
  • d vs

vs Fast t Food

  • d

■ Animal al Care e Legis islat ation ion ■ Superb rbug ugs ■ “Nightmare Bacteria” ■ Trans Fatt tty Acid ■ Gluten en Free ee ■ Third d Pa Party ty Inspec ecti tions

  • ns

■ Carbon bon footp

  • tprint

int

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Changing Perception of “Responsibility”

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Mar arket Shar are e of

  • f Maj

ajor

  • r Expor
  • rters

5-year ear Aver erage age

Other Others Ar Argentina gentina Austr ustralia alia Canada Canada EU EU For

  • rmer U

mer USSR SSR United Sta United States tes

Source: USDA, Foreig ign n Agricult ultural ural Servic ice, Pro roduc uctio ion n Supply y and Distrib ibut utio ion n (PS&D) Datab abas ase

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

OR … THE OPPORTUNITIES THAT LAY AHEAD

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Source ce: : https:/ ://21st 1stcenturys ysoci cialcr critic.b c.blogspo spot.com/ .com/p/ p/met methane-informa mation-and-disc scuss ssions.h .html ml 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Arabl able Lan and d Needed eeded to

  • Produce
  • duce Fix

ixed ed Quantity antity of

  • f Cr

Crop

  • p Prod
  • duc

ucts ts

20 Source ce: : FAO

 68% 68% Land Requ quireme ment nt in 50 years

slide-21
SLIDE 21

US USA Co Corn Yie ield ld Trends ends

Source: USDA-NASS (as of Jan 2017) 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Ado dopt ption ion of

  • f GE Cor
  • rn in

in USA - 2000 2000-2017

Source: USDA, Economic Research Service using data from USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service, June Agricultural Survey. 22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Ado dopti ption

  • n of
  • f GE

GE Soyb ybea eans ns in in US USA

19 1996 96 - 2010

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

GENETIC IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Traditio ditional nal Strat ategies egies

▪ Selective Breeding vs Natural Selection ▪ Within Line Selection ▪ Crossbreeding

  • Inbreeding
  • Outbreeding
  • Rotational
  • Terminal

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

“New Generation” Strat ategies gies

■ Genetic Engineering – Alter erati tion

  • n & recom
  • mbin

binati tion

  • n of geneti

tic materia erial l under er labora borator

  • ry condi

diti tions

  • ns

■ Trans nsgeni genics cs ■ GMO

■ Cloning – Pro rocess ess of pro roduc ducing ing simila lar populat ulations ions of geneti tically lly ident ntic ical l indiv ivid iduals ls ■ Gene Editing – Inser ertion, ion, deleti tion

  • n or repla

lacement ement of DNA at a specif ific ic site e in the e genome e

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Conventional entional Breedin ding vs Gene netic tic Engin ginee eering ring

27

Result ult  GMO Grains ns

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Fir irst st Succ ccessful essful Cl Clone

  • ne:

Dolly ly

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Cloning ing Summ mmar ary

PROS

1.

  • 1. Produce

duce the best t animal mal populati tion. n. 2.

  • 2. Reproduc

duce endange ngered red or even exti tinc nct t speci cies. s. 3.

  • 3. Way to quickl

kly y create more source ces s of food, , especi cially y meat. t. 4.

  • 4. Good for geneti

tic testi ting ng and drug ug research. h. 5.

  • 5. Bring

ng back lost st pets. .

CONS NS

1.

  • 1. Cannot bring back a beloved pet’s

persona sonality ty. 2.

  • 2. Can be seen as animal

mal cruelty ty. . 3.

  • 3. Is expens

nsive. . 4.

  • 4. Reduces

uces geneti tic c diversity sity. . 5.

  • 5. Huma

man n cloni ning? ng?

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Market Acceptability of Cloned Animals

2001 1 – 2008 08

■ FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) asked livestock producers to voluntarily keep food from clones and their offspring out

  • f the food chain until CVM could

further evaluate the issue. ■ Iowa State Fair Champion Steer – 2010 Champion was a clone

  • f 2008 Champion

– As a pre-caution, the meat did not enter the public food chain

Post-2008 08

FDA CVM concluded: ■ Cloning poses no unique risks to animal health ■ Composition of clone food products no different from conventional food products ■ Therefore, no additional risks to people eating food from clones or clone offspring

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Gene Editing

■ Inser ertion, tion, delet etion ion or replace acement ent of DNA A at a speci cific ic site in the genom

  • me

■ Techni chniques ues

– CRISP SPR – TALENs LENs – ZFNs – ODM

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

First GE Approval: Salmon

■ AquaB AquaBoun

  • unty

ty Technologies (early 1990’s) ■ Chinoo

  • ok

k Salmon

  • n can not
  • t mate

e with Atlant antic ic Salmon

  • n

■ Genetic tic Editing ting – Gro rowth th hormone e gene fro rom Chinoo

  • ok

k Salmo mon Atlantic antic Salmon mon – GH regulat lator gene from Ocean Pout t  Atlan lantic tic Salmo mon ■ Results lts – 2x Faster r Gro rowth th

■ 36 mon  18 18 mon

– Imp mpro roved d FE ■ USA – Appro proved ed (11/2015) but – No Not Ava vail ilabl able ■ Canad ada – Appr proved ed (4/2016) – Ava vail ilable le (8/2017)

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Species Targe get Targe geted d Trait/ t/Goal

Cattle tle

  • Intras

traspecies ecies POLLED LED allele ele substit titution ution

  • No
  • horns
  • Myos
  • sta

tati tin n (gene e knockout)

  • ut)
  • Increas

reased ed muscle le yield eld

  • Bet

eta-lac lactoglo

  • globulin

bulin (gene e knockou

  • ut)

t)

  • Elim

imination nation of milk k allerge rgen

  • Inser

erti tion

  • n of lysos
  • sta

taphin hin trans nsgen gene

  • Diseas

ease e resista tance nce

  • Inser

ertion tion of lysoz

  • zyme

e transgen nsgene

  • Diseas

ease e resistance tance

  • Inser

erti tion

  • n of SP110 trans

nsgen gene

  • Resistance

istance to tuber erculos ulosis is

Foo

  • od

d Anim imal al GE GE Applic plicat ation ions

Knockout = inactivation of gene function 33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Foo

  • od

d Anim imal al GE GE Applic plicat ation ions

34

Species Targ rget Targ rgeted d Trait/ t/Goal Goal Pig

  • CD1

D163 (gene e knockout)

  • ut)
  • PRRS

S Virus us Resista tance nce

  • Inter

erspec ecies ies RELA allele ele substi tituti tution

  • n
  • Afric

rican an Swine e Fever er Resista tance nce

  • Myos
  • sta

tati tin n (gene e knockout)

  • ut)
  • Increas

reased ed muscle le yield eld

  • “Puberty gene”
  • Elim

iminat nate e Physic ical l Castra trati tion

  • n

Source: Tousignant nant, 2015 15

Knockout = inactivation of gene function

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Species Targ rget Targ rgeted d Trait/ t/Goal Goal

Chick cken en

  • Ovalbumi

umin n (gene ne knock ckou

  • ut)
  • Elimi

mina nation

  • n of ovalbumi

umin n in egg

  • Insertion of Immunoglobulin heavy chain locus
  • Ger

ermli mline ne gene ne editing ng Goat

  • Myos
  • statin

n (gene ne knock ckou

  • ut)
  • Inc

ncrea eased ed musc scle e grow

  • wth
  • Prion
  • n prot
  • tei

ein gene e knock ckou

  • ut
  • Elimi

mina nation

  • n of prion
  • n prot
  • tei

ein

  • Bet

eta-lact ctogl

  • globul
  • bulin

n gene ne knock

  • ckou
  • ut
  • Elimi

mina nation

  • n of milk

k aller ergen gen Sheep ep

  • Myos
  • statin

n (gene ne knock ckou

  • ut)
  • Inc

ncrea eased ed musc scle e yield

Foo

  • od

d Anim imal al GE GE Applic plicat ation ions

Knockout = inactivation of gene function 35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Ge Gene Ed Editing ing Summ mmar ary

PROS

1.

  • 1. Goodbye to inherent

rent dise seases ses 2.

  • 2. Longe

ger and healthi thier lifespa span 3.

  • 3. Solvi

ving ng problems ms – one at a time, me, thus s making ng the futur ure better 4.

  • 4. What’s wrong with looking good?

CONS NS

1.

  • 1. Not meant

t to be flawl wless ss 2.

  • 2. Too early

y to know 3.

  • 3. Playi

ying ng God? d? 4.

  • 4. Desi

signe gner babies? s?

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Ge Gene e Ed Editing ting Sta tatus tus

■ Januar uary y 2017 ■ Dr Draft t FD FDA A regul ulat ation ion ■ View “Animals whose genom

  • mes

s have been en altered intentionally” as dr s drug ugs. s.

37

#187

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Develo elopment pment & Ado doption ption

  • f
  • f

New Technology echnology

➢ Misinf nfor

  • rma

mati tion

  • n Creat

ates s Fear ➢ Ther erefor efore, e, it it is is es essenti ential al to tel ell “THE” Story rather er than “A” Story